Will any Democrat women here vote for McCain because of Palin?

JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,625
edited September 2008 in A Moving Train
Will gender sway any of the ladies here to vote republican?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • NEVER.


    palin's stance on issues/policies of importance to me are just tooo divergent from my own pov i could never, ever support her. gender means nothing...it's all about issues FOR women, amongst many others....not just being a woman.

    obama has a FAR better record of support for women and women's issues, and ideas and ideals that are in line with my own for such.



    btw - i am an independent.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • While I'm impressed that McCain wants Palin as his VP, it's still not enough for me to go to the dark side and vote Republican. However, I am extremely disappointed with how the DNC has behaved the entire primary season and its mis-treatment of Hillary. So they don't have my vote either.

    Lots of democratic women will vote republican this November for their own personal reasons, and that's their business.

    I OWN MY VOTE!
    ~*~Me and Hippiemom dranketh the red wine in Cleveland 2003~*~

    First PJ Show: March 20, 1994 | Ann Arbor | Crisler Arena
  • NEVER.


    palin's stance on issues/policies of importance to me are just tooo divergent from my own pov i could never, ever support her. gender means nothing...it's all about issues FOR women, amongst many others....not just being a woman.

    Same here
  • nfanelnfanel Posts: 2,558
    nope. if anything she strengthens my vote for obama.

    (edit: i'm an independent, too)
  • No, I disagree with her on all the major issues! I actually think the only thing McCain is doing by picking Palin is insulting democratic women. He is saying that women do not pay attention to the issue and will vote for any women. ( Personally, I believe that this is not the case with any democratic women, and I know that is not the case for me).Therefore,he is insulting our intelligences and that makes me sick!
    I wouldn't vote before I would vote for McCain/ Palin ticket!
    2005: Montreal, Ottawa, Pittsburgh
    2006: Camden I & II, Continental II (NJ)
    2008: Camden I & II, DC, MSG I & II (NYC), & EV: NYC II
    2009: Spectrum last 2 nights
    2012: EV: Orlando I & II, Ft. Lauderdale I
    2013: Brooklyn I & II
    2016: Ft. Lauderdale & Miami
  • NO. Not even with a gun to my head.

    (ok, that might be a bit dramatic :) )
  • DeLukinDeLukin Posts: 2,757
    Nevermind (self-censorship)
    I smile, but who am I kidding...
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    NEVER.


    palin's stance on issues/policies of importance to me are just tooo divergent from my own pov i could never, ever support her. gender means nothing...it's all about issues FOR women, amongst many others....not just being a woman.

    obama has a FAR better record of support for women and women's issues, and ideas and ideals that are in line with my own for such.



    btw - i am an independent.

    +1 on all of that. :)
  • I'm sure that there will be some women who identify with her as a sports mom, or whatever, and may go that way because of her.

    There are millions of voters, so I'm sure that some would be that shallow... I just can't imagine there being a big enough number to justify McCain basically giving the finger to all of the moderates that he alienated with this pick.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • ofthegirl75ofthegirl75 New Jersey Posts: 315
    Hell no!
  • NO. Not even with a gun to my head.

    (ok, that might be a bit dramatic :) )

    lol!!


    and my answer is also

    NO
  • I'm sure that there will be some women who identify with her as a sports mom, or whatever, and may go that way because of her.

    There are millions of voters, so I'm sure that some would be that shallow... I just can't imagine there being a big enough number to justify McCain basically giving the finger to all of the moderates that he alienated with this pick.

    you are on to something here. A joker with the McCain campaign just said that the election is not about issues, but the composite view of what people take away from the candidates.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/09/mccain_manager_this_election_i.html

    This is so f-ing crazy. It's like I woke up in some sort of alternate dimension today.
  • you are on to something here. A joker with the McCain campaign just said that the election is not about issues, but the composite view of what people take away from the candidates.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/09/mccain_manager_this_election_i.html

    This is so f-ing crazy. It's like I woke up in some sort of alternate dimension today.



    scary, scary.


    i DO realize there are voters out there who vote based on looks, political parties, style, if they 'like' someone, etc. i also know there are hilary supporters who feel devalued, etc. however, i just canNOT imagine throwing away my pov on important issues....not even looking at what a candidate thinks and says....and voting solely on gender, age, experience, skin color, etc. it's a ridiculous notion to me.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • NEVER.


    palin's stance on issues/policies of importance to me are just tooo divergent from my own pov i could never, ever support her. gender means nothing...it's all about issues FOR women, amongst many others....not just being a woman.

    obama has a FAR better record of support for women and women's issues, and ideas and ideals that are in line with my own for such.



    btw - i am an independent.

    same here
  • EnkiduEnkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    Never in a million years. I could never support anyone with an anti-choice agenda. Male/female/other.

    I'm a Democrat.
  • Enkidu wrote:
    Never in a million years. I could never support anyone with an anti-choice agenda. Male/female/other.

    I'm a Democrat.


    You know, I use to say the same thing...the completely other side, but the same thing...

    Then I realized that no change will ever come with abortion. So, I stopped letting 1 issue that was never going anywhere dominate all the other issues I believe in.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • You know, I use to say the same thing...the completely other side, but the same thing...

    Then I realized that no change will ever come with abortion. So, I stopped letting 1 issue that was never going anywhere dominate all the other issues I believe in.


    it certainly is NOT only 'one issue'...with mccain, or palin.
    for me, anyway...
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • kcherubkcherub Posts: 961
    If McCain did pick a woman hoping to pick up Hillary's supporters, I think he may have made a grave error. That's like saying that I would have chosen the hooker down the street to watch my child because my babysitter was busy. Not making any inferences to Palin being a hooker, so please don't get this thread closed by commenting upon same! :)
    I still want you all to "take care"--I am just damn tired of typing it.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/kcherub#p/a/u/0/N-UQprRqSwo
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293

    Then I realized that no change will ever come with abortion. So, I stopped letting 1 issue that was never going anywhere dominate all the other issues I believe in.

    I don't think it's quite that simple to say nothing will ever happen to abortion. McCain himself has set that he would appoint judges to the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade, and it's probable that the next President will have the chance to appoint 2, possibly even 3, new justices to the Court. From my knowledge about the judges, there are four pretty firm "overturn" rulers sitting on the bench already (Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas). If McCain has the opportunity to have one more conservative voice on the Court, Roe V. Wade could certainly be overturned.
  • weenieweenie Posts: 1,623
    Setting aside the abortion issue, which really polarizes people's opinions, I find it incomprehensible that he even selected her. She's not qualified to be in the #2 spot and anyone who thinks otherwise is just looking at her through rose-colored Republican glasses. If something happened to McCain and she took over running the country, she would be no more than a puppet being told what to do by the Republican rank and file. Which, come to think of it, is how I feel about McCain.

    NO
    ~I want to realize brotherhood or identity not merely with the beings called human, but I want to realize identity with all life, even with such things as crawl upon earth.~
    Mohandas K. Gandhi

    ~I once had a sparrow alight upon my shoulder for a moment, while I was hoeing in a village garden, and I felt that I was more distinguished by that circumstance than I should have been by any epaulette I could have worn.~
    Henry David Thoreau
  • digster wrote:
    I don't think it's quite that simple to say nothing will ever happen to abortion. McCain himself has set that he would appoint judges to the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade, and it's probable that the next President will have the chance to appoint 2, possibly even 3, new justices to the Court. From my knowledge about the judges, there are four pretty firm "overturn" rulers sitting on the bench already (Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas). If McCain has the opportunity to have one more conservative voice on the Court, Roe V. Wade could certainly be overturned.


    You know what overturning Roe v Wade does? It leaves it up to the States...which is what should have been done to begin with.

    it doesn't make abortion illegal automatically. It allows the people of the state to make the determination for their state. But I can see how that might be a little scary for some.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • weenie wrote:
    Setting aside the abortion issue, which really polarizes people's opinions, I find it incomprehensible that he even selected her. She's not qualified to be in the #2 spot and anyone who thinks otherwise is just looking at her through rose-colored Republican glasses. If something happened to McCain and she took over running the country, she would be no more than a puppet being told what to do by the Republican rank and file. Which, come to think of it, is how I feel about McCain.

    NO


    What makes one "qualified"?

    Shouldn't being a citizen of the US be enough?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • weenieweenie Posts: 1,623
    What makes one "qualified"?

    Shouldn't being a citizen of the US be enough?

    LOL - good one. :)
    ~I want to realize brotherhood or identity not merely with the beings called human, but I want to realize identity with all life, even with such things as crawl upon earth.~
    Mohandas K. Gandhi

    ~I once had a sparrow alight upon my shoulder for a moment, while I was hoeing in a village garden, and I felt that I was more distinguished by that circumstance than I should have been by any epaulette I could have worn.~
    Henry David Thoreau
  • weenie wrote:
    Setting aside the abortion issue, which really polarizes people's opinions, I find it incomprehensible that he even selected her. She's not qualified to be in the #2 spot and anyone who thinks otherwise is just looking at her through rose-colored Republican glasses.

    Seriously?

    She's as qualified for the No. 2 spot on the GOP ticket as Obama is for the No. 1 spot on the Democratic ticket.

    If Obama *really* wants to make her experience a huge issue, he's going to be digging his own grave.

    Politically speaking, she was the best choice McCain could have made out of the pool of rumored candidates. She solidifies his credentials with the Republican base, plus gives him a *chance* to steal some of those moderate women who were leaning toward Hillary.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • iamicaiamica Chicago Posts: 2,628
    I think that McCain's choice was a pathetic effort to try to get women to vote for him, thinking that all we want is a woman in office. I don't vote based on race or gender; I vote based on which position is more in agreement with mine. I can't support what she supports.
    Chicago 2000 : Chicago 2003 : Chicago 2006 : Summerfest 2006 : Lollapalooza 2007 : Chicago 2009 : Noblesville (Indy) 2010 : PJ20 (East Troy) 2011 : Wrigley Field 2013 : Milwaukee (Yield) 2014 : Wrigley Field 2016
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    You know what overturning Roe v Wade does? It leaves it up to the States...which is what should have been done to begin with.

    it doesn't make abortion illegal automatically. It allows the people of the state to make the determination for their state. But I can see how that might be a little scary for some.

    Leaving it up to the states is alot different from nothing happening to it...if it is left up to the states there will be many women denied access to a medical procedure. Also, I for one am not willing to go back to an era of back-alley abortions, which is what stirred the pro-choice movement to take more significant action in the first place
  • TrixieCatTrixieCat Posts: 5,756
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    Will gender sway any of the ladies here to vote republican?
    I don't think there is a chance in Hell that any Democratic women will vote for McCain because of this conservative crazy-pants.
    Cause I'm broken when I'm lonesome
    And I don't feel right when you're gone away
  • justamjustam Posts: 21,412
    JOEJOEJOE wrote:
    Will gender sway any of the ladies here to vote republican?

    No.

    More specifically:

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=301446

    :)
    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    Seriously?

    She's as qualified for the No. 2 spot on the GOP ticket as Obama is for the No. 1 spot on the Democratic ticket.

    If Obama *really* wants to make her experience a huge issue, he's going to be digging his own grave.

    Politically speaking, she was the best choice McCain could have made out of the pool of rumored candidates. She solidifies his credentials with the Republican base, plus gives him a *chance* to steal some of those moderate women who were leaning toward Hillary.

    About all she does is solidify her credentials with the Republican base (which is not going to be nearly enough to win this election). As more of her political positions come out, people are starting to realize that she is right-wing. Very very right-wing. And most people are moderates/independents. They're not going to like that.

    And Obama and co. can easily criticize Palin's experience, as long as they do it carefully and keep it focused on McCain. McCain has said that Obama is unfit to be President because of his lack of experience. Fine, OK. But to be VP, who's main job is to be ready to be president at any moment, he chose someone without many credentials, even when he said the person he would choose would have "extensive credentials." What does that say about his judgment or how seriously he took the decision? Washington experience? None. Foreign policy experience? No matter how many times Cindy McCain says it, Alaska being near Russia is not going to convince anyone she has foreign policy experience. It's not a referendum on Palin, but it is on McCain. And if they wanna come back at Obama with lack of experience, let them. Everyone's heard it before, and no one who votes for Obama is going to be voting him in on the basis of his vast Washington experience. It's the McCain camp that has everything to lose here.

    So, if this was such a brilliant decision, why has McCain gone down by multiple percentage points in every national poll since the VP announcement?


    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpolls/index.html
  • digster wrote:
    And Obama and co. can easily criticize Palin's experience, as long as they do it carefully and keep it focused on McCain. McCain has said that Obama is unfit to be President because of his lack of experience.

    I, and I think most people, believe it's more important for the top of the ticket to have experience than the No. 2. In terms of sheer experience, Palin is more qualified to be president RIGHT NOW than Obama is. At least she's had some executive experience ... Obama's resume consists of, well, four years of running for president and a lot of "present" votes in the Senate.

    She doesn't need foreign policy experience. That's McCain's forte.
    So, if this was such a brilliant decision, why has McCain gone down by multiple percentage points in every national poll since the VP announcement?

    Because the Democratic convention just ended. A better question would be why didn't Obama get much of a bump from that? He was expecting double-digits ... most sources seem to indicate he got squat, or squat plus just one or two points. Could be the Palin thing, could be something else, but the fact remains, McCain did BETTER in the past week than even his own campaign could have expected.

    The Palin thing isn't hurting him at all ... And, in the end, if all it does is shore up his base -- which was iffy on him to begin with -- then it will have been a success. All the other candidates ... Romney, Lieberman, etc ... would have meant the end of his campaign, basically. He'd have been cooked.

    As it stands, according to the national average, he's within two points of Obama heading into his convention. That's probably the best position he could have hoped for.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
Sign In or Register to comment.