"You are an ignorant motherfucker and shouldn't be allowed to vote." --David Cross
LOVE the quote- David Cross is the man!
www.RLMcDaniel.com
1996: Ft Lauderdale
1998: Birmingham
2000: Charlotte, Tampa
2003: Tampa, Atlanta, Phoenix
2004: Kissimmee
2008: West Palm Beach, Bonnaroo, Columbia
2010: MSG2
2012: Music Midtown
2014: Memphis
2016: Ft. Lauderdale, Miami, Jacksonville, JazzFest 2018: Wrigley 1, Fenway 1 2022: Nashville 2023: Ft. Worth II 2024: Baltimore
He really is the man. And it's exactly how I feel a lot of the time...just had to make sure to give him credit for it so it's not coming directly from me...
Its curious when the same people who at times rail against the 2 party system, saying it is rigged false choices then go to town yelling at a man for wanting to run 3rd party.
Wether you think he is a joke or not, or wether you think he is hurting "your" parties chance at winning (i assure you, the dems will have no problem -- shy of vote fraud -- winning this election) ... it is HIS CHOICE to run if he fucking wants to.
Sheesh.
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Would you consider voting for Ralph Nader for president?
No 74%
Yes 26%
Total Votes: 90,385
Do you think Nader's bid could affect the outcome of the presidential race?
Yes 61%
No 39%
Total Votes: 87,118
NOTE: Poll results are not scientific and reflect the opinions of only those users who chose to participate. Poll results are not reflected in real time.
Everyone is born, but not everyone is born the same. Some will grow to be butchers, or bakers, or candlestick makers. Some will only be really good at making Jell-O salad. One way or another, though, every human being is unique, for better or for worse.
Tell me one person that's running who would actually be a better president than Nader. There are millions who think he'd do the best job but they're fucking pussies with their votes and don't dare to do the right thing.
"I used to like Nader"..??? What the fuck is that? Nader has and always will stand for the same things - Honesty, integrity, working hard to keep Americans truly safe and well. If you "used to like" him and now don't then I can only assume that your values have changed because he's always stuck to his guns.
I've concluded that 99% of the people who think "Nader has lost it" are just plain fucking ignorant and know very little about him. Stop watching fox fucking news and pay attention to what he's done and pay attention to what he stands for.
Did you even read my statement? I love his message BUT maybe he should try another way to get it out !!!!!!!!!!! BTW - I dont watch Fox news and I am liberal. Having stated that all I have to say is maybe you are an ignorant fuckstick who should stick his tongue up Nader's ass. Have a good day.
Its curious when the same people who at times rail against the 2 party system, saying it is rigged false choices then go to town yelling at a man for wanting to run 3rd party.
Wether you think he is a joke or not, or wether you think he is hurting "your" parties chance at winning (i assure you, the dems will have no problem -- shy of vote fraud -- winning this election) ... it is HIS CHOICE to run if he fucking wants to.
Sheesh.
I agree... but he's getting old with this crap... he should have been working on being president the moment he lost his first race... is reason why im starting to find it suspicious, he is the candidate for the green party, he should be working on it full force and with serious dedication... almost like on some fucking whim and out of some manic need he shows up and decides to be president...
he has been given enough years and plenty of time since his "safety belt" parade to become a unique force in our "democratic" process...
why would dem's squirm? Nadar has no influence at all right now. Dem's have learned, that's why Kucinich was ignored.
Barak will get 60% of the vote, McCain has no chance at being President. His support of Bush 2001 - 2006 when Republicans were abusing their power, he went along. No longer the Maverick, just another Bush croney.
I agree with you, but the problem is that the Dems will all say that he is taking votes away from them and if they do lose then it will be his fault. I would tend to agree with you about Barak taking the election but I don't think that its going to be a runaway victory. I think its going to be closer than people realize. Just my opinion though.
Personaly I would really like to see a strong 3rd candidate but I don't think Nader is the one.
why is he running now? he has no chance to win at all. even less of a chance than fuckabee. he won't even be on the ballot in all of the states so what is he trying to do? fuck nader. he is irrelevent. if he steals enough votes from the dem candidate, it might be close enough where the supreme court has to step in again, and we all know they will favor mccain.
i think nader is going to be embarrassed in this camapaign. just watch, he will have trouble getting on the ballot in some states and i doubt he will even be invited to debate. i think he will be mostly ignored by the american people.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
Democracy is not choosing between 2 corporate candidates that will continue down basically the same path. Having an alternative to them is...if enough people were not so willing to settle for the who they hate less we could put someone other than an individual who will cater to corporate interests in the whitehouse.
really tho, the green party does have something to do with weed.
I understand this, but people don't just vote for him because his party is linked to hemp.
www.RLMcDaniel.com
1996: Ft Lauderdale
1998: Birmingham
2000: Charlotte, Tampa
2003: Tampa, Atlanta, Phoenix
2004: Kissimmee
2008: West Palm Beach, Bonnaroo, Columbia
2010: MSG2
2012: Music Midtown
2014: Memphis
2016: Ft. Lauderdale, Miami, Jacksonville, JazzFest 2018: Wrigley 1, Fenway 1 2022: Nashville 2023: Ft. Worth II 2024: Baltimore
Why now? ... where has he been for the past year? what is his purpose? Is his only intent to bring up bad policy and bad voting records of the candidates? Which we all know that is easily spun away, smiled and cleared by any good politician? To bring up policy and acts that should be a part of our country... but are just a pipe dream? This man is lobbyist... obviously working towards the priorities of big think tanks and corporations... he may have been once a man with great ideals... but now I'm just beginning to think he is just another puppet/ schill ...
he's been in the elevator with me, smoking that PRESIDENTIAL!!
I agree with you, but the problem is that the Dems will all say that he is taking votes away from them and if they do lose then it will be his fault. I would tend to agree with you about Barak taking the election but I don't think that its going to be a runaway victory. I think its going to be closer than people realize. Just my opinion though.
Personaly I would really like to see a strong 3rd candidate but I don't think Nader is the one.
so much can happen, but it looks close now, but I think Barak will do well in debates on and the stump for the general and win over many moderate republicans and especially more independents.
I also think that for him to win big, many comfortable to upper middle class citizens will have to realize that they will feel some pain with Obama as President, but I think he will rebuilt the middle class, I'm more worried about him going tax crazy. He has to be smart, and the Dem's need to cut earmarks in congress.
nothing easy, but I think he'll be a good President. It's time to move past the older generations...
"Music, for me, was fucking heroin." eV (nothing Ed has said is more true for me personally than this quote)
Tell me one person that's running who would actually be a better president than Nader. There are millions who think he'd do the best job but they're fucking pussies with their votes and don't dare to do the right thing.
"I used to like Nader"..??? What the fuck is that? Nader has and always will stand for the same things - Honesty, integrity, working hard to keep Americans truly safe and well. If you "used to like" him and now don't then I can only assume that your values have changed because he's always stuck to his guns.
I've concluded that 99% of the people who think "Nader has lost it" are just plain fucking ignorant and know very little about him. Stop watching fox fucking news and pay attention to what he's done and pay attention to what he stands for.
I am all for having a bigger choice than the dems or the reps...but for right now that is it! He doesnt have a chance in hell of winning, and all he will do is take votes away from barack obama. Even if you dont like him, he is still loads better than what the GOP is offering. In times like these with a war ranging and our economy in the shitter we have to put our support behind someone who can win. Like him or not...he cant win...why the fuck would anyone not place a vote to ensure that our country gets out of the cluster fuck it is currently in.
I voted for him in 2000...I wish i didnt...I like what he stands for but in our current system a vote for him will not change anything.
"Music is the glue that holds everything together. Without it, everything would fall apart." --Eddie (From the movie EMPIRE RECORDS)
so much can happen, but it looks close now, but I think Barak will do well in debates on and the stump for the general and win over many moderate republicans and especially more independents.
I also think that for him to win big, many comfortable to upper middle class citizens will have to realize that they will feel some pain with Obama as President, but I think he will rebuilt the middle class, I'm more worried about him going tax crazy. He has to be smart, and the Dem's need to cut earmarks in congress.
nothing easy, but I think he'll be a good President. It's time to move past the older generations...
Can you define comfortable to upper middle class for me? I am just curious as I consider myself upper middle trash but I don't know what the classifications actually are(monetary wise).
I am all for having a bigger choice than the dems or the reps...but for right now that is it! He doesnt have a chance in hell of winning, and all he will do is take votes away from barack obama. Even if you dont like him, he is still loads better than what the GOP is offering. In times like these with a war ranging and our economy in the shitter we have to put our support behind someone who can win. Like him or not...he cant win...why the fuck would anyone not place a vote to ensure that our country gets out of the cluster fuck it is currently in.
I voted for him in 2000...I wish i didnt...I like what he stands for but in our current system a vote for him will not change anything.
I wouldn't vote for Barack anyway, so my vote for Nader, or my write in of Kucinich or whatever I decide that day in November will be for what I believe in. It's my right, I will exercise it. A lot of big things start very small.
Walking can be a real trip
***********************
"We've laid the groundwork. It's like planting the seeds. And next year, it's spring." - Nader
***********************
Prepare for tending to your garden, America.
Can you define comfortable to upper middle class for me? I am just curious as I consider myself upper middle trash but I don't know what the classifications actually are(monetary wise).
should've just said middle class, since it's been shrunk down so much, that there really isn't a lower eschelon of the middle class now.
"Music, for me, was fucking heroin." eV (nothing Ed has said is more true for me personally than this quote)
I got the feeling from his MTP interview, and the Obama clip that they showed, that Ralph reached out to Obama and tried to align himself with Obama, but was rejected. I believed him when he said earlier that he would only run if Hillary was the nominee. I agree with much of what Nader says, but i think he is running out of spite this year.
I also think this is being overplayed a bit. The media is trumpeting that he got almost 3,000,000 votes in 2000, but what did he get in 2004, about 400,000? I think he'll get about the same this year, or less, as the DNC portrays a McCain Presidency as George W. Bush's 3rd term. Nader lost 86% of his 2000 votes in 2004 (not mine, as I voted for him in 00 and 04) because many of nader's 2000 voters realized what a shit president W was. I'm a big fan of Ralph Nader, and his life's work. But I think this will be a non-issue if Obama gets the nomination. I know I will vote for Obama over McCain and Nader. If it's hillary, then it's a different story however.
I am all for having a bigger choice than the dems or the reps...but for right now that is it! He doesnt have a chance in hell of winning, and all he will do is take votes away from barack obama. Even if you dont like him, he is still loads better than what the GOP is offering. In times like these with a war ranging and our economy in the shitter we have to put our support behind someone who can win. Like him or not...he cant win...why the fuck would anyone not place a vote to ensure that our country gets out of the cluster fuck it is currently in.
I voted for him in 2000...I wish i didnt...I like what he stands for but in our current system a vote for him will not change anything.
So you would rather vote for someone you DON'T believe in? That's nothing short of idiotic. People need to fucking get off their asses and educate themselves. The only reason we (feel we) have to choose between two major candidates is due to 100% complete fucking ignorance. To say you agree with someone and to say you'd rather they be president but then you VOTE for someone else is NOT democracy. It's fucking insane and absurd and people who do that (and I know there are a lot of you out there) have fucked up values.
So you would rather vote for someone you DON'T believe in? That's nothing short of idiotic. People need to fucking get off their asses and educate themselves. The only reason we (feel we) have to choose between two major candidates is due to 100% complete fucking ignorance. To say you agree with someone and to say you'd rather they be president but then you VOTE for someone else is NOT democracy. It's fucking insane and absurd and people who do that (and I know there are a lot of you out there) have fucked up values.
Amen.
People act as if they have absolutely no power over their lives or who is choosen to lead it.
'Ummm...well, they say we get to pick between spam or a happy meal. Man, that's not really what I want to be eating but what can I do about it? There's some pretty good restaurants down the street but everyone else is already eating this. Uh, I guess I'll pick the happy meal. At least it comes with a shiny toy.'
If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
People acts as if they have absolutely no power over their lives or who is choosen to lead it.
'Ummm...well, they say we get to pick between spam or a happy meal. Man, that's not really what I want to be eating but what can I do about it? There's some pretty good restaurants down the street but everyone else is already eating this. Uh, I guess I'll pick the happy meal. At least it comes with a shiny toy.'
the happy meal has better marketing
i could eat at this thai place down the street, but...they don't have any advertisements
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
I agree with alot of what Nader has said on Meet the Press today. Obama isnt perfect but Nader has to think (even though he is predicting a democratic landside this election) inside that by him running it makes it more possible for a McBush presidancy. I just dont understand why doesnt run for a lower office. Congress, Senate...
They showed Obama responding to a question about Nader running today and from what Obama said it seems like Nader can be a pushy guy. Seems like Nader has reached out to Obama's campaign and that perhaps Nader wanted Obama to take certain stances and Obama wouldnt. Its all very interesting to me... I still dont think he should run. Obama's presidency could do a lot for the country on a morale level. If McBush ends up with this Im going to have to give Driftings posts some more thought, and even more thought to moving to Europe .
Just fucking hang it up already. You've ruined enough potential presidencies.
2003 Mansfield III 2004 Boston I 2006 Boston I 2008 Bonnaroo, Hartford, Mansfield I 2010 Hartford 2013 Worcester I, Worcester II, Hartford 2016 Bonnaroo, Fenway I, Fenway II 2018 Fenway I, Fenway II 2021 Sea.Hear.Now 2022 Camden 2024 MSG I, Fenway I, Fenway II
I think the guy comes from a good place. Most of us like to mix it up a little bit. But he is hurting America by doing this.
In 2000, I was convinced I was doing the right thing by voting for Nader. I was convinced that I couldn't vote from anyone from the 2 headed GOP/DNC monster.
I don't know what people were thinking if they voted for him in 2004.
But, for the first time since I have been an adult, there is a canidate out there who inspires people. A canidate who can get the house and the senate to cross party lines and work together. That is THE most important thing to me when I vote.
As far as Nader, he started this late in 2004 as well.
why is he hurting america? i don't get that, people are allowed to run for president if they want. if people don't want to vote for him that is their right. by the way, i am assuming that the canidate that you speck of is Obama and what reason do you believe that he can work across party lines.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
I agree with alot of what Nader has said on Meet the Press today. Obama isnt perfect but Nader has to think (even though he is predicting a democratic landside this election) inside that by him running it makes it more possible for a McBush presidancy. I just dont understand why doesnt run for a lower office. Congress, Senate...
They showed Obama responding to a question about Nader running today and from what Obama said it seems like Nader can be a pushy guy. Seems like Nader has reached out to Obama's campaign and that perhaps Nader wanted Obama to take certain stances and Obama wouldnt. Its all very interesting to me... I still dont think he should run. Obama's presidency could do a lot for the country on a morale level. If McBush ends up with this Im going to have to give Driftings posts some more thought, and even more thought to moving to Europe .
you know what else makes it more possible for an easy election is by having just one person running. don't you understan dthat people will only vote for nader if they are not happy with who is running. if the people are not happy with who is running then there must be a problem. it is Obama job to make sure that he wins the election by having views that people have.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
I just dont understand why doesnt run for a lower office. Congress, Senate...
That's what I have wondered about this guy too. Does he really care about improving the lives of Americans or does he just have a thing about seeing himself in the news every four years.
I agree... but he's getting old with this crap... he should have been working on being president the moment he lost his first race... is reason why im starting to find it suspicious
I don't understand why he doesn't do this either. Then again I don't understand why the loosing party doesn't do this. I mean after the democrats lost in 04 why didn't they pick there next candidate shortly after and they could have had him or her campaigning and getting his or her name out there ever since. I mean the election date is set pretty much in stone (unlike the Canadian system where the government can call an election pretty much whenever they want (unless it is a minority government then the opposition can)) so if you are the loser why wait around for 3 years before you. I mean if they had picked their they had picked the nominee in 05 they could be spending the next 3 years campaigning one guy and hammering the ruling party on all their fuck-ups.
That's what I have wondered about this guy too. Does he really care about improving the lives of Americans or does he just have a thing about seeing himself in the news every four years.
I don't understand why he doesn't do this either. Then again I don't understand why the loosing party doesn't do this. I mean after the democrats lost in 04 why didn't they pick there next candidate shortly after and they could have had him or her campaigning and getting his or her name out there ever since. I mean the election date is set pretty much in stone (unlike the Canadian system where the government can call an election pretty much whenever they want (unless it is a minority government then the opposition can)) so if you are the loser why wait around for 3 years before you. I mean if they had picked their they had picked the nominee in 05 they could be spending the next 3 years campaigning one guy and hammering the ruling party on all their fuck-ups.
maybe the reason he didn't was that maybe he was hoping that someone else will come out to fight the issues that he cares about. also if teh Dem. did do that they would not have Obama.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
why the hell are you blaming nadar? blame gore for not being able to carry his home state. blame katherine harris and the supreme fucking court for STEALING the election. blaming ralph is just stupid. if the democrats can't win on their own with their own candidate then it's their fault, period. nadar has every right to run.
i never understand why people blame anyone other than the person that lost. let's face it Gore fucked up badly and it should not have been as close as it was.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
Comments
1996: Ft Lauderdale
1998: Birmingham
2000: Charlotte, Tampa
2003: Tampa, Atlanta, Phoenix
2004: Kissimmee
2008: West Palm Beach, Bonnaroo, Columbia
2010: MSG2
2012: Music Midtown
2014: Memphis
2018: Wrigley 1, Fenway 1
2022: Nashville
2023: Ft. Worth II
2024: Baltimore
Upcoming: 2025 Hollywood, FL Night 2
i wouldnt trust him with a dry cleaners.
Wether you think he is a joke or not, or wether you think he is hurting "your" parties chance at winning (i assure you, the dems will have no problem -- shy of vote fraud -- winning this election) ... it is HIS CHOICE to run if he fucking wants to.
Sheesh.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
No 74%
Yes 26%
Total Votes: 90,385
Do you think Nader's bid could affect the outcome of the presidential race?
Yes 61%
No 39%
Total Votes: 87,118
NOTE: Poll results are not scientific and reflect the opinions of only those users who chose to participate. Poll results are not reflected in real time.
Did you even read my statement? I love his message BUT maybe he should try another way to get it out !!!!!!!!!!! BTW - I dont watch Fox news and I am liberal. Having stated that all I have to say is maybe you are an ignorant fuckstick who should stick his tongue up Nader's ass. Have a good day.
I agree... but he's getting old with this crap... he should have been working on being president the moment he lost his first race... is reason why im starting to find it suspicious, he is the candidate for the green party, he should be working on it full force and with serious dedication... almost like on some fucking whim and out of some manic need he shows up and decides to be president...
he has been given enough years and plenty of time since his "safety belt" parade to become a unique force in our "democratic" process...
I agree with you, but the problem is that the Dems will all say that he is taking votes away from them and if they do lose then it will be his fault. I would tend to agree with you about Barak taking the election but I don't think that its going to be a runaway victory. I think its going to be closer than people realize. Just my opinion though.
Personaly I would really like to see a strong 3rd candidate but I don't think Nader is the one.
www.seanbrady.net
why is he running now? he has no chance to win at all. even less of a chance than fuckabee. he won't even be on the ballot in all of the states so what is he trying to do? fuck nader. he is irrelevent. if he steals enough votes from the dem candidate, it might be close enough where the supreme court has to step in again, and we all know they will favor mccain.
i think nader is going to be embarrassed in this camapaign. just watch, he will have trouble getting on the ballot in some states and i doubt he will even be invited to debate. i think he will be mostly ignored by the american people.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
I understand this, but people don't just vote for him because his party is linked to hemp.
1996: Ft Lauderdale
1998: Birmingham
2000: Charlotte, Tampa
2003: Tampa, Atlanta, Phoenix
2004: Kissimmee
2008: West Palm Beach, Bonnaroo, Columbia
2010: MSG2
2012: Music Midtown
2014: Memphis
2018: Wrigley 1, Fenway 1
2022: Nashville
2023: Ft. Worth II
2024: Baltimore
Upcoming: 2025 Hollywood, FL Night 2
he's been in the elevator with me, smoking that PRESIDENTIAL!!
so much can happen, but it looks close now, but I think Barak will do well in debates on and the stump for the general and win over many moderate republicans and especially more independents.
I also think that for him to win big, many comfortable to upper middle class citizens will have to realize that they will feel some pain with Obama as President, but I think he will rebuilt the middle class, I'm more worried about him going tax crazy. He has to be smart, and the Dem's need to cut earmarks in congress.
nothing easy, but I think he'll be a good President. It's time to move past the older generations...
Stop by:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
I am all for having a bigger choice than the dems or the reps...but for right now that is it! He doesnt have a chance in hell of winning, and all he will do is take votes away from barack obama. Even if you dont like him, he is still loads better than what the GOP is offering. In times like these with a war ranging and our economy in the shitter we have to put our support behind someone who can win. Like him or not...he cant win...why the fuck would anyone not place a vote to ensure that our country gets out of the cluster fuck it is currently in.
I voted for him in 2000...I wish i didnt...I like what he stands for but in our current system a vote for him will not change anything.
Can you define comfortable to upper middle class for me? I am just curious as I consider myself upper middle trash but I don't know what the classifications actually are(monetary wise).
www.seanbrady.net
I wouldn't vote for Barack anyway, so my vote for Nader, or my write in of Kucinich or whatever I decide that day in November will be for what I believe in. It's my right, I will exercise it. A lot of big things start very small.
***********************
"We've laid the groundwork. It's like planting the seeds. And next year, it's spring." - Nader
***********************
Prepare for tending to your garden, America.
should've just said middle class, since it's been shrunk down so much, that there really isn't a lower eschelon of the middle class now.
Stop by:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
I also think this is being overplayed a bit. The media is trumpeting that he got almost 3,000,000 votes in 2000, but what did he get in 2004, about 400,000? I think he'll get about the same this year, or less, as the DNC portrays a McCain Presidency as George W. Bush's 3rd term. Nader lost 86% of his 2000 votes in 2004 (not mine, as I voted for him in 00 and 04) because many of nader's 2000 voters realized what a shit president W was. I'm a big fan of Ralph Nader, and his life's work. But I think this will be a non-issue if Obama gets the nomination. I know I will vote for Obama over McCain and Nader. If it's hillary, then it's a different story however.
Amen.
People act as if they have absolutely no power over their lives or who is choosen to lead it.
'Ummm...well, they say we get to pick between spam or a happy meal. Man, that's not really what I want to be eating but what can I do about it? There's some pretty good restaurants down the street but everyone else is already eating this. Uh, I guess I'll pick the happy meal. At least it comes with a shiny toy.'
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
the happy meal has better marketing
i could eat at this thai place down the street, but...they don't have any advertisements
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
They showed Obama responding to a question about Nader running today and from what Obama said it seems like Nader can be a pushy guy. Seems like Nader has reached out to Obama's campaign and that perhaps Nader wanted Obama to take certain stances and Obama wouldnt. Its all very interesting to me... I still dont think he should run. Obama's presidency could do a lot for the country on a morale level. If McBush ends up with this Im going to have to give Driftings posts some more thought, and even more thought to moving to Europe
2004 Boston I
2006 Boston I
2008 Bonnaroo, Hartford, Mansfield I
2010 Hartford
2013 Worcester I, Worcester II, Hartford
2016 Bonnaroo, Fenway I, Fenway II
2018 Fenway I, Fenway II
2021 Sea.Hear.Now
2022 Camden
2024 MSG I, Fenway I, Fenway II
Maybe it's a money thing but honestly, who is advising him it's a good idea to run?
It's just a waste of money until we do something to sway the publics attention from the two party system.
Right now we're basically politically like Radio in the 1950's... want a hit, how about some payola.....
why is he hurting america? i don't get that, people are allowed to run for president if they want. if people don't want to vote for him that is their right. by the way, i am assuming that the canidate that you speck of is Obama and what reason do you believe that he can work across party lines.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
you know what else makes it more possible for an easy election is by having just one person running. don't you understan dthat people will only vote for nader if they are not happy with who is running. if the people are not happy with who is running then there must be a problem. it is Obama job to make sure that he wins the election by having views that people have.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
That's what I have wondered about this guy too. Does he really care about improving the lives of Americans or does he just have a thing about seeing himself in the news every four years.
I don't understand why he doesn't do this either. Then again I don't understand why the loosing party doesn't do this. I mean after the democrats lost in 04 why didn't they pick there next candidate shortly after and they could have had him or her campaigning and getting his or her name out there ever since. I mean the election date is set pretty much in stone (unlike the Canadian system where the government can call an election pretty much whenever they want (unless it is a minority government then the opposition can)) so if you are the loser why wait around for 3 years before you. I mean if they had picked their they had picked the nominee in 05 they could be spending the next 3 years campaigning one guy and hammering the ruling party on all their fuck-ups.
maybe the reason he didn't was that maybe he was hoping that someone else will come out to fight the issues that he cares about. also if teh Dem. did do that they would not have Obama.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
i never understand why people blame anyone other than the person that lost. let's face it Gore fucked up badly and it should not have been as close as it was.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)