Radical Muslim regimes

2

Comments

  • MrBrian
    MrBrian Posts: 2,672
    OutOfBreath wrote:
    2. A mosque in my hometown was closing down and moving to new quarters. But the local authorities closed their old place before the new was ready because of the building standard. The muslims felt that was uncalled for and "threatened" to hold their prayer in the town square instead as a protest. One democrat promptly stepped up and suggested to hang pig carcasses all over the town square amped up with loud speakers with pig squeals. (Because muslims are afraid of pigs, as we well know.) Our town square is also supposedly our sacred ground as well :rolleyes:

    Peace
    Dan

    This is the way to do it. the american way.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay44gLnIoms&mode=related&search=
  • OutOfBreath
    OutOfBreath Posts: 1,804
    MrBrian wrote:
    This is the way to do it. the american way.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay44gLnIoms&mode=related&search=
    Hahahahahahaha.
    And a bit sad.

    See, that's my reaction to most things coming out our democrats' mouths too.

    Peace
    Dan
    "YOU [humans] NEED TO BELIEVE IN THINGS THAT AREN'T TRUE. HOW ELSE CAN THEY BECOME?" - Death

    "Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
  • rebornFixer
    rebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    What really, really scares me is that these regimes have "allies" in leftist political movements in our own societies.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    reborncareerist wrote:
    What really, really scares me is that these regimes have "allies" in leftist political movements in our own societies.

    he he...that's right, we hate "freedom", apple pie, jesus and the American way of life...
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    I'm not making the Chinese a scapegoat... I'm asking why the 'Radical Muslims that want to Take Over The World' don't regard China as this big enemy. Why is it us? It's probably because China isn't over there, buying Middle Eastern leaders, who end up oppressing the people with the weapons we provide them. And you can bet, if China were doing it instead of us... there would be a Jihad against Beijing instead of Washington.
    ...
    And you claim the Muslims don't hate the Chinese because they're afraid the Chinese will 'Fuck them up'? Where does that reasoning come from? Because of Tienimen Square? Who has China 'Fucked up', other than pacifist Buddhist monks and unarmed dissident students? What military has Red China ever taken on?
    ...
    Chinese and Muslims aside... who's fault is it that we are addicted to oil? You act as if we are minding our own business and for no reason... other than we read the Bible... the Muslims want to exterminate us. If we were minding our own business, we would just buy their fucking oil and say, "Thanx, assholes..." and be on our merry way. Why can't you even admit that we are part of the problem?

    Have you looked into US involvement in the middle east v.s. China in say the past 25 years? Your answer is there...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • rebornFixer
    rebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    inmytree wrote:
    he he...that's right, we hate "freedom", apple pie, jesus and the American way of life...

    "We"? If indeed you are one of the people I was referring to, fuck you. Hope you enjoy hell.

    You're probably not, though. The people I was referring to are NOT those who have serious issues with U.S. foreign policy. I am one of the latter, in fact.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    reborncareerist wrote:
    "We"? If indeed you are one of the people I was referring to, fuck you. Hope you enjoy hell.

    You're probably not, though. The people I was referring to are NOT those who have serious issues with U.S. foreign policy. I am one of the latter, in fact.

    well, perhaps I am...your cryptic response about "allies in leftist political movements in our own societies"...was not easily interpreted...

    if you were implying those against bushy and this war are those "allies" then a big fuck you too to you sir...

    if not, I have no idea what we are talking about...
  • rebornFixer
    rebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    inmytree wrote:

    if you were implying those against bushy and this war are those "allies" then a big fuck you too to you sir...

    I was not. Its not personal, but I had some bad conversations with people today that really freaked me out. People arguing that Iran having nukes is a good thing just doesn't compute with me. My first post was way too cryptic, apologies for that.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    reborncareerist wrote:
    What really, really scares me is that these regimes have "allies" in leftist political movements in our own societies.

    care to support your fear-mongering with any sort of substantiated evidence? who are their allies? cos it seems to me, most of their funding comes from right-wing political movements... aka big business.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,741
    reborncareerist wrote:
    I was not. Its not personal, but I had some bad conversations with people today that really freaked me out. People arguing that Iran having nukes is a good thing just doesn't compute with me. My first post was way too cryptic, apologies for that.

    no problem, my friend...:)

    for the record...I don't think anyone should have nukes, but that's just me...
  • NCfan
    NCfan Posts: 945
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    I'm not making the Chinese a scapegoat... I'm asking why the 'Radical Muslims that want to Take Over The World' don't regard China as this big enemy. Why is it us? It's probably because China isn't over there, buying Middle Eastern leaders, who end up oppressing the people with the weapons we provide them. And you can bet, if China were doing it instead of us... there would be a Jihad against Beijing instead of Washington.
    ...
    And you claim the Muslims don't hate the Chinese because they're afraid the Chinese will 'Fuck them up'? Where does that reasoning come from? Because of Tienimen Square? Who has China 'Fucked up', other than pacifist Buddhist monks and unarmed dissident students? What military has Red China ever taken on?
    ...
    Chinese and Muslims aside... who's fault is it that we are addicted to oil? You act as if we are minding our own business and for no reason... other than we read the Bible... the Muslims want to exterminate us. If we were minding our own business, we would just buy their fucking oil and say, "Thanx, assholes..." and be on our merry way. Why can't you even admit that we are part of the problem?

    I know you're not making the Chinese a scapegoat. I was refering to the way radical Muslims make America the scapegoat for their deparate state. China is not in the Middle East politically becuase nobody there wants to buy what their selling. Who the fuck wants to be a communist in the Middle East? Now who wants to live under Democracy in the Middle East? I'll give you a hint, the second option is more popular. Also, the Chinese aren't there becuase the Americans are. Our policies and actions in the Middle East are only making it a better place for China to do business with. Go look at the statistics for foriegn investment in countires ruled by dictators vs democratic governenments. Basically nobody wants to do business in that kind of environment.
  • jdub3001
    jdub3001 Posts: 194
    inmytree wrote:
    well, sign the fuck up and get on with it...

    Bravo!
  • pjfanatic4
    pjfanatic4 Posts: 127
    NCfan wrote:
    China is not in the Middle East politically becuase nobody there wants to buy what their selling. Who the fuck wants to be a communist in the Middle East? Now who wants to live under Democracy in the Middle East? I'll give you a hint, the second option is more popular.

    Explain how do you know that the Middle East wants democracy? You have no basis for saying that. We don't know what they want.

    And the US doesn't want to promote a democracy over there. Heck, we don't have a democracy HERE in the US. The US wants a "friendly" government, either through elected officials or the dictator type. The US will support both as long as they are "friendly" to US interests.
  • Cosmo
    Cosmo Posts: 12,225
    pjfanatic4 wrote:
    Explain how do you know that the Middle East wants democracy? You have no basis for saying that. We don't know what they want.

    And the US doesn't want to promote a democracy over there. Heck, we don't have a democracy HERE in the US. The US wants a "friendly" government, either through elected officials or the dictator type. The US will support both as long as they are "friendly" to US interests.
    ...
    True... the LAST thing in the U.S.'s Best interests is a Democracy, right? I mean, haven't you heard? Muslims all hate us and want to erradicate us along with our puppet masters, Israel. Who do you think people who hate us will elect into power? If you said, "What is... other people who hate us"... then, you would be correct. Why would the U.S. want to put the people who want to destroy us in charge of our oil?
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Alex_Coe
    Alex_Coe Posts: 762
    I can't believe a Canadian lied to me...
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    pjfanatic4 wrote:
    And the US doesn't want to promote a democracy over there. Heck, we don't have a democracy HERE in the US. The US wants a "friendly" government, either through elected officials or the dictator type. The US will support both as long as they are "friendly" to US interests.


    Hence why we ignore the oppressive rulers of Saudi Arabia. If we where really truely interested in stopping the spread of global terrorism we could accomplish a lot by taking a hard long look at Saudi Arabia.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • NCfan
    NCfan Posts: 945
    mammasan wrote:
    Hence why we ignore the oppressive rulers of Saudi Arabia. If we where really truely interested in stopping the spread of global terrorism we could accomplish a lot by taking a hard long look at Saudi Arabia.

    Not really. Their time will come. Just because we ally with them now, does not mean we don't have plans and prefferences for them too, ya know? If's not like Bush of Condi Rice can speak in public about what we're trying to do to their government.
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    NCfan wrote:
    Not really. Their time will come. Just because we ally with them now, does not mean we don't have plans and prefferences for them too, ya know? If's not like Bush of Condi Rice can speak in public about what we're trying to do to their government.

    yet you swear up and down that the united states is not trying to build an empire :rolleyes:
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    NCfan wrote:
    Not really. Their time will come. Just because we ally with them now, does not mean we don't have plans and prefferences for them too, ya know? If's not like Bush of Condi Rice can speak in public about what we're trying to do to their government.


    Because we have no plans for them. As long as they control the spigot we will continue to turn a blind eye to their activities.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • rebornFixer
    rebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    I think its worth mentioning that radical Muslim doctrine DOES refer to the eradication of all non-believers. It would be a mistake to assume that the Chinese are somehow safe. Hindus in India are not safe. Neither are Buddhists in Thailand. The U.S. is seen as the major target by many groups, yes, and that is probably because Americans do many things to attract this sort of negative attention. But the ideology exists all over the world, and its not simply a direct result of American actions.

Categories