Hillary sums it up...

2

Comments

  • miller8966
    miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    Hillary is the worst candidate ever! What kind of feminist lets her husband receive oral sex from an oversized woman and then stays with him?

    How can women, especially women with a feminist idelogue vote for Hillary.....THEY CANT.

    Vote republican
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • rearviewmiror
    rearviewmiror Posts: 894
    The Democrats ran a study to figure out the viability of a Hillary candidacy. The best outcome was 60/40 against. TOO many people hate her. These are people she will never win back.

    I am liberal, I used to love Hillary, and I think she is a perfect leader in the Senate. PLEASE GOD keep her away from the National Ticket.

    Hillary lost me forever when she went off about video games and their effects, I instantly understood why those that dont like her take hate to a new level.

    NO and NEVER for Hillary.
    9/7/98, 8/3/00, 9/4/00, 4/15/03, 7/1/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 5/24/06, 5/25/06, 6/17/08, 6/22/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 5/17/10, 10/15/13, 10/16/13.
  • RainDog
    RainDog Posts: 1,824
    farfromglorified wrote:
    I'm glad I can't convince them of that, because that would be a total lie.
    "Everything" was a bit hyperbolic; but voting in a more money neutral environment would open up more choice for the voters. And who they vote for does have a large effect on their issues of choice.


    farfromglorified wrote:
    How?
    By completely removing the argument that "the richest guy always wins."
  • VictoryGin
    VictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    miller8966 wrote:
    Hillary is the worst candidate ever! What kind of feminist lets her husband receive oral sex from an oversized woman and then stays with him?

    How can women, especially women with a feminist idelogue vote for Hillary.....THEY CANT.

    Vote republican

    uh yeah they can when you're using that reasoning. i think it's pretty stupid to say that feminists can't vote for hillary because her husband cheated on her. it was her choice to stay with him so people should honor that. and how the hell does that affect her political policy? that's a weak reason to not vote for a person.

    please. and do you have an idea of how many people cheat? what a joke.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • VictoryGin
    VictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    Jeanwah wrote:
    Now, that's a dream ticket.
    Hillary's great. And for all you Hillary haters, you obviously don't live in NY, where she happens to already be our Senator and is doing a great job.

    hillary is doing a lot of work here, which is one reason i hope she doesn't run for pres in 08. she loves working with policy, so i'd hope she could take a senate leadership position. becoming president would remove her from really getting into legislation.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    RainDog wrote:
    "Everything" was a bit hyperbolic; but voting in a more money neutral environment would open up more choice for the voters. And who they vote for does have a large effect on their issues of choice.

    See, that's the thing. The only barrier to underfunded candidates now is the voters themselves who, as you say, would vote in a more "money neutral environment".
    By completely removing the argument that "the richest guy always wins."

    But that argument isn't true today.
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    miller8966 wrote:
    Hillary is the worst candidate ever! What kind of feminist lets her husband receive oral sex from an oversized woman and then stays with him?

    How can women, especially women with a feminist idelogue vote for Hillary.....THEY CANT.

    Vote republican
    I'm a feminist, and I strongly believe that there's only one marriage in the entire world that is any of my business, and that's the one between me and my husband. I say whatever works for Bill and Hillary and doesn't harm anyone else, more power to 'em.

    I do hope that Hillary doesn't run. About 40% of the population would never vote for her under any circumstances, and that doesn't leave enough swing voters for her to win in the general election.

    Personally, if she does run I won't vote for her because I think she's aided and abetted this administration with regards to Iraq. My decision certainly wouldn't have anything to do with Bill's extracurricular activities, which don't interest me a bit.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    hippiemom wrote:
    I'm a feminist, and I strongly believe that there's only one marriage in the entire world that is any of my business, and that's the one between me and my husband. I say whatever works for Bill and Hillary and doesn't harm anyone else, more power to 'em.

    Bravo!
  • Jeanwah
    Jeanwah Posts: 6,363
    VictoryGin wrote:
    hillary is doing a lot of work here, which is one reason i hope she doesn't run for pres in 08. she loves working with policy, so i'd hope she could take a senate leadership position. becoming president would remove her from really getting into legislation.

    Ya know, you're probably right about keeping her in Senate, she's at the right level now. Anything larger would get her less involved. Plus, I don't really think she's got a great chance of winning presidency. It's really too bad.
  • EvilToasterElf
    EvilToasterElf Posts: 1,119
    Can anyone tell me what Obama's actually done?
  • farfromglorified
    farfromglorified Posts: 5,700
    EvilToasterElf wrote:
    Can anyone tell me what Obama's actually done?

    Stop pretending that's relevant ;)
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    miller8966 wrote:
    Hillary is the worst candidate ever! What kind of feminist lets her husband receive oral sex from an oversized woman and then stays with him?

    How can women, especially women with a feminist idelogue vote for Hillary.....THEY CANT.

    Vote republican

    so it shoulda been ok with hillary if the woman had been skinnier?
  • soulsinging
    soulsinging Posts: 13,202
    EvilToasterElf wrote:
    Can anyone tell me what Obama's actually done?

    he's the first democratic candidate with any charisma since clinton ;)
  • flywallyfly
    flywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    EvilToasterElf wrote:
    Can anyone tell me what Obama's actually done?

    Nothing, just like Georgie boy did as governor in this state.
  • Tom K
    Tom K Posts: 842
    A woman and a minority on the ticket in 08... for some reason I don't think it would work... I wish it could but it can't...
    I'm gone ..Long gone..This time I'm letting go of it all...So long...Cause this time I'm gone
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    Tom K wrote:
    A woman and a minority on the ticket in 08... for some reason I don't think it would work... I wish it could but it can't...

    The right woman and minority ticket should be able to garner a significant vote. I'd like to hope that most free thinkers care more about issues/agenda than gender/skin color. But Hillary isn't part of that ticket. She would get almost no Rep vote, and only a portion of the Dem vote. Many Democrats, as Hippimom pointed out, have an issue with her hawkish voting record, and Republicans uniformily label her "ultra-liberal."
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • YieldInHiding
    YieldInHiding Posts: 1,841
    flywallyfly wrote:
    Nothing, just like Georgie boy did as governor in this state.

    ZING!
    No longer overwhelmed it seems so simple now.
  • Jeanwah
    Jeanwah Posts: 6,363
    I should point out here that Hillary is continuing her Senate seat here in NY, and has won by a landslide. But that doesn't really matter to her haters out there, you know the ones...those who have no idea of all the things she's accomplishing here in NY.
  • Staceb10
    Staceb10 Posts: 675
    So the Dems are going to put a minority with little experience with the name BARACK OBAMA up for President? lmao... why even bother with an election.

    Does anyone really think our country is going to elect him at this stage? He's been a Senator for what... not even 2 years? 4 by election time?
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,886
    Staceb10 wrote:
    So the Dems are going to put a minority with little experience with the name BARACK OBAMA up for President? lmao... why even bother with an election.

    Does anyone really think our country is going to elect him at this stage? He's been a Senator for what... not even 2 years? 4 by election time?


    hey Stacey!!

    I agree...it's not his time. But....it is the right political climate for a Dem to win the presidency, so maybe he can overcome his shortcomings. I don;t think he could, but I would not betmy house on it.
    hippiemom = goodness

Categories