Is it true that in the US it is illegal...

13»

Comments

  • fanch75
    fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    brain_of_jas wrote:
    ...to dissagree/question the 9/11 comission's report ??

    Not trying to start any beef here. Just wondering!

    lmao

    no

    who told you this?
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • fanch75
    fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    brain_of_jas wrote:
    Yeah totally man. Also i read through the articles on both laws and neither one says that the public can't dissagree with the governments version of events. So you still have the first amendment and can question the commissions report yes? I think he's wasting my time! :rolleyes:

    Look at the protests here. Your friend is just really, really misinformed. To put it lightly.

    I was listening to talk radio and this guy said he wanted to kill Bush (live, on air, on a nationally syndicated program). So yeah, I think you can say you don't agree with the 9/11 report and be ok.
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • melodious
    melodious Posts: 1,719
    brain_of_jas wrote:
    ...to dissagree/question the 9/11 comission's report ??

    Not trying to start any beef here. Just wondering!
    it's a bit late in this thread, but only 10 years ago when a man and woman or two men or two women engaged in a domestic altercasion it was referred to as assault and battery? now if someone scorns another publicly; it's considered terrorist threats.
    all insanity:
    a derivitive of nature.
    nature is god
    god is love
    love is light
  • El_Kabong
    El_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    but there are some things you are not allowed to talk about here

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibel_Edmonds

    ;)
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • melodious
    melodious Posts: 1,719
    farfromglorified wrote:
    So your friend is surprised that the US modified its laws after 9/11??

    Perhaps you might want to teach your mate about AMBER Alerts. Following the kidnapping of Amber Hagerman here in 1996, the United States created a new system of laws and procedures to help notify the public of missing children. Perhaps your friend also believes Amber Hagerman was kidnapped by Bill Clinton???

    Please. If no changes to law would have been made following 9/11, that would have been cause for suspicion. You're talking about the most serious aggressive act on US soil since Pearl Harbor, after which you had people being detained based on race alone. While I'm no supporter of the Patriot Act, the suggestion that 9/11 was staged such that the Patriot Act could be passed is completely baseless and ridiculous.
    how so?
    all insanity:
    a derivitive of nature.
    nature is god
    god is love
    love is light
  • melodious
    melodious Posts: 1,719
    brain_of_jas wrote:
    Yeah totally man. Also i read through the articles on both laws and neither one says that the public can't dissagree with the governments version of events. So you still have the first amendment and can question the commissions report yes? I think he's wasting my time! :rolleyes:
    we can question all day long and night, but why then, are people that are my friends paranoid about speaking out? becasue some young team oriented do gooder wants to use speech as a means to send someone away. why are activists who try to pave a way to civil justice always arrested and locked away...

    leanord pelter
    mumia
    king jr
    bob marley??????

    happy b-day j, you are now 19.
    all insanity:
    a derivitive of nature.
    nature is god
    god is love
    love is light

Categories