so now that al qaeda has vowed to get revenge for killing al-zarqawi...
simpson,ay?
Posts: 45
don't you think we should have just captured him, instead of bombing the shit out of him?? i mean we knew exactly where he was obviously, and he was meeting with his spiritual advisor...which i assume was probably not really dangerous. am i overlooking something here?? i think this is a cycle of violence that's not going to be stopped by killing one guy, and if anything, it will contribute to more violence.
your thoughts...
your thoughts...
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
That is why they killed him so they can perpetuate the so called war and keep our troops over there and money going to their corporate buddies.
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
these events mean nothing.. all they want is attention - and of course respond by misrepresenting them, ignoring them and killing them..
so the ball just picks up more and more steam.. we either like it that way or are very stupid or both.
Someone on this board mentioned halliburtion...that's a drink!
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
taking a drink wont make the problems over there go away you dumbfuck. Bottoms up asswad.
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
the offical word I heard, from the US military so I doubt it will be believed here, was that they had a HVT (high value target) and they decided to take him out. Those that drop the bombs had no clue who it was. If they had tried to capture him and he slipped away or killed US soldiers, then someone's mother would have lost their son. I figure kill him, and it isn't like it wasn't justified.
Agreed. He was the type of person with whom no risks should have been taken. We've seen in the past how certain people have escaped capture, so it was best to take the strongest action. And like he said, the actual bombers had no idea who was inside.
but...how many mothers will lose sons in the retaliation for his violent death?
You act as if al queda's plan before killing Zarquawi was to defeat us with arm wrestling.
-Dick Cheney
"Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
-Joe Strummer 1952-2002
"All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
-George Orwell
When you have a chance to kill someone who has directly caused the murder of your troops and innocent civilians ( Yes , I'm talking about Iraqi's here too)
you don't risk letting him slip away. You aim, you set, and you kill.
Untill their will grows tired
How many would have died had he been able to keep on keepin on?
And so the dance begins.
www.myspace.com/jensvad
It really is that simple. Better to cycle than get run over by a bus, when the driver wants to run you over anyway.
You can't persecute a war and win, if you are afraid to take casualties. To win, you must persue the best strategy possible and let the chips fall where they may.
Sure, people will die out of revenge. But as long as we made the right decision, I'm fine with it. And I think we did take the appropriate action.
Kenny Olav for President 2008
Of which we're caught in the middle.
A couple of lucky ones
Tangled up in too much love
~cowboy junkies