Proud to be Canadian

small town becksmall town beck Posts: 6,691
edited April 2007 in A Moving Train
I admit I stole this from a friend's posting somewhere else and I thought it was a good read and although a pacifist, it still makes me damn proud to be a Canuck :D I thought I would share it here.


A British news paper salutes Canada . . . this is a good read. It is funny how it took someone in England to put it into words...
Sunday Telegraph Article From today's UK wires: Salute to a brave and modest nation - Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph LONDON -

Until the deaths of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan , probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops are deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will bury its dead, just as the rest of the world, as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.

It seems that Canada 's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored.

Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped
Glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States , and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved. Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy.

Almost 10% of Canada 's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, it's unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British."

The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth-largest air force in the world.

The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British.

It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of it's sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular on-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia , in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac , Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This past year more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    haa haa .... William Shitner is Canadian :D
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    part of the reason is that as a nation - we have not chosen to walk our own path ... we have been following the footsteps of big brother far too long ... when we try and venture down a different road ... we let them bring us back on theirs ...
  • dunkman wrote:
    haa haa .... William Shitner is Canadian :D


    Ok so he isn't the best example of a Canadian, we are proud of :o but we have lots more :D
  • hmmmm, no comments...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Just a little addition to the article, they've shown in the news early this morning, image of the Military police running checkpoint for every civilians driving in the area of this devilish symbol of the brits invasion, the Citadel. Everyone driving or walking by in the area were question by the military police for "security purpose". Makes me sick. Or is it the weather that puts me in that mood? Let's say both. Canada is going in a direction i seriously dislike. Way we are voting, way we are acting, way we are sucking up. I hate it.

    NATO allies in Quebec City to discuss Afghanistan
    Last Updated: Thursday, April 12, 2007 | 9:07 AM ET
    CBC News

    Officials from countries with troops in southern Afghanistan are set to meet in Quebec City on Thursday to talk about ways to improve the mission.

    Canadian Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor is expected to host the meeting, which will include military officials and defence ministers from countries that have contributed troops to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force regional command south.

    ISAF is a coalition of 36,000 troops from 37 countries, working to improve security in Afghanistan so that reconstruction can occur. Canada has more than 2,000 soldiers deployed in Kandahar province as part of the force.

    The countries at the meeting, in addition to Canada, are Australia, Denmark, Estonia, the Netherlands, Romania, the United Kingdom and the United States.

    The meeting is set to take place behind closed doors at the Citadelle, one of Quebec City's largest tourist attractions. Security is tight at the site and officials are releasing very little information.

    "The participants at the working meeting will share best practices and explore ways to enhance working relationships among Regional Command South countries under the guidance of ISAF," O'Connor said in a news release.

    U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates is expected to use the meeting to ask his counterparts to send more soldiers and equipment to Afghanistan.

    Gates has said he hopes to find ways to improve reconstruction efforts and help the Afghans become better able to deliver needed services to their people.

    In Afghanistan, ISAF has five regional commands: north, south, east, west and Kabul.

    NATO has made repeated calls for additional troops from its members but some, including France and Germany, have expressed reluctance and questioned the plan to send more troops to Afghanistan.

    http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/04/12/isaf-meeting.html
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Two BirdsTwo Birds Posts: 256
    Thanks for posting!

    Peace,
    Peace,
    ________________________
    Too many shows but never enough!
    These guys are the fruit of the earth...
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    Just a little addition to the article, they've shown in the news early this morning, image of the Military police running checkpoint for every civilians driving in the area of this devilish symbol of the brits invasion, the Citadel. Everyone driving or walking by in the area were question by the military police for "security purpose". Makes me sick. Or is it the weather that puts me in that mood? Let's say both. Canada is going in a direction i seriously dislike. Way we are voting, way we are acting, way we are sucking up. I hate it.
    Given some of the riots during the WTO (I think, maybe it was G8) meetings in Quebec City a couple years ago I'm not surprised. If Seattle had this type of event they'd have to have the same type security or even tighter. Eddie just as easily could have written Insignificance after the Quebec City meetings as after the Seattle WTO meetings.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • surferdude wrote:
    Given some of the riots during the WTO (I think, maybe it was G8) meetings in Quebec City a couple years ago I'm not surprised. If Seattle had this type of event they'd have to have the same type security or even tighter. Eddie just as easily could have written Insignificance after the Quebec City meetings as after the Seattle WTO meetings.

    I think (not sure) Bad Religion made a song after the QC events, i know they've made a video with those unreal images that this summit gave us, the fence, the gas, anyway i agree that Pearl Jam could have written Insignificance after the QC meetings.

    But still, and i'm not saying it is surprising, but this time around they're running checkpoint for people living in the area, working in the area or i guess just visiting the area, just because some diplomat are set to discuss about a war that is thousand miles away from here. This is what made me jump this moring when i was having my coffee preparing to go to work. And the news station just talking about it like if it's normal, casual activities.

    And while i'm started (hehe), those Quebec Election sure left a huge bad taste in my mouth, i don't recognize the Canada and Quebec i know, and i'm one of the 3% peoples who did vote for the only left wing party in these last election in Quebec, sure Canada is changing.
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    I think (not sure) Bad Religion made a song after the QC events, i know they've made a video with those unreal images that this summit gave us, the fence, the gas, anyway i agree that Pearl Jam could have written Insignificance after the QC meetings.

    But still, and i'm not saying it is surprising, but this time around they're running checkpoint for people living in the area, working in the area or i guess just visiting the area, just because some diplomat are set to discuss about a war that is thousand miles away from here. This is what made me jump this moring when i was having my coffee preparing to go to work. And the news station just talking about it like if it's normal, casual activities.

    And while i'm started (hehe), those Quebec Election sure left a huge bad taste in my mouth, i don't recognize the Canada and Quebec i know, and i'm one of the 3% peoples who did vote for the only left wing party in these last election in Quebec, sure Canada is changing.
    Quebec elections shocked me. It looks like Quebec is starting to move slowly from their more progressive social stances. Too bad, they're one of the things that made Quebec so special.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • taratara Posts: 293
    surferdude wrote:
    Given some of the riots during the WTO (I think, maybe it was G8) meetings in Quebec City a couple years ago I'm not surprised. If Seattle had this type of event they'd have to have the same type security or even tighter. Eddie just as easily could have written Insignificance after the Quebec City meetings as after the Seattle WTO meetings.

    i don't believe that there were riots in quebec city. many of my freinds and their families went to quebec city to protest the ftaa meetings, and i've seen footage of the protests, they were largely peaceful, where thousands of peopld were just sitting around and hanging out, a few people got angry (some of these weren't even protesters but idiots using the situation to cause trouble), causing the police to use tear gas, water canons, and rubber bullets, many times hitting peaceful protesters.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_City_Summit_of_the_Americas
    No problem can be solved from the same consciousness that created it.
    Albert Einstein
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    And while i'm started (hehe), those Quebec Election sure left a huge bad taste in my mouth, i don't recognize the Canada and Quebec i know, and i'm one of the 3% peoples who did vote for the only left wing party in these last election in Quebec, sure Canada is changing.

    yeah ... WTF?? ... wanted to ask you about that?? ... how could the BQ be so different from the provincial parties ... it went about as good as possible ... that goof Charest was voted in as the best of the worst ...
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    tara wrote:
    i don't believe that there were riots in quebec city. many of my freinds and their families went to quebec city to protest the ftaa meetings, and i've seen footage of the protests, they were largely peaceful, where thousands of peopld were just sitting around and hanging out, a few people got angry (some of these weren't even protesters but idiots using the situation to cause trouble), causing the police to use tear gas, water canons, and rubber bullets, many times hitting peaceful protesters.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_City_Summit_of_the_Americas

    yeah ... hooligans and media focusing on that stuff has given these protests an unfair image ...
  • surferdude wrote:
    Quebec elections shocked me. It looks like Quebec is starting to move slowly from their more progressive social stances. Too bad, they're one of the things that made Quebec so special.

    Agree, and Canadians should be aware of that "new" thing that is the ADQ, i know most medias around the country were happy to declare "separatism is dead" (of course it's not, i'm the living proof :) ), but what they should be aware of, is that the ADQ of Mario "W" Dumont are even more nationalist in a way. Action Démocratique du Québec (ADQ) want a french patriotic province (quebec constitution, quebec nationality, quebec passport !!!!) and hope that Canada will agree with this, in my mind their nationalist right wing views are even more dangerous for Canada than the separatist, they're exclusive and want to "define" what Quebecers are, write it down, and make everyone who live here, live according to "Quebec values". It looks a lot like the USA melting pot in my opinion, and i haven't even start to talk about Harper and Charest, who are the current leaders.

    Damn even the old separatist party are now disconnected, what exactly is the goal of having an independant Quebec if it's just to make it like Canada, but in french? I don't want that, if it's how they want it, then i'd rather stay in Canada, the separatist i am is for the establishment of a progressive french state in North America, which is not what the Bloc Q. AND Parti Quebecois are preaching for.

    So the options left to me, are the NDP, who should have more quality faces in Quebec next federal election, and Quebec solidaire on the provincial level. Too bad both are not very popular for the moment, they have a lot of work to do and a lot of people's hope on their shoulders.

    70% or so went to vote in the last election, which is the lowest since the 70's, so it proves how many in Quebec are starting to be disconnected with politics. In comparison, the 1995 referendum saw a record participation level of around 94% ! Next federal elections will be interesting to follow.
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Agree, and Canadians should be aware of that "new" thing that is the ADQ, i know most medias around the country were happy to declare "separatism is dead" (of course it's not, i'm the living proof :) ), but what they should be aware of, is that the ADQ of Mario "W" Dumont are even more nationalist in a way. Action Démocratique du Québec (ADQ) want a french patriotic province (quebec constitution, quebec nationality, quebec passport !!!!) and hope that Canada will agree with this, in my mind their nationalist right wing views are even more dangerous for Canada than the separatist, they're exclusive and want to "define" what Quebecers are, write it down, and make everyone who live here, live according to "Quebec values". It looks a lot like the USA melting pot in my opinion, and i haven't even start to talk about Harper and Charest, who are the current leaders.

    Damn even the old separatist party are now disconnected, what exactly is the goal of having an independant Quebec if it's just to make it like Canada, but in french? I don't want that, if it's how they want it, then i'd rather stay in Canada, the separatist i am is for the establishment of a progressive french state in North America, which is not what the Bloc Q. AND Parti Quebecois are preaching for.

    So the options left to me, are the NDP, who should have more quality faces in Quebec next federal election, and Quebec solidaire on the provincial level. Too bad both are not very popular for the moment, they have a lot of work to do and a lot of people's hope on their shoulders.

    70% or so went to vote in the last election, which is the lowest since the 70's, so it proves how many in Quebec are starting to be disconnected with politics. In comparison, the 1995 referendum saw a record participation level of around 94% ! Next federal elections will be interesting to follow.

    le parti vert? ... ha! ... my french sucks ... but i can get by in tadoussac ...
  • polaris wrote:
    le parti vert? ... ha! ... my french sucks ... but i can get by in tadoussac ...

    Well, i'll never vote for them, they should join the left wing party in Canada and in Quebec, and make their views expand in these coalition, i can't see how it would be good to have a government having environment first, people second. Of course it would be better than the current corporation first, people second, environment last situation, but i don't like them much. I'd like to see a guy like Stephen Guilbault (greenpeace) join one political party and makes his environment thoughts advance in the political sphere.

    Tadoussac is great, imagine what those first settlers thought when they first arrived there and saw those hills dropping in the water... it's beautiful. Have you seen any whales?
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    cool. i still don't like the policy of mistreating animals and eating the majestic horse.
  • cool. i still don't like the policy of mistreating animals and eating the majestic horse.

    i have no problem with people choosing to eat horse, or to hunt seals, in the world stage they're irrelevant anyway...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Well, i'll never vote for them, they should join the left wing party in Canada and in Quebec, and make their views expand in these coalition, i can't see how it would be good to have a government having environment first, people second. Of course it would be better than the current corporation first, people second, environment last situation, but i don't like them much. I'd like to see a guy like Stephen Guilbault (greenpeace) join one political party and makes his environment thoughts advance in the political sphere.

    Tadoussac is great, imagine what those first settlers thought when they first arrived there and saw those hills dropping in the water... it's beautiful. Have you seen any whales?

    prioritizing doesn't work for anyone ... it's about integrating the relevant issues ... putting environment first as u say is essentially putting people first ... they are one in the same ...

    yeah ... i've been out there 3 times ... kayaking out there ... been as close as i want to whales ...
  • onelongsongonelongsong Posts: 3,517
    i have no problem with people choosing to eat horse, or to hunt seals, in the world stage they're irrelevant anyway...

    i know it's a personal choice and i respect that. but google PMU MARES and see what your government allows. no animal should be treated like that. in the us; you'd go to jail for such treatment.
  • polaris wrote:
    prioritizing doesn't work for anyone ... it's about integrating the relevant issues ... putting environment first as u say is essentially putting people first ... they are one in the same ...

    yeah ... i've been out there 3 times ... kayaking out there ... been as close as i want to whales ...

    well i still won't vote for them, only the environment part makes them relevant, which is probably more what i was trying to say, so instead of voting for a party focusing on environment, i'll first vote for a party like Quebec Solidaire or NDP focusing on social democracy, a good government not bending up on corporate Canada or corporate Quebec would be a HUGE win for the environment, in my opinion it's the way to go.
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • i know it's a personal choice and i respect that. but google PMU MARES and see what your government allows. no animal should be treated like that. in the us; you'd go to jail for such treatment.

    I don't think the USA have any moral authority over animal treatment, sorry. Although, i agree, no animal should be treated like that. They're being treated like a product, which is definitly not right but not an isolate case to horse. BTW i don't want you to think i've ever ate horse.
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • btw onelongsong, thanks for the PMU google search suggestion, i don't know if that's what you had in mind, but i find this really interesting, something i didn't know:

    The Facts About Premarin®

    1. What is Premarin®?
    As the name implies, Premarin® is a conjugated estrogen product extracted from pregnant mares' urine (PMU). It is manufactured by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., and is most commonly prescribed for estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) to relieve hormonal deficiency symptoms associated with menopause or hysterectomy. More recently, it has been prescribed to help prevent osteoporosis and heart disease. Premarin® is the most widely used ERT drug, marketed for more than 50 years, and currently administered to more than nine million American women...(continue)...
    http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/equine_protection/the_facts_about_premarin.html

    edit: point 10 is interesting to me:
    10. What are the prospects for addressing these cruelties through new laws or government regulations?

    Not very good. Years ago, PMU farming was primarily situated in the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. When animal-protection groups opposed the mistreatment of horses and PMU farms faced the certainty of regulatory reform, the entire industry simply moved its operations to the more accommodating provinces of western Canada. Given this history, if stringent regulations were enacted, PMU farms would likely relocate to other areas or to developing countries where there may be even less ability to influence the care the horses receive. PMU farming occurs in only two states in the U.S., so there is unlikely to be sufficient support for federal legislation.
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • but it's all part of the industry first capitalist system we live in,

    It's normal to give a fine to an individuals who throw litter in the street, but no fine to company polluting massively air and water.

    It's normal for individuals crossing our borders to pay taxes if they import some souvenirs, but not for company who trade billions of dollars in products.

    It's normal for individuals to have fine or jail time when they mistreat their dogs, but no fine for mega company mistreating thousands of animals (pigs, cows, horses!)

    Anyway... i could go on...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    I've always said that if I couldn't live in Australia, I'd head for New Zealand first and Canada a close second. :)

    Canada is an amazing country and it sounds very much like you guys have suffered the same kind of bridesmaid bullshit that Australia has, only Australia is considered, (IF Australia's contribution is considered at all) more like the flower girl or the usher!

    Go Canada!! :D
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • Jeanie wrote:
    I've always said that if I couldn't live in Australia, I'd head for New Zealand first and Canada a close second. :)

    Canada is an amazing country and it sounds very much like you guys have suffered the same kind of bridesmaid bullshit that Australia has, only Australia is considered, (IF Australia's contribution is considered at all) more like the flower girl or the usher!

    Go Canada!! :D

    Funny I always thought if I had to leave Canada that I would go to Australia :D We do seem like kindred spirits. Always the bridesmaid, never the bride :rollleyes:
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    Funny I always thought if I had to leave Canada that I would go to Australia :D We do seem like kindred spirits. Always the bridesmaid, never the bride :rollleyes:

    :D Great minds girlie!
    Well I'm sure either or would be a highly satisfactory arrangement for both of us. :)

    so, not that I'm planning on getting married, but I guess if I did, I wasn't planning on bridesmaids either. but should I get married, you are more than invited. :)

    keep your eyes on the main game girl. you'll always be the bride. :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    poor poor canada. :( welcome to the big wide world of imperialism, where the colonised are overlooked, ignored and treated like subservient peons they allow themselves to be. do countries make the decision to contribute troops to a war that may or may not be their own doing to be recognised for their valour? i'm australian and if i cared i'd be feeling your collective pain. :)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Jeanie wrote:
    I've always said that if I couldn't live in Australia, I'd head for New Zealand first and Canada a close second. :)

    Canada is an amazing country and it sounds very much like you guys have suffered the same kind of bridesmaid bullshit that Australia has, only Australia is considered, (IF Australia's contribution is considered at all) more like the flower girl or the usher!

    Go Canada!! :D

    having been to all 3 countries - i'd pick NZ first ... although there are upsides and downsides for all 3 ...
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    polaris wrote:
    having been to all 3 countries - i'd pick NZ first ... although there are upsides and downsides for all 3 ...

    there's a down side to living in australia? :D
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    there's a down side to living in australia? :D

    you have no water
Sign In or Register to comment.