U.K cant find serial killer

miller8966

dunkman1974 wrote:

stop talking shit about things you arent sure of...

"Consultant forensic psychologist Dr Ian Stephen has worked on previous serial killer cases and advised the makers of the TV drama Cracker.

He said although there was little information to build up a clear profile of who may have killed these women, it was possible to hypothesise about what the person may be like.

Police have not said they are looking for a serial killer but have said there are similarities in the murder of Ms Alderton to the killings of Ms Nicol and Ms Adams.


Dr Stephen said the suspect was probably male, white, in his late 20s, 30s or 40s, and is someone who probably had been let down by women in his past.

"We need to look at how these crimes are connected," he said. My worry is that his perception of women will change and he will see any woman who's out on the street at night on their own as a prostitute

Dr Ian Stephen
"The victims are prostitutes, they are in the same area - so he could have a particular issue with women whatever origin that is from."

"He maybe had a mother who has let him down, or a mother who has abandoned him," he added. "In some sense he may have idolised women and then they let him down."

But he also said the killer might believe he is on "some kind of Christian mission... clearing the world of prostitutes".


I also read today that he may be reeking revenge on women after picking up a Sexually Transmitted Disease.. this was from a police criminologist as well!!

LoL. Ahh time for me to own you again. All i was givign was my hypothesis...if you want to think its some christian nut have fun with that...but you will most likely be wrong ( but your used to that arent you?).

tybird

Byrnzie wrote:

I know in Ipswich they have more important things to do, like tractor racing, and turnip munching competitions, but this is taking it too far.

Maybe the killer is some dude who lost a turnip munching contest to a woman???

dunkman

miller8966 wrote:

LoL. Ahh time for me to own you again. All i was givign was my hypothesis...if you want to think its some christian nut have fun with that...but you will most likely be wrong ( but your used to that arent you?).

what the fuck you on about... you never 'owned' me


your hypothesis is a pile of shit.... on one hand we have a seasoned, erudite criminal pyschologist saying it might be an evangelical fuckhead with a grudge against sin... and on the other we have Miller8966 a delivery guy from New Jersey, with intensely bad grammar problems, who thinks it might be a big bad man





awesome hypothesis dude... you should be writing the curriculum for the americas top universities

miller wrote:

Totally, totally, toally, wrong analysis. He isnt some evangelical christian trying to rid society of prostitution.

He does this because either

A) he holds a grudge against women...be it from child hood or from relationship experience.

He preys on them because they are easy targets. No one goes ballistic when a prostitute addicted to crack has gone astray for a few days.[/b]



oh and "your" and "you're" are 2 different things :rolleyes:

miller8966

dunkman1974 wrote:

what the fuck you on about... you never 'owned' me


your hypothesis is a pile of shit.... on one hand we have a seasoned, erudite criminal pyschologist saying it might be an evangelical fuckhead with a grudge against sin... and on the other we have Miller8966 a delivery guy from New Jersey, with intensely bad grammar problems, who thinks it might be a big bad man





awesome hypothesis dude... you should be writing the curriculum for the americas top universities

miller wrote:

Totally, totally, toally, wrong analysis. He isnt some evangelical christian trying to rid society of prostitution.

He does this because either

A) he holds a grudge against women...be it from child hood or from relationship experience.

He preys on them because they are easy targets. No one goes ballistic when a prostitute addicted to crack has gone astray for a few days.[/b]



oh and "your" and "you're" are 2 different things :rolleyes:

Its one criminologists opinion....its not cemented in stone.

At one point during your idiotic ramblings you thought it was a service men. Now you say its a christian....

These people are wrong alot of the time. All they are making is an educated guess. If these people were so smart why couldnt they find the green river killer? Again its only a guess.

And lol@ grammar...its a fucking pearl jam forum. If you get the gist of what im saying that should be enough.

flywallyfly

miller8966 wrote:

Ahnimus wrote:

Sounds like a classic type serial killer.

Killing prostitutes because he feels worthless to society. He feels that by killing prostitutes he is cleaning up other scum, which will give him a name and make him famous. Psychopathy.

quote]

Totally, totally, toally, wrong analysis. He isnt some evangelical christian trying to rid society of prostitution.

He does this because either

A) he holds a grudge against women...be it from child hood or from relationship experience.

He preys on them because they are easy targets. No one goes ballistic when a prostitute addicted to crack has gone astray for a few days.

LMAO !! Watching CSI or Silence of the Lambs has made Miller an expert on serial killers. Get back on your couch and get back to being a cereal killer.

miller8966

flywallyfly wrote:

miller8966 wrote:

LMAO !! Watching CSI or Silence of the Lambs has made Miller an expert on serial killers. Get back on your couch and get back to being a cereal killer.

I have more experience than you do in this field.

Byrnzie

dunkman1974 wrote:

1. a prostitute wont get into a car with a woman
2. its a man


simple huh

She/it may have dragged them into a car?

Byrnzie

tybird wrote:

Maybe the killer is some dude who lost a turnip munching contest to a woman???

Or he may have been cut up in his tractor by a woman in a car on his way to the local barn dance and it pushed him over the edge?

Byrnzie

miller8966 wrote:

dunkman1974 wrote:

what the fuck you on about... you never 'owned' me


your hypothesis is a pile of shit.... on one hand we have a seasoned, erudite criminal pyschologist saying it might be an evangelical fuckhead with a grudge against sin... and on the other we have Miller8966 a delivery guy from New Jersey, with intensely bad grammar problems, who thinks it might be a big bad man





awesome hypothesis dude... you should be writing the curriculum for the americas top universities



Its one criminologists opinion....its not cemented in stone.

At one point during your idiotic ramblings you thought it was a service men. Now you say its a christian....

These people are wrong alot of the time. All they are making is an educated guess. If these people were so smart why couldnt they find the green river killer? Again its only a guess.

And lol@ grammar...its a fucking pearl jam forum. If you get the gist of what im saying that should be enough.

Is it me or did you just attack yourself in this thread Miller?
My head is now spinning with images of Miller criticising himself, dead women, tractors and turnip munching criminal pyschologist's who look like Jesus!! :eek:

miller8966

Byrnzie wrote:

miller8966 wrote:

Is it me or did you just attack yourself in this thread Miller?
My head is now spinning with images of Miller criticising himself, dead women, tractors and turnip munching criminal pyschologist's who look like Jesus!! :eek:

where did i attack myself?

sapperskunk

dunkman1974 wrote:

fucking pathetic attempts at killing if you ask me

http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/shipman.shtml

"Harold Shipman may be the most prolific serial killer in the world.

An audit by the Department of Health estimated he was responsible for 236 murders over 24 years.

But nobody knows exactly what his motive may have been. Shipman was found dead in his cell in January 2004 and has taken his secrets to the grave.

Holy Shit that's a big fuckin number. But it does say estimated, my boy Ridgeway' s confirmed baby.

tybird

Byrnzie wrote:

Or he may have been cut up in his tractor by a woman in a car on his way to the local barn dance and it pushed him over the edge?

Would that the annual Drunken Barn Dance? Or the quarterly Drunken Barn Dance?

Byrnzie

tybird wrote:

Would that the annual Drunken Barn Dance? Or the quarterly Drunken Barn Dance?

The annual naked barn dance where the local village idiot is tarred and feathered at the end of the night and chased through town with a pitchfork.

tybird

Byrnzie wrote:

The annual naked barn dance where the local village idiot is tarred and feathered at the end of the night and chased through town with a pitchfork.

Sounds like fun..........unless you're the village idiot.

Ahnimus

Ridgway was arrested in 1982 and 2001 for charges related to prostitution. He became a suspect in 1983 for the Green River killings, in 1984 took and passed a polygraph test, and on April 7, 1987, police took hair and saliva samples that were later subjected to a DNA analysis, which provided the evidence for his arrest warrant.

The Green River Killer had the same kind of M.O.

Given the technology in the 80's, he passed the polygraph test which is easy for any psychopath to do.

miller8966

Ahnimus wrote:

Ridgway was arrested in 1982 and 2001 for charges related to prostitution. He became a suspect in 1983 for the Green River killings, in 1984 took and passed a polygraph test, and on April 7, 1987, police took hair and saliva samples that were later subjected to a DNA analysis, which provided the evidence for his arrest warrant.

The Green River Killer had the same kind of M.O.

Given the technology in the 80's, he passed the polygraph test which is easy for any psychopath to do.

A polygraph test doesnt mean much anyway.

flywallyfly

miller8966 wrote:

miller8966 wrote:

I have more experience than you do in this field.

Good for you, Matlock !!!!

enharmonic

miller8966 wrote:

A polygraph test doesnt mean much anyway.

It does under two circumstances.

1. It is administered properly
2. It is not administered to a sociopath

Most of the reasons that they have been looked upon with less weight over the last couple of decades is the result of the former. There's too much human error involved in the administration of the test...enough to get it thrown out in court. That doesn't mean that it's not a valuable tool.

miller8966

enharmonic wrote:

It does under two circumstances.

1. It is administered properly
2. It is not administered to a sociopath

Most of the reasons that they have been looked upon with less weight over the last couple of decades is the result of the former. There's too much human error involved in the administration of the test...enough to get it thrown out in court. That doesn't mean that it's not a valuable tool.

It doesnt hold up in court anyway...hence being pretty useless.

I believe a polygraph test just measures breathing and heart rate...but im not too sure.

dunkman

miller8966 wrote:

Its one criminologists opinion....its not cemented in stone.

At one point during your idiotic ramblings you thought it was a service men. Now you say its a christian....

These people are wrong alot of the time. All they are making is an educated guess. If these people were so smart why couldnt they find the green river killer? Again its only a guess.

And lol@ grammar...its a fucking pearl jam forum. If you get the gist of what im saying that should be enough.

he's a criminologist and you're not... enough said!

i never once said it was "a service men" (sic)... as i personally would say "a serviceman" but seeing as your grammar and spelling matches your IQ we'll not go there! But i never said it was a serviceman, i asked you why it couldnt be a serviceman, as that is what you stated.. not me!

And i also never said it was "a christian" I quoted a Doctor who has profiled that it could be a possibility.. not my hypothesis, as i'm not a criminal profiler... at least i admit that...

You are sitting there reading googled web stories about this killer and yet you seem to imagine your hypothesis if the situation is better than a Doctor who specialises in this field, has 30+ years experience and actually fucking lives near Suffolk...

i go with him every time... but you continue with the Prof. Plum in the Billiard Room with the Candlestick hotch-potch theories :rolleyes: