"Security had been stepped up in Beirut in advance of Nasrallah's arrival. Israel had threatened to kill Nasrallah during its offensive, but an attempt to assassinate him now was considered unlikely since it would risk plunging the region back into conflict.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert would not say in comments published Thursday whether Nasrallah remained a target. ``There is no reason for me to notify Nasrallah through the media how we will act. We will not give him advance notice. He is holding a victory march because he has lost,'' Olmert told the Israeli newspaper Maariv. "
I dont understand this at all. and your first sentence is not nessecary.
maybe the jewish people should have been dealt with? why, what were they doing at the time to deserve to be wiped off the planet?
Maybe he just started with the ones he didn't like and then found out it was a slippery slope. Kind of like going after terroists and dropping bombs on civilians. Shit happens and we all have to live with it. Those "stone age" comments bring out the best in me. See if there were nobody to make those comments, as if there were nobody to blow up themselves, the world would be a much better place. Tit for tat, eye for and eye, opinion for an opinion. Great world we live in. Especially when the view isn't like yours.
Maybe he just started with the ones he didn't like and then found out it was a slippery slope.
Yeah, I'm sure he started out with the ones he didn't like. Did the "ones he didn't like" murder innocent German civilians because they weren't Jewish?
Now to watch the crying start. Who is to say that Hitler's plan was all that bad. Since we want to talk big and tough about killing people! Maybe the Jewish people should have been dealt with and the only people who don't think that way are Jews. Then there would be no problem in the middle east. Ah yes we all have our ways to solve these problems and that may have very well be one of the best. You know just like the people you want to kill now. Easy pickings when you keep up the lets kill a certain people. Very easy pickings.
You know, there are many well-educated scholars from all over the world who believe that in the very beginning, Hitler did have a valid and legitimate gripe with the Jewish financial/corporate community.
They state that non-jewish germans were in fact purposely discriminated against, by the Jewish corporations. By refusing to hire or promote non-jewish germans for any jobs in a supervisory or management position. As well they claim non-germans were refused any kind of beneficial financial loans or opportunities, by the Jewish financial institutions. Yet Jewish people often recieved sweetheart deals which would assist them and their families to rise above.
All forms of oppression.
Obviosly Hitler took things way too far and went berzerk. But if there's any truth to these alleged accounts of social and finacial discrimination, onne could almost understand why Hitler started that whole thing.
It's a thorny bush when one advocates the murder or elimination of one group of people, over the other.
Maybe he just started with the ones he didn't like and then found out it was a slippery slope. Kind of like going after terroists and dropping bombs on civilians. Shit happens and we all have to live with it. Those "stone age" comments bring out the best in me. See if there were nobody to make those comments, as if there were nobody to blow up themselves, the world would be a much better place. Tit for tat, eye for and eye, opinion for an opinion. Great world we live in. Especially when the view isn't like yours.
hilter and el queda sympathizer? or you just like to argue
It's only pathetic to you, because you're not taking the time to read deeper into his message and think outside the box.
There's nothing really deep about it. I guess according to you, thinking outside of the box means understanding that Hitler's actions were somewhat justified.
You know, there are many well-educated scholars from all over the world who believe that in the very beginning, Hitler did have a valid and legitimate gripe with the Jewish financial/corporate community.
They state that non-jewish germans were in fact purposely discriminated against, by the Jewish corporations. By refusing to hire or promote non-jewish germans for any jobs in a supervisory or management position. As well they claim non-germans were refused any kind of beneficial financial loans or opportunities, by the Jewish financial institutions. Yet Jewish people often recieved sweetheart deals which would assist them and their families to rise above.
All forms of oppression.
Obviosly Hitler took things way too far and went berzerk. But if there's any truth to these alleged accounts of social and finacial discrimination, onne could almost understand why Hitler started that whole thing.
It's a thorny bush when one advocates the murder or elimination of one group of people, over the other.
I bring up the economy thing and it gets dismissed. You know, you only believe the history you want to. Under cut anybody's economy and welfare and not want to assimilate (gee where have we heard that before?) and sure enough a fire will be lit.
There's nothing really deep about it. I guess according to you, thinking outside of the box means understanding that Hitler's actions were somewhat justified.
I'll repeat myself.
There's a difference between understanding what could have (allegedly) developed his mindset, and advocating or agreeing with it.
I suggest you learn how to identify the distinctions.
There's a difference between understanding what could have (allegedly) developed his mindset, and advocating or agreeing with it.
so some jewish business leaders hired some other jews and its ok just hitler to do what he did? I really dont give a shit what developed hitlers midset. he killed 6 million people.
while I believe, or I hope, you dont advocate what happen in WWII, I still see no need to try to justify hitlers mindset.
What I find funny is that he is claiming victory now, but shortly after the conflict he was saying he never would have kidnapped the 2 soldiers had he known what Israel's response would have been. I think the Lebanese people's and Hezbollah relationship will be interesting to observe from this point. And I think this may have been a bit of saving face with the people.
its sad whats happening today over there. they should be rally to rebuild the country and work for peace instead of trying to pick a fight with israel, and the world.
so some jewish business leaders hired some other jews and its ok just hitler to do what he did? I really dont give a shit what developed hitlers midset. he killed 6 million people.
Maybe if he bombed them back to the stone age you would have understood!
so some jewish business leaders hired some other jews and its ok just hitler to do what he did? I really dont give a shit what developed hitlers midset. he killed 6 million people.
while I believe, or I hope, you dont advocate what happen in WWII, I still see no need to try to justify hitlers mindset.
Again, use your reading comprehension skills. Who said it was okay for Hitler to do what he did? Who's justifying? Show where in any of my posts I said that!
Let me ask you this.
If this account is factual, did the jewish communities and institutions take any steps to cease all discrimination and oppression of non-jewish germans?
Were the Jewish communities and institutions willing to negotiate and change their practices?
Was their accountability and responsibility by the Jewish?
I really dont give a shit what developed hitlers midset. he killed 6 million people.
You don't give a shit? You should!
Any possibility of unfair and discriminatory behavior and practices by the Jews, would certainly have contributed to the dispicable, violence and murder which occured. Thus, an objective Jew would certainly be concerned with any possibilities of their own actions or behaviors which led to it all.
Unless, one believes one's actions are never to be questioned, criticized or scrutinized.
so some jewish business leaders hired some other jews and its ok just hitler to do what he did?
This is a lame and ineffectual attempt to minimize and over-simplify. You know as well as I do, if true, that it's much more significant, profound and destructive to the social and financial structure of society.
Am I to assume you are defending and advocating the discrimination of non-german jews, by Jews?
Why is the possibility that the Jews were in fact practicing discrimination, not a issue you are willing to entertain, discuss or ponder?
Regardless, if Jews were in fact doing these things, it doesn't excuse or justify Hitler's actions. But it can go a long way to understanding where the hatered was rooted and how it escalated. Which could go a long way to preventing such things from occuring in the future, if both sides are willing to be reasonable, rational and honest with themselves.
Comments
News update.
Note:
"Security had been stepped up in Beirut in advance of Nasrallah's arrival. Israel had threatened to kill Nasrallah during its offensive, but an attempt to assassinate him now was considered unlikely since it would risk plunging the region back into conflict.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert would not say in comments published Thursday whether Nasrallah remained a target. ``There is no reason for me to notify Nasrallah through the media how we will act. We will not give him advance notice. He is holding a victory march because he has lost,'' Olmert told the Israeli newspaper Maariv. "
Maybe he just started with the ones he didn't like and then found out it was a slippery slope. Kind of like going after terroists and dropping bombs on civilians. Shit happens and we all have to live with it. Those "stone age" comments bring out the best in me. See if there were nobody to make those comments, as if there were nobody to blow up themselves, the world would be a much better place. Tit for tat, eye for and eye, opinion for an opinion. Great world we live in. Especially when the view isn't like yours.
Yeah, I'm sure he started out with the ones he didn't like. Did the "ones he didn't like" murder innocent German civilians because they weren't Jewish?
You know, there are many well-educated scholars from all over the world who believe that in the very beginning, Hitler did have a valid and legitimate gripe with the Jewish financial/corporate community.
They state that non-jewish germans were in fact purposely discriminated against, by the Jewish corporations. By refusing to hire or promote non-jewish germans for any jobs in a supervisory or management position. As well they claim non-germans were refused any kind of beneficial financial loans or opportunities, by the Jewish financial institutions. Yet Jewish people often recieved sweetheart deals which would assist them and their families to rise above.
All forms of oppression.
Obviosly Hitler took things way too far and went berzerk. But if there's any truth to these alleged accounts of social and finacial discrimination, onne could almost understand why Hitler started that whole thing.
It's a thorny bush when one advocates the murder or elimination of one group of people, over the other.
hilter and el queda sympathizer? or you just like to argue
It's only pathetic to you, because you're not taking the time to read deeper into his message and think outside the box.
nope, I sure dont
There's nothing really deep about it. I guess according to you, thinking outside of the box means understanding that Hitler's actions were somewhat justified.
I bring up the economy thing and it gets dismissed. You know, you only believe the history you want to. Under cut anybody's economy and welfare and not want to assimilate (gee where have we heard that before?) and sure enough a fire will be lit.
I just don't have to read and believe your version of everything. Call it arguing all you want.
There's a difference between understanding what could have (allegedly) developed his mindset, and advocating or agreeing with it.
I'll repeat myself.
There's a difference between understanding what could have (allegedly) developed his mindset, and advocating or agreeing with it.
I suggest you learn how to identify the distinctions.
so some jewish business leaders hired some other jews and its ok just hitler to do what he did? I really dont give a shit what developed hitlers midset. he killed 6 million people.
while I believe, or I hope, you dont advocate what happen in WWII, I still see no need to try to justify hitlers mindset.
What I find funny is that he is claiming victory now, but shortly after the conflict he was saying he never would have kidnapped the 2 soldiers had he known what Israel's response would have been. I think the Lebanese people's and Hezbollah relationship will be interesting to observe from this point. And I think this may have been a bit of saving face with the people.
its sad whats happening today over there. they should be rally to rebuild the country and work for peace instead of trying to pick a fight with israel, and the world.
Maybe if he bombed them back to the stone age you would have understood!
Sorry fins!
what the hell are you talking about now.
forget it, I really dont care
I Only Hope The U.s And Israel Are Close By... Thatd Teach Em.
to be livin here today.
‘Cause the flag still stands for freedom,
and they can’t take that away.
And I’m proud to be an American,
where at least I know I’m free.
And I wont forget the men who died,
who gave that right to me.
Again, use your reading comprehension skills. Who said it was okay for Hitler to do what he did? Who's justifying? Show where in any of my posts I said that!
Let me ask you this.
If this account is factual, did the jewish communities and institutions take any steps to cease all discrimination and oppression of non-jewish germans?
Were the Jewish communities and institutions willing to negotiate and change their practices?
Was their accountability and responsibility by the Jewish?
You don't give a shit? You should!
Any possibility of unfair and discriminatory behavior and practices by the Jews, would certainly have contributed to the dispicable, violence and murder which occured. Thus, an objective Jew would certainly be concerned with any possibilities of their own actions or behaviors which led to it all.
Unless, one believes one's actions are never to be questioned, criticized or scrutinized.
This is a lame and ineffectual attempt to minimize and over-simplify. You know as well as I do, if true, that it's much more significant, profound and destructive to the social and financial structure of society.
Am I to assume you are defending and advocating the discrimination of non-german jews, by Jews?
Why is the possibility that the Jews were in fact practicing discrimination, not a issue you are willing to entertain, discuss or ponder?
Regardless, if Jews were in fact doing these things, it doesn't excuse or justify Hitler's actions. But it can go a long way to understanding where the hatered was rooted and how it escalated. Which could go a long way to preventing such things from occuring in the future, if both sides are willing to be reasonable, rational and honest with themselves.