If steroids make one a obnoxious blowhard jackoff.
I imagine steroids would make someone a blowhard jackoff. It helps them run and stuff, Oh wait, nope, steroids can lead to impotence.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
I think he's on steriods. Has anyone else ever thought that?
I totally agree with that...I think he's taking a lesser dose of whatever Michael Groce is taking. I think you can tell a lot about people by just looking at them, not really their personal appearance per se, but their expressions. O'Riley just looks like he likes to argue. Its kind of like if you see a picture of Rodney Dangerfield. He doesn't have to SAY anything, you just laugh. If you look at O'Riley, you're all of a sudden in a serious, argumentative mode. I think Rodney Dangerfield is the anti-O'Riley.
And you ask me what I want this year
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
I should hope that O'Reilly moped the floor with Letterman. Letterman's job is not about steifling others in political conversations.
Somehow this reminds me of the time (and this was a few years ago) that Donahue went on the O'Reilly show and Donahue "out O'Reillied" O' Reilly. That was awsome. Right on Bill's home floor.
I remember that. Good show, Donahue. As for Olberman, the little jabs he takes in retort to O'Reilly are just about the only thing O'Reilly has going for himself as, as, um, er, a journalist?
Very clear he loathes W and is using metaphores that are a bridge too far and the part about 9-11 is far too harsch, but when I compare this to what I've seen of O'Reilly it at least has some journalistic, factual information, instead of an opinion presented as truth, but again it's over the top. It's clearly from a left point of view. I'm surprised someone is critizing Bush on TV this harsch. Is MSNBC a left broadcaster?
And the fact that O'Reilly (or Fox for that matter) has such high viewing ratings is a sad thing to me. He clearly doesn't have any journalistic qualities.
And the fact that O'Reilly (or Fox for that matter) has such high viewing ratings is a sad thing to me. He clearly doesn't have any journalistic qualities.
They will all be leaving soon. Don't get me wrong, there will be a fight.
Comments
I think he's on steriods. Has anyone else ever thought that?
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
I imagine steroids would make someone a blowhard jackoff. It helps them run and stuff, Oh wait, nope, steroids can lead to impotence.
I've always thought they made you very short tempered.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
I totally agree with that...I think he's taking a lesser dose of whatever Michael Groce is taking. I think you can tell a lot about people by just looking at them, not really their personal appearance per se, but their expressions. O'Riley just looks like he likes to argue. Its kind of like if you see a picture of Rodney Dangerfield. He doesn't have to SAY anything, you just laugh. If you look at O'Riley, you're all of a sudden in a serious, argumentative mode. I think Rodney Dangerfield is the anti-O'Riley.
And I try to make this kind and clear
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
And desire and love and empty things
Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
I remember that. Good show, Donahue. As for Olberman, the little jabs he takes in retort to O'Reilly are just about the only thing O'Reilly has going for himself as, as, um, er, a journalist?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
http://youtube.com/results?search_query=olberman+&search=Search
Very clear he loathes W and is using metaphores that are a bridge too far and the part about 9-11 is far too harsch, but when I compare this to what I've seen of O'Reilly it at least has some journalistic, factual information, instead of an opinion presented as truth, but again it's over the top. It's clearly from a left point of view. I'm surprised someone is critizing Bush on TV this harsch. Is MSNBC a left broadcaster?
And the fact that O'Reilly (or Fox for that matter) has such high viewing ratings is a sad thing to me. He clearly doesn't have any journalistic qualities.
They will all be leaving soon. Don't get me wrong, there will be a fight.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.