Bill O'Reilly

2»

Comments

  • FredFlintstone
    FredFlintstone Posts: 193
    You shouldnt criticize the leader during a time of war.
    By criticizing President O'Reilly, you undermine the troops who are heroically fighting the War on Christmas.
    "Sean Hannity knows there is no greater threat to America today than Bill Clinton 15 years ago"- Stephen Colbert
  • DCGARDEN
    DCGARDEN Posts: 515
    Not really a big fan -

    I find him arrogant as hell and he's kind of a bully on the show

    That being said, Letterman ambushed him pretty bad that night. I thought BO'
    stayed calm because he knew it was Letterman's audience, and did pretty good. I saw him get the best of Michael Moore one time, but also saw Phil Donahue get the best of him.

    He's fake, tries to move more to the center than he really is, and is always
    aware of his own perception out there -

    Could care less about the guy
    I'll keep taking punches
    Untill their will grows tired
  • miller8966
    miller8966 Posts: 1,450
    hes as middle ground as anderson cooper
    America...the greatest Country in the world.
  • i am a donut
    i am a donut Posts: 68
    O'Reilly RULEZ....!

    "And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'" –in his book, "The O'Reilly Factor For Kids," 2004
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200511100008

    "So anyway I'd be rubbing your big boobs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda' kissing your neck from behind...and then I would take the other hand with the falafel thing and I'd just put it on your p***y but you'd have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business..." --as quoted in a sexual harassment suit filed against him by a Fox News producer, 2004
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200511100008

    "If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again, all right?" -on finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, March 18, 2003
    http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-10.htm
    www.myspace.com/sharkie002
  • Teslarocker
    Teslarocker Posts: 123
    I bet the 2006 election wiped the smile from Bill O'Reillys mug
  • Androgynous Mind
    Androgynous Mind Posts: 520
    hailhailkc wrote:
    O'Reilly has continually gone after Bush and aspects of the way the Iraq war was conducted. It just so happens that many people on this board conveniently ignore that fact, and instead choose to label Bill as being NOT fair and balanced because he tends to lean conservative.

    Ironic how you don't hear these same people groaning and moaning about...oh...I don't know...Keith Olberman. You know, the guy who used to give me my football highlights at 6am on ESPN for years and years.

    Oh yeah, he's a Bush basher, and he's on MSNBC. They're SO much MORE involved in reporting real news and less op-ed than FOX...yeah, my bad...:rolleyes:

    The only thing I can glean from this piss and moan session about Bill O'Reilly and FOX is that it's okay to spout op-ed and disguise it as news as long as the opening segment of your program doesn't say that it's "fair and balanced."

    how true it is....
    Oh he fills it up with the love of a girl...
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    hailhailkc wrote:
    The only thing I can glean from this piss and moan session about Bill O'Reilly and FOX is that it's okay to spout op-ed and disguise it as news as long as the opening segment of your program doesn't say that it's "fair and balanced."

    It would be ok if he didn't lie and slander constantly.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • LifeWasted21
    LifeWasted21 Posts: 149
    the difference is i think olberman actually DOES some journalism. WHen he gets down into it and serious about things, he has done his research. I dont care if someone on tv comes from a particular point of view. I dont give a shit about fair and blanced. The difference is when someone like o reilyl or hannity dont agree with someone...they dont even listen to their sdie. They just start speaking louder so whoever else can't get their point across. It comes off as childish.

    ILl give it to oreilly, ive seen/heard him bash the current policy and sometiems speak intelligently but for the most part...what i said above is far more often than the latter.

    Also, the thing about letterman...anyone who thinks "do you want america to win the war" is a black or white issue is far nuts.

    why is it if we dont think the way to win the war is in iraq, or if its a abigger problem we started in iraq, and dont want to say "yea i want to kick terrorists ass" we want america to "lose" (whatever the hell that means)

    in conclusion. o reilly is an idiot.
  • Austicman
    Austicman Posts: 1,328
    i am a donut wrote:
    O'Reilly RULEZ....!

    "And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'" –in his book, "The O'Reilly Factor For Kids," 2004
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200511100008

    "So anyway I'd be rubbing your big boobs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda' kissing your neck from behind...and then I would take the other hand with the falafel thing and I'd just put it on your p***y but you'd have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business..." --as quoted in a sexual harassment suit filed against him by a Fox News producer, 2004
    http://mediamatters.org/items/200511100008

    "If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again, all right?" -on finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, March 18, 2003
    http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-10.htm


    How about that Apology Bill. I find the second part of that statement hilarious. The fact that he trusted Bush in the first place, had to know you were doomed doing something like that.
    I can't go the library anymore, everyone STINKS!!
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    O'Reilly is going to die from an aneurysm. He's too high-strung.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    Ahnimus wrote:
    O'Reilly is going to die from an aneurysm. He's too high-strung.

    I think he's on steriods. Has anyone else ever thought that?
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • norm
    norm Posts: 31,146
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    I think he's on steriods. Has anyone else ever thought that?
    If steroids make one a obnoxious blowhard jackoff.
  • Ahnimus
    Ahnimus Posts: 10,560
    cutback wrote:
    If steroids make one a obnoxious blowhard jackoff.

    I imagine steroids would make someone a blowhard jackoff. It helps them run and stuff, Oh wait, nope, steroids can lead to impotence.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Abookamongstthemany
    Abookamongstthemany Posts: 8,209
    cutback wrote:
    If steroids make one a obnoxious blowhard jackoff.

    I've always thought they made you very short tempered.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Abookamongstthemany wrote:
    I think he's on steriods. Has anyone else ever thought that?

    I totally agree with that...I think he's taking a lesser dose of whatever Michael Groce is taking. I think you can tell a lot about people by just looking at them, not really their personal appearance per se, but their expressions. O'Riley just looks like he likes to argue. Its kind of like if you see a picture of Rodney Dangerfield. He doesn't have to SAY anything, you just laugh. If you look at O'Riley, you're all of a sudden in a serious, argumentative mode. I think Rodney Dangerfield is the anti-O'Riley.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    I should hope that O'Reilly moped the floor with Letterman. Letterman's job is not about steifling others in political conversations.

    Somehow this reminds me of the time (and this was a few years ago) that Donahue went on the O'Reilly show and Donahue "out O'Reillied" O' Reilly. That was awsome. Right on Bill's home floor.

    I remember that. Good show, Donahue. As for Olberman, the little jabs he takes in retort to O'Reilly are just about the only thing O'Reilly has going for himself as, as, um, er, a journalist?
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Obi Once
    Obi Once Posts: 918
    jlew24asu wrote:
    do you see olberman as a narrow minded liberal, far left guy who spouts BS. or a awesome guy who only speaks the truth?
    I threw Olberman in YouTube and watched the 1st 3 links. I never heard of the guy.

    http://youtube.com/results?search_query=olberman+&search=Search

    Very clear he loathes W and is using metaphores that are a bridge too far and the part about 9-11 is far too harsch, but when I compare this to what I've seen of O'Reilly it at least has some journalistic, factual information, instead of an opinion presented as truth, but again it's over the top. It's clearly from a left point of view. I'm surprised someone is critizing Bush on TV this harsch. Is MSNBC a left broadcaster?

    And the fact that O'Reilly (or Fox for that matter) has such high viewing ratings is a sad thing to me. He clearly doesn't have any journalistic qualities.
    your light's reflected now
  • gue_barium
    gue_barium Posts: 5,515
    Obi Once wrote:
    And the fact that O'Reilly (or Fox for that matter) has such high viewing ratings is a sad thing to me. He clearly doesn't have any journalistic qualities.


    They will all be leaving soon. Don't get me wrong, there will be a fight.
    all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
    except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
  • Obi Once
    Obi Once Posts: 918
    gue_barium wrote:
    They will all be leaving soon. Don't get me wrong, there will be a fight.
    You mean the Fox presenters? How's that, because of the elections?
    your light's reflected now

Categories