Are abortion clinic bombers terrorists?

NeilJam
Posts: 1,191
Sarah Palin doesn't seem to think they are:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/23/palin-abortion-clinic-bombers/
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/23/palin-abortion-clinic-bombers/
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
NeilJam wrote:Sarah Palin doesn't seem to think they are:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/23/palin-abortion-clinic-bombers/
Wow. Does anyone have a clip that continues on longer than this one?0 -
scb wrote:Wow. Does anyone have a clip that continues on longer than this one?
I too would like to hear the rest of the answer, but based on what I heard, Palin is wrong. Of course they're terrorists. I'm sure she thinks they're Christian soldiers doing God's work, but she would be wrong."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
Yeah, I'd like to see the rest of the answer too.
It's concerning that anyone can defend people who blow up buildings, harm innocent, and/or kill innocent people.
Even if you are pro-life and running for the vice presidency, are you afraid of losing the homicidal right-wing terrorist vote?
Just say, "yes, terrorism is using fear or 'terror' as means of coercion. That fits the bill."
I don't think there's any arguing about it. Political affiliations shouldn't infect your thinking to the point where words lose all meaning.
But, I would still be interested in hearing the rest of the response. For all I know, she might have said something similar to this.0 -
Of course they are terrorists.hippiemom = goodness0
-
Terrorists and the most moronic people on earth. That's some good pro-life action right there, killing people..."I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"0
-
Jeremy1012 wrote:Terrorists and the most moronic people on earth. That's some good pro-life action right there, killing people...
I could never figure that one out. Pro-lifers killing people. Unreal.I'll ride the wave where it takes me.0 -
NeilJam wrote:Sarah Palin doesn't seem to think they are:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/23/palin-abortion-clinic-bombers/
She said "that behavior is unacceptable" but, "I don't know if you are going to use the word terrorist there".
This is an argument of semantics and a silly one at that.
People who bomb abortion clinics should go to prison forever and I'm pro-life... that said, I agree that I wouldn't know if they'd fit under the term "terrorist".... I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she said.0 -
Stone Is God wrote:I could never figure that one out. Pro-lifers killing people. Unreal.
Certainly sends the wrong message.
I'm sure they think they are saving lives by killing people that kill babies....but sheesh, what a way to cloud the issue and drive people away from your side.hippiemom = goodness0 -
jeffbr wrote:I too would like to hear the rest of the answer, but based on what I heard, Palin is wrong. Of course they're terrorists. I'm sure she thinks they're Christian soldiers doing God's work, but she would be wrong.
I don't know what she could add to this statement that would make it better. How could they not be considered terrorists? Anyone else that bombs a building would be considered to be one.0 -
NeilJam wrote:I don't know what she could add to this statement that would make it better. How could they not be considered terrorists? Anyone else that bombs a building would be considered to be one.
I agree. That's actually why I wanted to hear the rest of the answer. I just can't image how she could answer any way other than "yes" so I don't know what more she possibly could have said."I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
fuck yeah they are totally and it doesn't matter what she says they are ...jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
saveuplife wrote:She said "that behavior is unacceptable" but, "I don't know if you are going to use the word terrorist there".
This is an argument of semantics and a silly one at that.
People who bomb abortion clinics should go to prison forever and I'm pro-life... that said, I agree that I wouldn't know if they'd fit under the term "terrorist".... I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she said.
Even if she's not going easy on abortion clinic bombers, at the very least she seems to not know what a terrorist is.0 -
saveuplife wrote:She said "that behavior is unacceptable" but, "I don't know if you are going to use the word terrorist there".
This is an argument of semantics and a silly one at that.
People who bomb abortion clinics should go to prison forever and I'm pro-life... that said, I agree that I wouldn't know if they'd fit under the term "terrorist".... I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she said.
Yeah, as much as I think that she's an idiot, I have to agree with you about it being semantics.
Is a kid who shoots up a school a terrorist? Is someone who holds up a bank a terrorist? Is someone who robs and attacks a person at an ATM machine a terrorist? I guess by the definition that terrorist is someone who causes terror, just about any violent criminal action could be considered a terrorist attack.
Should she have maybe answered it a little better? Yes, but it's not like she said that she's ok with abortion clinic bombings.My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln0 -
saw that last night ... pretty sad.I don't want to be hostile. I don't want to be dismal. But I don't want to rot in an apathetic existance either.0
-
scb wrote:Even if she's not going easy on abortion clinic bombers, at the very least she seems to not know what a terrorist is.
Read blackredyellow's response.... it speaks towards this. I don't know what exactly falls under the term terrorist either.... like he said, is someone who holds up a bank a terrorist?
He answer was fine.0 -
blackredyellow wrote:Yeah, as much as I think that she's an idiot, I have to agree with you about it being semantics.
Is a kid who shoots up a school a terrorist? Is someone who holds up a bank a terrorist? Is someone who robs and attacks a person at an ATM machine a terrorist? I guess by the definition that terrorist is someone who causes terror, just about any violent criminal action could be considered a terrorist attack.
Should she have maybe answered it a little better? Yes, but it's not like she said that she's ok with abortion clinic bombings.
I don't think isolated events count as terrorism. Terrorism is more systematically used to change the behavior of a group. (Obviously that's not an exact definition.)
Those who bomb abortion clinics do so with the intention of stopping not just one abortion provider, but also with the intention of scaring others into not providing abortions for fear that they might get bombed too.0 -
saveuplife wrote:Read blackredyellow's response.... it speaks towards this. I don't know what exactly falls under the term terrorist either.... like he said, is someone who holds up a bank a terrorist?
He answer was fine.
That's exactly why laws like the Patriot Act are scary. 'Terrorist' and 'terrorism' are incredibly broad and general terms. Since 9/11, the actual meanings behind those words and to whom they apply are unncessarily changing to include more and more people.
This why this legislation needs to be repealed.0 -
saveuplife wrote:She said "that behavior is unacceptable" but, "I don't know if you are going to use the word terrorist there".
This is an argument of semantics and a silly one at that.
People who bomb abortion clinics should go to prison forever and I'm pro-life... that said, I agree that I wouldn't know if they'd fit under the term "terrorist".... I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she said."I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"0 -
saveuplife wrote:She said "that behavior is unacceptable" but, "I don't know if you are going to use the word terrorist there".
This is an argument of semantics and a silly one at that.
People who bomb abortion clinics should go to prison forever and I'm pro-life... that said, I agree that I wouldn't know if they'd fit under the term "terrorist".... I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she said.
Terrorism: "The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims."
Terrorist: "A person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims."
I understand it's about the definition of what is, is, but this is scary.
It's more than semantics. Either she's ignorant of the definition of a terrorist or she's making an exception for terrorists who share her views. Take your pick."Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley0 -
the full clip...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw5SA7Hks9s&feature=related
by the way, I love the sigh....:)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help