New Documentary Disproves Official 9/11 Hoax Once and For All

DriftingByTheStorm

my2hands wrote:

so you believe the 1963 Kremlin, but you dont believe anything your government ever says?

dude, you are really grasping... you take any alternative version as fact as long as it paints the american govt as an evil all knowing and all seeing entitity hell bent on world destruction :rolleyes:


"RUSSIA SAID IT WAS SO!!!!!" hahahahahahaha

Are you fucking shitting me?
I don't have to believe the kremlin.
It was pointed out as ironic commentary pertaining to the OTHER thread regarding Russia.

I don't have to believe the fucking kremlin,
because there are CREDIBLE characters who have come forward to spill the beans.

The most notable would be E. Howard Hunt, who has LONG been accused of being a participant.

The goddamn Federal Government ITSELF, at the conclusion of the House Select Committee on Assasinations SAID SO in 1979:

HSCA wrote:

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy

They hauled Antonio Veciana in to testify that he believed "Maurice Bishop" was indeed CIA Western Hemisphere Operations Chief, David Atlee Phillips. url=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5262646400103196900&ei=YmHFSPP3FJTEqQLLtq25BQ&q=o%27reilly+jfk&vt=lf&hl=en]Bill Oreilly reported on it![/url ... and 3 days later the guy ends up with a bullet in his head (but miraculously survives and WON'T talk about it again)!

The HSCA thought the CIA was lying then about its claims that they had no one on staff with the alias "Bishop". They thought Bishop was Phillips. They wanted to prosecute the CIA for purgery, but were not allowed to pursue this aim.

E. Howard Hunt implicates Phillips directly as the man near the top (of his own personal sphere of knowledge, clearly) ...

James Files (who claims to BE the gunman on the knoll) implicates Phillips directly.

Self-Proclaimed (and vouched for by Anna Lewis) mistress of Oswald, Judyth Vary Baker claims Oswald thought his controller was David Atlee Phillips,

and Chauncey Holt, who is proclaimed (and photo ID'd) as one of the "Three Tramps" claims HIS controller was also David Atlee Phillips, and that he did all the badge and counterfit ID work for the job.

Oswald claimed he was "just a patsy"
and Ruby said it was "men in high places. VERY high places."

REALLY FUCKING GRASPING HUH?

Give me a fucking break.

locked

my favorite theory was the one where the conspiracy folks claimed all the passengers who called from their cell phones in the hijacked planes were "voice-overs"... and not the passengers..

That did it for me.. you lost me..

and I am one of those people who believe in:
Roswell
Bigfoot
JFK assasination was a conspiracy..

so don't paint me as trusting everything my gov't tells me..

but keep asking yourself this one question..

if the goal was for the government to get us into war, invasion the oil fields, etc..
was THIS PLAN (the 9/11 attacks) the most efficient hoax attack to unleash?

I mean, christ, the CIA just could have sank a battleship off the coast of saudia arabia to just blamed Al Queda.. yes?

ledvedderman

locked wrote:

my favorite theory was the one where the conspiracy folks claimed all the passengers who called from their cell phones in the hijacked planes were "voice-overs"... and not the passengers..

That did it for me.. you lost me..

and I am one of those people who believe in:
Roswell
Bigfoot
JFK assasination was a conspiracy..

so don't paint me as trusting everything my gov't tells me..

but keep asking yourself this one question..

if the goal was for the government to get us into war, invasion the oil fields, etc..
was THIS PLAN (the 9/11 attacks) the most efficient hoax attack to unleash?

I mean, christ, the CIA just could have sank a battleship off the coast of saudia arabia to just blamed Al Queda.. yes?

I'm with you on Roswell, Bigfoot, and JFK. I think I can answer for Drifting (not because I agree, but because it is predictable) that the reason they didn't just sink a battle ship is because it needed to be embedded in the citizens minds and have a true effect on us.

I don't believe that...just saving Drifting a reply

my2hands

i love driftin's threads!!!!

i have to have a beer with you one day bro, you are one crazy ass mofo!


btw, i notice you are cursing alot today?

LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun

we didnt need any great disaster to invade Iraq in 91. i think they could have just said that those crazy ass Taliban were planning something and that would have been more than enough for most of America.

DriftingByTheStorm

my2hands wrote:

i love driftin's threads!!!!

i have to have a beer with you one day bro, you are one crazy ass mofo!


btw, i notice you are cursing alot today?

Yeah.
i think i'm losing my grip with this board.
May be time to lay off.
Honestly hoping Kat can help me with that.

I already told you i'm ready to buy you a drink.
Just step up next tour.
I'm telling you now, i have just as much fun (probably more) than most on this board.
Boy knows how to party.

azwyldcats

i think i'm losing my grip with this board.
May be time to lay off.

No one is holding a gun to your head. Lay off. There are a million conspiracy sites where everyone can agree with you, it will be Utopia!

my2hands

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Yeah.
i think i'm losing my grip with this board.
May be time to lay off.
Honestly hoping Kat can help me with that.

I already told you i'm ready to buy you a drink.
Just step up next tour.
I'm telling you now, i have just as much fun (probably more) than most on this board.
Boy knows how to party.

no, please stay on the MT

you are friggin hilarious, this place would be boring without you!!!!!