Jesus Christ! THIS is HOW BAD they want him to GO AWAY!

2

Comments

  • Drowned Out
    Drowned Out Posts: 6,056
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    :edit:
    guh hold on here.
    confused


    :D....I'm caught your edits....I think I know what you're seeing...
    I'm pretty sure he's confirmed for the Iowa debate.
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    Drowned Out wrote:
    :D....I'm caught your edits....I think I know what you're seeing...
    I'm pretty sure he's confirmed for the Iowa debate.

    Yeah.
    I'm still confused why that ABC News clip in the title post says he was "left out of the last one" ... i found a clip of Ron Paul being left out of an old straw poll debate, but i can't find any current paul ban.

    I found this radio interview which is a fucking crock to say the least, however it is from june.

    ?
    hmm
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    I DID find THIS

    ABC is unholy.
    I just moved them to the "just as bad as Fox" category. NBC has some pretty honest coverage at times, and CNN really seems to depend on the show (Dobbs and Cafferty are kind, but Anderson 360 and others aren't, Blitzer is hard to call) ... but that "this" link is crap -- pure trash journalism.

    How the fuck can someone say "CONTROLS the money supply in a FREE market" ... what the hell kind of self-contradictory bullshit is that?

    And the perversions of logic and disparity of words just gets worse from page 1 on.

    :(

    BOO!

    Worst part: "Bernanke answered saying, in the parlance of an average economist, he's just doing what Congress created the Fed to do. "

    Uh. Way to go dick face. The Federal Reserve was a SCHEME dreamed up by The Real Daddy Warbucks himself, and duped over on the american people while congress was home on christmas break -- except for the congressman father-in-law of JD Rockefeller (Senator Aldrich) -- who had three years earlier provided his very own railcar to whisk himself and members of JP Morgans, JD Rockefellers and the Rothschilds clan away to a private island of the coast of Georgia (appropriately named Jekyll Island -- Owned by JP Morgan)to hatch this very scheme ...

    Yes thats right, Ron Paul is the idiot who is just yelling at the Fed Chairman for "doing what congress created the Fed to do"... ?

    NEWS FLASH:
    Paul Warburg, Morgan, Rockefeler and his father-in-law Senator FUCKED the American worker in the ass. They swindled the few non-christmas-celebrating members of congress to vote for the bill -- with a bit of persuasion thrown in by AP Andrews, the assistant secretary of treasury who was also 1 of the 7 men on that little duckhunt conspiracy vacation to Jekyll Island.

    The bill was passed on DECEMBER 22nd 1913, and signed by the president on fucking christmas eve!

    UH!?!

    Merry Christmas America
    ???

    Did congress ask the fed to do anything?
    Fuck no.

    In fact, the congressional record of votes on that december day shows 43 yeas to 25 nays with 27 not voting (celebrating christmas) ... NO democrat voted against the bill, and the democrats had just elected Wilson to PROTECT them from "THE MONEY TRUST" (Morgan, Rockefeller, and the Rothschilds, by name!) ...
    why would they vote for a goddamn bill written expressly and under extreme secrecy by that very same trust?

    THEY WERE SWINDLED! Lied to by dirty politicians connected to the family personaly.

    What a shock.

    AND this douche from ABC is spreading the lie.

    :(
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Digg is doing their best to censor Ron Paul

    http://www.ronpaulnation.com/?p=350
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    Look at some of the articles here.

    How much of that looks like press other candidates are getting?

    How much of it seems like anything more than bashing of a man who doesn't stand for the gluttonous corporate interst?

    When this guy (CBS news writer) says "I wish grown adults who know better" refering to his presumed audience who he hopes he is persuading to see Ron Paul as irrelevant, is he refering to "controlled sheep who take everything with a corporate logo as gospel"?

    There is a dividing line appearing in humanity between those that trust only the mainstream news and are actualy WORRIED for kids who look to the internet for answers and those 'kids' who are actualy looking to other more open sources for their "news".
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • OutOfBreath
    OutOfBreath Posts: 1,804
    "Come down.
    Get off your fuckin cross.
    We need the fuckin space to nail the next fool martyr."

    Peace
    Dan
    "YOU [humans] NEED TO BELIEVE IN THINGS THAT AREN'T TRUE. HOW ELSE CAN THEY BECOME?" - Death

    "Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
  • sweetpotato
    sweetpotato Posts: 1,278
    callen wrote:
    so you won't support a candidate...not because you disagree with his policies but because you don't agree with some of his supporters???

    correct- kinda like how some people can't support a candidate because of his hair. or her breasts- the fact that she HAS them, i mean.
    "Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, Barack Obama."

    "Obama's main opponent in this election on November 4th (was) not John McCain, it (was) ignorance."~Michael Moore

    "i'm feeling kinda righteous right now. with my badass motherfuckin' ukulele!"
    ~ed, 8/7
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    ABC still can't seem to control the minds of its local affiliate channels, though.

    Ths is pretty damn good press, for a change.

    ;)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    sweetpotato wrote:
    correct- kinda like how some people can't support a candidate because of his hair. or her breasts- the fact that she HAS them, i mean.


    i wanna go on record

    I SUPPORT BREASTS!!!!
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • Sludge Factory
    Sludge Factory Posts: 976
    810wmb wrote:
    i wanna go on record

    I SUPPORT BREASTS!!!!


    You are a bra?
  • Jack_C_Gregory
    Jack_C_Gregory Posts: 540
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7Da75iKju4
  • 810wmb
    810wmb Posts: 849
    Sludge Factory wrote:
    You are a bra?

    i'm a mouth
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    CNN doing another "fair" job, yay!
    Yah Good Media Good!
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    PBS, WOO HOO!
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    sweetpotato wrote:
    correct- kinda like how some people can't support a candidate because of his hair. or her breasts- the fact that she HAS them, i mean.

    i support any candidate with breasts :p
  • Danny Boy
    Danny Boy Posts: 161
    sweetpotato wrote:
    correct- kinda like how some people can't support a candidate because of his hair. or her breasts- the fact that she HAS them, i mean.

    There will be a few people out there who won't vote for Hillary because she has breasts. I won't vote for her because she's a conniving, manipulative, self-serving asshole.

    It's pretty disgusting that so many media outlets don't cover Ron Paul or treat him with disdain based on his principles which are more in line with the average American than almost all of the other candidates. I did see his interview with Blitzer and didn't get the feeling that he was treated unfairly, perhaps interrupted a few times, but it seemed decent. And Paul should be asked tough questions about some of his stances; by receiving and responding to those questions he'll have the chance to distinguish himself from the other candidates and perhaps even restore a little respect for the Constitution.
    Trading magic for fact, no tradebacks... So this is what it's like to be an adult...
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    This does well to explain it.

    http://www.shoutfile.com/v/a42Hu9Hr/Wake_Up_America
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • hippiemom
    hippiemom Posts: 3,326
    floyd1975 wrote:
    I actually agree with a lot of what Ron Paul says. I also agree with your first line here. The persecution complex of the Ron Paul volunteers and bloggers has played right into the stereotypes that they complain about.

    If you look back a couple of months on here, they had a youtube video showing that Myspace was fully against Congressman Paul. It turned out to be some guy not knowing what he was doing, but somehow it proved a conspiracy against their candidate nonetheless.

    I used to publicly support Congressman Paul. Now I fear being lumped in with the rabid supporters who have done nothing but hurt his public image.
    I've talked to people who say they're behind Ron Paul 100%, but they won't admit it publicly anymore because they're sick of being laughed at and lumped in with his more loony supporters. That's a disaster for Paul. His campaign has survived thus far by word of mouth, but if the sane people stop talking about him, he's going to be perceived as the candidate of the lunatic fringe.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • Yoyoyo
    Yoyoyo Posts: 310
    hippiemom wrote:
    I've talked to people who say they're behind Ron Paul 100%, but they won't admit it publicly anymore because they're sick of being laughed at and lumped in with his more loony supporters. That's a disaster for Paul. His campaign has survived thus far by word of mouth, but if the sane people stop talking about him, he's going to be perceived as the candidate of the lunatic fringe.

    Amen to that. Talking to your own family members and trying to open their minds can be hard enough, and these are the people you trust the most. I am confident though, to let Ron Paul do the speaking and do a good job of representing himself.
    No need to be void, or save up on life

    You got to spend it all
  • kenny olav
    kenny olav Posts: 3,319
    I really like Ron Paul. He is sincere, and everything he said in this clip (and in other instances) was well thought out but not scripted. He handles the media very well and does not let himself be led into their phony arguments. I have been supporting Mike Gravel, but I am now leaning more towards voting for Ron Paul in the Republican primary.

Categories