Wesley Snipes Accquited Of ALL FELONY TAX CHARGES! The People Are Waking Up !??!

MasterFramer

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Like i've said repeatedly, it ain't a fucking cake walk. Thats life.
But there comes a time when you can do whats right, no matter how hard it is, or you can be a fucking pussy and go along with the insidious status quo.

I think given our previous discussions, that we actualy agree on princple more than we disagree ... you just seem to want to ignore your princples and accept "fate", because to act on your princples is a hard fight.

So whats the deal?

Fucking Pussy? Come on man... what are you purposing? Dont file your taxes and hope you dont get fucked by the IRS? I dont have Snipes lawyers to bail me out... and again... he has to still pay the money he "owes".

DriftingByTheStorm

MasterFramer wrote:

Fucking Pussy? Come on man... what are you purposing? Dont file your taxes and hope you dont get fucked by the IRS? I dont have Snipes lawyers to bail me out... and again... he has to still pay the money he "owes".

No man. I'm talking in general.
Of course i don't advocate you not paying your taxes.
If you didn't have the resources to secure excellent legal council you'd be a fool.

And i'm not just talking about you.
I'm talking about the general sentiment echoed up and down on this board and throughout America today.

What set me off here was your, " I would really like you to describe how shit would be paid for if everyone stopped paying taxes, cause according to you, we are not required to".

Because, that is right. WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO.
So if something is not right, shouldn't you adjust your actions?

If it is fundamentaly dishonest to rob us of our wealth at a federal level, shouldn't we knock off the bullshit and figure a way to get back to the constitution?

Like i said, you have to stand up for your principles at some point.

If the Federal Reserve is BAD IN THE LONG RUN, people have to suck it up ... let the "massive correction" set in, and get back on with life on the up and up.

But lets not wait for it to all crash in to the ground, so that they can sell us out the chinese on the cheap. Then we can all get sterilized, and have only boy children, and they can sell our organs to the highest bidder, and force abortions etc.

MasterFramer

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

If the Federal Reserve is BAD IN THE LONG RUN, people have to suck it up ... let the "massive correction" set in, and get back on with life on the up and up.

But lets not wait for it to all crash in to the ground, so that they can sell us out the chinese on the cheap. Then we can all get sterilized, and have only boy children, and they can sell our organs to the highest bidder, and force abortions etc.

Until the massive correction happens nothing can or will be changed... and you know the Chinese already own us .

jammypearledved

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Wesley is actualy A PATRIOT, STANDING UP FOR YOUR LIBERTY.

hahahahahahahahahahaha

DriftingByTheStorm

February 2, 2008

TRUTH ATTACK!
NEWS FROM THE FRONT

GOOD NEWS BULLETIN
LARRY BECRAFT BLOCKS ANOTHER DOJ PERSECUTION

JURY HUNG AFTER BENNETT TRIAL
GOVERNMENT LEAVES WITHOUT A HEAD ON ITS LANCE

HONOLULU, HI—The news came through right on the heels of the Snipes verdict and did not garner the attention that partial conviction received, but it’s all good news from Hawaii. Lucky Bennett, accused of conspiracy and tax evasion walked out of the courtroom after a trial that was on and off since it started on January 8, 2008, leaving as innocent has he had entered. Unlike the Snipes case, Bennett took the stand and explained how he came to discover that the income tax had no application to him and Larry Becraft delivered a brilliant closing, pointing out that the only evidence of Bennett’s belief at the time of the “crime” was Bennett’s testimony.

Larry argued to the jury that the government has the burden to prove Bennett’s belief and intentions as of April 15 of each year for which he was charged, that proof required evidence. Holding his hands out like a scale he demonstrated that the government must shift the scale all the way over, not just tip it—beyond any reasonable doubt. He pointed out that Lucky gave his sworn testimony as to what he believed as of those April 15’s—the scales move to his side. But what evidence has the government shown you about Lucky’s beliefs or intent on those dates? Still holding his “scales” out, “Did you see it move? I didn’t see it move.”

Obviously, some of the jury understood that. From one who has been in this system for nearly four decades it is almost impossible to convince a jury that firmly believes the earth is flat that anyone who says otherwise truly believes that it is round. A hung jury is a monumental achievement. It is a loss by the government, who walks away empty handed, no head to display on its lance.

Whether the government will take a second shot at Bennett remains to be seen, but although they could not tip the scales they have tipped their hands, and that means Lucky Bennett knows what they have up their sleeves and will be even better prepared and able to mount his defense.

Well done, Lucky! Well done, Larry!

Kel Varnsen

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Regardless of his personal motives,
Wesley Snipes was willing to stick HIS NECK OUT ON THE LINE to make a MORAL STAND on an ISSUE OF PRINCIPLE.

That is patriotic.

When the founding fathers started the revolution for a new country, guess what, THEY WERE JUST TIRED OF GETTING FUCKED OVER BY THE CROWN OF ENGLAND, and they WERE ACTING IN THEIR OWN BEST FUCKING INTEREST ... DUH ... but it was still helluva patriotic act, and it benefited all future americans.

Where is the disconnect?

Your anger is seemingly borne only out of the fact that Snipes has a lot of money.

But he is not sticking his neck out. He is totally trying to pass the blame onto his accountant, (who has been stripped of his licence which fits my definition of a crooked accountant). If he truly was trying to take a stand he would admit that is what he was doing rather than trying to trying to pass the buck onto someone else. To relate this to your American Revolution analogy it would be like if after the Boston Tea Party the people involved said they accidentally knocked the boxes into the harbor or that someone else did it. To me if you are going to do some civil disobidence, you should at least stand up and take credit for it. This interview makes it pretty clear he is not trying to take any sort of a stand:

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20165873,00.html

DriftingByTheStorm

Kel Varnsen wrote:

But he is not sticking his neck out. He is totally trying to pass the blame onto his accountant, (who has been stripped of his licence which fits my definition of a crooked accountant). If he truly was trying to take a stand he would admit that is what he was doing rather than trying to trying to pass the buck onto someone else. To relate this to your American Revolution analogy it would be like if after the Boston Tea Party the people involved said they accidentally knocked the boxes into the harbor or that someone else did it. To me if you are going to do some civil disobidence, you should at least stand up and take credit for it. This interview makes it pretty clear he is not trying to take any sort of a stand:

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20165873,00.html

Okay.
I guess I agree that Wesley doesn't qualify as a general in the Tax Revolution army.

I DID post this thread TWO SECONDS after the news hit the AP wire. Check the OP, the release was "less that one minute ago" ...

so i obviously didn't have all the facts.
You are right, Wesley seems to be a big pussy on this.

But the failure to get convictions isn't the greatest thing for the IRS.

And the above case from Hawaii CERTAINLY is bad news for them!