Is George W. Bush The "GrandSon of the Beast", Aleister Crowley?

NMyTree

Religious people...those worshiping God/Jesus.....Allah/Mohammad or whatever you want to call this god. Or any god for that matter....

Perceive the occult as competition or a threat to the perceived powers of their god. They perceive the Occult as a contradiction to their God's powers.

So naturally, since they percieve their god as the god of all that is good and loving (cough...cough....), then, in their minds, the Occult must be the opposite......Evil.

And they have played that up for centuries.

Truth is, for all we know......the organized religions may turn out to be the work of the evil one (the devil), as a means of dividing humans, pandering to their self-righteousness and pitting them against themselves.

And the Occult may in fact turn out to be the works of all the natural spiritualism and natural physics of the universel; which we simply don't comprehend at this stage of our existence and intelligence.

You never know. It could turn out that way.

Collin

NMyTree wrote:

I could never tell the difference between Barbara and any old guy, anyway.

For the longest time I thought Barbara was an old guy. Even when she was in her 40s.

Barbara should really wear her wig when she poses for a camera. She looks good with the hat, though.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

cornnifer wrote:

There really is no difference between being spoonfed by the mass media and spoonfed by crackpot conspiracy theorists with way to much time on their hands. Being fed from a different bowl is all. Maybe some folks "won't be fooled again" by guys who balance glass bottles on their doorknobs and wire their apartments to burn in case the proverbial "they" should happen to find them.

please remove broomstick from sphincter...you'll feel better.

Nevermind

I wouldnt be suprised if half this message board could be traced back to him and his fuckstick.

jeffbr

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

please remove broomstick from sphincter...you'll feel better.

Nevermind wrote:

I wouldnt be suprised if half this message board could be traced back to him and his fuckstick.

I know Angelica thinks of these guys as the enlightened and extra-perceptive idealist elite, but in this case I guess I'm happy being just an average joe who relys on logic and reason. I try to stay out of the fruitloop threads, but it is always humorous when the fruitloops condescend as Driftin' did in this thread. I generally like Driftin' but when some of this wacky shit is flung around and presented as alternative to being stuck in a fake paradigm, it is natural for the reasonable to question.

Nevermind

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nD09cSvR64Q
Heres the link to the Freeman interview.

http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=batch_download&batch_id=Q01INnFBdWNveE5jR0E9PQ
And some Crowley workks if interested.

DriftingByTheStorm

jeffbr wrote:

I try to stay out of the fruitloop threads, but it is always humorous when the fruitloops condescend as Driftin' did in this thread.I generally like Driftin' but when some of this wacky shit is flung around and presented as alternative to being stuck in a fake paradigm, it is natural for the reasonable to question.

You do realize that my condescension was in direct response to someone who said "this forum has gone downhill in a real bad way...", in direct reference to ME, right?

Look. I AGREE WITH YOU.

When someone comes on and says something as seemingly random as, "is George W. Bush the grandson of Aleister Crowley", "it is natural for the reasonable to question".

Fuck man, I ASKED a question my self!
The goddamn title of the thread is a fucking question!

The problem i have is that while it may be "natural for a reasonable person to question", those people (and you are going here on the assumption that they are reasonable, and presumably not I?) are NOT ASKING REASONABLE QUESTIONS.

Heres how it works:

1. Unsubstantiated claim or question
2. Response: You're a fucking idiot\loon\wacko. You detract from this forum.
3. General mudslinging.
4. Distraction and side dialogue
5. You show up and say of course its reasonable to ask questions.

My question: WHERE ARE THE FUCKING QUESTIONS, MR. REASONABLE?

Lets here it.
Shit.

Someone look at this stuff.

George W. Bush's maternal grandmother galavants around IN CLOSE RELATION to Aleister Crowley and comes home pregnant.

Given the notoriety of his "fuck stick" and given the apparent notoriety of her own sexual promiscuity (rumors of affairs with Eishenhower, was it?) ... whose to fucking say?

But shit, instead of just bashing me,
ask a reasonable question.

Don't just come on here and be a dick because your seemingly narrow perception of the world doesn't jive with a possibly more complex or bizzare actuality. [not directed at you, Jeff, just in general]

Question for Jeff: WHAT MAKES THIS THREAD "FRUITLOOP"?
Seriously i want to know what the fuck it is about some of this stuff (take Bohemian Grove, for example, which IS DOCUMENTED) "fruitloop" ... ???
:(

angelica

jeffbr wrote:

I know Angelica thinks of these guys as the enlightened and extra-perceptive idealist elite...

these are your words, definitely not mine!

What the people referred to are is powerful. I don't see that as in dispute. (edit: I may have misunderstood who you mean by "these guys"...if you mean those like Roland and Drifting, I don't consider them enlightened, but I do consider them to have a fairly rare perception! ..which also at times contains flaws, like most of our mindsets do!)

What I defend is "the occult", which is as neutral as water. It can be used for good or bad.

, but in this case I guess I'm happy being just an average joe who relys on logic and reason. I try to stay out of the fruitloop threads, but it is always humorous when the fruitloops condescend as Driftin' did in this thread. I generally like Driftin' but when some of this wacky shit is flung around and presented as alternative to being stuck in a fake paradigm, it is natural for the reasonable to question.

all paradigms are valid, given the context. And if we all allow ourselves to evolve, we progress to other paradigms, just as we progressed from crawling to walking.

angelica

I'd like to add about perception and intuition...there are no limits for possibilities to look into. To shut down potential is to contract. When we consider such potential, that's where logic comes in as necessary in order to uncover the truth. Logic and intuition are used in concert! They are not at odds with each other.

To suggest our more perceptive, far-seeing intuitive types are "crazy" is .... a position coming from lack of awareness. To degrade intuitive intelligence, which is not logical intelligence, is fairly socially acceptable, and speaks to our bias as a society, not to the truth of the importance of such intelligence.

The proof will be in the logic that disproves such possibilities...not in the personal attacks based on emotional argument or lack of awareness.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

jeffbr wrote:

I know Angelica thinks of these guys as the enlightened and extra-perceptive idealist elite, but in this case I guess I'm happy being just an average joe who relys on logic and reason. I try to stay out of the fruitloop threads, but it is always humorous when the fruitloops condescend as Driftin' did in this thread. I generally like Driftin' but when some of this wacky shit is flung around and presented as alternative to being stuck in a fake paradigm, it is natural for the reasonable to question.

Pass the broomstick....

lol....I love when people get all uptight about stupid shit like this.

THC

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

This is weird shit.
If anyone cares to put down their perceived "sanity" for a minute and embrace the notion that the elite of this world actually DO practice weird occultic rituals, and DO worship the maintenance of close blood relations (blood lines) and so forth ... then the following is certainly an odd possibility.

George W. Bush May Be The Grandson of Aleister Crowley

Photos of Barbara Bush & Aleister Crowley

Weird?
I dunno.
I heard about this from Freeman, who was on the AJ Show last friday.
Freeman knows a SHIT TON about freemasonry, occultism, numerology, kabalism, and all sorts of fucked up shit. I mean the guy is WELL READ.

Anyhow.
Certainly sounds plausible, if not totaly unsubstantiated.

i def. believe there are some wierd things going on in the world and some secret organizations...but i gotta say this has no real evidence whatsoever...and is so far fetched its pretty ridiculous...
i mean...those pics are just kinda saying...'dont they look alike?'...lol

DriftingByTheStorm

THC wrote:

i def. believe there are some wierd things going on in the world and some secret organizations...but i gotta say this has no real evidence whatsoever...and is so far fetched its pretty ridiculous...
i mean...those pics are just kinda saying...'dont they look alike?'...lol

When you go to sleep at night, and in the morning awake to see snow on the ground, you have "no real evidence" that it snowed, but you may reasonably infer this.

Likewise, when someone is out of the country away from their husband and (even according to mainstream media accounts) in the company of a strang occultic sexual beast ... AND THEY COME HOME PREGNANT, one may REASONABLY make the inference of from whence the baby was conceived.

Now, she COULD have had sex with this writer, Frank Harris (ALSO NOT HER HUSBAND), but she was already also rumoured to be sleeping with presidents.

Either way its fishy.
Especially when you look at Ms. Pierce, and then you look at Aleister and Barbara.
She simply looks like the man.

Why is this such a ridiculous assumption.
She is KNOWN to have been hanging out with him in close proximity.

I'm not saying it is or is not true.
But the immediacy of some of the dismissals out of hand on this matter are just embarrasing.

Has no one an open mind to POSSIBILITY any more?

Prey tell, outside of this being Aleister Crowley, WHAT MAKES THIS SO ABSURD?

Surely adultry isn't limited only to us peons.

angelica

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Has no one an open mind to POSSIBILITY any more?

nope. Not much........ sorry.....

outside of this being Aleister Crowley, WHAT MAKES THIS SO ABSURD?
Surely adultry isn't limited only to us peons.

absurdity depends on acceptable social convention, seemingly - what is beyond our ideas of acceptable is absurd....

The Aleister Crowley dimension always throws in some automatic grist for the naysaying mill.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

I'm not saying it is or is not true.
But the immediacy of some of the dismissals out of hand on this matter are just embarrasing.

Has no one an open mind to POSSIBILITY any more?

Prey tell, outside of this being Aleister Crowley, WHAT MAKES THIS SO ABSURD?

Surely adultry isn't limited only to us peons.

cough...elitism...cough

DriftingByTheStorm

angelica wrote:

nope. Not much........ sorry.....








absurdity depends on acceptable social convention, seemingly - what is beyond our ideas of acceptable is absurd....

The Aleister Crowley dimension always throws in some automatic grist for the naysaying mill.

I just find this to be so utterly stupifying.

WHAT specificaly are these people questioning.
As far as i can tell, it may just as well be the very fact that I am the one "bringing it up", as it were.

I mean really.
IT IS ADMITTED THAT SHE WAS
a. NOT IN THE SAME COUNTRY AS HER HUSBAND
b. IN THE COMPANY OF ALEISTER CROWLEY
c. TRACKING BACK 9 MONTHS FROM THE BIRTH, SEE item a.

We can speculate ALL day as to who was or wasn't the father,
but on the face of it, it SEEMS PROBABLE

i'm not saying CERTAIN, or ANY such notion.
but what confounds me is the assertion that this is "ABSURD"?

WHY! ?!? ?

DriftingByTheStorm

Ya'll want speculative,
lets do it:

Is Uncle Sam "Related" To The Luciferian "Baphomet"?

Now who would go and design that shit?


Oh, here's one more for you:
George Washington, a Freemason, "As above, so also below" stance, half naked, just like old Baphomet"

Hmm.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

The Uncle Sam resemblance is uncanny....

angelica

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Ya'll want speculative,
lets do it:

Is Uncle Sam "Related" To The Luciferian "Baphomet"?

Now who would go and design that shit?


Oh, here's one more for you:
George Washington, a Freemason, "As above, so also below" stance, half naked, just like old Baphomet"

Hmm.

Drowned Out

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

Ya'll want speculative,
lets do it:

Is Uncle Sam "Related" To The Luciferian "Baphomet"?

Now who would go and design that shit?


Oh, here's one more for you:
George Washington, a Freemason, "As above, so also below" stance, half naked, just like old Baphomet"

Hmm.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Illuminati/dc.htm

Washington monument: At the ground level each side of the monument measures 55.5 feet long, which is equal to 666 inches. The height of the obelisk is 555.5 feet, which is equal to 6,666 inches.
wiki says the height is true, but the base is only 661"

RolandTD20Kdrummer

All I see is Baphomet....

http://www.unclesamphotos.com/

edit: but ok... c'mon what's the deal with this one from 1917?
http://www.unclesamphotos.com/images/061219141453_Uncle_Sam_Buy_a_United_States_Government_Bond_LG.jpg


and this one?!?!?!
http://www.solarnavigator.net/films_movies_actors/film_images/Austin_Powers_Mike_Myers_as_Dr_Evil.jpg