Rant

2»

Comments

  • the facethe face Posts: 192
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I've never read it, but I've been meaning to. I think most people on this board realize by now that I have an interest in psychology and I'm curious what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf. It would be a good way to get insight into his mind and his motives. Though, I'm pretty sure I'm on the right track anyway.

    So, just so you know, this is my interest. I understand you are "new" and trying to make a good impression, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt. :)
    cmon man, can i get an exception from you on this guy at least. he wants to read mein kampf dude.....
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    the face wrote:
    YOU want to report ME? Now thats funny; As for mothers, yours was great. leave mine out of it.

    I'm joking around with you dude. You seem to have an aggression and communication complex. Have you considered psychiatric help? I don't mean this in a degrading way, it can really be an enlightening experience.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    the face wrote:
    cmon man, can i get an exception from you on this guy at least. he wants to read mein kampf dude.....


    I read Mein Kampf, but that doesn't make me an anti-semite, just as reading the Communist Manufesto doesn't make someone a communist. Let me just say the language you have decides to resort to in your attacks is in extremely poor taste.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    the face wrote:
    But when you see that someone has started 20 or more anti israel threads with hundreds of anti israel posts it sure appears to be more than just an issue with the State of Israel.....

    So you don't think that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one of the major issues of our time and deserves to be discussed then? I feel pasionately about the injustice of the situation. And I feel no need to apologise for that.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    dayan wrote:
    On the train right now are links to interviews run on major news networks with David Duke and an anti-zionist rabbi. During the war between Israel and Lebanon this summer there were constantly interviews with very eloquent Lebanese officials who were extremely critical of Israel. I think generally most news outlets do their best to present both sides of an issue, so I don't see how you can say that the media silences criticism of Israel.

    On the Train? Not on the mainstream news though? '...there were constantly interviews with very eloquent Lebanese officials who were extremely critical of Israel.'? Really? And where were these?
    I live in England and the news media is blatantly biased in favour of Israel. It's so obvious that the issue is raised here again and again in chatrooms and 'have your say' sections of the media, and yet nothing changes.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    mammasan wrote:
    I'm starting to get a bit sick and tired at the labeling that is occuring on this message board. Racism is not something that should be taken lightly nor should that label be through around lightly. Not all of us are going to agree on this board and that is the beauty of it. If we all had the same opinion none of would be able to learn from each other. Anti-semtism is a term that I have seen pop up more and more frequently on this board. We all have different opinions and levels of support for Israel. Some of us fully support Israel and it's actions, other stand in the middle, and others still are completely against many of Israels actions. This is especially true in regards to the Israel/Palestinian situation. We don't see eye to eye, but lately that has been reason to label someone an anti-semite. That term carries such a vile and disturbing meaning, as it should, much like most racist labels. I don't know of anyone on this board that would fit the description of an anti-semite. Do some people here disagree with Israeli policy? Yes. Do some here disagree with the manner in which the state of Israel was created? Yes. No one here, that I have seen, wishes ill will on Israelies or Jews or thinks that Jews should not have a land of their own and the ability to live a peacefull life. I view it as me labeling people who support to deportation of all illegal immigrants racist simply because most are hispanic. That would be a diplorable act by me to label someone something so vile simply because I don't agree with. I'm sure I will get an ear full or maybe even called an anti-semite for this but I just had to get it off my chest.

    If I was taught all my life that people hated me for nothing other than a story passed down from generation to generation and never tried to change. I would toss around that term at will to make myself feel better too. Wouldn't you? I am a card carrying anti-semite. Anointed by the chosen people who visit this board themselves. If at first you feel slighted because you know you are wrong and still trying to defend one's race. Play the race card. Makes you that much of a bigger person.

    Hey! Stop putting the past in the future and life may get a hell of a lot better for not just you lot but everybody else who likes to live life that way. You run into walls when you keep looking over your shoulder.
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    mammasan wrote:
    I'm starting to get a bit sick and tired at the labeling that is occuring on this message board. Racism is not something that should be taken lightly nor should that label be through around lightly. Not all of us are going to agree on this board and that is the beauty of it. If we all had the same opinion none of would be able to learn from each other. Anti-semtism is a term that I have seen pop up more and more frequently on this board. We all have different opinions and levels of support for Israel. Some of us fully support Israel and it's actions, other stand in the middle, and others still are completely against many of Israels actions. This is especially true in regards to the Israel/Palestinian situation. We don't see eye to eye, but lately that has been reason to label someone an anti-semite. That term carries such a vile and disturbing meaning, as it should, much like most racist labels. I don't know of anyone on this board that would fit the description of an anti-semite. Do some people here disagree with Israeli policy? Yes. Do some here disagree with the manner in which the state of Israel was created? Yes. No one here, that I have seen, wishes ill will on Israelies or Jews or thinks that Jews should not have a land of their own and the ability to live a peacefull life. I view it as me labeling people who support to deportation of all illegal immigrants racist simply because most are hispanic. That would be a diplorable act by me to label someone something so vile simply because I don't agree with. I'm sure I will get an ear full or maybe even called an anti-semite for this but I just had to get it off my chest.

    well stated, as usual, mammasan...

    I think when a term like "anti-semite" is overused and misused, it tends to desensitize the true meaning...

    also, as the great EF? stated...playing the race card is lame...

    I happen to think that some enjoy playing the victim, wearing it around their neck like a big stinky albatross..."my people are hated, oh whoa is me"...

    There is no gov't, religion, culture, and so on, that is perfect...each has it's faults...and just because someone points out those faults, it does not automatically mean that person is a anti-anything...
  • inmytree wrote:
    I happen to think that some enjoy playing the victim, wearing it around their neck like a big stinky albatross..."my people are hated, oh whoa is me"...

    That's a fair statement, as long as you agree that there are some people on this board who constantly enjoy making the Palestenians their "victim".
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • stuckinlinestuckinline Posts: 3,368
    i hate 'labeling' and 'name calling'. it seems so childish to 'label' someone.



    how's it going mammasan?
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    mammasan wrote:
    I read Mein Kampf, .
    Mein Kampf was one of our 'reading books' when I was at school. It was read by all and debated.
  • floyd1975floyd1975 Posts: 1,350
    the face wrote:
    cmon man, can i get an exception from you on this guy at least. he wants to read mein kampf dude.....

    I would read that book and I have been accused of blindly supporting the "zionist murderers" by some on this board. There's nothing wrong with checking out a book.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    the face wrote:
    cmon man, can i get an exception from you on this guy at least. he wants to read mein kampf dude.....
    I've read Mein Kampf. I've also read Plato's Republic, Mao's Little Red Book, The Communist Manifesto, Locke's Two Treatises, Machiavelli's The Prince, and heaven only knows what else. You have something against knowledge?

    Mein Kampf is rubbish, by the way .... but I wouldn't know that if I hadn't read it, now would I?
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,447
    I would love to see everyone's reaction if this thread was about racism...blacks versus whites, etc....

    I think mammasan makes a good point. It becomes useless to discuss the issues when people start throwing around anti-semite, racist, etc where it doesn't necessarily exist.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,447
    hippiemom wrote:
    I've read Mein Kampf. I've also read Plato's Republic, Mao's Little Red Book, The Communist Manifesto, Locke's Two Treatises, Machiavelli's The Prince, and heaven only knows what else. You have something against knowledge?

    Mein Kampf is rubbish, by the way .... but I wouldn't know that if I hadn't read it, now would I?


    Yep, all those books stink. In fact most books stink. Reading only ruins the mind. It doesn't open it, it leads you down someone else's path. ;)

    only 2 books worth reading....

    Green Eggs and Ham
    &
    The Catcher in the Rye

    Stop after those and start thinking for yourself.


    FYI, I'm partly joking. ;)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    only 2 books worth reading....

    Green Eggs and Ham
    &
    The Catcher in the Rye

    Stop after those and start thinking for yourself.
    I myself am partial to the barmix guide. And I've gotten a lot of mileage out of the book on erotic massages I have.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Yep, all those books stink. In fact most books stink. Reading only ruins the mind. It doesn't open it, it leads you down someone else's path. ;)

    only 2 books worth reading....

    Green Eggs and Ham
    &
    The Catcher in the Rye

    Stop after those and start thinking for yourself.


    FYI, I'm partly joking. ;)
    I'm going to assume that Green Eggs and Ham and The Catcher in the Rye were the parts you weren't joking about, because I certainly agree with you there! In fact, I'd go a step further and say that everyone should read the entire collected works of Dr. Seuss :)
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    surferdude wrote:
    I myself am partial to the barmix guide. And I've gotten a lot of mileage out of the book on erotic massages I have.
    Another pair of classics!
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • angelicaangelica Posts: 6,038
    hippiemom wrote:
    I'm going to assume that Green Eggs and Ham and The Catcher in the Rye were the parts you weren't joking about, because I certainly agree with you there! In fact, I'd go a step further and say that everyone should read the entire collected works of Dr. Seuss :)
    I agree! Especially "There's a Wocket in my Pocket"!!! :)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    angelica wrote:
    I agree! Especially "There's a Wocket in my Pocket"!!! :)
    Please, stop being funny. I'm have deadlines to meet at work.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,447
    surferdude wrote:
    I myself am partial to the barmix guide. And I've gotten a lot of mileage out of the book on erotic massages I have.


    Yeah, but you can learn those things by doing...without the book.

    Where else can you learn all the places you can eat green eggs and ham? now that is dropping some knowledge.

    Anyhow...back to the thread...all name calling does is bring the discussion of the issue and make it a personal matter between the name caller and the name callee...we all do it from time to time, but in regards to anti-semites and racists it has a very detrimental effect to the discussion at hand. And with how quick people are to pull out one of those names, it's no wonder the world is such a difficult place to compromise in, huh?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Apartheid in the Holy Land
    by Desmond Tutu
    December 20, 2006

    In our struggle against apartheid, the great supporters were Jewish people. They almost instinctively had to be on the side of the disenfranchised, of the voiceless ones, fighting injustice, oppression and evil. I have continued to feel strongly with the Jews. I am patron of a Holocaust centre in South Africa. I believe Israel has a right to secure borders.

    What is not so understandable, not justified, is what it did to another people to guarantee its existence. I've been very deeply distressed in my visit to the Holy Land; it reminded me so much of what happened to us black people in South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police officers prevented us from moving about.

    On one of my visits to the Holy Land I drove to a church with the Anglican bishop in Jerusalem. I could hear tears in his voice as he pointed to Jewish settlements. I thought of the desire of Israelis for security. But what of the Palestinians who have lost their land and homes?

    I have experienced Palestinians pointing to what were their homes, now occupied by Jewish Israelis. I was walking with Canon Naim Ateek (the head of the Sabeel Ecumenical Centre) in Jerusalem. He pointed and said: "Our home was over there. We were driven out of our home; it is now occupied by Israeli Jews."

    My heart aches. I say why are our memories so short. Have our Jewish sisters and brothers forgotten their humiliation? Have they forgotten the collective punishment, the home demolitions, in their own history so soon? Have they turned their backs on their profound and noble religious traditions? Have they forgotten that God cares deeply about the downtrodden?

    Israel will never get true security and safety through oppressing another people. A true peace can ultimately be built only on justice. We condemn the violence of suicide bombers, and we condemn the corruption of young minds taught hatred; but we also condemn the violence of military incursions in the occupied lands, and the inhumanity that won't let ambulances reach the injured.

    The military action of recent days, I predict with certainty, will not provide the security and peace Israelis want; it will only intensify the hatred.

    Israel has three options: revert to the previous stalemated situation; exterminate all Palestinians; or -- I hope -- to strive for peace based on justice, based on withdrawal from all the occupied territories, and the establishment of a viable Palestinian state on those territories side by side with Israel, both with secure borders.

    We in South Africa had a relatively peaceful transition. If our madness could end as it did, it must be possible to do the same everywhere else in the world. If peace could come to South Africa, surely it can come to the Holy Land?

    My brother Naim Ateek has said what we used to say: "I am not pro- this people or that. I am pro-justice, pro-freedom. I am anti-injustice, anti-oppression."

    But you know as well as I do that, somehow, the Israeli government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to criticise it is to be immediately dubbed anti-semitic, as if the Palestinians were not semitic. I am not even anti-white, despite the madness of that group. And how did it come about that Israel was collaborating with the apartheid government on security measures?

    People are scared in this country [the US], to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful -- very powerful. Well, so what? For goodness sake, this is God's world! We live in a moral universe. The apartheid government was very powerful, but today it no longer exists. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pinochet, Milosevic, and Idi Amin were all powerful, but in the end they bit the dust.

    Injustice and oppression will never prevail. Those who are powerful have to remember the litmus test that God gives to the powerful: what is your treatment of the poor, the hungry, the voiceless? And on the basis of that, God passes judgment.

    We should put out a clarion call to the government of the people of Israel, to the Palestinian people and say: peace is possible, peace based on justice is possible. We will do all we can to assist you to achieve this peace, because it is God's dream, and you will be able to live amicably together as sisters and brothers.


    Desmond Tutu is the former Archbishop of Cape Town and chairman of South Africa's truth and reconciliation commission. This address was given at a conference on Ending the Occupation held in Boston, Massachusetts, earlier this month. A longer version appears in the current edition of Church Times.
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    hailhailkc wrote:
    That's a fair statement, as long as you agree that there are some people on this board who constantly enjoy making the Palestenians their "victim".

    I do......
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Don't the Rothschilds control European finance?

    no. they don't.
  • dayandayan Posts: 475
    Byrnzie wrote:
    On the Train? Not on the mainstream news though? '...there were constantly interviews with very eloquent Lebanese officials who were extremely critical of Israel.'? Really? And where were these?
    I live in England and the news media is blatantly biased in favour of Israel. It's so obvious that the issue is raised here again and again in chatrooms and 'have your say' sections of the media, and yet nothing changes.

    During the summer I watched cnn world, and the bbc and skynews and saw coverage that showed both the Lebanese perspective and the Israeli perspective. Over all I thought the journalism did its best to be professional. all of the above statements are major networks that air in England. And are you really going to tell me that the Guardian isn't critical of Israel. People who are critical of Israel might be upset that the media isn't as critical as they are, but that doesn't mean that the media silences criticism.
Sign In or Register to comment.