Rush will once again prove that the left owns racism

gue_barium

soulsinging wrote:

ah, i dont watch enough tv i guess... how do i do the embarrassed face?

I kind of remember the Breck girl in the 70's. It's kind of odd, even for me, to hear of the Breck girl these days.

soulsinging

gue_barium wrote:

I kind of remember the Breck girl in the 70's. It's kind of odd, even for me, to hear of the Breck girl these days.

that was before my time. no wonder i dont get it. regardless, didnt know rush was tearing on john edwards. that's a shame he has to stoop so low. this is probably the first time in a decade i've actually been impressed with the democratic field of candidates.

gue_barium

soulsinging wrote:

that was before my time. no wonder i dont get it. regardless, didnt know rush was tearing on john edwards. that's a shame he has to stoop so low. this is probably the first time in a decade i've actually been impressed with the democratic field of candidates.

It's a broader field than I can ever remember. It does me good to know you're part of the better half.

soulsinging

gue_barium wrote:

It's a broader field than I can ever remember. It does me good to know you're part of the better half.

you'd think after 23,000 self indulgent posts people would know which side im on

gue_barium

soulsinging wrote:

you'd think after 23,000 self indulgent posts people would know which side im on

Damn, you got 3,000 in a hurry. I'm on a pretty good clip, myself.

soulsinging

gue_barium wrote:

Damn, you got 3,000 in a hurry. I'm on a pretty good clip, myself.

yeah, i should probly retire soon. i waste entirely too much time here.

hippiemom

Purple Hawk wrote:

cheap shots at the breck girl? and his wife? no, i think matt lauer had that covered...

and what's wrong with being bald?

Nothing at all! Bald is dead sexy

gue_barium

soulsinging wrote:

yeah, i should probly retire soon. i waste entirely too much time here.

Alright, we can stop now.
Yesterday is gone.

lol.

I'm going to carry on with the focus on bald-sexy.

Milhouse VanHouten

Purple Hawk wrote:

cheap shots at the breck girl? and his wife? no, i think matt lauer had that covered...

and what's wrong with being bald?

rush, saint that he is, waited almost half a day before he started bagging on edwards for deciding to continue his campaign.

how long until rush says that elizabeth edwards is faking her cancer for political reasons?

nothing wrong with being bald. geez, you conservatives are overly sensitive and p.c.

El_Kabong

soulsinging wrote:

rush is supposed to be comedy? and how come when your fav musicians make such comedy it's bullshit and when your guy does it he's just making good points? that sounds pretty hypocritical to me.

i would like to see this answer, too!

El_Kabong

Purple Hawk wrote:

can you explain? i think for myself...i actually make my living studying politics...i see him as having more credibility than npr, pbs, all the "dino media." but that's just me. going through life thinking that everyone not like you can't think for themselves...isn't a way to go through life.

didn't he say 'there are more trees today than there were 100 years ago!'

Rushlimbo

El_Kabong wrote:

didn't he say 'there are more trees today than there were 100 years ago!'

Plus after the 2006 elections he said he was glad many of the Republicans lost because he was tired of falsely sticking up for them -- he admits he has been lying for these guys for years -- and all the dittoheads continue to listen to him as if he isnt still lying to them. Unbelievable.

Purple Hawk

Rushlimbo wrote:

Plus after the 2006 elections he said he was glad many of the Republicans lost because he was tired of falsely sticking up for them -- he admits he has been lying for these guys for years --

If I get banned, then I get banned, but you are an idiot. you really are...you are incapable of thinking.

he didn't "admit" to lying "for these guys" and if that's your interpretation, you are not very smart.

Purple Hawk

hippiemom wrote:

Nothing at all! Bald is dead sexy

damn straight, yo

Purple Hawk

El_Kabong wrote:

i would like to see this answer, too!

the answer is that my fave musicians aren't exactly masters of comedy...rush is. as is jon stewart...and i admire him for it...no hypocrisy here!

Rushlimbo

Purple Hawk wrote:

If I get banned, then I get banned, but you are an idiot. you really are...you are incapable of thinking.

he didn't "admit" to lying "for these guys" and if that's your interpretation, you are not very smart.

Really? This is what Limbaugh said. Please explain to me what he means by these statements if he isnt admitting he has been lying about supporting them. And you believe everything he says now because ??? (You have to take your blinders off to read, btw)

Limbaugh on his November 8th, 2006 show -->

"I feel liberated, and I'm going to tell you as plainly as I can why. I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I don't think deserve having their water carried. Now, you might say, "Well, why have you been doing it?" Because the stakes are high. Even though the Republican Party let us down, to me they represent a far better future for my beliefs and therefore the country's than the Democrat Party and liberalism does."

"And I believe my side is worthy of victory, and I believe it's much easier to reform things that are going wrong on my side from a position of strength. Now, I'm liberated from having to constantly come in here every day and try to buck up a bunch of people who don't deserve it, to try to carry the water and make excuses for people who don't deserve it."

"But there have been a bunch of things going on in Congress, some of this legislation coming out of there that I have just cringed at, and it has been difficult coming in here, trying to make the case for it when the people who are supposedly in favor of it can't even make the case themselves -- and to have to come in here and try to do their jobs."

http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2006/11/rush-is-free.html

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006717.html

http://mediamatters.org/items/200611090005

desandrews

Rushlimbo wrote:

Really? This is what Limbaugh said. Please explain to me what he means by these statements if he isnt admitting he has been lying about supporting them. And you believe everything he says now because ??? (You have to take your blinders off to read, btw)

Limbaugh on his November 8th, 2006 show -->

"I feel liberated, and I'm going to tell you as plainly as I can why. I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I don't think deserve having their water carried. Now, you might say, "Well, why have you been doing it?" Because the stakes are high. Even though the Republican Party let us down, to me they represent a far better future for my beliefs and therefore the country's than the Democrat Party and liberalism does."

"And I believe my side is worthy of victory, and I believe it's much easier to reform things that are going wrong on my side from a position of strength. Now, I'm liberated from having to constantly come in here every day and try to buck up a bunch of people who don't deserve it, to try to carry the water and make excuses for people who don't deserve it."

"But there have been a bunch of things going on in Congress, some of this legislation coming out of there that I have just cringed at, and it has been difficult coming in here, trying to make the case for it when the people who are supposedly in favor of it can't even make the case themselves -- and to have to come in here and try to do their jobs."

http://www.beliefnet.com/blogs/crunchycon/2006/11/rush-is-free.html

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/006717.html

http://mediamatters.org/items/200611090005

Makes sense to me. He didn't like defending people he didn't fully agree with but he realized he either defended them or implicitly endorsed others that he disagreed with even more so. Isn't that what people who voted for John Kerry but whose hearts were really green did?

gue_barium

desandrews wrote:

Makes sense to me. He didn't like defending people he didn't fully agree with but he realized he either defended them or implicitly endorsed others that he disagreed with even more so. Isn't that what people who voted for John Kerry but whose hearts were really green did?

No, it isn't. Rush just seems to be trying to disassociate himself with the walking talking disaster that is the Bush administration. Kerry voters were better than 2 years ahead of him.

desandrews

gue_barium wrote:

No, it isn't. Rush just seems to be trying to disassociate himself with the walking talking disaster that is the Bush administration. Kerry voters were better than 2 years ahead of him.

Q: What?

"just seems to be trying to" is not much of an authoratative(sp?) statement. Seems like if you really knew what he was doing you could say it with a little more confidence than what you did. I remember distinctly people on this board talking about how they voted for Kerry but they really wanted to vote Green or someone else that was further left than Kerry, but they voted Kerry because they thought it was so important this time around to defeat Bush not because Kerry was so great, a la Vote For Change tour endorsing Kerry instead of Nader. I still don't see any difference here.

One other point of notice, Bush didn't run in 2006, Bush didn't lose in 2006, so Rush's comments have nothing to do with Bush, but you made sure to bring it in to the fray. Let me one up that trend and accuse Rush of being a Nazi.

A: Take that!

gue_barium

desandrews wrote:

Q: What?

"just seems to be trying to" is not much of an authoratative(sp?) statement. Seems like if you really knew what he was doing you could say it with a little more confidence than what you did. I remember distinctly people on this board talking about how they voted for Kerry but they really wanted to vote Green or someone else that was further left than Kerry, but they voted Kerry because they thought it was so important this time around to defeat Bush not because Kerry was so great, a la Vote For Change tour endorsing Kerry instead of Nader. I still don't see any difference here.

One other point of notice, Bush didn't run in 2006, Bush didn't lose in 2006, so Rush's comments have nothing to do with Bush, but you made sure to bring it in to the fray. Let me one up that trend and accuse Rush of being a Nazi.

A: Take that!

That's pretty weak.
"...just seems to be trying to" as in he's using "Republicans" "letting us down" as the course of his logic. Well, what Republicans are there? What Party is currently in the White House, and has been since 2001?