OJ Simpson Guilty on ALL 12 Counts!!!

24

Comments

  • stupidcorporatewhore
    stupidcorporatewhore Posts: 761
    brandon10 wrote:
    Anyone who has any respect for the law of the land should be sickened by this decision.

    O.J. has never had respect for the law of the land. I guarantee you he is sickened by this decision.
    Ghetto Star wrote:
    Let us celebrate the demise of another human being. Feel better about yourself?

    pretty much. Fuck O.J., he should have stayed underground.

    his arrogance wouldn't allow him to stay out of the spotlight.

    he got what he deserved, period.
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    ACCBootlegGoddess wrote:
    A) He was found not guilty...NOT INNOCENT. Not Guilty means there wasn't enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered Nicole and Ron. We all know he's guilty as sin.

    B) So you are saying...if you stole something of mine its ok for me to round up my buddies, grab some guns, kidnap you, and threaten to kill you unless you give it back to me?? You are ok with that??

    Why the hell didn't he go to the cops or sue them??? If he had walked on this it would have sent the WRONG message to people...saying Vigilante justice is ok...which is IS NOT.


    If he isn't guilty, then he's innocent. And how the fuck do you know he's guilty? Were you there? The West Memphis #3 are a product of our justice system and so is O.J. It's like me coming on here and saying they are guilty and they are getting what they deserve. It would only be an opinion. You don't know shit for sure. But as far as the justice system is concerned, this case is fucked. 9 counts??? Kidnapping???! Have you even followed this case?
  • SoonForgotten2
    SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    brandon10 wrote:
    If he isn't guilty, then he's innocent.

    Wrong. He was simply not found to be guilty. He was not proven to be innocent and again, in the civil suit, he was found to be responsible for their deaths. What about this do you not understand?
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    Commy wrote:
    maybe its time to bring vigilantism back. Not so rich celebrities can get their useless memorabilia back but so we can bring the real criminals to justice. rumslfeld, cheney, bush, the real criminals.
    Maybe, but vigilantes like joe horn i can do without thanks.

    The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules. And tonight, you’re gonna break your one rule...

    It's simple, we, uh, kill the Batman...
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    Pj_Gurl wrote:

    The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules.
    agreed, anarcho syndicalism for sure. but there's a lot to be said for no rules, in some situations.
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    SoonForgotten2 wrote:
    Wrong. He was simply not found to be guilty. He was not proven to be innocent and again, in the civil suit, he was found to be responsible for their deaths. What about this do you not understand?


    Not Guilty. LOL Whatever you want to call it. If that makes you feel better. Can you tell me about anyone that has been found innocent in a court of law?
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    If you try not to let your emotions get in the way, you may realize how fucked this case is. See, I don't give a shit about OJ one way or another. So this case really scares me.
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 3,159
    brandon10 wrote:
    If you try not to let your emotions get in the way, you may realize how fucked this case is. See, I don't give a shit about OJ one way or another. So this case really scares me.

    I have to agree with you there. This case is living proof that personal prejudice can play a big role in whether or not a man gets to spend the rest of his life in prison. Scary is definitely the word.
    reigning champion

    http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?t=272825
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    brandon10 wrote:
    Not Guilty. LOL Whatever you want to call it. If that makes you feel better. Can you tell me about anyone that has been found innocent in a court of law?
    There are plenty of examples of people being proven innocent by DNA etc. O.J was never proven innocent, he just wasn't proven guilty according to the jury, although I would argue that the DNA evidence against him was more than enough. How any intelligent person could have witnessed O.J's behaviour SINCE and be in any doubt as to his guilt is beyond me.

    Also, stop skirting the fact that in the civil suit, he WAS found guilty.
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    There are plenty of examples of people being proven innocent by DNA etc. O.J was never proven innocent, he just wasn't proven guilty according to the jury, although I would argue that the DNA evidence against him was more than enough. How any intelligent person could have witnessed O.J's behaviour SINCE and be in any doubt as to his guilt is beyond me.

    Also, stop skirting the fact that in the civil suit, he WAS found guilty.


    I never once said proven. Those are your words. I don't give a shit if he is guilty of murder or not. It doesn't pertain to this case. You see, I continue to talk about our laws and how they work. But continue to let your emotions get in the way. It really makes you look smart.
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    brandon10 wrote:
    I never once said proven. Those are your words. I don't give a shit if he is guilty of murder or not. It doesn't pertain to this case. You see, I continue to talk about our laws and how they work. But continue to let your emotions get in the way. It really makes you look smart.
    My point is, I don't see a huge step from murdering two people and then spending a decade essentially gloating by keeping yourself in the public eye to armed robbery and kidnap. Something of a step down really. Point is, even if every single one of these current charges was trumped up, are we supposed to feel sorry for him? He's going to jail, he should have gone a long time ago.

    American's getting high and mighty about the proprieties of their legal system is laughable. It's all bollocks, at least this time some sort of karmic justic is being done.
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    My point is, I don't see a huge step from murdering two people and then spending a decade essentially gloating by keeping yourself in the public eye to armed robbery and kidnap. Something of a step down really. Point is, even if every single one of these current charges was trumped up, are we supposed to feel sorry for him? He's going to jail, he should have gone a long time ago.

    American's getting high and mighty about the proprieties of their legal system is laughable. It's all bollocks, at least this time some sort of karmic justic is being done.


    Keeping himself in the public eye??? Are you kidding? He's OJ! He couldn't get out of the public eye if he tried. We can all feel great that someone we feel is likely a murderer is going to prison, but going about it in a shady manner is disturbing. And the Government is getting away with it because they play to fools emotions. We have laws for a reason. If we weren't going to follow them, then maybe you people should have just lynched OJ right after he was found NOT GUILTY.
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    brandon10 wrote:
    Keeping himself in the public eye??? Are you kidding? He's OJ! He couldn't get out of the public eye if he tried. We can all feel great that someone we feel is likely a murderer is going to prison, but going about it in a shady manner is disturbing. And the Government is getting away with it because they play to fools emotions. We have laws for a reason. If we weren't going to follow them, then maybe you people should have just lynched OJ right after he was found NOT GUILTY.
    He would be followed by the press, sure. He did not need to pop up every few years, swear he was going to find "the real killer" and then write a book hypothesising how he would have done it if he did!!!
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • SoonForgotten2
    SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    brandon10 wrote:
    Keeping himself in the public eye??? Are you kidding? He's OJ! He couldn't get out of the public eye if he tried. We can all feel great that someone we feel is likely a murderer is going to prison, but going about it in a shady manner is disturbing. And the Government is getting away with it because they play to fools emotions. We have laws for a reason. If we weren't going to follow them, then maybe you people should have just lynched OJ right after he was found NOT GUILTY.

    What exactly is so shady about it? All the legal analysis I've read said he's done and that appeals won't have any legs. He was on tape running this whole thing, so what do you disagree with here? The laws he broke were not written with the plot of screwing OJ in mind.
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • Anon
    Anon Posts: 11,175
    I just realized that he was acquitted of murder on my birthday in 1995, Oct. 3.

    And then he was convicted on these charges on my birthday in 2008, Oct. 3.

    Crazy. Total coincidence, but one of those moments that makes you stop and say, maybe in your best Keanu Reeves voice, "whoa."
  • brandon10
    brandon10 Posts: 1,114
    SoonForgotten2 wrote:
    What exactly is so shady about it? All the legal analysis I've read said he's done and that appeals won't have any legs. He was on tape running this whole thing, so what do you disagree with here? The laws he broke were not written with the plot of screwing OJ in mind.


    If you are really that obtuse, then I don't have the time to get into it with you. This case is crooked on so many levels. But I'll give you something to think about. What do you consider to be kidnapping?
  • SoonForgotten2
    SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    brandon10 wrote:
    If you are really that obtuse, then I don't have the time to get into it with you. This case is crooked on so many levels. But I'll give you something to think about. What do you consider to be kidnapping?

    Hilarious that you have to resort to insults, but whatever.

    The recordings were sometimes garbled, but Simpson's voice came through loud and clear: "Don't let nobody out of this room." The words formed the basis of the prosecution's kidnapping charge.

    In the UK, the charge would be false imprisonment. If you have any issue here, it's with the law itself. But again, there has been no legal analysis that I have heard which states this is a problem. OJ got what was coming to him. Do you really believe he didn't break the law here? He's on tape... his own words. I don't know what more you want.
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • SoonForgotten2
    SoonForgotten2 Posts: 2,245
    Actually let me add this, which is the definition for kidnapping in the state of Nevada:

    http://ag.state.nv.us/child_advocate/prosecuting.htm
    1. A person who willfully seizes, confines, inveigles, entices, decoys, abducts, conceals, kidnaps or carries away a person by any means whatsoever with the intent to hold or detain, or who holds or detains the person for ransom, or reward, or for the purpose of committing sexual assault, extortion or robbery upon or from the person, or for the purpose of killing the person or inflicting substantial bodily harm upon him, or to exact from relatives, friends, or any other person any money or valuable thing for the return or disposition of the kidnapped person, and a person who leads, takes, entices, or carries away or detains any minor with the intent to keep, imprison, or confine him from his parents, guardians, or any other person having lawful custody of the minor, or with the intent to hold the minor to unlawful service, or perpetrate upon the person of the minor any unlawful act is guilty of kidnapping in the first degree which is a category A felony.
    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/sets/72157600802942672/">My Pearl Jam Photos</a>

    <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmgphotos/4731512142/&quot; title="PJ Banner2 by Mister J Photography, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1135/4731512142_258f2d6ab4_b.jpg&quot; width="630" height="112" alt="PJ Banner2" /></a>
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,263
    brandon10 wrote:
    That's a valid point. But it doesn't do anything to ease my nerves about the fact that I could be put away for trying to get my stuff back. In fact it worsens them. I'm not super rich.

    So, vigilante justice is okay with you?
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,263
    brandon10 wrote:
    If he isn't guilty, then he's innocent. And how the fuck do you know he's guilty? Were you there? The West Memphis #3 are a product of our justice system and so is O.J. It's like me coming on here and saying they are guilty and they are getting what they deserve. It would only be an opinion. You don't know shit for sure. But as far as the justice system is concerned, this case is fucked. 9 counts??? Kidnapping???! Have you even followed this case?

    Well, the West Memphis #3 were found guilty in court. According to your theory that not-guilty means the person is innocent, then you think the WM3 are in fact the murderers.

Categories