Art teacher in hot water over topless photos

blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
edited July 2006 in A Moving Train
I don't agree with this school district at all...


Art teacher in hot water over topless photos

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) -- Until they found the topless photos, Austin High School officials considered Tamara Hoover an excellent art teacher with a knack for helping students find their creativity.

Now, she's fighting for her job.

The photos, which were posted on Flickr.com by her partner, depict Hoover in the shower, lifting weights, getting dressed, in bed and doing other routine activities.

Hoover said Friday the photos are art and makes no apologies.

"I'm an artist and I'm going to participate in the arts," Hoover said. "If that's not something they want me to do then I want to be told that. I don't feel as if I was doing anything that was beyond expectations."

The school district said the photos were inappropriate and violate the "higher moral standard" expected of public school teachers. As she was escorted out of class last month she was told that she's become an ineffective teacher.

The district wants to revoke her teaching certification, which would keep her out of Texas classrooms permanently. Hoover will appeal the ruling and is prepared to take the case to court, she said.

Hoover's abrupt dismissal highlights a new concern for employees: Your boss has Internet access, too.

"People don't realize when they put their entire diary out there, they're giving very private information to the public," said Kate Brooks, director of career services for liberal arts students at the University of Texas at Austin.

The photos came to light last month as a result of a feud over ceramics equipment with another art teacher, according to sworn affidavits. Students who had seen the pictures showed the teacher, who then notified school officials.

Austen Clements, one of Hoover's students, noted that many artists have nude pictures, including Georgia O'Keeffe.

"If Georgia O'Keeffe wanted to teach at Austin High, I don't think they'd say, 'No, you have nude pictures online,"' Clements said.

The school was attended by President Bush's daughters, Barbara and Jenna.

Find this article at:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/16/naked.teacher.ap/index.html

pics can be found here
http://savemanny.blogspot.com/2006/06/hs-teacher-ms-hoovers-artistic-nudes.html
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • rightonduderightondude Posts: 745
    not exactly a smart move, considering she can't really control the age limit of who's viewing the pictures once they're posted.
  • CenterCityCenterCity Posts: 193
    well now that she's out in the open, if she's an excellent art teacher, it would be a shame to not let her teach again? kids are smart, they'd understand morality.
    I need to finish writing.
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    when you are a teacher there are things you absolutely should not do. Your students should not be able to log onto the internet and see you naked. I don't care if it's art or not.

    this really is a no-brainer to me.

    It also makes me wonder why I didn't have teachers like this.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    Is it me or do these things always happen in Texas?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Collin wrote:
    Is it me or do these things always happen in Texas?

    Is it me or is this what's considered 'art' in Texas? :D
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • keeponrockinkeeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    I disagree with the school district.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    she seems pretty kinky to me based on a few of those pics...my kind of girl :p
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    not exactly a smart move, considering she can't really control the age limit of who's viewing the pictures once they're posted.

    I thought she didn't put them on the internet but her friend, the artist that made these pictures, did?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • fifefife Posts: 3,327
    this is so funny. last week there was a thread here about a teacher in texas who might go to prison for 20 years for sleeping with an 18 year old student. what is going on in Texas? anyway, this story to be so stupid. she is an Art teacher. and lo and behold she does art in her spare time. first off, she did not put the pictures on the internet. does anyone find it funny that she can be fired for having pictures on the internet but yet Texas voted for a president who was caught drinking and driving. it's just sex people.
  • PegasusPegasus Posts: 3,754
    not exactly a smart move, considering she can't really control the age limit of who's viewing the pictures once they're posted.
    As I understand it, those were nude photos, not porn.
    Age has nothing to do with it or don't you take kids to antiquity museums? Plenty of naked statues there...
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    More nonsense for idiots to get all worked up about.

    Maybe if Americans weren't so uptight ........with a huge stick up their collective butts, they would teach their children that the naked human body is not an evil, disgusting thing; but a natural, beautiful part of nature's work- then no one would be " dramatized" by nudity.

    How in the world this ever made it to CNN, is beyond my comprehension. It is a non-issue, in my opinion.

    I'm more offended and disgusted by teachers who preach, spread or routinely refer to the word of "their" god and religion. Force-feeding one's religion (god) down innocent children's throats, is so very manipulative and coniving. By far, that has a much more profound negative impact, than nudity ever could.

    This shows how truely fucked up Americans are regarding nudity.

    Bombared the TV and landscape with images and suggestions that an all out invasion and war (bombing, killing, murder) is indeed "Patriotic" and "Justified". God Bless!

    But nudity is going to destroy the very moral fabric of our society:rolleyes:

    What a bunch a fuckin' idiots.

    Where's a Janet Jackson exposed nipple, when you need one the most!
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    what grade is this?? ... not that it should make a difference ...

    but i was drawing nudes in grade 10 at my high school art class ... wtf??
  • NMyTree wrote:
    More nonsense for idiots to get all worked up about.

    Maybe if Americans weren't so uptight ........with a huge stick up their collective butts, they would teach their children that the naked human body is not an evil, disgusting thing; but a natural, beautiful part of nature's work- then no one would be " dramatized" by nudity.

    How in the world this ever made it to CNN, is beyond my comprehension. It is a non-issue, in my opinion.

    I'm more offended and disgusted by teachers who preach, spread or routinely refer to the word of "their" god and religion. Force-feeding one's religion (god) down innocent children's throats, is so very manipulative and coniving. By far, that has a much more profound negative impact, than nudity ever could.

    This shows how truely fucked up Americans are regarding nudity.

    Bombared the TV and landscape with images and suggestions that an all out invasion and war (bombing, killing, murder) is indeed "Patriotic" and "Justified". God Bless!

    But nudity is going to destroy the very moral fabric of our society:rolleyes:

    What a bunch a fuckin' idiots.

    Where's a Janet Jackson exposed nipple, when you need one the most!

    I couldn't have said it better myself.
    "It's not British music, it's American music. Now c'mon." -Bob Dylan
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    NMyTree wrote:
    More nonsense for idiots to get all worked up about.

    Maybe if Americans weren't so uptight ........with a huge stick up their collective butts, they would teach their children that the naked human body is not an evil, disgusting thing; but a natural, beautiful part of nature's work- then no one would be " dramatized" by nudity.

    How in the world this ever made it to CNN, is beyond my comprehension. It is a non-issue, in my opinion.

    I'm more offended and disgusted by teachers who preach, spread or routinely refer to the word of "their" god and religion. Force-feeding one's religion (god) down innocent children's throats, is so very manipulative and coniving. By far, that has a much more profound negative impact, than nudity ever could.

    This shows how truely fucked up Americans are regarding nudity.

    Bombared the TV and landscape with images and suggestions that an all out invasion and war (bombing, killing, murder) is indeed "Patriotic" and "Justified". God Bless!

    But nudity is going to destroy the very moral fabric of our society:rolleyes:

    What a bunch a fuckin' idiots.

    Where's a Janet Jackson exposed nipple, when you need one the most!

    We may look at nudity differently than you.. it doesn't make us stupid. And though I doubt many people see anything vile or wrong in these pictures - she is still a school teacher. There is money in porn in our country - and even child porn. The message a teacher sends to her students is important. It is worth a look to see if the message is too complex for the students.

    A young impressionable student may find this to be the deciding factor as she was weighing posing nude for money.

    I am not sure if I agree with a dismissal.. but if I were running a school, I'd ask that my teachers don't pose nude - or work somewhere else.

    America may be stupid about nudity.. but this is our society, and the children influenced by this teacher have to live in it whether they like it or not.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    Abuskedti wrote:
    We may look at nudity differently than you.. it doesn't make us stupid. And though I doubt many people see anything vile or wrong in these pictures - she is still a school teacher. There is money in porn in our country - and even child porn. The message a teacher sends to her students is important. It is worth a look to see if the message is too complex for the students.

    A young impressionable student may find this to be the deciding factor as she was weighing posing nude for money.

    I am not sure if I agree with a dismissal.. but if I were running a school, I'd ask that my teachers don't pose nude - or work somewhere else.

    America may be stupid about nudity.. but this is our society, and the children influenced by this teacher have to live in it whether they like it or not.

    You're a parent, you know this.

    Our children copy, imitate and mirror our behavior, attitudes and perceptions at a very early age (eventually they grow up and develope their own opinions). If one reacts negatively to something or preaches disgust, fear and immorality about specific issues and events-then our children will be traumatized and upset when these specific issues or events arise.

    Just like with Janet Jackson. Not one kid saw a damn thing or even realized what had happened. It happened so fast. Only after the idot adults over-dramatized, over-reacted, slowed down the video, zoomed in on the breast and used one million pointers to identify the " exposed breast/nipple" on the screen, did any kid realize what had happened and develope an opinion on it.

    If as a parent you teach kids the human body is evil, naughty, disgusting, immoral or perverse; then that's what they will believe and react that way.
  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    NMyTree wrote:
    You're a parent, you know this.

    Our children copy, imitate and mirror our behavior, attitudes and perceptions at a very early age (eventually they grow up and develope their own opinions). If one reacts negatively to something or preaches disgust, fear and immorality about specific issues and events-then our children will be traumatized and upset when these specific issues or events arise.

    Just like with Janet Jackson. Not one kid saw a damn thing or even realized what had happened. It happened so fast. Only after the idot adults over-dramatized, over-reacted, slowed down the video, zoomed in on the breast and used one million pointers to identify the " exposed breast/nipple" on the screen, did any kid realize what had happened and develope an opinion on it.

    If as a parent you teach kids the human body is evil, naughty, disgusting, immoral or perverse; then that's what they will believe and react that way.


    I don't think anyone is saying its evil. Just perhaps inappropriate for published photos for a school teacher. If that was my daughter, I'd be proud. As a teacher that teaches minors... I don't like it. I am making an assumption that this is a high school or below teacher - if its college.. I take it all back..
  • boxwine_in_hellboxwine_in_hell Posts: 1,263
    Why the fuck didn't I take art in high school?
    one foot in the door
    the other foot in the gutter
    sweet smell that they adore
    I think I'd rather smother
    -The Replacements-
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    i think in this particular instance, it all goes back to her contract. what exactly is said/specified in her contract, and whatever that is, she agreed to it when she signed it. that's it.

    now, as a former art teacher myself, i can tell you in NO way would i have a job if i did the same...definitely a clause in my contract that covered this and called it off limits. is that right? i don't know. obviously, i am ALL for free artistic expression, but when you become a teacher, particularly for HS and younger......it's not even a question of nudity being 'bad'...but moreso to what degree your students look upon you, etc. perhaps, again, if our culture wasn't as prudish about nudity as it is, it would not hold the same weight...but given where we are today, it's a completely different scenario.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • denverfandenverfan Posts: 218
    Where are the PICS!!!!
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity but they've always worked for me." Gonzo

    'If my fuckin' ex-wife told me to take care of her dog while her and her new boyfriend went to Honolulu, I'd tell her to go fuck herself." -The Dude

    Whisky Drinker, Non-Hunter from Denver.
  • boxwine_in_hellboxwine_in_hell Posts: 1,263
    denverfan wrote:
    Where are the PICS!!!!

    I second that.
    one foot in the door
    the other foot in the gutter
    sweet smell that they adore
    I think I'd rather smother
    -The Replacements-
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    well you both need to pay better attention. links are included in the very first post. now unless they have been taken offline, i had seen them when this first all occurred.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • moeaholicmoeaholic Posts: 535
    well you both need to pay better attention. links are included in the very first post. now unless they have been taken offline, i had seen them when this first all occurred.

    they have been taken offline, it says it at the first page in the link.

    it's already been said here, if she's teaching high school or lower, she should have known better. and if it's "just art", why were the pics taken down? stand behind your beliefs. i don't think she should be fired, she wasn't the one that posted the pictures online. but she should at least be suspended or something to that degree.
    "PC Load Letter?! What the fuck does that mean?"
    ~Michael Bolton
  • denverfandenverfan Posts: 218
    well you both need to pay better attention. links are included in the very first post. now unless they have been taken offline, i had seen them when this first all occurred.

    Christ, I'm talking about nakie pics!!!
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity but they've always worked for me." Gonzo

    'If my fuckin' ex-wife told me to take care of her dog while her and her new boyfriend went to Honolulu, I'd tell her to go fuck herself." -The Dude

    Whisky Drinker, Non-Hunter from Denver.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    denverfan wrote:
    Christ, I'm talking about nakie pics!!!

    they're in there! or they were.
    you just have to look thru em all. sheesh.

    edit - just saw moe's post. you're too late, they're gone.

    well, even if they are not 'her art'...as a teacher, even just posing and allowing pics as such to be published can be a violation of your contract. as i said, i don't know what her particular contract states...but bottomline, whether one thinks it prudish or not, if she signed her contract, that's an agreement to said terms. if you don't like the terms, don't sign the contract. you can't say you will follow a set of obligations, renig, and then expect no repercussions...no matter what actions she did to violate her contract.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • That's not such a smooth move, but c'mon, she's showing pretty much what is shown on tv, they need to get off her ass and let her teach.
    "I believe everybody should have a room where they get rid of all their releases. So my room was a stage."
    - Jimi Hendrix

    "I thought I'd do something nice for the band... I'll hang myself."
    - Jason Newsted, Metallica
  • It's her right to put them on the internet.

    And it's a college.. it's not like she's teaching a bunch of first graders here, these kids are grown up, and at the very least, legally adults.

    Kind of weird, but nothing wrong with it.
    Come on pilgrim you know he loves you..

    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org

    Oh my, they dropped the leash.



    Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!

    "Make our day"
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    art for art's sake.
  • MilestoneMilestone Posts: 1,140
    Abuskedti wrote:

    A young impressionable student may find this to be the deciding factor as she was weighing posing nude for money.


    Whatever.

    I visited the Louve in Paris a few months ago. There were school children walking all around that place, which is filled with nude statues and paintings. Does that mean that there will be an increase in the French porn industry???

    Come on.
    11-2-2000 Portland. 12-8-2002 Seattle. 4-18-2003 Nashville. 5-30-2003 Vancouver. 10-25-2003 Bridge School. 9-2-2005 Vancouver.
    7-6-2006 Las Vegas. 7-20-2006 Portland. 7-22-2006 Gorge. 9-21-2009 Seattle. 9-22-2009 Seattle. 9-26-2009 Ridgefield. 9-25-2011 Vancouver.
    11-29-2013 Portland. 10-16-2014 Detroit. 8-8-2018 Seattle. 8-10-2018 Seattle. 8-13-2018 Missoula.  5-10-2024 Portland.  5-30-2024 Seattle.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    Milestone wrote:
    Whatever.

    I visited the Louve in Paris a few months ago. There were school children walking all around that place, which is filled with nude statues and paintings. Does that mean that there will be an increase in the French porn industry???

    Come on.


    everyone is focusing on the wrong part of the issue. it does not matter what the action is - if she violated her contract, they have the right to terminate, or whatever appropriate action is outlined. does no one believe in contracts? what's their purpose if one may violate at will?

    btw - i believe she taught in a HS.

    and, also....school children brought on a fieldtrip to a museum must have parental consent, thus the parents acknowledge what their children may see and agree. i don't even think it's the nudity per se that is the issue...but the nudity that is of the teacher, and it was more than mere breasts...not that it makes a difference, there were a few very clear/explicit photos of full frontal nudity. i think at worst, the worry is the teacher/student relationship, the respect and seriousness, etc.

    however, NONE of this even matters, at all. the ONLY thing that matters is, what is outlined in her contract, that she agreed to, and if in fact she has violated said agreement.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow



  • btw - i believe she taught in a HS.


    sorry i misread this : " said Kate Brooks, director of career services for liberal arts students at the University of Texas at Austin."

    I can understand being upset for a highschool teacher doing that.

    i still don't really see anything really wrong with it, but they're minors and i doubt she even got parental consent for it.

    I wouldn't have a problem with it per se (although it DEFINETLY depends on the situation), but that desicion isn't for her to make, it's for the parents to make.
    Come on pilgrim you know he loves you..

    http://www.wishlistfoundation.org

    Oh my, they dropped the leash.



    Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!

    "Make our day"
Sign In or Register to comment.