There goes the Neighborhood

binauralsounds
binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
edited July 2006 in A Moving Train
Don't have a link yet, but syria now fully and officially supports Hezbollah in it's fight against Israel! Which, of course, Iran supports syria.

Here we go!! Hang on folks!!!!
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • DMITCH8080
    DMITCH8080 Posts: 18
    Where did you hear this? News? Internet?
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    DMITCH8080 wrote:
    Where did you hear this? News? Internet?


    I was flippin thru channels and caught it briefly. It was on one of the cable channels. Searching the wires now, but haven't found it. when i heard it bout 20 minutes ago it said, "this just in"...

    I was in the other room, so still checking.
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    Ok, just caught it. not surprising, i heard the infamous fox news alert. (they do a fox news alert everytime someone takes a dump) It reads:

    Syria says it will come to defense of Lebanon and Hezbollah!!!!

    HERE WE GO!
  • hailhailkc
    hailhailkc Posts: 582
    Yeah, I saw that too. It's a worldwide suicide.
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • truroute
    truroute Posts: 251
    http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/14/mideast/index.html
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Is it me or does it seem like Israel may be the terrorists here....?
  • NakedClown
    NakedClown Posts: 545
    It's on.... for real.... really this time...

    For those of us in our mid-late 20s, we've watched this simmer our whole lives - and it's about to boil over like never before...
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    NakedClown wrote:
    It's on.... for real.... really this time...

    For those of us in our mid-late 20s, we've watched this simmer our whole lives - and it's about to boil over like never before...
    Goddamn warmonging countries. I've never wished more that Israel wasn't the 51st state....
  • PaperPlates
    PaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Maybe now this middle east problem will be solved once and for all. All out war= one side must win. And my money is on the allies. Im neither glad nor happy about war, despite what you all may think, but if its gonna happen (and it was bound to), at least there's the knowledge that Israel can most likely win all on their own. And if need be, they have allies. Once a certain line is crossed, they CANT afford to go in half assed, it'll have to be all or none.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    PaperPlates wrote:
    Maybe now this middle east problem will be solved once and for all. All out war= one side must win. And my money is on the allies. Im neither glad nor happy about war, despite what you all may think, but if its gonna happen (and it was bound to), at least there's the knowledge that Israel can most likely win all on their own. And if need be, they have allies. Once a certain line is crossed, they CANT afford to go in half assed, it'll have to be all or none.


    on their own? Israel is using US gunships in their war. US tanks, US guns, US bullets, US armor, US jets, US surveillance, US satellites, US support.

    Most definetly not on their own.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1990/BCE.htm
  • Eliot Rosewater
    Eliot Rosewater Posts: 2,659
    Commy wrote:
    on their own? Israel is using US gunships in their war. US tanks, US guns, US bullets, US armor, US jets, US surveillance, US satellites, US support.

    Most definetly not on their own.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1990/BCE.htm
    Exactly...this is yet another american war in the middle-east. I want my government back.
  • PaperPlates
    PaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Commy wrote:
    on their own? Israel is using US gunships in their war. US tanks, US guns, US bullets, US armor, US jets, US surveillance, US satellites, US support.

    Most definetly not on their own.

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1990/BCE.htm

    I meant could. Also said they have allies. ;)

    This conflict sucks. Totally agree on that. But I have to say that the other parties involved were just asking for war, and sometimes, as they say, be careful what you wish for. :(
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    I hope the US stays the fuck out.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    PaperPlates wrote:
    I meant could. Also said they have allies. ;)

    This conflict sucks. Totally agree on that. But I have to say that the other parties involved were just asking for war, and sometimes, as they say, be careful what you wish for. :(

    Could? Could what? stand up on their own? Their wouldn't be an Israel without the United States...that should be obvious.

    Asking for war? When hundreds of your people -and to the palestinians who have a strong sense of community and togetherness, unlike here in the United States-to lose ONE of their own is profound. They are going to try and get them back. And its not one, its hundreds of their people sitting in Israeli jails, women and CHILDREN.

    Hezbollah was trying to get them back....so Israel started a war.
  • SundaySilence
    SundaySilence Posts: 537
    PaperPlates wrote:
    I meant could. Also said they have allies. ;)

    This conflict sucks. Totally agree on that. But I have to say that the other parties involved were just asking for war, and sometimes, as they say, be careful what you wish for. :(

    Of course they were. The aim of terrorism is almost always to provoke overreaction.
  • PaperPlates
    PaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    SundaySilence wrote:
    Of course they were. The aim of terrorism is almost always to provoke overreaction.

    Or reaction. Depending on your viewpoint I guess. This one was apparently the straw that broke the camel's back. No pun of any kind intended.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    Terrrorism IS a reaction.
  • binauralsounds
    binauralsounds Posts: 1,357
    don't gimme no wrote:
    Exactly...this is yet another american war in the middle-east. I want my government back.

    son of a bitch..... I knew it was only a short matter of time before OUR govt did this.

    mother fuck!
  • pjrvm
    pjrvm Posts: 99
    If a war starts the US will most definately get involved and there will be screaming and crying to no end. If the US does not get involved and lets the two sides kill each other off there will be the same people saying, "How can the US let this happen". Think what you want of George Bush and his government but he has faced (and seemingly will face another) a number of dilemmas during his nearly 6 years in office. Regardless of what happens in the middle east the United States will be blamed for it by the rest of the world and by its own citizens. Don't think for a minute that there wouldn't have been the same amount of backlash and criticism of Bush if he had decided not to go into Iraq and Afghanastan. The criticism would have taken the form of "why aren't we defending our country". War is a terrible thing, but we don't live in a perfect world and sometimes it has to happen. So think for a while about both sides of a decision before we start pinning the problems in the middle east on the US and on George Bush.
    PS. I'm a Canadian, I'm curious as to what our government's reaction will be.
  • Purple Hawk
    Purple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    pjrvm wrote:
    If a war starts the US will most definately get involved and there will be screaming and crying to no end. If the US does not get involved and lets the two sides kill each other off there will be the same people saying, "How can the US let this happen". Think what you want of George Bush and his government but he has faced (and seemingly will face another) a number of dilemmas during his nearly 6 years in office. Regardless of what happens in the middle east the United States will be blamed for it by the rest of the world and by its own citizens. Don't think for a minute that there wouldn't have been the same amount of backlash and criticism of Bush if he had decided not to go into Iraq and Afghanastan. The criticism would have taken the form of "why aren't we defending our country". War is a terrible thing, but we don't live in a perfect world and sometimes it has to happen. So think for a while about both sides of a decision before we start pinning the problems in the middle east on the US and on George Bush.
    PS. I'm a Canadian, I'm curious as to what our government's reaction will be.

    This is a great post.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days

Categories