Options

By RALPH NADER-An Open Letter to W.

MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,673
edited August 2006 in A Moving Train
(Was this already posted? If so then sorry for the re-post)
An Open Letter to George W. Bush on Lebanon
Telling the Israelis to "Take Your Time"

By RALPH NADER

The widespread destruction of a defenseless Lebanon-its civilians, its life-sustaining public services, its environment-is a grim and indelible testament to your consummate cruelty and ignorance. Nearly two weeks ago when your tardy Secretary of State met with the Israeli Prime Minister, the message she carried was summarized in a large headline across page one of an Israeli newspaper, "TAKE YOUR TIME."

Yes, take your time, says George W. Bush, pulverizing fleeing refugees in cars full of families, bombing apartment buildings, hospitals and the poor huddled in large south Beirut slums.

Take your time, says George W. Bush, in destroying bridges, roads, gasoline stations, airports, seaports, wheat silos, vehicles with medical supplies, clearly marked ambulances taking the wounded to clinics, even a milk factory .

Take your time, says George W. Bush, while shelters are demolished with bodies of little children together with their mothers and fathers buried in the rubble.

Take your time, says George W. Bush, while the number of fleeing refugees nears one million Lebanese, many exposed to hunger, disease, lack of potable water and medicines. All this in a country friendly to the United States, which played by your rules, protested the Syrian army back into Syria and was trying democratically to put itself together.

Take your time, says George W. Bush, while he speeds more supplies of precision missiles containing deadly anti-personnel cluster bombs which will claim the lives of innocent children for years into the future. The phosphorous bombs laying waste to fields growing crops and horribly burning innocents come from the U.S.A. under your direction.

Do you think the taxpayers of America would approve of such shipped weapons were they ever asked?

Are there words in the English language suitable for the impeachable serial war crimes you are intimately involved in committing not only in Iraq but also now through your encouragement and supplying of the once again invading Israeli government?

Are there words to describe your strategic stupidity which will further increase opposition and peril to the United States around the world and especially in the Middle East? Your own Generals and former CIA Director, Porter Goss, among others in your Administration, have declared that your occupation of Iraq is a magnet attracting the recruiting and training of more and more "terrorists" from Iraq and other countries. And so now this will be the case in Lebanon. All this is a growing "blowback," to use the CIA word for a boomeranging foreign policy, that is endangering the security of the United States.

The calibrated Israeli terror bombing of Lebanon comes in three stages. With its electronic pinpoint precision bombing and artillery, the Israeli government goes after civilians, their homes, cities, towns and villages. Then after telling some to abandon their neighborhoods, it cuts population centers off from each other by destroying transportation facilities into and inside Lebanon, making both refugee flight and delivery of emergency relief efforts either impossible or very difficult. Then its planes, tanks and artillery endanger or destroy what food, water and relief efforts manage to get through to the injured and dying. Warehouse food supplies are incinerated. About four hundred small fishing boats north of Beirut on the oil-polluted coastline were demolished as well.

All the above mayhem and much more have been reported in the U.S., European, Lebanese and Israeli media. The bulk of the fatalities in Lebanon have been civilians. The bulk of the fatalities on the Israeli side have been soldiers. Very fortunately for the Israelis, the Hezbollah rockets are very inaccurate, the vast majority falling harmlessly. Unfortunately for the Lebanese, the precision American armaments of the Israelis are very accurate, which serves to account for why the total casualties and physical destruction are 100 times greater in Lebanon than in Israel.

Most of these accurate munitions come from your decision to send them. Knowing they will be used for offensive purposes, including the lethal demolition of a long-established UN compound, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act which you have sworn to uphold, places the responsibility of being a domestic law breaker squarely on your shoulders.

There is another law that is not being enforced-the Humanitarian Aid Corridor Act of 1996 sponsored by then Republican Senator Robert Dole. Foreign aid is supposed to be cut off to any nation that obstructs the provision of humanitarian aid to another country. As one example, press reports that two tankers, each with 30,000 tons of diesel fuel critical for operating Lebanese hospitals and water pumping stations, are idling in Cyprus from fear of the totally dominant Israeli navy and air force.

There are only a few days left of fuel in Lebanon, which is heading for a larger wave of secondary casualties. They and other critical suppliers need safe passage which the U.S. Navy in the area can readily provide, should it receive orders from the Commander in Chief.

You heard high Israeli officials accurately say on the day the massive bombing of Lebanon began, followed not preceded by Hezbollah rockets, that "nothing in Lebanon is safe." That huge over-reaction to the recent Hezbollah border raid, in addition to many more previous air, sea and land border violations by the Israeli government, certainly put you on public notice.

Since you view yourself as a reborn Christian, and since you have the power to stop the Israeli state terror assaults on Lebanon, you may wish to reflect on Leviticus 19:16 "Neither shalt thou stand idly by the blood of thy neighbor."

Lebanon was a friendly country to you and you have stood by not just idly, but willfully aiding and abetting its devastation.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    defenseless Lebanon?
  • Options
    MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,673
    brain of c wrote:
    defenseless Lebanon?

    Maybe next time you'll be able to make it all the way past 10 words. Give it some time,

    "defenseless Lebanon-its civilians, its life-sustaining public services, its environment"

    Unless Mr Nader missed the part of the war where the lebanese children and mothers started to use american made laser guided weapons?
  • Options
    hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    I wonder why Nader doesn't write an open letter to the leader of Hezzbollah too.

    ???
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • Options
    hailhailkc wrote:
    I wonder why Nader doesn't write an open letter to the leader of Hezzbollah too.

    ???

    because he is addressing the problem at it's source. working backwards never does much.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    hailhailkc wrote:
    I wonder why Nader doesn't write an open letter to the leader of Hezzbollah too.

    ???


    If he thought they could throw him a few votes, he probably would.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Options
    If he thought they could throw him a few votes, he probably would.

    If he only wanted more votes and would do anything for them, then he would sell out to corporate America like all the other braindead politicians 'playing pretend' for your votes so he could afford tons brainwashing commercials telling you how to think. He wants to make you think and question, imo....not just tell you what you should think.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    If he only wanted more votes and would do anything for them, then he would sell out to corporate America like all the other braindead politicians 'playing pretend' for your votes so he could afford tons brainwashing commercials telling you how to think. He wants to make you think and question, imo....not just tell you what you should think.

    He's a politician.

    End
    of
    story.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Options
    He's a politician.

    End
    of
    story.
    ]

    but he is one that hasn't sold out his ideals for corporate $$$$$. he exposes these greedy fucks instead of using them for his advantage....surely you can see the difference even if you don't agree with his stances.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    ]

    but he is one that hasn't sold out his ideals for corporate $$$$$. he exposes these greedy fucks instead of using them for his advantage....surely you can see the difference even if you don't agree with his stances.

    I cant simply trust the man's convicitons, nor yours. ;) If I was able to view both his contributors records, and his own financial records, perhaps I'd believe this. They all have a price. They all have "backers". Who are his?

    found this thus far.

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/09/MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL

    "Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader -- still not on the ballot in a single state -- has received a recent windfall of contributions from deep-pocketed Republicans with a history of big contributions to the party, an analysis of federal records show.

    Nearly one in 10 of Nader's major donors -- those writing checks of $1, 000 or more -- have given in recent months to the Bush-Cheney campaign, the latest documents show. GOP fund-raisers also have "bundled" contributions -- gathering hefty donations for maximum effect to help Nader, who has criticized the practice in the past. "
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Options
    I cant simply trust the man's convicitons, nor yours. ;) If I was able to view both his contributors records, and his own financial records, perhaps I'd believe this. They all have a price. They all have "backers". Who are his?

    I think for the most part his supporters have always been the people that share his vision and ideology. I'll look into it more and get back with you on more specifics.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    I cant simply trust the man's convicitons, nor yours. ;) If I was able to view both his contributors records, and his own financial records, perhaps I'd believe this. They all have a price. They all have "backers". Who are his?

    found this thus far.

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/09/MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL

    "Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader -- still not on the ballot in a single state -- has received a recent windfall of contributions from deep-pocketed Republicans with a history of big contributions to the party, an analysis of federal records show.

    Nearly one in 10 of Nader's major donors -- those writing checks of $1, 000 or more -- have given in recent months to the Bush-Cheney campaign, the latest documents show. GOP fund-raisers also have "bundled" contributions -- gathering hefty donations for maximum effect to help Nader, who has criticized the practice in the past. "

    About the Repub $$. He wasn't trying to do them any favors, he was hoping their plan would backfire on them. I do believe there is a big difference there, no shady backroom deals and promises.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    About the Repub $$. He wasn't trying to do them any favors, he was hoping their plan would backfire on them. I do believe there is a big difference there, no shady backroom deals and promises.


    How'd you get into the backroom? Since surely you wouldnt state that, unless you were there and know it as fact. ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Options
    How'd you get into the backroom? Since surely you wouldnt state that, unless you were there and know it as fact. ;)

    So you are saying that Nader is actually working with repubs to get their money, even when he fights against everything they stand for? I think they donated to him to take votes away from Kerry. That seems obvious to me. I suppose I could be wrong...but that just doesn't make sense to me.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    So you are saying that Nader is actually working with repubs to get their money, even when he fights against everything they stand for? I think they donated to him to take votes away from Kerry. That seems obvious to me. I suppose I could be wrong...but that just doesn't make sense to me.


    So, did he or did he not take the money?
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • Options
    So, did he or did he not take the money?


    did he makes promises or deals with them? Or was it more of a strategy for the repubs?
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    JohnBriggsJohnBriggs Posts: 101
    Now it's Bush's fault that Lebanon is getting fucked up? I don't like the guy but when will fucking Americans own up to there own bullshit and stop blaming George for everything.
  • Options
    hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    because he is addressing the problem at it's source. working backwards never does much.

    So Hezzbollah isn't also a source of this problem? Regardless of what you think about Bush, you can't sit here and NOT admit that a terrorist organization occupying the southern half of Lebanon isn't AT LEAST PART OF the "source" of the problem.

    I think, like Paper Plates said, Nader is nothing more than a politician. Just another person in a long line who makes their views known by continually bashing Bush instead of addressing the issue head on.

    Nader bitching to Bush in an open letter IS working backwards. If he wanted to work at the beginning of the problem, he would work to get Hezzbollah out of Lebanon.

    That isn't the sexy, political solution though, is it?!?! It's much easier to bash Bush with a letter, and keep all of your cronies at home happy. What exactly is this letter going to do, other than reinforce to your base that you hate Bush?
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • Options
    MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,673
    hailhailkc wrote:
    So Hezzbollah isn't also a source of this problem? Regardless of what you think about Bush, you can't sit here and NOT admit that a terrorist organization occupying the southern half of Lebanon isn't AT LEAST PART OF the "source" of the problem.

    Hezbollah exists only because the lebanese army is unable to defend it's people, that's why the hez has majority support of the people of lebanon, when israeli aggression stops, at that time if hezbollah's still around and cause any trouble, then i'll consider them a real problem. So the source of the issue/problem remains Israel and that's why it's imperative to go after them.
  • Options
    hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    MrBrian wrote:
    Hezbollah exists only because the lebanese army is unable to defend it's people, that's why the hez has majority support of the people of lebanon, when israeli aggression stops, at that time if hezbollah's still around and cause any trouble, then i'll consider them a real problem. So the source of the issue/problem remains Israel and that's why it's imperative to go after them.

    Israeli aggresssion? Hezbollah occupies southern Lebanon because the Lebanese army is too weak to stop them, and Hezzbollah knows this. Hezzbollah is the one who continually acts out in aggression from behind the border of Lebanon. You can't blame Israel for going into Lebanon to stop them.

    Why is that so hard to understand?!?!

    If your neighbor continually harassed you and your family from behind someone else's fence (not even his own), wouldn't you go into that backyard and finally take care of the situation so you could live in peace?
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • Options
    MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,673
    hailhailkc wrote:
    Israeli aggresssion? Hezbollah occupies southern Lebanon because the Lebanese army is too weak to stop them, and Hezzbollah knows this. Hezzbollah is the one who continually acts out in aggression from behind the border of Lebanon. You can't blame Israel for going into Lebanon to stop them.

    Why is that so hard to understand?!?!

    If your neighbor continually harassed you and your family from behind someone else's fence (not even his own), wouldn't you go into that backyard and finally take care of the situation so you could live in peace?

    Yet you don't support the palestinian struggle,
  • Options
    hailhailkc wrote:
    So Hezzbollah isn't also a source of this problem? Regardless of what you think about Bush, you can't sit here and NOT admit that a terrorist organization occupying the southern half of Lebanon isn't AT LEAST PART OF the "source" of the problem.

    I think, like Paper Plates said, Nader is nothing more than a politician. Just another person in a long line who makes their views known by continually bashing Bush instead of addressing the issue head on.

    Nader bitching to Bush in an open letter IS working backwards. If he wanted to work at the beginning of the problem, he would work to get Hezzbollah out of Lebanon.

    That isn't the sexy, political solution though, is it?!?! It's much easier to bash Bush with a letter, and keep all of your cronies at home happy. What exactly is this letter going to do, other than reinforce to your base that you hate Bush?

    No, Hezbollah isn't a source of the problem. It is an effect of the problem. You have to eliminate cause to change the effect. If we rid the world of Hezbollah, another group will form to take their place because the problem is still there creating this effect.

    Nader knows this and chooses to work at the problem from it's source because that is the only means of actually changing the outcomes we are currently experiencing. You have to end the sickness it's self not just fight off the symptoms.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    He's a politician.

    End
    of
    story.

    He's not. (he's an activist who uses political landscape to make his points)

    Do
    your
    research.
  • Options
    MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,673
    and for the people who have that much dislike and hate for Mr Nader and what he's done/does/doing and will do in the future.....Please feel free to rip the seat belts from your cars, the seat belts that he helped fight for.

    It's so sad to see his words, his views so easily dismissed by so many americans, but he'd still fight to save your lives.
  • Options
    Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    This is definately a post that encourages me to calmly walk outside my apartment and approach my car. As I approach my trunk, I look for my keys and open the trunk. I slowly search for the tire iron, and ask the first passerby to repeatedly smash me over teh skull.

    Sigh.

    What is Ralph Nader's? strategy? NOBODY on the international scene, INCLUDING Lebonan, will not do anything about the Hezbos. People like Nader, Anan, they don't have ANY ideas. Please someone articulate their 'final solution' to Israel!!!
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Options
    Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    No, Hezbollah isn't a source of the problem. It is an effect of the problem.

    Not meant to be sarcastic, antagonistic, or any of that. But is the fact that Israel exists the source of the problem?
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Options
    This is definately a post that encourages me to calmly walk outside my apartment and approach my car. As I approach my trunk, I look for my keys and open the trunk. I slowly search for the tire iron, and ask the first passerby to repeatedly smash me over teh skull.

    Sigh.

    What is Ralph Nader's? strategy? NOBODY on the international scene, INCLUDING Lebonan, will not do anything about the Hezbos. People like Nader, Anan, they don't have ANY ideas. Please someone articulate their 'final solution' to Israel!!!


    I think encouraging diplomacy is a better solution than promoting death and destruction.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    I think encouraging diplomacy is a better solution than promoting death and destruction.


    In an ideal world, I think we all would argee with that. But I don't see any Hezzbo diplomats. They aren't a state. There are state actors (Iran, Syria, and apparently Lebonan) that obviously support this group.

    To me diplomacy can only work if both sides want peace. I honeslty do not believe that the Hezbos want peace.
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
  • Options
    In an ideal world, I think we all would argee with that. But I don't see any Hezzbo diplomats. They aren't a state. There are state actors (Iran, Syria, and apparently Lebonan) that obviously support this group.

    To me diplomacy can only work if both sides want peace. I honeslty do not believe that the Hezbos want peace.

    Well, you will never find out if diplomacy can work or not if your refuse to talk and to try to reason with the other side.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • Options
    sourdoughsourdough Posts: 579
    In an ideal world, I think we all would argee with that. But I don't see any Hezzbo diplomats. They aren't a state. There are state actors (Iran, Syria, and apparently Lebonan) that obviously support this group.

    To me diplomacy can only work if both sides want peace. I honeslty do not believe that the Hezbos want peace.
    Hizbollah does have diplomats. They do have representatives, and are involved directly in the Lebanese government. Today Nasrallah said that he never would have authorized the kidnappings if there was a 1% chance of a war that materialized. I actually believe him on this one because he kinda loses face as a tough militant which would make him go over with the anti-Israeli extremists. Hizbollah and Hamas both have military wings that grab international headlines but also provide public services, schoos, hospitals etc...
  • Options
    Purple HawkPurple Hawk Posts: 1,300
    Well, you will never find out if diplomacy can work or not if your refuse to talk and to try to reason with the other side.

    True...but again, are there any Hezbo diplomats? Are there any Al-Quida representatives? Iran engages in diplomacy but are obviously not serious.

    I really do think diplomacy is the ideal way to go, and we should exhaust all possibilities.

    I also think we need to be serious. It's a joke to wave your finger at Iran for it's nuclear program without any enforcement. That's my problem with the UN. How many of their resolutions have been broken (even by Israel) but how many of them have been enforced? What is the point of these resolutions if there are no incentives or enforcement mechanisms?
    And you ask me what I want this year
    And I try to make this kind and clear
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
    Cuz I don't need boxes wrapped in strings
    And desire and love and empty things
    Just a chance that maybe we'll find better days
Sign In or Register to comment.