Police officer slows down speeding biker

MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
edited July 2008 in A Moving Train
Before this video surfaced the officer said the cyclist rode into him... soooo not true.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUkiyBVytRQ
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    holy shit. It's terrible, but I must admit it made me laugh...
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    I truly hope that officer gets in trouble. That was terrible. The guy was trying to ride around him, the cop saw him coming....... What a doofus! The cop, that is.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • What a dick.
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,620
    Is there any more to the story besides the video?
    hippiemom = goodness
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    Is there any more to the story besides the video?

    (sure)

    NYPD Officer Patrick Pogan, of the Midtown South Precinct, is the officer seen in yesterday's video knocking a cyclist to the ground during Critical Mass Friday. In criminal charges filed against the cyclist, Pogan made a statement summarizing the events and why he stopped the cyclist and arrested him. The Officer's statement is wildly, almost humorously, at odds with the video; and Pogan made his statement to the DA before the video was known about or seen by the DA.

    Here is the except from the criminal charges against the cyclists. "Deponent" is officer Pogan.


    "Deponent states that deponent observed the defendant obstructing vehicular traffic by riding defendant's bicycle in the center lane of traffic while traveling southbound on 7th Avenue at the above-named location and while weaving defendant's bicycle in and out of the center lane of traffic, thereby forcing multiple vehicles to stop abruptly or change their direction in order to avoid hitting the defendant. Deponent further states that the defendant's above-described conduct caused public disturbance and inconvenience in that it caused disruption of the normal flow of vehicular traffic."

    "Deponent further states that upon instructing the defendant to cease the above-described conduct, the defendant steered the defendant's bicycle in the direction of the deponent and drove defendant's bicycle directly into deponent's body, causing deponent to fall to the ground and causing deponent to suffer lacerations on deponent's forearms."

    http://www.onnyturf.com/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=23999
  • The cop filed an official report that the guy ran into him and then resisted arrest.

    Basically we have a liar cop that should be fired for being a jackass.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    Totally agree, Roland. That cop was out of control. I hate those Critical Mass assholes (they pulled their shit here in Seattle, too), but there was no excuse for what the cop did.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • What's the deal at the end with that woman who grabs they guy's bike and starts riding away with it?

    I would be so pissed, I'd be swearing like crazy at that cop.

    I once called a police officer a "fucking asshole" (seriously no lie) as I drove away once at a bullshit traffic stop. (this guy was over the top). I got fined for pulling out in front of him (lame). Anyways he chases after me, pulls me over again, then starts in on me practically spitting on me threatening to charge me for "dozens" of violations of his choosing....he basicall told me whatever he could make up on the spot off the top of his head, he would charge me for, and that I should be a little more "appreciative" of him next time or else.

    I hired a lawyer and hauled his ass in court. Charges dismissed. I still had to pay out of pocket because of some spontaneous testosterone fluctuation.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • duggroduggro Posts: 1,343
    http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/2008/07/police-officer-suspended-after-000948.php


    Police officer suspended after video shows him 'bodyslamming' a bicyclist
    Staff Reporter | Posted July 29, 2008 2:41 PM



    Police in New York have reportedly stripped an officer of his gun and badge after a videotape surfaced showing him shoving a bicyclist to the ground last week.

    Patrick Pogan of the Midtown South police precinct is being investigated after he allegedly pushed a cyclist during a demonstration on Friday.

    Christopher Long was riding through Times Square as a part of a monthly bike ride demonstration called Critical Mass when the officer appeared to approach him and shove him to the ground.

    The bicyclist was arrested and accused of riding his bike into the officer, but the video posted on YouTube tells a different story as Officer Pogan is shown lurching toward the bike. The Associated Press video report described the officer's actions as "bodyslamming" the cyclist.
    Dublin Leeds Berlin Wembley
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    What's the deal at the end with that woman who grabs they guy's bike and starts riding away with it?

    I'm betting she was a friend of the cyclist and just wanted to make sure the cops didn't try to impound the bike or anything.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • MrBrianMrBrian Posts: 2,672
    If the vid didn't exist, I wonder what wouldve happened? hmmmmm.... :)
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    This article talks about how the cop said one thing, but the "cheap digital" evidence showed otherwise. It also mentions how a lot of false complaints by cops have been refuted by witnesses taking "cheap digital" video.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/nyregion/30about.html?em&ex=1217563200&en=e162726ad1b6d34b&ei=5087%0A
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    man, if I were a cop, I'd be awesome. I don't know why lots of cops have to be such assholes.
  • RiverrunnerRiverrunner Posts: 2,419
    jeffbr wrote:
    I'm betting she was a friend of the cyclist and just wanted to make sure the cops didn't try to impound the bike or anything.

    That was my thoughts too. She took it before someone else stole it or the cops took it. The cyclist was arrested and spent 26 hours in jail believe it or not - all based on the officer's sworn complaint about him being reckless or something. The guy still has to appear in court again.
    The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way it treats its animals. Ghandi
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,620
    MrBrian wrote:
    (sure)

    NYPD Officer Patrick Pogan, of the Midtown South Precinct, is the officer seen in yesterday's video knocking a cyclist to the ground during Critical Mass Friday. In criminal charges filed against the cyclist, Pogan made a statement summarizing the events and why he stopped the cyclist and arrested him. The Officer's statement is wildly, almost humorously, at odds with the video; and Pogan made his statement to the DA before the video was known about or seen by the DA.

    Here is the except from the criminal charges against the cyclists. "Deponent" is officer Pogan.


    "Deponent states that deponent observed the defendant obstructing vehicular traffic by riding defendant's bicycle in the center lane of traffic while traveling southbound on 7th Avenue at the above-named location and while weaving defendant's bicycle in and out of the center lane of traffic, thereby forcing multiple vehicles to stop abruptly or change their direction in order to avoid hitting the defendant. Deponent further states that the defendant's above-described conduct caused public disturbance and inconvenience in that it caused disruption of the normal flow of vehicular traffic."

    "Deponent further states that upon instructing the defendant to cease the above-described conduct, the defendant steered the defendant's bicycle in the direction of the deponent and drove defendant's bicycle directly into deponent's body, causing deponent to fall to the ground and causing deponent to suffer lacerations on deponent's forearms."

    http://www.onnyturf.com/blogs/view_post.php?content_id=23999


    Thank you.

    What a jerk.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • This article talks about how the cop said one thing, but the "cheap digital" evidence showed otherwise. It also mentions how a lot of false complaints by cops have been refuted by witnesses taking "cheap digital" video.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/nyregion/30about.html?em&ex=1217563200&en=e162726ad1b6d34b&ei=5087%0A

    maybe the next move, after trying to kill the internet with internet2, is going to be to try and kill "cheap digital" cameras.

    lol.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • _outlaw wrote:
    man, if I were a cop, I'd be awesome. I don't know why lots of cops have to be such assholes.

    I'd be like...hey man check out this fat pound of weed I scored from the evidence room...it's frickn b-a-d-a-s-s!
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    MrBrian wrote:
    If the vid didn't exist, I wonder what wouldve happened? hmmmmm.... :)
    yep...one of the reasons the death penalty is crap....bad cops....happens every freakin day.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    I'd be like...hey man check out this fat pound of weed I scored from the evidence room...it's frickn b-a-d-a-s-s!
    totally. :D
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")


  • I guarantee you hear nothing from Sharpton because the cop administering the beating was black.
    "All the rusted signs we ignore throughout our lives"--Ed
  • MLC2006MLC2006 Posts: 861
    just a quick read on "Critical Mass" on wiki. looks like their MO is cutting off vehicular traffic, for whatever reason. the report said that this particular guy was weaving in and out of traffic trying to get vehicles to slam on brakes or change directions to keep from hitting him. that sounds like a way to get someone seriously injured. note also that probably a dozen cyclists went by the cops without incident....it was this one particular guy. so, if he was in fact cutting traffic off, then this cop should get a pat on the back for a job well done.
  • MLC2006 wrote:
    just a quick read on "Critical Mass" on wiki. looks like their MO is cutting off vehicular traffic, for whatever reason. the report said that this particular guy was weaving in and out of traffic trying to get vehicles to slam on brakes or change directions to keep from hitting him. that sounds like a way to get someone seriously injured. note also that probably a dozen cyclists went by the cops without incident....it was this one particular guy. so, if he was in fact cutting traffic off, then this cop should get a pat on the back for a job well done.


    I agree. I'll go even further and say that I think there are a good amount of people in NY lately that have been finding a way to GET PAID. Any abuse by a cop (especially in liberal NYC) is an easy way to make money nowadays. Q: What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions? A: MONEY!
    "All the rusted signs we ignore throughout our lives"--Ed
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    MLC2006 wrote:
    just a quick read on "Critical Mass" on wiki. looks like their MO is cutting off vehicular traffic, for whatever reason. the report said that this particular guy was weaving in and out of traffic trying to get vehicles to slam on brakes or change directions to keep from hitting him. that sounds like a way to get someone seriously injured. note also that probably a dozen cyclists went by the cops without incident....it was this one particular guy. so, if he was in fact cutting traffic off, then this cop should get a pat on the back for a job well done.

    Well, as a police officer I think he has an obligation to uphold the law, not break it.

    But as I said in my previous post in this thread, I think the Critical Mass people are assholes, and their cause is counter productive. I have a nice "brush guard" on the front of my Durango and I'm sure would have no trouble moving some of those douchebags out of my way if necessary. Even reputable bicycle organizations in Seattle don't condone the Critical Mass people. They may raise awareness of bikes, but they also raise dislike. Instead of antagonizing, they should actually obey the traffic laws and co-exist with automobiles, just as they would like autos to co-exist with them.

    Here's what the fuckers did in Seattle over the weekend:
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008078611_criticalmass29m.html
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • MLC2006MLC2006 Posts: 861
    jeffbr wrote:
    Well, as a police officer I think he has an obligation to uphold the law, not break it.

    see, that's the problem, you're assuming the cop is breaking the law, and that's not clear. supposedly, the guy was weaving in and out of lanes to cut vehicles off. now, he clearly showed no sign of stopping for the cop as he was making evasive maneuvors to avoid the cop. if he was indeed cutting off traffic, the cop was obligated to stop him.

    now, here's a scenario.....the cop sees the guy cutting off traffic and does nothing to stop him. 1 or 2 blocks down the street, the guy cuts off another vehicle which swerves and hits a group of people killing one or two of them. that happens, the first thing that's going to be said is, "why the fuck didn't cop stop him?". then, the cop will be fired and most definitely be sued by the victims' families. that's the problem with this "digital evidence" referenced by others.....it keeps half the story and ignores the rest of the story.
  • MLC2006MLC2006 Posts: 861
    hartamh wrote:
    I saw this on the news this morning. You can clearly see the cop went after this guy. Thanks for camera's catching this.

    yes, you can see the cop's went after this guy. which is something that cops do when a crime has been committed. and once again, note that the cops did go after the other 30 cyclists that went by them to begin with. if the cop just wanted to tackle somebody, there were at least 3-4 that got close enough that he would've barely had to move. but no, he went out of his way to talk 10-15 feet over to tackle this one particular guy. that indicates to me that this one particular guy did something he shouldn't have done. call me crazy.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    MLC2006 wrote:
    see, that's the problem, you're assuming the cop is breaking the law, and that's not clear. supposedly, the guy was weaving in and out of lanes to cut vehicles off. now, he clearly showed no sign of stopping for the cop as he was making evasive maneuvors to avoid the cop. if he was indeed cutting off traffic, the cop was obligated to stop him.

    now, here's a scenario.....the cop sees the guy cutting off traffic and does nothing to stop him. 1 or 2 blocks down the street, the guy cuts off another vehicle which swerves and hits a group of people killing one or two of them. that happens, the first thing that's going to be said is, "why the fuck didn't cop stop him?". then, the cop will be fired and most definitely be sued by the victims' families. that's the problem with this "digital evidence" referenced by others.....it keeps half the story and ignores the rest of the story.

    Fine, then why did that pig lie on his report if he hadn't done anything wrong?

    He clearly falsified a report. Video evidence exposed his lie. He has now been suspended.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    jeffbr wrote:
    Fine, then why did that pig lie on his report if he hadn't done anything wrong?

    He clearly falsified a report. Video evidence exposed his lie. He has now been suspended.


    exactly.....yes the cyclists are morons but the cop is the bigger n=moron for lowing himself to their level...cop deserves to be fired and charged with assult
  • How Ironic...

    "Critical Mass is a bicycling event typically held on the last Friday of every month in cities around the world. While the ride was originally founded with the idea of drawing attention to how unfriendly the city was to bicyclists"
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • MLC2006MLC2006 Posts: 861
    jeffbr wrote:
    Fine, then why did that pig lie on his report if he hadn't done anything wrong?

    He clearly falsified a report. Video evidence exposed his lie. He has now been suspended.

    good to see how unbiased you are using "that pig". I don't know what's in his police report. It appeared to me that he made an effort to stop the guy and the guy clearly made an evasive maneuvor to avoid being stopped, so he was then forcibly stopped. I would hope that was written in the report. unless you have some new info that I've not seen, the cop has not been suspended....he's been put on desk duty until further investigation.
Sign In or Register to comment.