Shame on you! Here's what happens when you ban guns...

69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
edited August 2007 in A Moving Train
The US has the most guns per capital in the world, even though overall violent and property crime has reached a 32-year low. Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/23/nshot323.xml

Britain's rising levels of gun crime
By Sophie Borland and Aislinn Simpson
Last Updated: 3:12am BST 24/08/2007

The number of young people prosecuted for firearms offences has soared by 20 per cent in the past five years, it was revealed earlier this month.

In 2001, 1,193 youngsters under age 21 went to magistrates courts on gun related charges. By 2005, that had risen to 1,444. The statistics come after a recent wave of gun crime in Britain’s inner cities, with many victims not even out of their teens.

Shadow home affairs minister James Brokenshire said: “The rise in gun crime demonstrated by these figures is alarming.”

In April Bernard Hogan-Howe, the chief constable of Merseyside Police, insisted new laws to make reporting information on shootings and possession of guns a 'duty’’ were essential because people were too scared to come forward.

Mr Hogan-Howe, in the running to be the next Metropolitan Police commissioner, said the wall of silence protecting the increasing number of young people drawn into gun crime had to be broken.

In an interview with The Guardian, he said Britain should adopt laws similar to those in Australia "where people have a duty to report information about gun crime to the police".

But he called on the Government to push them further and apply them to firearm victims too frightened of reprisals to press charges.

"The challenge is people who survive do not want to complain and the best witness is quite often the victim who can provide a description and motive," he said.

"By refusing to help it can put the investigation on to the back foot."

His comments come as police chiefs voice growing frustration at the difficulty in tackling gun crime among youths.

Mr Hogan-Howe told the newspaper his force was already evicting families that harboured children who possessed guns, and moving them to other areas.

His officers are also instructed to stop and search suspects regularly. The chief constable, who attended a gun crime summit at Downing Street in February, said such initiatives were leading the way in stamping out the problem.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • lucylespianlucylespian Posts: 2,403
    Yeah, but look at how low the overall numbers are. They are taliking about and extra 200 crimes a year over a five years period, compared to the US which slaughters 22 00 peeps a year. The UK figures are not fatalities, just crimes, very few of which would involve fatalities.
    That's what you get when you ban guns. A low enough leverl of gun crime that a few hundred cases seems like a problem.

    You guys can't see the tears, cos you are drowning in an ocean !!
    Music is not a competetion.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Let's see now ... according to the 2005 statistics that I was able to find, the U.S. has a population a little under five times that of Britain. Let's round it to five for the sake of simplicity. In 2005, there were 73 gun-related homicides in Britain. So if they're handling things so much worse than we are, we should have fewer than 365, right?

    But wait ... we had 12,118.

    I'm a little confused as to how someone in the U.S. can say "Shame on you!" to Britain. We have more than 33 times as many gun-related homicides, shouldn't it be shame on us?
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    hippiemom wrote:
    But wait ... we had 12,118.

    I'm sure if you reduced that number by the number of people who deserved what they got or had it coming to them one way or another, it would be comparable to if not a lot less than Britain's number.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    69charger wrote:
    The US has the most guns per capital in the world, even though overall violent and property crime has reached a 32-year low. Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond....


    Be proud of American export! Be very, very proud!
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    hippiemom wrote:
    Let's see now ... according to the 2005 statistics that I was able to find, the U.S. has a population a little under five times that of Britain. Let's round it to five for the sake of simplicity. In 2005, there were 73 gun-related homicides in Britain. So if they're handling things so much worse than we are, we should have fewer than 365, right?

    But wait ... we had 12,118.

    I'm a little confused as to how someone in the U.S. can say "Shame on you!" to Britain. We have more than 33 times as many gun-related homicides, shouldn't it be shame on us?


    i was just gonna post this when i read yours... simple maths tells me that i have an 8inch willy... it also tells me that i'm far less likely to be shot here in Scotland than in the US... far less.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    sponger wrote:
    I'm sure if you reduced that number by the number of people who deserved what they got or had it coming to them one way or another, it would be comparable to if not a lot less than Britain's number.

    yo dogg, you said it. that punk be deservin what i be layin down.
  • 69charger69charger Posts: 1,045
    even flow? wrote:
    Be proud of American export! Be very, very proud!

    So Britain is to blame for tooth decay and gum disease in the U.S. then?
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    69charger wrote:
    So Britain is to blame for tooth decay and gum disease in the U.S. then?

    the bad teeth thing is old man... i watched Spike Lee's documentary of New Orleans the other night and most of those people on that had old tombstones for teeth... or some had no teeth at all... i know it was a hurricane but did it knock out all their teeth as well as the levees.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • OpenOpen Posts: 792
    sponger wrote:
    I'm sure if you reduced that number by the number of people who deserved what they got or had it coming to them one way or another, it would be comparable to if not a lot less than Britain's number.


    By your logic, which i dont agree with, you could apply that to Britians numbers as well.
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    dunkman wrote:
    the bad teeth thing is old man... i watched Spike Lee's documentary of New Orleans the other night and most of those people on that had old tombstones for teeth... or some had no teeth at all... i know it was a hurricane but did it knock out all their teeth as well as the levees.
    No. But we are frequently referred to as the most "European" city in the U.S.
    :D
  • DeniDeni Posts: 233
    sponger wrote:
    I'm sure if you reduced that number by the number of people who deserved what they got or had it coming to them one way or another, it would be comparable to if not a lot less than Britain's number.


    Tell that to Chiara Levin's mother.
    "Ideas are bulletproof." --V

    Peace and Love
    Deni
    :)
  • Get_RightGet_Right Posts: 13,313
    there is no reason any private person needs to own or carry a handgun

    keep a shotgun if you are worried about being attacked
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    guns are for pussies and people who live in fear...
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    hippiemom wrote:
    Let's see now ... according to the 2005 statistics that I was able to find, the U.S. has a population a little under five times that of Britain. Let's round it to five for the sake of simplicity. In 2005, there were 73 gun-related homicides in Britain. So if they're handling things so much worse than we are, we should have fewer than 365, right?

    But wait ... we had 12,118.

    I'm a little confused as to how someone in the U.S. can say "Shame on you!" to Britain. We have more than 33 times as many gun-related homicides, shouldn't it be shame on us?


    this post is so blinding in its brilliance and simple arithmeticness that i had to quote it again
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    dunkman wrote:
    this post is so blinding in its brilliance and simple arithmeticness that i had to quote it again


    yea but this thread is about guns......logic and rational thinking doesn't belong here....;) :D:D
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    dunkman wrote:
    this post is so blinding in its brilliance and simple arithmeticness that i had to quote it again
    Simple arithmatics are all I'm capable of, so I'm glad you like it! :)
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    cutback wrote:
    yea but this thread is about guns......logic and rational thinking doesn't belong here....;) :D:D


    you used 3 smilies fuckteeth.. i'm going to shoot you in the pancreas
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    dunkman wrote:
    you used 3 smilies fuckteeth.. i'm going to shoot you in the pancreas


    :( :):o:p :mad:
  • JamMastaEJamMastaE Posts: 444
    holy shit,is this what we have become? a nation of ignorant fools?

    first of all,guns are as American as apple pie.they are a part of being FREE.
    the 2nd amendment was put in place in case the government turned tyrannical (like now) we would have a means of fighting back,averting oppression and re-instilling the law (Constitution). the people out in the streets for the most part are using ILLEGAL firearms!!! law abiding citizens who legally own their guns account for only a fraction of deaths.and their accuracy with said weapons are way above what the police shoot.

    are you suggesting only cops and military should have guns? so any group of 50 or more fully armed men could come and take over half your city and you'd be helpless?plus police don't legally have to protect you!!!do you know that?they could sit there and watch you get stabbed to death and not even have to do anything.if you call 911 and say your life is in danger but the cops don't show up for an hour,there is nothing you can legally do. while your whole family's lives could be in peril.

    no my friends,THE PUSSY is the man who rather call the cops and hide rather than grab his gun and defend his family!!!

    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
    -- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

    "The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good"
    -- George Washington

    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
    -- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188

    and Mr. peace himself

    "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest."
    -- Mahatma Gandhi

    this one is for you all

    "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficient... The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding."
    -- Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis


    When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state".

    Love your country, but never trust its government.
    -- Robert A. Heinlein

    "The state calls its own violence `law', but that of the individual `crime'"
    -- Max Stirner

    "Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."
    -- John F. Kennedy

    False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
    -- Cesare Beccaria, as quoted by Thomas Jefferson's Commonplace book


    Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
    -- Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788


    ahh the good old days when we were a nation of men.
    "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain


    "I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
    Emiliano Zapata
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    JamMastaE wrote:
    holy shit,is this what we have become? a nation of ignorant fools?

    first of all,guns are as American as apple pie.they are a part of being FREE.
    the 2nd amendment was put in place in case the government turned tyrannical (like now) we would have a means of fighting back,averting oppression and re-instilling the law (Constitution). the people out in the streets for the most part are using ILLEGAL firearms!!! law abiding citizens who legally own their guns account for only a fraction of deaths.and their accuracy with said weapons are way above what the police shoot.

    are you suggesting only cops and military should have guns? so any group of 50 or more fully armed men could come and take over half your city and you'd be helpless?plus police don't legally have to protect you!!!do you know that?they could sit there and watch you get stabbed to death and not even have to do anything.if you call 911 and say your life is in danger but the cops don't show up for an hour,there is nothing you can legally do. while your whole family's lives could be in peril.

    no my friends,THE PUSSY is the man who rather call the cops and hide rather than grab his gun and defend his family!!!

    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
    -- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

    "The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good"
    -- George Washington

    "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
    -- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-188

    and Mr. peace himself

    "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest."
    -- Mahatma Gandhi

    this one is for you all

    "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficient... The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding."
    -- Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis


    When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state".

    Love your country, but never trust its government.
    -- Robert A. Heinlein

    "The state calls its own violence `law', but that of the individual `crime'"
    -- Max Stirner

    "Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."
    -- John F. Kennedy

    False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
    -- Cesare Beccaria, as quoted by Thomas Jefferson's Commonplace book


    Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
    -- Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788

    you are 33 times more likely to be shot in the face by a drug-addled retard than i am...

    quite comforting that

    jammasta wrote:
    ahh the good old days when we were a nation of men.

    real men dont need guns.. they use fists, something which you once threatened on me...

    p.s. real men dont threaten people on a forum...
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    It's in the water.

    By that I mean, something is different about the people, not the guns.

    Though, "Gun Culture" might have something to do with it. Because the U.S. culture in general supports the use of guns for show and because the U.S. people are afraid of the big bad Muslim amongst other things.

    It's not the actual guns that kill, it's the culture, and it's uniquely american.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • A gun has to be picked up...loaded...pointed at someone...then fired...

    Guns are essentially 100% harmless on their own, aside from any manufacturing toxins introduced into the environment.

    Something to go hmm about.

    It's all culture baby...lock and load my big mac combo biatch...daddy's gonna get his freak on!!!
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • JamMastaEJamMastaE Posts: 444
    dunkman wrote:
    you are 33 times more likely to be shot in the face by a drug-addled retard than i am...

    quite comforting that

    not if i shoot him first:)



    dunkman wrote:
    real men dont need guns.. they use fists, something which you once threatened on me...

    p.s. real men dont threaten people on a forum...

    i didn't threaten you,you misunderstood.

    and you're missing the point as usual.
    "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain


    "I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
    Emiliano Zapata
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Ahnimus wrote:
    It's in the water.

    By that I mean, something is different about the people, not the guns.

    Though, "Gun Culture" might have something to do with it. Because the U.S. culture in general supports the use of guns for show and because the U.S. people are afraid of the big bad Muslim amongst other things.

    It's not the actual guns that kill, it's the culture, and it's uniquely american.

    Yes, uniquely guns are harmless even in the hands of our children who accidentally kill each other. It's many times is our culture as in Cypress Hill's Cock The Hammer.

    "Hmmm, what you talkin' `bout punk
    Gimme room as I light up the boom
    Cock the hammer, wave the white banner
    Ever heard a gun (Glock) go `click' like a camera?

    Cock the hammer!
    Cock the hammer, it's time for action!
    Cock the hammer!
    Cock the hammer, it's time for action!"


    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    Deni wrote:
    Tell that to Chiara Levin's mother.

    You misunderstood my post.
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    Open wrote:
    By your logic, which i dont agree with, you could apply that to Britians numbers as well.

    I didn't say that you couldn't.
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    hippiemom wrote:
    Let's see now ... according to the 2005 statistics that I was able to find, the U.S. has a population a little under five times that of Britain. Let's round it to five for the sake of simplicity. In 2005, there were 73 gun-related homicides in Britain. So if they're handling things so much worse than we are, we should have fewer than 365, right?

    But wait ... we had 12,118.

    I'm a little confused as to how someone in the U.S. can say "Shame on you!" to Britain. We have more than 33 times as many gun-related homicides, shouldn't it be shame on us?

    not only did you save me from having to do the research, you totally rocked that.
  • coming in 2012...the MCDonalds good little soldier happy meal.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
Sign In or Register to comment.