The US and War

polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
edited May 2007 in A Moving Train
there is too much money to be made in war ... times of peace are bad for the economy ... nothing like a good ole arms race to profit from ... when will people finally put all the pieces together (failure in afghanistan; fraud war in iraq; abandoning world treaties or various arms; backing out of the nuclear proliferation treaty; etc...) ... the evidence is overwhelming ...

****************************

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070531/ts_nm/russia_usa_missile_dc_2;_ylt=ArRynPAadGmftCqTNmx29JH7kPUI

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's test firing of an intercontinental ballistic missile on Tuesday was in response to U.S. steps that have sparked an arms race and undermined world security, Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday.

"Our American partners have left the ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missile) Treaty. We have warned them then that we will come out with a response to maintain the strategic balance in the world," Putin told a news conference.

"We conducted a test of a new strategic ballistic missile with multiple warheads, and of a new cruise missile, and will continue to improve our resources."

"We are not the initiators of this new round of the arms race," said Putin. "(Our partners) are stuffing eastern Europe with new weapons. A new base in Bulgaria, another in Romania, a site in Poland, radar in the Czech Republic . . . what are we supposed to do? We cannot just observe all this."

Russia test-fired a new intercontinental ballistic missile on Tuesday featuring multiple warheads that senior officials said could pierce any missile defense system, including the planned U.S. shield in Europe.

Russia says the U.S. missile defense shield is a threat to its security and will change the strategic balance in Europe, but Washington dismisses such fears, saying the shield is intended to counter "rogue states."
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    Now that the States has showed them how to create billionaires in the old Russia, it will be hard for them to starve them out again.

    I wonder when the rhetoric that goes hand in hand with Iran will start about Russia. Oh wait, they can do something about it.
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    polaris wrote:
    ... times of peace are bad for the economy ...

    could be the most ignorant economic statement I have ever heard.


    :applauds:
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jlew24asu wrote:
    could be the most ignorant economic statement I have ever heard.


    :applauds:

    let me know if it is indeed the most ignorant ...

    i actually meant to type times of peace are bad for business although there are definitely theories associated with wars and their ties to economic prosperity ... so, to some thinkers - not actually far from the truth ...

    let us know if you have anything to add to this escalation in the arms race around the world led by your homeland ...
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    polaris wrote:
    let me know if it is indeed the most ignorant ...

    i actually meant to type times of peace are bad for business although there are definitely theories associated with wars and their ties to economic prosperity ... so, to some thinkers - not actually far from the truth ...
    I'd love to read it. show me.
    polaris wrote:
    let us know if you have anything to add to this escalation in the arms race around the world led by your homeland ...
    what arms race?
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I'd love to read it. show me.

    http://www.rediff.com/money/2005/jul/14perfin.htm
    jlew24asu wrote:
    what arms race?

    did you read the article?

    "We are not the initiators of this new round of the arms race," said Putin
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Putin is full of shit. He's creating the notion of an arms race. Russia is not directly threatened by the U.S. He's just got an inferiority complex, like many world leaders, and is using a handy excuse to develop better weapons.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Putin is full of shit. He's creating the notion of an arms race. Russia is not directly threatened by the U.S. He's just got an inferiority complex, like many world leaders, and is using a handy excuse to develop better weapons.

    uhhh ... pentagon spending has skyrocketed ... not just in iraq ... in all aspects ... they've pulled out of all the arms treaties ... the US are developing more nukes and they are building bases everywhere ...
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    What rogue states will the US counter from the Czech Republic and Poland?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • MilestoneMilestone Posts: 1,140
    polaris wrote:
    there is too much money to be made in war ... times of peace are bad for the economy ... nothing like a good ole arms race to profit from ... when will people finally put all the pieces together (failure in afghanistan; fraud war in iraq; abandoning world treaties or various arms; backing out of the nuclear proliferation treaty; etc...) ... the evidence is overwhelming ...


    Please explain how Kanada (a peaceful nation) is doing so well economically?
    11-2-2000 Portland. 12-8-2002 Seattle. 4-18-2003 Nashville. 5-30-2003 Vancouver. 10-25-2003 Bridge School. 9-2-2005 Vancouver.
    7-6-2006 Las Vegas. 7-20-2006 Portland. 7-22-2006 Gorge. 9-21-2009 Seattle. 9-22-2009 Seattle. 9-26-2009 Ridgefield. 9-25-2011 Vancouver.
    11-29-2013 Portland. 10-16-2014 Detroit. 8-8-2018 Seattle. 8-10-2018 Seattle. 8-13-2018 Missoula.  5-10-2024 Portland.  5-30-2024 Seattle.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Putin is full of shit. He's creating the notion of an arms race. Russia is not directly threatened by the U.S. He's just got an inferiority complex, like many world leaders, and is using a handy excuse to develop better weapons.

    which is exactly what bushy and the war machine has done...
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Putin is full of shit. He's creating the notion of an arms race. Russia is not directly threatened by the U.S. He's just got an inferiority complex, like many world leaders, and is using a handy excuse to develop better weapons.


    maybe he sees us militarizing space and doesn't want just our weapons poitning down at everybody?

    what was this administration's excuse for breaking the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and the ucbm treaty as well as being against the nuke test ban, chemical and biological weapons ban.....?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Oh, sorry ... Did you guys say something? I was just busy basking in the radiant glow of a bunch of liberals defending both increased militarization and the actions of a man responsible for eroding democracy in one of the world's big powers.

    Carry on ...
    :)
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    "If you hate something, don't you do it too ..."


    What?
    :)
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Milestone wrote:
    Please explain how Kanada (a peaceful nation) is doing so well economically?

    oil is how many bucks a barrel?

    if you follow the thread - the crux of the issue isn't that war is good for the economy ... which i don't necessarily agree with (typo as mentioned earlier) ... rather that there is a lot of money to be made in war for certain interest groups and it plays in their favour when foreign policy advocates instability in regions and the supposed requirement to proliferate new weaponry ...
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    "If you hate something, don't you do it too ..."


    What?
    :)

    uhhh ... who's saying what putin is doing is a good thing??
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    Oh, sorry ... Did you guys say something? I was just busy basking in the radiant glow of a bunch of liberals defending both increased militarization and the actions of a man responsible for eroding democracy in one of the world's big powers.

    Carry on ...
    :)


    who was defending it?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    "I really hate Bush ... He's eroded democracy in the U.S., he's a war monger ... Just look at Iraq!, he's increased military spending".

    "Putin? Oh yeah. He's eroded democracy in Russia, he's a war monger ... Just look at Chechnya!, he's increased military spending ..."

    "Still though, its all Bush's fault. I only disapprove when its Americans doing this sort of thing. ... The Russians? I mean really now. What do you expect?"
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    "I really hate Bush ... He's eroded democracy in the U.S., he's a war monger ... Just look at Iraq!, he's increased military spending".

    "Putin? Oh yeah. He's eroded democracy in Russia, he's a war monger ... Just look at Chechnya!, he's increased military spending ..."

    "Still though, its all Bush's fault. I only disapprove when its Americans doing this sort of thing. ... The Russians? I mean really now. What do you expect?"


    yes, putin is a horrible person, especially what they did in chechnya and that theatre....and i disapprove of what he's doing...but how can you tell someone no when you are doing it at a far larger scale?

    seems a bit hypocritical, is all

    but hey, he's got terrorism to balme now, he doesn't need to falsify intel like reagan did in the 80's w/ russia to get more military funding
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    polaris wrote:
    let me know if it is indeed the most ignorant ...

    i actually meant to type times of peace are bad for business although there are definitely theories associated with wars and their ties to economic prosperity ... so, to some thinkers - not actually far from the truth ...

    let us know if you have anything to add to this escalation in the arms race around the world led by your homeland ...
    I'd say a 100 years ago or so it was thought that war was good for the economy as England, the US and Canada were manufacturing based economies. But with the change in economies from manufacturing to knowledge base I don't think this holds true anymore.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    polaris wrote:
    oil is how many bucks a barrel?

    if you follow the thread - the crux of the issue isn't that war is good for the economy ... which i don't necessarily agree with (typo as mentioned earlier) ... rather that there is a lot of money to be made in war for certain interest groups and it plays in their favour when foreign policy advocates instability in regions and the supposed requirement to proliferate new weaponry ...
    This is true but there are businesses that only thrive during peace time, or famines, or whatever world event you can represent. I just don't think that the defence industry is the tail that wags the dog anymore. I believe the next industry to wag the dog is going to be the whole enviro industry. We already have the greed (carbon trading) and fear mongering required for it to be a substantial and long-term industry.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    surferdude wrote:
    I'd say a 100 years ago or so it was thought that war was good for the economy as England, the US and Canada were manufacturing based economies. But with the change in economies from manufacturing to knowledge base I don't think this holds true anymore.

    i would probably agree
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    surferdude wrote:
    This is true but there are businesses that only thrive during peace time, or famines, or whatever world event you can represent. I just don't think that the defence industry is the tail that wags the dog anymore. I believe the next industry to wag the dog is going to be the whole enviro industry. We already have the greed (carbon trading) and fear mongering required for it to be a substantial and long-term industry.

    the defence industry is definitely the engine behind bush's actions ...

    as for the rest of your commentary - i think it's sad ...
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    El_Kabong wrote:
    who was defending it?

    no one was, el...

    when people can't make a good point or respond to a valid comment, they make things up, thus causing those who were correct to begin with to respond the the made-up comment...

    you see, putin is basically doing the same thing that bushy and company have been doing for years, and when that is pointed out, the obtuse will somehow see this statement as being in support of putin....when in reality it is not...
  • Drew263Drew263 Birmingham, AL Posts: 602
    Even for me..a warmongering, bigotted, racist, world hating, lover of all things war and money, neo-con....W has gone too far.

    Why in the fuck do we have to do everything? Why do we need missile defense systems in Europe? Like we can't fire nuclear missiles from our own country? Why are we the ones "saving the world" from Iran's nuclear program?

    Kinda wish we'd just back off of everything a little bit...
  • SpecificsSpecifics Posts: 417
    Drew263 wrote:
    Even for me..a warmongering, bigotted, racist, world hating, lover of all things war and money, neo-con....W has gone too far.

    Why in the fuck do we have to do everything? Why do we need missile defense systems in Europe? Like we can't fire nuclear missiles from our own country? Why are we the ones "saving the world" from Iran's nuclear program?

    Kinda wish we'd just back off of everything a little bit...

    Do you still think america is saving the world? wow
    most realise they're doing nothing but fucking it up more than it already was.
  • korbykorby Posts: 298
    its the U.S. GOVERNment and WAR

    PJ and friends are the U.S. too
    its ok
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Specifics wrote:
    Do you still think america is saving the world? wow
    most realise they're doing nothing but fucking it up more than it already was.

    did you read his post...?

    he didn't say he personally thought the US was saving the world...
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    Drew263 wrote:
    Even for me..a warmongering, bigotted, racist, world hating, lover of all things war and money, neo-con....W has gone too far.

    Why in the fuck do we have to do everything? Why do we need missile defense systems in Europe? Like we can't fire nuclear missiles from our own country? Why are we the ones "saving the world" from Iran's nuclear program?

    Kinda wish we'd just back off of everything a little bit...

    we share the same wish!
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    korby wrote:
    its the U.S. GOVERNment and WAR

    PJ and friends are the U.S. too

    what are the majority of US people doing about it?
  • SpecificsSpecifics Posts: 417
    inmytree wrote:
    did you read his post...?

    he didn't say he personally thought the US was saving the world...

    yes i did, yes he did, guess its your turn
Sign In or Register to comment.