you go on about something being retarded and now you are calling me stupid...perhaps you need to relax a bit, read the sticky post at the top, and make youself a bit more clear....
...Bush's version of democracy which he is trying to spread like fire in the ME, is equally, if not 10x more damaging - rather, I take that back - Bush's idealogy IS 10x more damaging than Osamas. If we're now doing an informal poll, let's stick to the numbers game and consider how many innocent people each god-damn-bat-shit crazy person have slaughtered:
Bush - at least 200,000 in Iraq alone
Osama - combined terrorist attacks, maybe 10,000
Kim Jong Ill - I've looked, I'm NOT defending the guy, but I couldn't find any record of casualties under his reign. Now I know N. Korea is a horrible place, and I'm sure this guy has done a lot of bad, but he hasn't started any wars, and he doesn't produce the worlds deadliest nuclear arsenal.
...Bush's version of democracy which he is trying to spread like fire in the ME, is equally, if not 10x more damaging - rather, I take that back - Bush's idealogy IS 10x more damaging than Osamas. If we're now doing an informal poll, let's stick to the numbers game and consider how many innocent people each god-damn-bat-shit crazy person have slaughtered:
Bush - at least 200,000 in Iraq alone
Osama - combined terrorist attacks, maybe 10,000
Kim Jong Ill - I've looked, I'm NOT defending the guy, but I couldn't find any record of casualties under his reign. Now I know N. Korea is a horrible place, and I'm sure this guy has done a lot of bad, but he hasn't started any wars, and he doesn't produce the worlds deadliest nuclear arsenal.
...Bush's version of democracy which he is trying to spread like fire in the ME, is equally, if not 10x more damaging - rather, I take that back - Bush's idealogy IS 10x more damaging than Osamas. If we're now doing an informal poll, let's stick to the numbers game and consider how many innocent people each god-damn-bat-shit crazy person have slaughtered:
Bush - at least 200,000 in Iraq alone
Osama - combined terrorist attacks, maybe 10,000
Kim Jong Ill - I've looked, I'm NOT defending the guy, but I couldn't find any record of casualties under his reign. Now I know N. Korea is a horrible place, and I'm sure this guy has done a lot of bad, but he hasn't started any wars, and he doesn't produce the worlds deadliest nuclear arsenal.
200,000? Innocents?> All killed by US soldiers? Reality check please.
Comments
I refuse to believe you're that stupid.
I'm serious...
you go on about something being retarded and now you are calling me stupid...perhaps you need to relax a bit, read the sticky post at the top, and make youself a bit more clear....
You've all seen Dr. Stangelove right?
Conjure up a picture of George Bush in your mind.
Now, remember General Jack D. Ripper.
Notice anything scary, interesting, or maybe god-damn-bat-shit insane about calling Kim Jong Ill crazy yet ignoring the profile of Bush?
another one? so are you going to tell me osama is better then bush too?
would you be upset if one lumped them together? which here means: they are both willing to kill others to push their ideology...
would the same be said for hitler and roosevelt? millions of people died during their administrations.
hilter - yes
roosevelt - no
osama - yes
bush - no
*sigh*
osama - yes
bush - yes
...Bush's version of democracy which he is trying to spread like fire in the ME, is equally, if not 10x more damaging - rather, I take that back - Bush's idealogy IS 10x more damaging than Osamas. If we're now doing an informal poll, let's stick to the numbers game and consider how many innocent people each god-damn-bat-shit crazy person have slaughtered:
Bush - at least 200,000 in Iraq alone
Osama - combined terrorist attacks, maybe 10,000
Kim Jong Ill - I've looked, I'm NOT defending the guy, but I couldn't find any record of casualties under his reign. Now I know N. Korea is a horrible place, and I'm sure this guy has done a lot of bad, but he hasn't started any wars, and he doesn't produce the worlds deadliest nuclear arsenal.
so who is a better person. Bush or Osama?
I haven't met either of them. All i know is what they have done. There is what you do and what you don't do.
Every Man is Guilty of all the good He doesn't do. - Paine.
they are both guilty people if this quote has any truth.
why does it matter....is there some sort of contest...?
anyway, I'd say: neither...
what is it with all these wacky quotes today?
its scary that is bush ran against osama for president of the message pit. we would all be forced to read the Quran
Neither.
(or, rather, who gives a f*&@)
I despise both of them, cause baby, I'm an anarchist. And they're both terrible people. I hope that you don't trust either of them.
Neither is noble.
it matters. neither is a very acceptable answer
i wouldn't vote for Bush or Osama
o great your one of those people. im done with you.
haha, scary indeed
At least we are not forced to burn the Quran...? My history teacher would highly disapprove.
It was my first Asian!!!
You misquoted me!
I said,
"Baby, I'm an anarchist."
It's a line from a Against Me! song.
But there we have it, you seem to be set against me!
Trust me fella, I'm not in any way against you, or your right to make silly assertions.
Why must you be hateful?
I'm sorry. lets hug
200,000? Innocents?> All killed by US soldiers? Reality check please.
www.myspace.com/jensvad
I never said they were killed by US soldiers.
...here's your check,
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11674.htm