Atlanta considers banning baggy pants

2»

Comments

  • JuberooJuberoo Posts: 472
    Leave it to my screwed up city to make national news with something like this (shudders). I'm convinced that if it's a f'd up news story, it's nexus is in Atlanta: ie. Mike Vick, Runaway Bride, Benoit, Courthouse Shooter Brian Nichols, Cynthia McKinney, ect.
    Yep....another reason to add to the list of why its called "Yucklanta" here in the north :)
    Makes much more sense, to live in the present tense.

    A truly liberal person is conservative when necessary.

    Pro-life by choice.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    i'm all in favor of seeing girls thongs.
    ...
    It all depends.
    If she's an uglier, fatter version of Rosie O'Donnell... I'm passing. I don't want to see someone testing the tensile strength of lycra spandex by straining the fibers around a barrel of testured, gelatinous goo.
    ...
    And as for the dudes.. I would think the Altanta cops like them wearing them pants... they only have to chase them 1/2 a block before their tousers trip them.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    This would be funny if it weren't so pathetic and such a waste of time and tax payers money to pay these guys salaries.
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    upina2001 wrote:
    ive seen reports on this and they seem pretty confident that this may help things. Plus the parents will be fined if the kids continue to violate the rules.
    Of course, its a good money maker too!!

    so they'll stick it to the parents on baggy pants, but won't hold parents accountable in the education of their children. I'm glad that we've got our priorities straight.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    surferdude wrote:
    If NYC can ban trans fat in restaurants I see this as no worse an invasion of privacy or personal rights.

    at least the NYC ban can be seen as a public health move.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    surferdude wrote:
    If NYC can ban trans fat in restaurants I see this as no worse an invasion of privacy or personal rights.

    that's the example i was looking for... thanks!
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    chopitdown wrote:
    at least the NYC ban can be seen as a public health move.

    so could this.
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    This is ridiculous. What the fuck are these people doing? This is what they come up with? Banning clothes?

    It's fucking insane.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • JamMastaEJamMastaE Posts: 444
    how many of you still believe you live in a FREE COUNTRY???

    I'm getting really sick of Big Brother sticking his big fat pointy fucking nose in my/our business!!!!!!!!!!!



    "we gotta take the power back" Zack De la Rocha
    "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain


    "I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
    Emiliano Zapata
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    so could this.

    which is true, but baggy pants is def much more of a stretch, imo.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • CollinCollin Posts: 4,931
    surferdude wrote:
    If NYC can ban trans fat in restaurants I see this as no worse an invasion of privacy or personal rights.

    This made me think about something else. My dad was fined a couple of days ago because he wasn't wearing a seat belt.

    I have to agree with my dad, that's pretty weird and insane.

    But clothes is, I think, something entirely different.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    chopitdown wrote:
    which is true, but baggy pants is def much more of a stretch, imo.

    yeah, but they've done so much stretching to band behaviors of which they disapprove that i cant really do more than shrug my shoulders here. im hardly outraged. this has been allowed to go on long enough. why are people surprised? probly cos most have been asleep or watching tv ;)
  • JamMastaEJamMastaE Posts: 444
    hey i have an idea!!

    let's ban corrupt politicians & power mad dick heads!!!!!!!!!(i know,it's redundant)


    they are much more of a danger than second hand smoke,baggy pants or seat belt laws.

    all we need is a couple million citizens who are concerned about their country to embark on the capital and make some citizen arrests.(ok,a whole bunch of arrests)
    "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain


    "I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
    Emiliano Zapata
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    surferdude wrote:
    If NYC can ban trans fat in restaurants I see this as no worse an invasion of privacy or personal rights.

    The trans fat ban resulted from the obesity in America, especially the "children" dialogue. Fast food industry would stand to have lost millions of dollars with the bad publicity that trans fat was getting. People also, began to ask within restaurants if their food was being cooked it trans fat, the ban gained automatic support. The fast food/restaurant industry did not put up a fight against the ban. The food industry as a whole still utilizes it in packaged processed food products, their battle was over the labeling of contents issue.

    The end result that affects everyone was that this dialogue resulted with "overweight" (not obesity) being classified as a "medical" condition. A medical condition eligible to be covered under the "health care" system, including "Medicaid and medicare". So now people can be nip and tucked, get reduced gym fees, and ride around on a scooter cart on your tax dollar. But at least the children won't get fries cooked in trans fat when they go to a fast food place.

    Winner health care system
    Loser the taxpayer
    Kids still fat - got milk
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • In other news...in the gay neighborhoods walking around with full on oiled up and throbbing erection is considered somewhat over the top...which has just come up a few notches in the past few months to edge out assless chaps http://members.arstechnica.com/x/zuvembi/pink-assless-chaps.jpg

    assless chaps is probably my favorite redundant phrases... if chaps weren't assless, they would just be called pants. :)
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • JamMastaEJamMastaE Posts: 444
    assless chaps is probably my favorite redundant phrases...


    that explains so much!!!!!!!!!
    "In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain


    "I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
    Emiliano Zapata
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    Juberoo wrote:
    Whoever created thongs is an idiot. I can't stand them....its like walking around with a permanent wedgie.....stupid design!
    I thought the whole point of thongs was to prevent a panty line ... in other words, to make sure people COULDN'T see your underwear ... so I don't get this trend at all. I personally think walking around with your underwear hanging out looks trashy, but if we're going to write legislation against everything trashy, we're not going to have time for anything else.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
Sign In or Register to comment.