Can you find a Concentration Camp in your state?

yahamita

http://www.infowars.com/detcamp.html

yoke

not in my area.. i do have an old base that my town took over but other than the lead paint and asbestos there is nothing to be worired about. As far as the woods go na, we dont have anything.

yahamita

yahamita wrote:

http://www.infowars.com/detcamp.html

do a search on the page for concentration camps..

Anon

:rolleyes:

Unbelievable. The shit some people come up with. I like how it's so top secret that people are just allowed to stroll up and take pictures.

DriftingByTheStorm

Pj_Gurl wrote:

:rolleyes:

Unbelievable. The shit some people come up with. I like how it's so top secret that people are just allowed to stroll up and take pictures.

REX84 is a REAL program, and has been fully implemented for well over a decade.

Wiki REX84 wrote:

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, is a plan by the United States federal government to test their ability to detain large numbers of American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency.
You MAY want to reconsider your opinion.

i believe that question touches upon a sensitive and highly classified area.

Wiki On REX84 \ wrote:

Nonetheless, the basic facts about Rex 84 and other contingency planning readiness exercises--and the potential threat they pose to civil liberties if fully implemented in a real operation--are taken seriously by scholars and civil liberties activists.

Anon

DriftingByTheStorm wrote:

REX84 is a REAL program, and has been fully implemented for well over a decade.



i believe that question touches upon a sensitive and highly classified area.

So why is the Alex Jones site acting like it's some ground breaking news?

RolandTD20Kdrummer

Pj_Gurl wrote:

So why is the Alex Jones site acting like it's some ground breaking news?

Ground breaking news, or perhaps just information put out to raise awareness?

It looks like an old page to me, ( re: format compared to infowars.com itself).

dg1979us

Pj_Gurl wrote:

So why is the Alex Jones site acting like it's some ground breaking news?

Because he is no different than Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, and telling people what they want to hear. Nobody on this board has seen this personally or has any real facts this is true, but fuck, it is sent to Alex Jones, they have to slurp his shit up.



Seriously, dont listen to these people anymore than you listen to the Rush Limbaugh followers. None of them no shit, they just read and believe what they want too.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

dg1979us wrote:

Because he is no different than Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh, and telling people what they want to hear. Nobody on this board has seen this personally or has any real facts this is true, but fuck, it is sent to Alex Jones, they have to slurp his shit up.



Seriously, dont listen to these people anymore than you listen to the Rush Limbaugh followers. None of them no shit, they just read and believe what they want too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

Did you not catch the martial law threat over the bailout just recently? That should be a wake up call like no other. It happened. It's real.

Whether these camps exist or not is moot conjecture. I think you paint people with far too broad a brush to justify your own beliefs.

dg1979us

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84

Did you not catch the martial law threat over the bailout just recently? That should be a wake up call like no other. It happened. It's real.

Whether these camps exist or not is moot conjecture. I think you paint people with far too broad a brush to justify your own beliefs.

What are my own beliefs? Tell them to me, because I bet you dont have a goddamn clue to my beliefs. I voted for Nader in 04, when most on this board were on the Kerry bandwagon. Now, I read this board this election, cycle, and many of the Kerry supporters in 04, are were rallying for Nader. So tell me my thoughts beliefs since you obviously know so well. I was well ahead of this board, and will certainly hold the Kerry supporters in 04 more accountable than the Obama supporters now.

In saying that, that doesnt mean I believe anything sent to Alex Jones, who believe it or not, (am Im sure you wont acknowledge this), is a for profit entertainer no different than Hannity or Limbaugh. People believe what they want to believe, and listen to what they want to hear, and you are no exception.

I live in the south, and have been to Miss. more times than you, I promise. Because you read it on the internet doesnt make it true. Wake the fuck up. There are serious issues in the world and in this country and continent, and you dont help those issues by sitting behind your comp and eating up bullshit opinions from someone making money from you. ANd go ahead and write me off as you wish and make yourself feel better about yourself. But you know as much about this world as the Hannity keyboard commandos, which isnt shit.

MrBrian

dg1979us wrote:

What are my own beliefs?. I voted for Nader in 04, when most on this board were on the Kerry bandwagon. Now, I read this board this election, cycle, and many of the Kerry supporters in 04, are were rallying for Nader. So tell me my thoughts beliefs since you obviously know so well. I was well ahead of this board, and will certainly hold the Kerry supporters in 04 more accountable than the Obama supporters now.

Why would you hold them more accountable? btw, who did you vote for this time around? Just curious.

I'm trying to see how far ahead you are,

dg1979us

MrBrian wrote:

Why would you hold them more accountable? btw, who did you vote for this time around? Just curious.

I'm trying to see how far ahead you are,

I hold them more accountable because Kerry was just as full of shit as Bush, and didnt even hide it. In 04 the issue was the war. Kerry voted for the war, in August of 04 said he wouldnt have changed that decision, and never said he would end the war. Yet, the anti-war misinformed crowd eat him up.

And this year I voted for Nader as well. IT will be the last time. He isnt serious about running. He is a great guy who has done a lot for the US and world in general. And I agree with a lot of his points But at this point, after I voted for him, I realized he is for face time and nothing else.

Ron Paul actually cares and actually tries to be president. It was a failed effort. But Paul, at least did gain the attention of many and made a dent. Both are older guys, so who knows if they will make the effort again. But Nader, after the last 2 elections, I know wont get my support. His past efforts I love, but at this point he is done and could care less about being president. If he did he would at least make a serious effort, just like Paul did.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

dg1979us wrote:

What are my own beliefs? Tell them to me, because I bet you dont have a goddamn clue to my beliefs. I voted for Nader in 04, when most on this board were on the Kerry bandwagon. Now, I read this board this election, cycle, and many of the Kerry supporters in 04, are were rallying for Nader. So tell me my thoughts beliefs since you obviously know so well. I was well ahead of this board, and will certainly hold the Kerry supporters in 04 more accountable than the Obama supporters now.

In saying that, that doesnt mean I believe anything sent to Alex Jones, who believe it or not, (am Im sure you wont acknowledge this), is a for profit entertainer no different than Hannity or Limbaugh. People believe what they want to believe, and listen to what they want to hear, and you are no exception.

I live in the south, and have been to Miss. more times than you, I promise. Because you read it on the internet doesnt make it true. Wake the fuck up. There are serious issues in the world and in this country and continent, and you dont help those issues by sitting behind your comp and eating up bullshit opinions from someone making money from you. ANd go ahead and write me off as you wish and make yourself feel better about yourself. But you know as much about this world as the Hannity keyboard commandos, which isnt shit.

Well I find it conflicting points of view that you dismiss Alex Jones altogether by saying people that look into him just blindly slurp up what he offers, but then hold the beliefs you just outlined above. I'm no big fan of his To be honest I visit his website maybe once or twice a month, but he is far from deluded on the issues if that was your original intention.

Mutiny! he cried

dg1979us wrote:

I hold them more accountable because Kerry was just as full of shit as Bush, and didnt even hide it. In 04 the issue was the war. Kerry voted for the war, in August of 04 said he wouldnt have changed that decision, and never said he would end the war. Yet, the anti-war misinformed crowd eat him up.

And this year I voted for Nader as well. IT will be the last time. He isnt serious about running. He is a great guy who has done a lot for the US and world in general. And I agree with a lot of his points But at this point, after I voted for him, I realized he is for face time and nothing else.

Ron Paul actually cares and actually tries to be president. It was a failed effort. But Paul, at least did gain the attention of many and made a dent. Both are older guys, so who knows if they will make the effort again. But Nader, after the last 2 elections, I know wont get my support. His past efforts I love, but at this point he is done and could care less about being president. If he did he would at least make a serious effort, just like Paul did.

Why do you think Nader wasn't serious?

It doesn't look like we're getting anyone who opposed the invasion this time, either. In fact I think Kucinich and Gravel were the only democratic candidates that opposed it.

MrBrian

dg1979us wrote:

I hold them more accountable because Kerry was just as full of shit as Bush, and didnt even hide it. In 04 the issue was the war. Kerry voted for the war, in August of 04 said he wouldnt have changed that decision, and never said he would end the war. Yet, the anti-war misinformed crowd eat him up.

And this year I voted for Nader as well. IT will be the last time. He isnt serious about running. He is a great guy who has done a lot for the US and world in general. And I agree with a lot of his points But at this point, after I voted for him, I realized he is for face time and nothing else.

Ron Paul actually cares and actually tries to be president. It was a failed effort. But Paul, at least did gain the attention of many and made a dent. Both are older guys, so who knows if they will make the effort again. But Nader, after the last 2 elections, I know wont get my support. His past efforts I love, but at this point he is done and could care less about being president. If he did he would at least make a serious effort, just like Paul did.

I hold Obama supporters =ly accountable. They made no demands on him, gave him a free pass to the white house.

Every wrong turn Obama made, in a speech or action was greated with excuses from his followers.

The excuses will continue years from now and in 2012 we will be left with "We have to vote for Obama again, we can't have Palin win"

I do not agree that Nader is only for face time, you know he is mainly trying to bring issues to the table and the issues he speaks of, his views are very sound.

The Problem with Ron Paul, he pretty much gave up at the end. I just don't see much fight in him. But he is a smart guy, he had a big chance to do some real damage this election but he did not. The dent may not be big enough.

But as I feared back in 2004, the time of the neo libs is coming and now it has arrived with Obama and co. I feel they are much more dangerous than the neo cons before them.

btw, the neo cons are a dying breed. I mean that way of thinking will still be around, but they will be replaced by another power group, The next couple of years will show us with what.

The hope is, Ron Paul style, but he did not do enough, like I said the dent is just not big enough.

dg1979us

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

Well I find it conflicting points of view that you dismiss Alex Jones altogether by saying people that look into him just blindly slurp up what he offers, but then hold the beliefs you just outlined above. I'm no big fan of his To be honest I visit his website maybe once or twice a month, but he is far from deluded on the issues if that was your original intention.

No No, I dont disagree with everything he says by any means. But, I do get the feeling there are many that eat up his shit with no questions asked. Maybe that isnt you, and I apologize if I put that on you. But lets be serious. Jones is just the opposition extreme of Limbaugh or Hannity. Does he say some things that have an element of truth? Certainty. Does he also feed a lot of complete bullshit? Certainly.

dg1979us

Mutiny! he cried wrote:

Why do you think Nader wasn't serious?

It doesn't look like we're getting anyone who opposed the invasion this time, either. In fact I think Kucinich and Gravel were the only democratic candidates that opposed it.

If he was serious he would have tried. Kucinich, Gravel, Paul, are at least member of parties that matter. Should they be the only parties that matter? No. But the truth is they are. Nader, who knows damn well it takes money to compete, (again, I dont agree with the money element, but that is reality), raises no money, hardly campaigns, and basically releases youtube videos.

Like I said, I voted for him the last 2 elections. But it wont happen again. He cant win or even make a dent. I hadnt even heard of Ron Paul until this last election cycle, and made very nice headway. He did that because he was serious. Nader needs to back a Kucinich or someone similar in 12, but he needs to sit that one out, unless he is serious.

MrBrian

dg1979us wrote:

If he was serious he would have tried. Kucinich, Gravel, Paul, are at least member of parties that matter. Should they be the only parties that matter? No. But the truth is they are. Nader, who knows damn well it takes money to compete, (again, I dont agree with the money element, but that is reality), raises no money, hardly campaigns, and basically releases youtube videos.

Like I said, I voted for him the last 2 elections. But it wont happen again. He cant win or even make a dent. I hadnt even heard of Ron Paul until this last election cycle, and made very nice headway. He did that because he was serious. Nader needs to back a Kucinich or someone similar in 12, but he needs to sit that one out, unless he is serious.

Nader gave a record number of campaigns speeches, he was all over. Of course he only got time on the tele a few times.

Mutiny! he cried

dg1979us wrote:

If he was serious he would have tried. Kucinich, Gravel, Paul, are at least member of parties that matter. Should they be the only parties that matter? No. But the truth is they are. Nader, who knows damn well it takes money to compete, (again, I dont agree with the money element, but that is reality), raises no money, hardly campaigns, and basically releases youtube videos.

Like I said, I voted for him the last 2 elections. But it wont happen again. He cant win or even make a dent. I hadnt even heard of Ron Paul until this last election cycle, and made very nice headway. He did that because he was serious. Nader needs to back a Kucinich or someone similar in 12, but he needs to sit that one out, unless he is serious.

I don't think he ran until Kucinich dropped out and he said he would have stayed out had a real progressive, like Kucinich, won the nomination. Also he and Matt Gonzalez did campaign, they didn't get any coverage and were not allowed into the debates, again.

Lastly, b/c of the votes he received the Independent party no longer has to petition for ballot access in several states in 2010

dg1979us

MrBrian wrote:

I hold Obama supporters =ly accountable. They made no demands on him, gave him a free pass to the white house.

Every wrong turn Obama made, in a speech or action was greated with excuses from his followers.

The excuses will continue years from now and in 2012 we will be left with "We have to vote for Obama again, we can't have Palin win"

I do not agree that Nader is only for face time, you know he is mainly trying to bring issues to the table and the issues he speaks of, his views are very sound.

The Problem with Ron Paul, he pretty much gave up at the end. I just don't see much fight in him. But he is a smart guy, he had a big chance to do some real damage this election but he did not. The dent may not be big enough.

But as I feared back in 2004, the time of the neo libs is coming and now it has arrived with Obama and co. I feel they are much more dangerous than the neo cons before them.

btw, the neo cons are a dying breed. I mean that way of thinking will still be around, but they will be replaced by another power group, The next couple of years will show us with what.

The hope is, Ron Paul style, but he did not do enough, like I said the dent is just not big enough.

I dont completely separate Obama and Kerry supporters, dont get me wrong. I am saying, dont lecture me on Nader this year, if you supported Kerry 4 years ago. At least Obama brings some type of vision to the table, where Kerry didnt. But, like I said, I voted for neither, but my personal opinion, is that Obama will be the better president of the two.

How do you say Paul gave up at the end, but Nader didnt? That is delusional. Paul had his own separate convention during the repub convention back in Aug(sept?). Paul seriously tried and broke fundraising records. Nader, was relying on his name. Sorry, I love Ralph Nader for the things he has done. But this last election, he put no effort in to, and certainly no effort compaired to Paul.

Paul didnt win, but he made a didnt. Nader become more irrelevant every time he pretends to compain. There is at least hope with Paul, because he puts the effort in. Nader doesnt.

RolandTD20Kdrummer

dg1979us wrote:

No No, I dont disagree with everything he says by any means. But, I do get the feeling there are many that eat up his shit with no questions asked. Maybe that isnt you, and I apologize if I put that on you. But lets be serious. Jones is just the opposition extreme of Limbaugh or Hannity. Does he say some things that have an element of truth? Certainty. Does he also feed a lot of complete bullshit? Certainly.

Oh ok...misunderstanding...my bad.

edit: I agree with you btw..