Home› The Porch
Options

hmmm Benny Hall a little expensive?

illegal pantsillegal pants Posts: 13,471
edited November 2008 in The Porch
http://cgi.ebay.com/Beatles-White-Album-UK-1968-Mono-LP-Cover-No-0000005_W0QQitemZ110312162347QQcmdZ

don't know if this is porch worthy but...

:eek:

i'd love to know which artist John gave this to
wah
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Options
    holapearljamholapearljam Posts: 62
    This will be fun to watch as the week goes on...
  • Options
    jervin007jervin007 Posts: 3,181
    Wow, that is so cool. A must have for any Beatles fanatic. Great story behind the record as well, especially because the first four copies went to the band. It will be interesting to see what the rarest record goes for.
    PJ:
    2003 Mansfield: July 2
    2004 Boston: Sept 28 & 29
    2005 Montreal: Sept 15
    2006 Boston: May 24 & 25
    2008 Hartford: June 27, Mansfield: June 28,
    2010 Boston: May 17
    2013 Worcester: Oct 15, Hartford: Oct 25,
    2016 Hampton: April 18, Raleigh: April 20 (cancelled), Columbia: April 21. Quebec: May 5. Boston (Fenway): August 7

    EV Solo: Boston 8/2/08, Boston 6/16/11
  • Options
    pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 14,723
    that is an insane item...

    can see someone like the hard rock cafe, steamrollering this one
  • Options
    ReleaseMe...ReleaseMe... Posts: 494
    holy shit
    Mansfield II: # 23, since '03

    routine was the theme..

    there aint gonna be any middle any more
  • Options
    Hold_OnHold_On Posts: 52
    wow, amazing vinyl
  • Options
    demetriosdemetrios Canada Posts: 87,974
    Would make an amazing christmas gift for a friend I know at work.
    I'll buy it with his cc tonight! :P
  • Options
    dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    I was gonna put my maximum bid of £25,001 in when i saw the postage was £20!!!! fuck that... no way would i pay that for postage... does it come in a lead casket?
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Options
    demetriosdemetrios Canada Posts: 87,974
    dunkman wrote:
    I was gonna put my maximum bid of £25,001 in when i saw the postage was £20!!!! fuck that... no way would i pay that for postage... does it come in a lead casket?

    Like 40 bucks CDN? To ship something that rare? Yeah, forget that. I need that item sent to me by jet plane, with security guards, and riffles.
  • Options
    OkOk Posts: 2,144
    demetrios wrote:
    Like 40 bucks CDN? To ship something that rare? Yeah, forget that. I need that item sent to me by jet plane, with security guards, and riffles.

    lol. great post.
  • Options
    southerngardensoutherngarden Posts: 457
    very cool...will surely watch this one....

    but i dont get it? is it just rare because its #5? whats the difference from this one?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Beatles-WHITE-ALBUM-ORIGINAL-68-UK-1ST-ISSUE-MONO-2-LP_W0QQitemZ130268640854QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Records?hash=item130268640854&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1308

    are they both super rare or is only #5 rare...obviously #5 is rare, there is only one of them...
    I shit and I stink, I'm real, join the club...
  • Options
    mjbmjb Posts: 1,314
    southerngarden wrote:
    very cool...will surely watch this one....

    but i dont get it? is it just rare because its #5? whats the difference from this one?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Beatles-WHITE-ALBUM-ORIGINAL-68-UK-1ST-ISSUE-MONO-2-LP_W0QQitemZ130268640854QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Records?hash=item130268640854&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1308

    are they both super rare or is only #5 rare...obviously #5 is rare, there is only one of them...

    I think the #5 is about the only difference. I hope the sleeve wasn't made by the dude making the fake Ten Basketball LPs
  • Options
    UncleNeilUncleNeil Posts: 120
    My uncle is a huge Beatles collector, I sent him the link and he said this:
    besides the historical significance of it, the condition (as described in the ebay ad) is flawless! plus the fact that it's MONO...the mix on this is totally different on many of the tracks, and a first pressing (which this obviously is) would be the closest thing to the master tapes (sound/fidelity-wise), without actually tapping those master tapes! so besides being a sound investment, it is a bootleggers dream!
    Bridge Benefit 99, 01, 03, 04 (EV), 06
    Las Vegas 03, 06, MSG I & II - 2008
    Halloween Philadelphia, MSG II 2010
  • Options
    dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    southerngarden wrote:
    very cool...will surely watch this one....

    but i dont get it? is it just rare because its #5? whats the difference from this one?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/Beatles-WHITE-ALBUM-ORIGINAL-68-UK-1ST-ISSUE-MONO-2-LP_W0QQitemZ130268640854QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Records?hash=item130268640854&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1308

    are they both super rare or is only #5 rare...obviously #5 is rare, there is only one of them...

    well the significance of the #5 is quite clear from the original ebay listing... numbers 1-4 were normally given to The Beatles themselves... so No.5 will be the lowest numbered copy that is available to other people... so basically paul, george, john and ringo have the first 4 and if you bought this it'd be number 5... it says all that in the original ebay listing, or didnt you read it?
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Options
    southerngardensoutherngarden Posts: 457
    dunkman wrote:
    well the significance of the #5 is quite clear from the original ebay listing... numbers 1-4 were normally given to The Beatles themselves... so No.5 will be the lowest numbered copy that is available to other people... so basically paul, george, john and ringo have the first 4 and if you bought this it'd be number 5... it says all that in the original ebay listing, or didnt you read it?

    yes, i read it, but thanks for re-writing it for me....

    the part that im trying to ask about is the rarest record reference. number 5 is no more rare than number 0477137 (the one from the link i posted). i understand the significance of number 5...but to pay that much for one number and barely $200 for another number of the same lp seems off..i get it, its like youre the fifth beatle...

    its like with the benny lps. 2000 were made. #11 is equally as rare as #1999...there is only one with that number out of 2000.

    MONO is a good point...
    I shit and I stink, I'm real, join the club...
  • Options
    yokeyoke Posts: 1,440
    wow, I would love this.. little out of price range though
    Thats a lovely accent you have. New Jersey?

    www.seanbrady.net
  • Options
    youngsteryoungster Boston Posts: 6,574
    yoke wrote:
    wow, I would love this.. little out of price range though

    yeah, I'm with you. I can prob get the CD for $20. more in my price range.
    He who forgets will be destined to remember.

    9/29/04 Boston, 6/28/08 Mansfield, 8/23/09 Chicago, 5/15/10 Hartford
    5/17/10 Boston, 10/15/13 Worcester, 10/16/13 Worcester, 10/25/13 Hartford
    8/5/16 Fenway, 8/7/16 Fenway
    EV Solo: 6/16/11 Boston, 6/18/11 Hartford,
  • Options
    HorosHoros Posts: 4,518
    cropduster82 wrote:
    yeah, I'm with you. I can prob get the CD for $20. more in my price range.
    If you don't have the CD then you need to get it. One of the best albums of all time.

    People are into numbers and many numbers have signifigance for different reasons. White Album No. 0001968 may sell for more because it matches the release year. I'm sure Benny Hall No. 10 would sell for more than one with a higher number.
    #FHP
  • Options
    illegal pantsillegal pants Posts: 13,471
    UncleNeil wrote:
    My uncle is a huge Beatles collector, I sent him the link and he said this:

    very interesting, thanks for posting his thoughts!

    it's creeping up higher... :o
    wah
  • Options
    dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    southerngarden wrote:
    yes, i read it, but thanks for re-writing it for me....

    the part that im trying to ask about is the rarest record reference. number 5 is no more rare than number 0477137 (the one from the link i posted). i understand the significance of number 5...but to pay that much for one number and barely $200 for another number of the same lp seems off..i get it, its like youre the fifth beatle...

    its like with the benny lps. 2000 were made. #11 is equally as rare as #1999...there is only one with that number out of 2000.

    MONO is a good point...

    i disagree... no5 would make it the lowest numbered copy in CIRCULATION... no. 0477137 just doesnt have the same clout, the same history... it was probably bought in a shop... no5 will have a history to it (i.e. John Lennon himself had it in his home, and gave it to a fellow musician... he might have even played it, touched it, rolled a joint on it, etc ;) )

    of course there is only 1 no.5 and 1 no.0477137... but no.5 is rarer.. as the price shows.
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • Options
    RedMosquito02RedMosquito02 Posts: 2,560
    dunkman wrote:
    i disagree... no5 would make it the lowest numbered copy in CIRCULATION... no. 0477137 just doesnt have the same clout, the same history... it was probably bought in a shop... no5 will have a history to it (i.e. John Lennon himself had it in his home, and gave it to a fellow musician... he might have even played it, touched it, rolled a joint on it, etc ;) )

    of course there is only 1 no.5 and 1 no.0477137... but no.5 is rarer.. as the price shows.

    Agreed, what a SICK item!!!!
    33...
Sign In or Register to comment.