Kiedis's Cobain reenactment: Disrespectful?
turquoisetrouble
Posts: 185
The most recent Entertainment Weekly (5/25/06), has an "Explain Yourself" paragraph, which they usually save for things they think are in bad taste, about the Cobain reenactment. It reads as follows: "In the new Chili Peppers video, "Dani California," the group gleefully references bands like the Beatles, Parliament, and the Sex Pistols. Which is entertaining and all... until their nod to a sullen Kurt Cobain - with a candle extinguishing before him - suddenly puts a damper on the festivities. And we weren't the only ones who noticed. "It was a big concern of [Chili Peppers bassist] Flea's," says the clip's director Tony Kaye (American History X). "Flea asked [ex-Nirvana drummer] Dave Grohl if it was okay. Dave said yeah - Nirvana was about having fun." We wouldn't call this homage "fun," but it certainly did strike a chord."
David Byrne of Talking Heads fame, on his site, writes an interesting piece about how little influence artists generally have on their music videos, and I think this may have been one of those situations. I think Flea was dragged kicking and screaming through this thing. He clearly saw it was in poor taste, and assumed Dave Grohl would agree with him. Unfortunately, Dave Grohl has poor taste himself, despite his close bond with Cobain. Maybe nobody got hurt, but this video was coldly calculated. I think in a very general way, the minds behind this video wanted very dearly to have people associate the Peppers with Nirvana, who are considered rock and roll legends in the mainstream press, and thus mainstream thought (whether we agree with that assessment or not). Rolling Stone on its 1000th issue had Cobain floating like an angel over its masthead, and that is clearly the establishment's acceptance of him as a rock and roll god. And of course the record company's would love to build the association between Kiedis and an acknowledged rock and roll god. It was calculated and crude like many music videos are. Some music videos are calculated in that they show off sexy, young flesh to sell records. There's a lot of corporate pressure to do that. In this case, Kiedis is wearing a wig and impersonating Cobain's bad posture to get credibilty, not to pay tribute. And I don't think it was Kiedis's decision. I think the record company made him do it.
I really like the Chili's new record, but I think it's unfortunate about the forces around them. Maybe they're allowing these forces to dominate because they want to build some wealth (I'm guessing they're not as smart with the money as PJ). I signed up on the RHCP website, and everything there is much more corporate (the fan's postings are not as sophisticated either, but that's nitpicking). I just know that the Peppers as individuals are not the corporate types, so it stinks to see how they're being influenced. At least PJ keeps it real, and doesn't care that their new video isn't going to sell records, but instead represents honest art for its own sake.
See Post #51 for significant additional reflection/information on the above argument.
Here is my original posting. One change I would make is that I wouldn't use the word "sacred" regarding unplugged, but here it is:
When I saw the video for Dani California, I was taken aback that Anthony Kiedis dressed up as Kurt Cobain in Unplugged Nirvana mode. This was one of the very last performances before Cobain died, and I associate this performance with his death. To me, it's a sacred thing, and they shouldn't mess with that Unplugged episode even in tribute. Impersonations are a tricky thing sometimes.
Throughout the video, the Chili Peppers are goofing on all the different musical trends. Straight from this light-hearted goofing mode, they go to Kiedis dressed up as Cobain, in that green sweater that is so iconic.
I've considered myself to be a Pepper fan for many years, and I understand people make mistakes. I think they just made a mistake.
I also realize that the Peppers themselves have had major struggles and challenges that they've dealt with, not entirely dissimilar from Cobain's. I just have a weird feeling seeing this.
David Byrne of Talking Heads fame, on his site, writes an interesting piece about how little influence artists generally have on their music videos, and I think this may have been one of those situations. I think Flea was dragged kicking and screaming through this thing. He clearly saw it was in poor taste, and assumed Dave Grohl would agree with him. Unfortunately, Dave Grohl has poor taste himself, despite his close bond with Cobain. Maybe nobody got hurt, but this video was coldly calculated. I think in a very general way, the minds behind this video wanted very dearly to have people associate the Peppers with Nirvana, who are considered rock and roll legends in the mainstream press, and thus mainstream thought (whether we agree with that assessment or not). Rolling Stone on its 1000th issue had Cobain floating like an angel over its masthead, and that is clearly the establishment's acceptance of him as a rock and roll god. And of course the record company's would love to build the association between Kiedis and an acknowledged rock and roll god. It was calculated and crude like many music videos are. Some music videos are calculated in that they show off sexy, young flesh to sell records. There's a lot of corporate pressure to do that. In this case, Kiedis is wearing a wig and impersonating Cobain's bad posture to get credibilty, not to pay tribute. And I don't think it was Kiedis's decision. I think the record company made him do it.
I really like the Chili's new record, but I think it's unfortunate about the forces around them. Maybe they're allowing these forces to dominate because they want to build some wealth (I'm guessing they're not as smart with the money as PJ). I signed up on the RHCP website, and everything there is much more corporate (the fan's postings are not as sophisticated either, but that's nitpicking). I just know that the Peppers as individuals are not the corporate types, so it stinks to see how they're being influenced. At least PJ keeps it real, and doesn't care that their new video isn't going to sell records, but instead represents honest art for its own sake.
See Post #51 for significant additional reflection/information on the above argument.
Here is my original posting. One change I would make is that I wouldn't use the word "sacred" regarding unplugged, but here it is:
When I saw the video for Dani California, I was taken aback that Anthony Kiedis dressed up as Kurt Cobain in Unplugged Nirvana mode. This was one of the very last performances before Cobain died, and I associate this performance with his death. To me, it's a sacred thing, and they shouldn't mess with that Unplugged episode even in tribute. Impersonations are a tricky thing sometimes.
Throughout the video, the Chili Peppers are goofing on all the different musical trends. Straight from this light-hearted goofing mode, they go to Kiedis dressed up as Cobain, in that green sweater that is so iconic.
I've considered myself to be a Pepper fan for many years, and I understand people make mistakes. I think they just made a mistake.
I also realize that the Peppers themselves have had major struggles and challenges that they've dealt with, not entirely dissimilar from Cobain's. I just have a weird feeling seeing this.
Mansfield 8/7/92, 7/2/03; Boston 9/28/04, 5/24/06, 5/25/06
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
I know that they've named-dropped Cobain in a song, and spoken of him in interviews. So, I believe they have a respect for the man's memory. However, in keeping with the tone of the video it might have been wiser to parody the Even Flow or Alive performance videos, Anthony goofing Eddie as he jumps from the balcony or something.
He killed himself, get over it. That video was about honoring music and it's progression through time. Nothing at all rude about it.
And as far as him not being a "god", in my opinion he was pretty awesome.
(Edited to take out defensive praise of Cobain. Everyone's opinions on Cobain are set already.)
The unplugged part is more beautiful than anything else. with the close-up on the extinguished candle in the calm verse just before the chorus.
All round a fun and feel-good video, with the peppers having a blast, mixed in with a serious moment commemorating Kurt. As someone already said, a great video to add to an otherwise mediocre song.
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
I want to really like the new double CD. Frusciante is an innovative guy, and Flea of course is Flea. I loved loved loved Blood Sugar Sex Magic, I listened to it so much. And I've really liked each of their CD's since then, including One Hot Minute, which I do think is underrated. I wish they embraced that album more, and played that material in concert. Frusciante should be able to learn that material. One thing is that the Peppers seem to concentrate too much on the hits when they play concerts, whereas PJ digs deeper into their catalog for their shows.
Someone else pointed this out when the vid first came out. When they're doing the Nirvana bit there is a candle on and just at the end of the clip he sing 'Gone too fast' (i think) and the candle is out. I thought that was an awesome part of the video.
Anyone who thinks its disrespectful is, well, wrong, lol.
sorry...fuck videos. I haven't watched a video in 10 years, and it has made me a better music fan. Not "better than you", just a better listener. I remember being swayed by mediocre music because the videos were awesome. Now, I let my headphones tell me what's good...not my eyes.
old music: http://www.myspace.com/slowloader
"Down in the bad lands she was savin' the best for last
It only hurts when I laugh, gone too fast".
Thats whats sung over the Nirvana part and I wouldnt say its coincidence.
"Who is driving? Oh my god Bear is driving, how can that be?! ...Car full of midgets!"
Photobucket: MagicBus2006
What I find really disrespectful is when people use pictures of Kurt's real dead body in avatars and things - I got into a fight with someone on haven about that once, because to me that's worse than someone spoofing them on stage.
---
London, Brixton, 14 July 1993
London, Wembley, 1996
London, Wembley, 18 June 2007
London, O2, 18 August 2009
London, Hammersmith Apollo (Ed solo), 31 July 2012
Milton Keynes Bowl, 11 July 2014
And wasn't Kurt mentioned in Californication?''Coabin can you hear the spheres singing songs off station to station.'' Or something like that.No idea what that meant.
But you're gonna have to serve somebody.
www.bebo.com/pearljam06
If the vocals on Teen Spirit had been intelligible, Nirvana would have went nowhere because the "Novelty" of the song would have been nil. We had heard the rhythm before when Boston hit with "More Than A Feeling", but as Weird Al pointed out "it's hard to bargle nawdle zous with all these marbles in my mouth". If "In Bloom" had been the first single would we all still be kissing Nirvana's ass?
P.S. I'd love to see people get this up in arms over Jeff Buckley, Layne Staley, or Aaliyah.
Edit: Let me add that I do like Nirvana, but I refuse to lionize them or give them more credit than they deserve.
You think the Slayer tour is out, or what?
"Finally! I get to save the earth with deadly lasers instead of deadly slide shows." -- Al Gore.
I believe the editor of the video knows. Great timing? Coincidence? Seriously?...
"Who is driving? Oh my god Bear is driving, how can that be?! ...Car full of midgets!"
Photobucket: MagicBus2006
If it is the part i think you r talking about where he has his hair straight down over his face you may find he is refering to the Misfits.
And did you stop and think that maybe they are actually paying tribute to some of there fav bands??
I acknowledge they are paying tributes to the bands they like. But as I said, the Kurt thing is weird to me. Anthony wearing a Cobain wig and slouching like him. What kind of a tribute is that? If he wanted to do a tribute, he should sing a Nirvana song (that's something PJ does for the acts they respect). To act like Kurt Cobain would be singing a new RHCP song, a song with Anthony's lyrics, is a little presumptuous. Yeah, it's just a music video. But if you're going to do a tribute, do it right. I'm glad Anthony mentioned Kurt in Californication. That actually gave me chills. But they should have skipped this "tribute." I love the Peppers, but they just made a mistake here. It is cheezzzzzzy. Can you imagine Eddie dressing up as one of his heroes in a video. The only person he dressed up as was Bush, and that was someone he wanted to ridicule.
www.first-avenue.com
This is what it sounds like when you get served.
Fucking A!
You think the Slayer tour is out, or what?
"Finally! I get to save the earth with deadly lasers instead of deadly slide shows." -- Al Gore.
My thoughts exactly.
Exactly. I also was annoyed when Nirvana were seen as some sort of savior, some death-knell to Hair Metal. Yes, their popularity helped to turn the tide, but what they did was not new. Grunge, the sound, the look, were not new or exclusive to Seattle. Much of it was owed to the Northeast, i.e. Boston, and the Minneapolis scene. If you want to see early examples of the grunge look, look at mid-80's Soul Asylum, or Husker Du, or the Replacements, or for god's sake, Neil Young's entire career. I've outgrown Bleach, Nevermind, etc, but I always turn back to the Pixies, Replacements, etc, because they were the real deal. Even though I despise Anthony Kiedis, i even would say the RHCP's are/were more vital. The fact that PJ has survived is a testament to them being a real rock band, and not a categorical one-off, or grunge band. It's the same with Hole and L7, if you know their histories, you'd know they'd never be as big without their connection to Minneapolis' Babes In Toyland. Courtney Love was a stripper at a seedy St. Paul strip club when she was kissing their ass and perfecting her shtick.
www.first-avenue.com
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f19/culot4/5d504142.jpg
It is not disrespectful at all. As already pointed out the scene includes the line "Gone too fast" followed by a shot of a burnt out candle. They had fun with the video but they werent cheapshots. Whoever said the burnt out candle was a coincidence....I mean come on.
and for christs sake it's the chilli peppers they wouldn't know serious if it bit them on the arse.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
out of their arms, not far away it's californifaction"
Californication is Part 1 of this trio (2 being By the Way and 3 Dani Cal.)
Kurt's got a place in the story in some way.
it wasn't direspectful.
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
Oh my, they dropped the leash.
Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!
"Make our day"