Slam away, but Spin Doctors are better funk rock than...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56a4b/56a4b128197b5b3e49e6ab3b60c91d3df1ebab17" alt="harmless_little_f***"
RHCP. And I'll take that opinion to my death.
'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
i sure can't. Bunch of pop bullshit ever since they made their first few millions with Under the Bridge (The OHM album excluded, Navarro rocked out some epic shit on that one)
What was it.....1988 the last time the RHCP were anything remotely considered funk? i think so.
Fair point.. but what do RHCP have left without the funk rock? Bland nothingness. And they've proved it time and time again.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
agreeded while I like the previous two records the last one was a fucking bust, in a word redundant. and I always thought the Spin Doctors were way too good for "one hit wonder" status
edit-like jimmy olsen's blues? fuck I love that song
Chris Cornell
http://www.myspace.com/mrwalkerb
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4XqZQJ4NoA&feature=related
I long for them to release something like this again.
Meh..... we agree on most things J but I'm not convinced, sorry.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suH0xS1zxHA
how about this? it's a pretty slow psychedelic funky tune from their lest album before Hillel Slovak died and Frusciante took over.
where's is the substance in scibbitybippiutybopbopbopbopdeboppitybop anyway?
The SD's musicianship is pretty fucking spectacular.. if you wanted to analyse it, OK, I could get into that pissing contest; I'd have a good case.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
I didn't say RHCP weren't great musicians.. Chad Smith. Case in point. But it did sound as if you were startin' up an argument against Spin Doctors' musicianship.. they're about on a par imo.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
And yeah, call them what you want but they are certainly not bad musicians......
BSSM is pure funk......
And John is just an inspiration to me, such a good player http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE3dUUj4_4Q&feature=related
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com
Why? because for once in history someone pitted 2 VERY non-similar bands against each other?
If i have to see one more fucking "who's better....pearl jam or nirvana?" or "....beatles or rolling stones?" thread i am going to fucking vomit.
He had the balls to put up a band that is horrible yet critical darlings against a band who is actually decent but got a bad label (flash in the pan). i say add to the discussion if you can, but most people can't because the RHCP's label pays to plaster them all over the radio so that is the only reference point most people have concerning the 2 bands.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=pW03XxO8bmw
See These Bones
amazing live band. their radio hits do not reveal them as a band.
http://www.myspace.com/brain_of_c
That makes no sense!
I'll show you....
Say what you want, but Pearl Jam are way better than the Bee Gees, anyday!
See? BTW, Mark, that cd is here waiting for you
i think you're the only one who thinks that are good live.
Non-similar in the sense that one is heavily marketed and the other is not.
i established the criteria for why i said that immediately following that sentence.
don't just read the headlines.
OK, fair play. Are they still going? I haven't heard of them since that 'big' record they had about 15 years ago.
As for RHCP, nothing remarkable about them for me, they're allright. I'd actually prefer the 'mellower' stuff they've done just recently, to that frantic 'funk for funks sake', they used to trot out. But that's mostly to do with John's guitar playing, which is quite wonderful.
I still haven't seen any evidence to the contrary. Everyone of your opinion has just said 'Wtf dude?' Like I'm supposed to go 'Oh yeah, I forgot.. wtf? Of course RHCP are better!' Give me some evidence that
1) RHCP play funk better than SD's
2) RHCP are better musicians than SD's
3) RHCP write more complex songs and arrangements than SD's
And then we can start the discussion. Albums sales, critical acclaim and popularity have nothing to do with this.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
so you haven't seen them, either.
http://www.myspace.com/brain_of_c
That covers at least numbers 1 and 2
Hmm.. the words 'on a par' spring to mind, again. That said, that was excellent; pity I've NEVER heard them come across that well on record.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
Don't listen to anyone who tells you that Blood Sugar Sex Magik is their best.
And if we're talking amazing arrangements and stuff, you might recognise this little tune... when that shitheap of a "band" crazy town stole it. the original is gorgeous. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBt5-ZINRhs
Looks like there's some material I need to be hearing. That said, there's something to be said for quitting while you are ahead (Spin Doctors)... RHCP seem to be planning on fizzling out like a snowflake.
- the great Sir Leo Harrison
Seen them 3 times. They rank at the very BOTTOM of a list of 200+ bands i have seen. absolutely awful, without fail, every time.