Interesting read!

walkthamilewalkthamile Posts: 349
edited June 2008 in Other Music
http://www.columbusalive.com/?sec=music&story=alive/2008/0508/m-range.html

Can't STP the rock
By Chris DeVille
blog I e-mail


With Stone Temple Pilots set to headline the second-annual Rock on the Range fest at Crew Stadium next weekend — STP's first show in six years — it's time for a critical reappraisal of one of rock's most underrated bands.

Scott Weiland, Eric Kretz and the DeLeo brothers blended glam, pop and hard rock into a cocktail that still has radio programmers drunk 15 years later. They made no bones about striking rock-star poses, appealing to the masses and, you know, enjoying themselves.

And unlike many radio staples from The Doors to Nickelback, STP was actually responsible for some of the best music of their era. As Steve Hyden pointed out in an excellent piece for The Onion A.V. Club's blog, "STP's B-level status in '90s rock history has practically nothing to do with the music and almost everything to do with the misfortune of coming out during one of the most annoyingly cred-conscious periods in the history of mainstream rock."

Although he went on to espouse a bizarre theory that Weiland developed his heroin addiction to gain artistic credibility, on his main point Hyden is correct. The Pilots' highly melodic, hugely powerful rock should have earned them widespread acclaim. Instead, they were decried for not taking themselves too seriously in an era that fetishized "important" music by miserable artists.

Nirvana and Pearl Jam wrote hooky, stadium-ready rock anthems too, but those bands are more or less respected (as always, Nirvana more so than Pearl Jam). The most legitimate reason is lyrics. Weiland was no poet, and while Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder probably get more credit than they deserve in this category, at least their Gen-X babbling mostly made sense.

But rock music doesn't have to make sense. It just has to rock. Nirvana and Pearl Jam rocked, but they felt self-conscious about it. Nirvana emerged from the underground, where the rules of rock stardom are different. Pearl Jam fancied themselves indie rockers too, even though they were basically populists through and through.

Stone Temple Pilots made no bones about being full-blooded mainstream rock stars. For this, they were tarred and feathered by rock critics. They deserve better.

There is a lingering impression that STP was ripping off Pearl Jam. Yes, Weiland went overboard with his Eddie Vedder impression on 1992 debut Core. But by the time Purple came out in 1994, STP had established an identity of its own. The record boasted some of alt-rock's most enduringly awesome singles — "Vaseline," "Interstate Love Song" — and superb deep cuts like surprisingly heartbreaking "Still Remains" and the frantic, tuneful "Unglued."

1996's Tiny Music ... Songs From the Vatican Gift Shop was even better — sometimes jangly, sometimes gracefully subdued. In "Big Bang Baby," "Lady Picture Show" and "Trippin' On a Hole in a Paper Heart," the band produced three of the decade's finest hits.

Even latter-day STP had something to offer. No. 4 was a hard-hitting collection with better songwriting and production than Core. And at least the goofy Shangri-La Dee Da had glorious pop nugget "Days of the Week."

These achievements have been obscured by the perception of STP as imitators, hacks and cock-rockers. In some ways, the band fits all those descriptions, but a good song is a good song, context be damned.

Perhaps now, as the reunited STP headlines Rock on the Range over a slate of bands it clearly has outclassed, we can finally step out from the oppressive shadow of grunge-era legalism and appreciate this band's stellar body of work.
+--+-Official Upcoming Australasian Tour:Member #9-+--+
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • http://www.columbusalive.com/?sec=music&story=alive/2008/0508/m-range.html

    Can't STP the rock
    By Chris DeVille
    blog I e-mail


    With Stone Temple Pilots set to headline the second-annual Rock on the Range fest at Crew Stadium next weekend — STP's first show in six years — it's time for a critical reappraisal of one of rock's most underrated bands.

    Scott Weiland, Eric Kretz and the DeLeo brothers blended glam, pop and hard rock into a cocktail that still has radio programmers drunk 15 years later. They made no bones about striking rock-star poses, appealing to the masses and, you know, enjoying themselves.

    And unlike many radio staples from The Doors to Nickelback, STP was actually responsible for some of the best music of their era. As Steve Hyden pointed out in an excellent piece for The Onion A.V. Club's blog, "STP's B-level status in '90s rock history has practically nothing to do with the music and almost everything to do with the misfortune of coming out during one of the most annoyingly cred-conscious periods in the history of mainstream rock."

    Although he went on to espouse a bizarre theory that Weiland developed his heroin addiction to gain artistic credibility, on his main point Hyden is correct. The Pilots' highly melodic, hugely powerful rock should have earned them widespread acclaim. Instead, they were decried for not taking themselves too seriously in an era that fetishized "important" music by miserable artists.

    Nirvana and Pearl Jam wrote hooky, stadium-ready rock anthems too, but those bands are more or less respected (as always, Nirvana more so than Pearl Jam). The most legitimate reason is lyrics. Weiland was no poet, and while Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder probably get more credit than they deserve in this category, at least their Gen-X babbling mostly made sense.

    But rock music doesn't have to make sense. It just has to rock. Nirvana and Pearl Jam rocked, but they felt self-conscious about it. Nirvana emerged from the underground, where the rules of rock stardom are different. Pearl Jam fancied themselves indie rockers too, even though they were basically populists through and through.

    Stone Temple Pilots made no bones about being full-blooded mainstream rock stars. For this, they were tarred and feathered by rock critics. They deserve better.

    There is a lingering impression that STP was ripping off Pearl Jam. Yes, Weiland went overboard with his Eddie Vedder impression on 1992 debut Core. But by the time Purple came out in 1994, STP had established an identity of its own. The record boasted some of alt-rock's most enduringly awesome singles — "Vaseline," "Interstate Love Song" — and superb deep cuts like surprisingly heartbreaking "Still Remains" and the frantic, tuneful "Unglued."

    1996's Tiny Music ... Songs From the Vatican Gift Shop was even better — sometimes jangly, sometimes gracefully subdued. In "Big Bang Baby," "Lady Picture Show" and "Trippin' On a Hole in a Paper Heart," the band produced three of the decade's finest hits.

    Even latter-day STP had something to offer. No. 4 was a hard-hitting collection with better songwriting and production than Core. And at least the goofy Shangri-La Dee Da had glorious pop nugget "Days of the Week."

    These achievements have been obscured by the perception of STP as imitators, hacks and cock-rockers. In some ways, the band fits all those descriptions, but a good song is a good song, context be damned.

    Perhaps now, as the reunited STP headlines Rock on the Range over a slate of bands it clearly has outclassed, we can finally step out from the oppressive shadow of grunge-era legalism and appreciate this band's stellar body of work.
    wow that was realy long but prety intrestign. old spt was prety col but i dnt realy liek teh new stuf to much yet gues its gota grw on me a litle firts. nice to c thme bak in cocnert agin.
  • Music For RhinosMusic For Rhinos Posts: 1,693
    http://www.columbusalive.com/?sec=music&story=alive/2008/0508/m-range.html

    Can't STP the rock
    By Chris DeVille
    blog I e-mail


    With Stone Temple Pilots set to headline the second-annual Rock on the Range fest at Crew Stadium next weekend — STP's first show in six years — it's time for a critical reappraisal of one of rock's most underrated bands.

    Scott Weiland, Eric Kretz and the DeLeo brothers blended glam, pop and hard rock into a cocktail that still has radio programmers drunk 15 years later. They made no bones about striking rock-star poses, appealing to the masses and, you know, enjoying themselves.

    And unlike many radio staples from The Doors to Nickelback, STP was actually responsible for some of the best music of their era. As Steve Hyden pointed out in an excellent piece for The Onion A.V. Club's blog, "STP's B-level status in '90s rock history has practically nothing to do with the music and almost everything to do with the misfortune of coming out during one of the most annoyingly cred-conscious periods in the history of mainstream rock."

    Although he went on to espouse a bizarre theory that Weiland developed his heroin addiction to gain artistic credibility, on his main point Hyden is correct. The Pilots' highly melodic, hugely powerful rock should have earned them widespread acclaim. Instead, they were decried for not taking themselves too seriously in an era that fetishized "important" music by miserable artists.

    Nirvana and Pearl Jam wrote hooky, stadium-ready rock anthems too, but those bands are more or less respected (as always, Nirvana more so than Pearl Jam). The most legitimate reason is lyrics. Weiland was no poet, and while Kurt Cobain and Eddie Vedder probably get more credit than they deserve in this category, at least their Gen-X babbling mostly made sense.

    But rock music doesn't have to make sense. It just has to rock. Nirvana and Pearl Jam rocked, but they felt self-conscious about it. Nirvana emerged from the underground, where the rules of rock stardom are different. Pearl Jam fancied themselves indie rockers too, even though they were basically populists through and through.

    Stone Temple Pilots made no bones about being full-blooded mainstream rock stars. For this, they were tarred and feathered by rock critics. They deserve better.

    There is a lingering impression that STP was ripping off Pearl Jam. Yes, Weiland went overboard with his Eddie Vedder impression on 1992 debut Core. But by the time Purple came out in 1994, STP had established an identity of its own. The record boasted some of alt-rock's most enduringly awesome singles — "Vaseline," "Interstate Love Song" — and superb deep cuts like surprisingly heartbreaking "Still Remains" and the frantic, tuneful "Unglued."

    1996's Tiny Music ... Songs From the Vatican Gift Shop was even better — sometimes jangly, sometimes gracefully subdued. In "Big Bang Baby," "Lady Picture Show" and "Trippin' On a Hole in a Paper Heart," the band produced three of the decade's finest hits.

    Even latter-day STP had something to offer. No. 4 was a hard-hitting collection with better songwriting and production than Core. And at least the goofy Shangri-La Dee Da had glorious pop nugget "Days of the Week."

    These achievements have been obscured by the perception of STP as imitators, hacks and cock-rockers. In some ways, the band fits all those descriptions, but a good song is a good song, context be damned.

    Perhaps now, as the reunited STP headlines Rock on the Range over a slate of bands it clearly has outclassed, we can finally step out from the oppressive shadow of grunge-era legalism and appreciate this band's stellar body of work.



    Wow, cool article.

    I'm goin' to see STP in June, should be sweet.
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    i had a stp sticker on my bike in 1971.
  • given2fly10given2fly10 Posts: 485
    stp is not a pearl jam rip off. stp were around long before pearl jam was even a thought.
    And he still gives his love, he just gives it away, The love he receives is the love that is saved, And sometimes is seen a strange spot in the sky, A human being that was given to fly

    no bed=no brian

    coke sucks
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    stp is not a pearl jam rip off. stp were around long before pearl jam was even a thought.

    um......same year?
  • Music For RhinosMusic For Rhinos Posts: 1,693
    STP formed in 1987 according to wikipedia. Pearl Jam formed in 1990.

    STP's got em by 3 years.

    Edit: it's just that Pearl Jam broke through into mainstream first.
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    debut lp's. same year.
  • MattyJoeMattyJoe Posts: 1,424
    I don't like this article. STP are the ones who get too much credit. Underrated? Every goddamn radio station has been talking and talking about how awesome they are and about the tour for months now. STP basically rode the grunge wave started by Green River (then, of course, Mother Love Bone), Soundgarden, etc. They got away with it because they were more open to commercialism. So when bands like Nirvana and PJ fell out of the mainstream, STP took over.
    I pledge to you a government that will not only work well, but wisely, its ability to act tempered by prudence, and its willingness to do good, balanced by the knowledge that government is never more dangerous than when our desire to have it help us blinds us to its great power to harm us.
    -Reagan
  • Dirty StuartDirty Stuart Posts: 182
    wow that was realy long but prety intrestign. old spt was prety col but i dnt realy liek teh new stuf to much yet gues its gota grw on me a litle firts. nice to c thme bak in cocnert agin.

    Pardon?

    (apologies if you are dyslexic)
    OH: You need to stop buying Pearl Jam stuff, we have no room
    Me: How about we just get a bigger house?

    http://db.etree.org/DirtyStuart
    http://randomismsofa.blogspot.com
  • Carlos DCarlos D Posts: 638
    Stone Temple Pilots were just a better timed version of Creed.What really annoys me is how much Scott Weiland's voice has changed over the years,he just alters it to suit whatever style is fashionable at the time.
    It may be the devil or it may be the Lord
    But you're gonna have to serve somebody.

    www.bebo.com/pearljam06
  • Music For RhinosMusic For Rhinos Posts: 1,693
    brain of c wrote:
    debut lp's. same year.

    no, ten - 1991, core - 1992
  • cuyler41cuyler41 Posts: 383
    Scott Weiland ain't fit to carry Eddie Vedders wank rag.
  • MapleTeaMapleTea Posts: 50
    STP formed in 1987 according to wikipedia. Pearl Jam formed in 1990.

    STP's got em by 3 years.

    Edit: it's just that Pearl Jam broke through into mainstream first.

    Oh please, Ten was released in August 91 and Core in Sept 92! That's over a year between the releases, and Weiland and co exploited the shit out of grunge from vocals all the way down to facial expressions. STP are a joke!
    *****no time to be void or save up on life,
    you got to spend it all...*****
  • DanimalDanimal Posts: 2,000
    brain of c wrote:
    um......same year?

    Nope.
    "I don't believe in PJ fans but I believe there is something, not too sure what." - Thoughts_Arrive


  • jbalicki10jbalicki10 Posts: 517
    I enjoyed all three bands, Niv, PJ, and STP

    STP really declined after No4 though. Probably because of Scotts drug problems, which is really sad...
  • jbalicki10 wrote:
    I enjoyed all three bands, Niv, PJ, and STP

    STP really declined after No4 though. Probably because of Scotts drug problems, which is really sad...

    I enjoy them all as well PJ, STP, and Nivana in that order. What always amazed me was that STP was lumped into the Seattle scene when they were from San Diego.
    Raleigh '03; Hartford '08; Mansfield II '08; Buffalo '10; Hartford '10;
    East Troy I '11; East Troy II '11; DeLuna Fest '12; Wrigley '13; Buffalo '13;
    Toronto II '16; Wrigley I '16; Wrigley II '16; Wrigley I '18; Wrigley II '18;
    Asbury Park '21; MSG '22; Camden '22
  • elmerelmer Posts: 1,683
    That's funny!!!!!!!!!!!!

    One of the central reasons why their singles never broke bigger was Weiland himself. Y'gotta admit the guy could be a bit of a tit onstage, plus he lacked the requisite looks of a mainstream 'rock star' in the Vedder/Cobain/Cornell mould. Oh, and his live voice wasn't all that tremendous.
    But,I liked the first three albums immensely whatever.
  • Gremmie95Gremmie95 Posts: 749
    STP were good, not great. Putting out albums that are half filler, half radio hits does not make you a great band.
  • WobbieWobbie Posts: 29,978
    October22 wrote:
    why do people quote the original post? fuck, that annoys me.


    It fucking annoys me, too!! :D:D:D
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
  • Music For RhinosMusic For Rhinos Posts: 1,693
    MapleTea wrote:
    Oh please, Ten was released in August 91 and Core in Sept 92! That's over a year between the releases, and Weiland and co exploited the shit out of grunge from vocals all the way down to facial expressions. STP are a joke!


    Do you even read the posts??? I clearly stated Ten was from '91 and Core was in '92 in post #13, BEFORE your post.

    C'mon people, READ!

    edit: Besides, it doesn't matter when the albums came out, STP did form before PJ. It's a non-debatable fact.
  • elmerelmer Posts: 1,683
    Maybe I was a little harsh, I dunno?

    Anyone got a boot of the mtv unplugged they did?
  • MapleTeaMapleTea Posts: 50
    Do you even read the posts??? I clearly stated Ten was from '91 and Core was in '92 in post #13, BEFORE your post.

    C'mon people, READ!

    edit: Besides, it doesn't matter when the albums came out, STP did form before PJ. It's a non-debatable fact.

    But you originally said that they formed in 1987 as if that gives them more artistic credibility or something. When they formed doesn't mean anything, the fact is they developed their sound in response to what was going on around them...Weiland copied and their band were manufactured, case closed!
    *****no time to be void or save up on life,
    you got to spend it all...*****
  • Music For RhinosMusic For Rhinos Posts: 1,693
    MapleTea wrote:
    But you originally said that they formed in 1987 as if that gives them more artistic credibility or something. When they formed doesn't mean anything, the fact is they developed their sound in response to what was going on around them...Weiland copied and their band were manufactured, case closed!


    No. I was not implying anything having to do with artistic credibility. I was simply stating a fact. The same way you would say "the sky is blue."

    Obviously Pearl Jam is my favorite band but STP doesn't deserve all the shit they catch for being rip-offs, they are their own band.
  • MattyJoe wrote:
    I don't like this article. STP are the ones who get too much credit. Underrated? Every goddamn radio station has been talking and talking about how awesome they are and about the tour for months now. STP basically rode the grunge wave started by Green River (then, of course, Mother Love Bone), Soundgarden, etc. They got away with it because they were more open to commercialism. So when bands like Nirvana and PJ fell out of the mainstream, STP took over.

    Agreed. These guys along with Bush etc helped kill the alternative 90's scene because basically they just perpetuated the grunge styereoptype when it was cool. Underrated? You've got to be kidding.

    Next Wieland joins Velvet Revolver. But you would never have seen Chris Cornell or Eddie joining the ex-GNR's band members because the Seattle scene was really opposed to that whole glamrock bullshit GnR's was a part of. Wieland however had no problems, and it just confimed to me anyway that Wieland was an oppurtunistic phony.
  • 1. STP are extremely underrated. They have had as many hit songs as Pearl Jam, and more than Soundgarden, Nirvana, or AIC ever did. But unfortunately were stuck in the grunge shadow just because they were not from Seattle and therefore never got a mention in the same breath as "the big 4"

    2. STP ripped off no one. Eddie Vedder doesn't even sound like himself from the first PJ album. And the first PJ album sounds nothing like PJ sounds now. And why? Because new bands are at the mercy of their producers, who are paid an assload of money by the record company to make the music sound like what is popular at the time. You don't get to start calling your own shots till you prove yourself with some hits, as STP and PJ BOTH did. STP was no Pearl Jam copy, STP JUST LIKE PEARL JAM were mixed to sound that way by someone else.

    3. STP is from San Diego. Which is where Eddie Vedder was living prior to joining PJ. So how does anyone know Ed didn't copy Weiland? WE DON'T. Maybe Ed was having a few beers at a local show when he was still trying to figure out how to sing.

    4. STP fucking kicks ass live. And Weiland is one of the best frontmen i have ever had the pleasure of paying to see. You would all do yourselves a huge favor to check them out while you have the chance.
    You can't spell "dumb" without DMB
  • elmerelmer Posts: 1,683
    These guys along with Bush etc
    STP were on a totally higher plane than fuckin' Bush.....my friggin' word! Rossdale ain't up to licking the sweat off Weiland's inner thigh, though I bet he'd like to!
  • walkthamilewalkthamile Posts: 349
    3. STP is from San Diego. Which is where Eddie Vedder was living prior to joining PJ. So how does anyone know Ed didn't copy Weiland? WE DON'T. Maybe Ed was having a few beers at a local show when he was still trying to figure out how to sing.

    Sorry, but I was beginning to enjoy your post until this!

    It is widely known that Vedder was pretty well entrenched in the San Diego music scene, and many will vouch for this...Weiland and STP for that matter sprung up from obscurity...They were not heard of, and I would lean more towards Weiland hearing Ten and altering his style, whether the record company forced him to or not, than Vedder hearing Weiland in San Diego!
    +--+-Official Upcoming Australasian Tour:Member #9-+--+
  • elmerelmer Posts: 1,683
    I would lean more towards Weiland hearing Ten and altering his style, whether the record company forced him to or not, than Vedder hearing Weiland in San Diego!
    Neither was the case in all probablility! This 'sound-a-like' debate surely ended upon both bands releasing their second albums.
  • elmer wrote:
    Neither was the case in all probablility! This 'sound-a-like' debate surely ended upon both bands releasing their second albums.

    Agreed. Core was a much darker album, stylistically, than any of STP's other records, which probably led to Weiland singing in his lower register for much of it. As STP broadened their sound on Purple and Tiny Music, Weiland's voice broadened with it. As for his expressions in the Plush video, I'd say that's probably imitation.
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • 1. STP are extremely underrated. They have had as many hit songs as Pearl Jam, and more than Soundgarden, Nirvana, or AIC ever did.

    Sorry I don't get how they are underrated because of this.
Sign In or Register to comment.