Heads up for Benny vinyl on Ebay.

F5F5 Posts: 791
edited September 2008 in The Porch
Bridge - 10/25/03
Mansfield I - 6/28/08
Eddie NYC - 8/4/08
Seattle - 9/21/09, 9/22/09
Salt Lake City 9/28/09
LA 9/30/09, 10/07/09
San Diego 10/9/09
Alpine Valley 9/03/11, 9/04/11
Ashbury Park 9/18/21
LA 5/06/21, 5/07/21
Phoenix 05/09/22
NYC 9/11/22
Denver 9/22/22
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • sweet...lets see if it can break $1000!
    I shit and I stink, I'm real, join the club...
  • I'm guessing it gets to at least $1100. It's just ridiculous that records can cost so much. There needs to be some serious re-printing.
    Nathan
  • I remember when I posted one a few years ago for $700 or $800 during a free listing week on ebay and I got reamed for it. I figured I would see what I could get for it. One message pit member in particular was a complete bitch about it. Looks like the buyer (I took $650) got a deal from that one. Wish I held on to it but I needed the cash for some car problems.
  • Now it's advertised on here. More people will see it and yes, the price will be sky high. Stop taking away the fun for those who like to search places like ebay for DEALS.
  • How much was this album originally sold for by the ten club? How many years ago was this sale?
  • I think it was $32 plus shipping. The show was in 03, so I think the sale was probably at the end of 03.
  • June 2004. The 10C sale was June 2004.
    -Chris
    Male, 34

    I'm on Facebook - facebook.com/christopher.leesye1

    1998 Brisbane 2
    2003 Brisbane 1
    2006 LA 1 & 2
    2008 LA 2, San Diego 1 (EV)
    2009 LA 1, 2, 3 & 4, San Diego
    2011 St. Louis (EV)
    2012 Tulsa 1 & 2 (EV)
    2013 Chicago, Dallas & OKC
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    I remember when I posted one a few years ago for $700 or $800 during a free listing week on ebay and I got reamed for it. I figured I would see what I could get for it. One message pit member in particular was a complete bitch about it. Looks like the buyer (I took $650) got a deal from that one. Wish I held on to it but I needed the cash for some car problems.


    Some of these fans are ridiculous when it comes to this stuff. They convince themselves they have some kind of sanctimonious higher-ground and viciously attack everyone else.

    Look at behavior and sanctimonious drivel some of these people dished out to that guy selling his Benny on that audiocircle forum. Childish.

    It's as if they think they're waving some kind of self-righteous flag of divine integrity, or something. I started to feel bad for that guy and felt the need to register on there , just for the purpose of apologizing for the behavior of the jerks and to assure him not all Pearl Jam fans are like that.

    Also wished him luck in selling it. If I could afford it right now, I would buy it.

    My Benny albums have seen a lot of play and I've been wanting to get another one, in case the vinyl starts to show some audible wear and tear.

    But I can't afford it, right now.

    He responded back to my PM, last night.

    If these people would have took the time to engage in a civil discussion with that guy, they would have found out the reason he is selling it and why getting more money is important to him.

    Guy got layed-off from his job, has three kids, a wife, a home and they are struggling...day-to-day to put food on the table and pay all their bills. It became obvious from what he said in the PM that he really didn't want to sell it. But has no choice. Guy says he's been a Pearl Jam fan since day one. He got his Benny from the Ten Club sale.

    So along comes these sanctimonious windbags, who register at that site just so they can start attacking the guy, sending him nasty, vicious PMs and crapping all over his sales thread. They didn't even take the time to ask the guy anything about why he was selling it.

    I don't know, just doesn't seem right to do such a thing.

    I can sympathize with him, for sure. I have two kids, a home ......and I don't know what I would do if I lost my job and had to support my family without a job. Yeah, Savings are there for me. But Savings don't last long when you're out of work, paying bills, feeding a family and out searching for a new job. And not everyone has Savings. Especially these days and after the last eight years.

    While I completely understand the concept of "Limited Special Editions" and have no problem with that. I sure do wish Ten Club would do another pressing.
  • IamMineIamMine Posts: 2,743
    NMyTree wrote:
    Some of these fans are ridiculous when it comes to this stuff. They convince themselves they have some kind of sanctimonious higher-ground and viciously attack everyone else.

    Look at behavior and sanctimonious drivel some of these people dished out to that guy selling his Benny on that audiocircle forum. Childish.

    It's as if they think they're waving some kind of self-righteous flag of divine integrity, or something. I started to feel bad for that guy and felt the need to register on there , just for the purpose of apologizing for the behavior of the jerks and to assure him not all Pearl Jam fans are like that.

    Also wished him luck in selling it. If I could afford it right now, I would buy it.

    My Benny albums have seen a lot of play and I've been wanting to get another one, in case the vinyl starts to show some audible wear and tear.

    But I can't afford it, right now.

    He responded back to my PM, last night.

    If these people would have took the time to engage in a civil discussion with that guy, they would have found out the reason he is selling it and why getting more money is important to him.

    Guy got layed-off from his job, has three kids, a wife, a home and they are struggling...day-to-day to put food on the table and pay all their bills. It became obvious from what he said in the PM that he really didn't want to sell it. But has no choice. Guy says he's been a Pearl Jam fan since day one. He got his Benny from the Ten Club sale.

    So along comes these sanctimonious windbags, who register at that site just so they can start attacking the guy, sending him nasty, vicious PMs and crapping all over his sales thread. They didn't even take the time to ask the guy anything about why he was selling it.

    I don't know, just doesn't seem right to do such a thing.

    I can sympathize with him, for sure. I have two kids, a home ......and I don't know what I would do if I lost my job and had to support my family without a job. Yeah, Savings are there for me. But Savings don't last long when you're out of work, paying bills, feeding a family and out searching for a new job. And not everyone has Savings. Especially these days and after the last eight years.

    While I completely understand the concept of "Limited Special Editions" and have no problem with that. I sure do wish Ten Club would do another pressing.

    I don't support the attacks, but the agreement (as with most of 10c's sales) was that it was NOT FOR RESALE.

    Some 10c members had their membership revoked for selling benny.

    I feel for the guy but I hear that all the time. Many are in similar boats like this guy but the agreement with 10c was that they were not for resale, period.

    If he wanted to sell this, then he had to know he was willing to face consequences - losing his 10c membership. I understand that is in pale comparison with his finanical situtation. If he was a long time PJ fan, then he had to know what kind of fans he would be dealing with? I'm just making assumptions here.

    I have a lot of PJ stuff/collections that I could easily sell to make the ends meet, but the agreement I made with 10c was not to sell them and personally, myself, knowing the band doesn't wish for that makes it personal for me as well.

    The guy made his decision, obviously...

    As for others getting bashed and while I agree things could have been handled in a civil manner, the fans get upset because they know the rules and it's not okay for others to break the rules with 10c.

    If one breaks the rule and gets away with it, then others can too. Then what is the point of enforcing the 10c's rules?

    I guess the entire point is that 10c said "NOT FOR RESALE" - period.
    JA: Why do I get the Ticketmaster question?
    EV: It's your band.
    ~Q Magazine


    "Kisses for the glow...kisses for the lease." - BDRII
  • IamMine wrote:
    I don't support the attacks, but the agreement (as with most of 10c's sales) was that it was NOT FOR RESALE.

    Some 10c members had their membership revoked for selling benny.

    I feel for the guy but I hear that all the time. Many are in similar boats like this guy but the agreement with 10c was that they were not for resale, period.

    I imagine if this guy is struggling to feed his family the last thing on his mind is the fact that 10club might revoke his membership. Other than that I don't think 10club has any power to enforce the "not for resale" clause. It is his album to do what he wants with, it is not like they can take him to court over it. Personally if it were me in that position I would probably do the exact same thing.
  • It was sold on June 21st of 2004 and was $35 + S/H. I will play frisbee with my 3 dogs with mine before I sell it! ;)
    Never, ever, flipping forget
    "Free Shipping" SPEEDY MCCREADY

    My friend was going to see Eddie last night. Since he was in Vegas, I gave him 5 Grand to gamble with. I told him I wanted it all to go on Black. Bastard! PhillyCrownOfThorns-11-2-12
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    IamMine wrote:
    I don't support the attacks, but the agreement (as with most of 10c's sales) was that it was NOT FOR RESALE.

    Some 10c members had their membership revoked for selling benny.

    I feel for the guy but I hear that all the time. Many are in similar boats like this guy but the agreement with 10c was that they were not for resale, period.

    If he wanted to sell this, then he had to know he was willing to face consequences - losing his 10c membership. I understand that is in pale comparison with his finanical situtation. If he was a long time PJ fan, then he had to know what kind of fans he would be dealing with? I'm just making assumptions here.

    I have a lot of PJ stuff/collections that I could easily sell to make the ends meet, but the agreement I made with 10c was not to sell them and personally, myself, knowing the band doesn't wish for that makes it personal for me as well.

    The guy made his decision, obviously...

    As for others getting bashed and while I agree things could have been handled in a civil manner, the fans get upset because they know the rules and it's not okay for others to break the rules with 10c.

    If one breaks the rule and gets away with it, then others can too. Then what is the point of enforcing the 10c's rules?

    I guess the entire point is that 10c said "NOT FOR RESALE" - period.

    Okay, I see what you're saying.

    But when someone is loses their job and is desperately trying to feed their family and keep a roof over their head. 10c's rules are going to pale in comparison.


    Now for a few interesting points.......

    This "Not For Resale" point you make is true. That is the rules.

    But if you look in the original thread here at the Pit, no one ever mentioned anything about the "Not For Resale" rule. In fact, they were giddy with joy that a Benny Hall was available for purchase at the $300.00 price point.

    And if you read his sales thread, you see that no one even mentions the "Not For Resale" rule. They are just griping and attacking because he changed and increased the price.

    No one mentioned a damn thing in any of the threads about the "Not For Resale" rule, here at the Porch. Until you just mentioned it.

    I suppose if he was selling the Benny Hall for $2.00 it would still be against the "Not For Resale" rule, correct? But I'll bet not one single person here would have a nasty thing to say about that! And I'll bet 99% of them would buy it for that $2.00 price and then resell it for a huge profit.

    Some of the questions you ask whether rhetorical or not, would have to asked to him. I don't know.

    But from reading what he has said in the threads and in his PMs, I don't think he is that familiar with the fan base. Doesn't seem like he's ever been here or spent any significant time here...at the Pit. He said his friend from here is the one who enlightened him. And from his handling of the christmas singles ad, doesn't seem like he's all that in touch with what's going on.

    I imagine three kids keeps a guy busy:D
  • IamMineIamMine Posts: 2,743
    NMyTree wrote:
    Okay, I see what you're saying.

    But when someone is loses their job and is desperately trying to feed their family and keep a roof over their head. 10c's rules are going to pale in comparison.


    Now for a few interesting points.......

    This "Not For Resale" point you make is true. That is the rules.

    But if you look in the original thread here at the Pit, no one ever mentioned anything about the "Not For Resale" rule. In fact, they were giddy with joy that a Benny Hall was available for purchase at the $300.00 price point.

    And if you read his sales thread, you see that no one even mentions the "Not For Resale" rule. They are just griping and attacking because he changed and increased the price.

    No one mentioned a damn thing in any of the threads about the "Not For Resale" rule, here at the Porch. Until you just mentioned it.

    I suppose if he was selling the Benny Hall for $2.00 it would still be against the "Not For Resale" rule, correct? But I'll bet not one single person here would have a nasty thing to say about that! And I'll bet 99% of them would buy it for that $2.00 price and then resell it for a huge profit.

    Some of the questions you ask whether rhetorical or not, would have to asked to him. I don't know.

    But from reading what he has said in the threads and in his PMs, I don't think he is that familiar with the fan base. Doesn't seem like he's ever been here or spent any significant time here...at the Pit. He said his friend from here is the one who enlightened him. And from his handling of the christmas singles ad, doesn't seem like he's all that in touch with what's going on.

    I imagine three kids keeps a guy busy:D

    ;) True...I didn't read the entire thread...paid attention to yours the most. :D

    Two wrongs don't make a right...

    I doubt anyone would sell their Benny for $2.00 anyway...but I do see your point, though. I think I'd have a heart attack if it went for 2.00. :p

    And I've got four keeping me busy, too! :)
    JA: Why do I get the Ticketmaster question?
    EV: It's your band.
    ~Q Magazine


    "Kisses for the glow...kisses for the lease." - BDRII
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    I have two......a 4 1/2 year old and a 2 year old. The eldest just started his second year of pre-school. Because of his birthday, he won't be able to start Kindergarten till next year, when he'll already be 5 years and nine months old.

    That's the law.

    Meanwhile, my little guy is running the babysitter ragged...while I work :D
  • pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,087
    and no doubt pay half your wages to the babysitter....
  • godpt3godpt3 Posts: 1,020
    NMyTree wrote:

    This "Not For Resale" point you make is true. That is the rules.

    But if you look in the original thread here at the Pit, no one ever mentioned anything about the "Not For Resale" rule. In fact, they were giddy with joy that a Benny Hall was available for purchase at the $300.00 price point.

    And if you read his sales thread, you see that no one even mentions the "Not For Resale" rule. They are just griping and attacking because he changed and increased the price.

    No one mentioned a damn thing in any of the threads about the "Not For Resale" rule, here at the Porch. Until you just mentioned it.

    I suppose if he was selling the Benny Hall for $2.00 it would still be against the "Not For Resale" rule, correct? But I'll bet not one single person here would have a nasty thing to say about that! And I'll bet 99% of them would buy it for that $2.00 price and then resell it for a huge profit.


    A recent court case dealing with the sale of radio station promo CDs ruled that just stamping something "Not for Resale" is absolutely meaningless and has no legal standing. The doctrine of first sale still stands! Once someone sells you something, you are legally free to do whatever you want with it.
    "If all those sweet, young things were laid end to end, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised."
    —Dorothy Parker

    http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
  • pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,087
    godpt3 wrote:
    A recent court case dealing with the sale of radio station promo CDs ruled that just stamping something "Not for Resale" is absolutely meaningless and has no legal standing. The doctrine of first sale still stands! Once someone sells you something, you are legally free to do whatever you want with it.

    this really is an excellent point, I recall that case now, I posted that on the pjcollectors forum.

    Still there is a moral ground I guess, if Ten club asks you not to sell something perhaps we should respect that.

    That being said, I have no trouble with anyone doing this, I certainly wouldnt call them from pillar to post and ask that they are banned as buying things is the onyl way I have managed to grow such a collection and acquire things I would have otherwise found impossibe to get.

    There are a number of people, me included that has looked to sell the Mystery poster, ok only at the price paid, but is that technically wrong too??

    This really is an endless argument that surfaces time and time again
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    godpt3 wrote:
    A recent court case dealing with the sale of radio station promo CDs ruled that just stamping something "Not for Resale" is absolutely meaningless and has no legal standing. The doctrine of first sale still stands! Once someone sells you something, you are legally free to do whatever you want with it.


    You're talking common law.

    IamMine and I were discussing " Ten Club " rules and how they apply to Ten Club membership.

    Of course the law permits us to do what ever we want with it and I believe we should have the right to do what we want with it.

    But Ten Club objects to this and has/will revoke membership over it. That was what IamMine was saying.
  • IamMineIamMine Posts: 2,743
    godpt3 wrote:
    A recent court case dealing with the sale of radio station promo CDs ruled that just stamping something "Not for Resale" is absolutely meaningless and has no legal standing. The doctrine of first sale still stands! Once someone sells you something, you are legally free to do whatever you want with it.

    That's interesting - thanks for bringing that to my attention.

    But if 10c said not for resale, they do have the rights to revoke one's membership if the rule is broken.

    I can't imagine one would sue 10c for that!

    pdalowsky - I agree that it's also about respect.

    As for the mystery posters... I dunno? It couldn't hurt to shoot Santos a pm. :)

    I would find it very funny if they dedicated an entire page or two defining what "not for resale" meant in details.

    And then a FAQ page...

    Gosh, I miss those ages, NMyTree! I never thought I'd say that about my daughter who is turning 13 this weekend...but phheeeww, she was one handful and mischevious child who did not like to listen, sleep at night, or even to be touched!

    She is one lovely teenager now. :) My oldest is 15 and the youngest of four is 6.

    First time in 15 years the kids are in school full time....strange feeling. Feeling old, too. :p
    JA: Why do I get the Ticketmaster question?
    EV: It's your band.
    ~Q Magazine


    "Kisses for the glow...kisses for the lease." - BDRII
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    pdalowsky wrote:
    this really is an excellent point, I recall that case now, I posted that on the pjcollectors forum.

    Still there is a moral ground I guess, if Ten club asks you not to sell something perhaps we should respect that.

    That being said, I have no trouble with anyone doing this, I certainly wouldnt call them from pillar to post and ask that they are banned as buying things is the onyl way I have managed to grow such a collection and acquire things I would have otherwise found impossibe to get.

    There are a number of people, me included that has looked to sell the Mystery poster, ok only at the price paid, but is that technically wrong too??

    This really is an endless argument that surfaces time and time again

    Accoring to Ten Club rules any Resale is against the rules. If I remember correctly the rules simply stipulates that "Not For Resale".

    So if you sell something for a penny....50 cents......face value....or several hundreds of dollars above cost; it's still against the rules. If I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me on it and show some proof with a quote from the rule book.

    But you won't see anyone here complaining or attacking if someone is selling something for a penny or 50 cents. They'll be giddy in their celebration.

    It's only when someone sells it for a lot more money than face value, even if it is clear the market has been set at the price; that the sanctimonious crap starts to flow.
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    IamMine wrote:
    That's interesting - thanks for bringing that to my attention.

    But if 10c said not for resale, they do have the rights to revoke one's membership if the rule is broken.

    I can't imagine one would sue 10c for that!

    pdalowsky - I agree that it's also about respect.

    As for the mystery posters... I dunno? It couldn't hurt to shoot Santos a pm. :)

    I would find it very funny if they dedicated an entire page or two defining what "not for resale" meant in details.

    And then a FAQ page...

    Gosh, I miss those ages, NMyTree! I never thought I'd say that about my daughter who is turning 13 this weekend...but phheeeww, she was one handful and mischevious child who did not like to listen, sleep at night, or even to be touched!

    She is one lovely teenager now. :) My oldest is 15 and the youngest of four is 6.

    First time in 15 years the kids are in school full time....strange feeling. Feeling old, too. :p

    :) Good stuff, right there.

    I'll let you know how worse for wear I am when they are both 13 and 15:D
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    pdalowsky wrote:
    and no doubt pay half your wages to the babysitter....

    Nah, she's very reasonable and she's babysitting in my house. I work from home, so that comes with advantages and disadvantages.

    Most of my income goes to mortgage, utilities, food, insurance... etc.
  • pdalowskypdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,087
    NMyTree wrote:
    Nah, she's very reasonable and she's babysitting in my house. I work from home, so that comes with advantages and disadvantages.

    Most of my income goes to mortgage, utilities, food, insurance... etc.

    wow thats awesome,. over here in the Uk we get stung for such things, My brother pays the equivalent of $2000 a month to have his two little ones in Nursery from 9am to 4pm. Insane
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    pdalowsky wrote:
    wow thats awesome,. over here in the Uk we get stung for such things, My brother pays the equivalent of $2000 a month to have his two little ones in Nursery from 9am to 4pm. Insane

    Yeah it is insane. And believe me, quality Daycare/Nursery here in the USA is also quite expensive. If we had to go that way and find a suitable Daycare/Nursery; it would cost us close to the same thing as what your brother pays.

    We can find cheaper here, but I'm very particular....cautious......selective about who watches my boys. I am very fortunate to have a trusted, close friend to watch them here in my home, while I work. as well as the means to compensate her.

    A lot of people aren't so fortunate and they have a hard time finding trusted, quality daycare/babysitting.

    As a parent you find yourself being overly cautious and selective in their safety and care. At least I do. I imagine most parents do.
  • IamMineIamMine Posts: 2,743
    NMyTree wrote:
    Nah, she's very reasonable and she's babysitting in my house. I work from home, so that comes with advantages and disadvantages.

    Most of my income goes to mortgage, utilities, food, insurance... etc.

    Ahhh....I also have been and am working from home so I do know what you are talking about! ;)

    2,000 a month, pdalowsky?! That's insane!

    Last time I put my kids in daycare it was like 230 a week PER CHILD!

    Now it's gone up according to my friend who just had a baby and has to go back to work after 6 weeks.

    I'm glad I got let go six months after our youngest was born.

    That was the last time I had been in the "real world". ;)

    However, after I graduate this fall with my bachelor's degree...I might have to get back out there in the ugly world. Unless I get lucky and get hired working from home!

    Heh.

    Having fun watching this thread getting off the track, mitchmoore2? Sorry, dude!

    I see you are 22 years old... a baby to me! :D

    Now i know how those older people feel when they have the urge to say something like: "Wow, when I was your age...."

    Because I was about to say that...and decided to grind my teeth. :D

    I'll shut up now and go outside to count the cars passing by. ;)
    JA: Why do I get the Ticketmaster question?
    EV: It's your band.
    ~Q Magazine


    "Kisses for the glow...kisses for the lease." - BDRII
  • Get_RightGet_Right Posts: 13,381
    I dont really care if someone sells stuff for profit
    posters tickets vinyl whatever-reality is the auction sites and CL have made is easier and more profitable to sell stuff-thats the American way

    I cant blame a person for trying making a buck

    and $700-$1000 bucks for the benny set is nuts-cant blame anyone for making that deal

    I get more angry at the people who feel compelled to notify the ten club when someone sells stuff-stop snitching and worry about your self (not directed at anyone-just venting)
  • DanimalDanimal Posts: 2,000
    Son: Dad, I'm cold and hungry.
    Dad: Sorry I don't have money for heat or food since I got layed off.
    Son: Well, can't you sell one of your vinyls?
    Dad: Sorry Ten Club has their rules.


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
    "I don't believe in PJ fans but I believe there is something, not too sure what." - Thoughts_Arrive


  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    Get_Right wrote:
    I get more angry at the people who feel compelled to notify the ten club when someone sells stuff-stop snitching and worry about your self (not directed at anyone-just venting)

    There's a lot of petty and childish people in the world. The Pearl Jam fanbase is no exception.
  • Get_RightGet_Right Posts: 13,381
    NMyTree wrote:
    There's a lot of petty and childish people in the world. The Pearl Jam fanbase is no exception.

    yep
    might actually be a higher concentration of them
  • Danimal wrote:
    Son: Dad, I'm cold and hungry.
    Dad: Sorry I don't have money for heat or food since I got layed off.
    Son: Well, can't you sell one of your vinyls?
    Dad: Sorry Ten Club has their rules.


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA


    Exactly you wouldn't want the dad to get his membership revoked and possibly lose his senority. He would have to sit in the back row at the next concert he goes to. A person has to have their priorities.
Sign In or Register to comment.