Mark Cuban 2028

Gern Blansten · February 7

You heard it here first...or maybe you heard it somewhere else.

battle1 · February 7

Thats been floated plenty already. You aren’t first, Gern.

He gets my vote.

battle1 · February 7

Cuban - Richardson 2028

Gern Blansten · February 7

battle1 said:

Thats been floated plenty already. You aren’t first, Gern.

He gets my vote.

hence the "or maybe you heard it somewhere else"

READ MAN! COMPREHENSION IS KEY!

josevolution · February 7

2028 😂 maybe just maybe if Democrats can somehow win both houses in 26 then I’ll talk 28! As of now I’d say 28 is already in the bag for Musk to win reelection

Tim Simmons · February 7

I'm a Pritzker man myself

Gern Blansten · February 7

Tim Simmons said:

I'm a Pritzker man myself

Yeah I like him too.

Halifax2TheMax · February 7

Hilarious that you think there will be “free and fair” elections again.

battle1 · February 7

Halifax2TheMax said:

Hilarious that you think there will be “free and fair” elections again.

Actually, it is hilarious that you think there won’t be.

battle1 · February 7

Pritzker is a fine gentleman, but has no shot.

Halifax2TheMax · February 7

battle1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Hilarious that you think there will be “free and fair” elections again.

Actually, it is hilarious that you think there won’t be.

Bahahahahahahaha! You might want UN election observers brought in to monitor things but I’m guessing no, seeing how everything is just fine in your eyes.

battle1 · February 7

Halifax2TheMax said:

battle1 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Hilarious that you think there will be “free and fair” elections again.

Actually, it is hilarious that you think there won’t be.

Bahahahahahahaha! You might want UN election observers brought in to monitor things but I’m guessing no, seeing how everything is just fine in your eyes.

What would Cuban do? Thats the question. Im here to say I would vote for Mark Cuban.

tbergs · February 7

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

DE4173 · February 7

Cuban/Castro 2028!

*Julián

battle1 · February 7

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

Did you see the link someone posted of Chuck Shumer chanting We will win!

I would welcome Cuban with open American arms.

Gern Blansten · February 7

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

Yeah but our billionaire actually cares for people...

DE4173 · February 7

Nm 😉

OnWis97 · February 7

josevolution said:

2028 😂 maybe just maybe if Democrats can somehow win both houses in 26 then I’ll talk 28! As of now I’d say 28 is already in the bag for Musk to win reelection

Here's the far-too-early odds (by my gut):

MAGA wins a nearly legit election: 5%
MAGA wins a "for show" election that's not in doubt: 60%
Non-MAGA Republic wins the election <1%
A Dem wins the election 10%
No election: 25%

OnWis97 · February 7

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

That would be nice but beggars can't be choosers.

nicknyr15 · February 7

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

I thought I was the only one who thought that for a second.

DE4173 · February 7

🎶If you hate sommmmmething, don't you do it too🎶

tbergs · February 7

Gern Blansten said:

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

Yeah but our billionaire actually cares for people...

That's not my point. Sure, he's probably better than Trump and Musk, but also, not someone I want running the country. We should be looking at Governors and Senators, you know, people with political experience who could lead the country and represent us on the world stage. The problem seems to be though that many states are electing local celebrities/rich people or people based on looks and not expertise or experience.

On one side people are chanting for the removal of DEI because it should be about merit and experience while then appointing/hiring people based on whether they like them or they're "loyal". It's as if they only want to end DEI because it interferes with cronyism.

HughFreakingDillon · February 7

I can see it now. Half of america: I ain’t votin’ fer no stinkin cuban! I vote for MURICANS!

HughFreakingDillon · February 7

I’m hoping for The Rock.

CAN YA SAMELLLLALALALALOW, what President ROCK is executing?

HughFreakingDillon · February 7

I mean, Canada voted in a drama teacher.

And that…turned out…cough…fine.

Gern Blansten · February 7

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

Yeah but our billionaire actually cares for people...

That's not my point. Sure, he's probably better than Trump and Musk, but also, not someone I want running the country. We should be looking at Governors and Senators, you know, people with political experience who could lead the country and represent us on the world stage. The problem seems to be though that many states are electing local celebrities/rich people or people based on looks and not expertise or experience.

On one side people are chanting for the removal of DEI because it should be about merit and experience while then appointing/hiring people based on whether they like them or they're "loyal". It's as if they only want to end DEI because it interferes with cronyism.

I get it...but that doesn't seem to work for us. I think Gavin Newsom would be great but the GOP mud machine has probably damaged him too much.

Cuban is a philanthropist and his pharmacy company clearly doesn't have much of a profit motive. He's using his wealth to serve which is refreshing.

tbergs · February 7

Gern Blansten said:

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tbergs said:

I really hope we get out of the celebrity billionaire for president business.

Yeah but our billionaire actually cares for people...

That's not my point. Sure, he's probably better than Trump and Musk, but also, not someone I want running the country. We should be looking at Governors and Senators, you know, people with political experience who could lead the country and represent us on the world stage. The problem seems to be though that many states are electing local celebrities/rich people or people based on looks and not expertise or experience.

On one side people are chanting for the removal of DEI because it should be about merit and experience while then appointing/hiring people based on whether they like them or they're "loyal". It's as if they only want to end DEI because it interferes with cronyism.

I get it...but that doesn't seem to work for us. I think Gavin Newsom would be great but the GOP mud machine has probably damaged him too much.

Cuban is a philanthropist and his pharmacy company clearly doesn't have much of a profit motive. He's using his wealth to serve which is refreshing.

Maybe the ex-wives of the billionaires can run? MacKenzie Scott for POTUS and then one of the other one's who basically donated all their ex's wealth to charity. Fuck those tech bros.

mace1229 · February 7

josevolution said:

2028 😂 maybe just maybe if Democrats can somehow win both houses in 26 then I’ll talk 28! As of now I’d say 28 is already in the bag for Musk to win reelection

I think it will be a while before we see a 2 in a row term same party president. People are going to be unhappy and vote another way next election, and then again the following. Just like the last 3.

OnWis97 · February 7

mace1229 said:

josevolution said:

2028 😂 maybe just maybe if Democrats can somehow win both houses in 26 then I’ll talk 28! As of now I’d say 28 is already in the bag for Musk to win reelection

I think it will be a while before we see a 2 in a row term same party president. People are going to be unhappy and vote another way next election, and then again the following. Just like the last 3.

This assumes a free and fair election.

Elon Musk is mid-coup right now. And nobody seems too interested in stopping it.

Halifax2TheMax · February 7

OnWis97 said:

mace1229 said:

josevolution said:

2028 😂 maybe just maybe if Democrats can somehow win both houses in 26 then I’ll talk 28! As of now I’d say 28 is already in the bag for Musk to win reelection

I think it will be a while before we see a 2 in a row term same party president. People are going to be unhappy and vote another way next election, and then again the following. Just like the last 3.

This assumes a free and fair election.

Elon Musk is mid-coup right now. And nobody seems too interested in stopping it.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, free and "fair" elections? Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! From Letter From An American:

The current administration’s actions strengthen the hand of foreign nations, especially China, against the U.S. Yesterday, Pam Bondi, Trump’s second choice for attorney general—the first had to withdraw after the House Ethics Committee drew attention to his drug use and sexual behavior—took the oath of office.

Today, Bondi disbanded the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) and cut back enforcement of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). Then-director of the FBI Christopher Wray established FITF in 2017 to stop countries like Russia and China from interfering with American politics, as Russia had done in 2016 to help elect Trump. FARA required anyone accepting money from a foreign government to declare that connection, and was key in helping law enforcement agencies to dismantle foreign influence operations. Trump’s 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort, for example, pleaded guilty to violating FARA when he didn’t disclose that he was being paid by those linked to the Russian government. (In December 2020, before he left office, Trump pardoned Manafort.)

Prioritizing human smuggling and drug cartels, the Justice Department under Bondi is scaling back white-collar crimes like bribery of foreign officials, kleptocracy, and money laundering. In the past few years, the Justice Department has recovered yachts, planes, and real estate from Russians sanctioned because of the attack on Ukraine. “Taken together these changes are an invitation to foreign actors to interfere in American affairs,” Aaron Zelinsky, a former national security prosecutor for the Justice Department, told Ben Penn of Bloomberg Law. “Even worse, it’s an invitation to Americans to help them do it.”

battle1 · February 7

Be well, my fine fellow Americans. Be well.

Mark Cuban 2028

Comments