** KAMALA HARRIS FOR PRESIDENT -PART DEUX **

The Juggler

mickeyrat said:

Gern Blansten said:

I won't listen because I really don't know where to even go...I'll just watch the clips that survive

youtube channel live.

and spotify

The internet, my man! lol



I would bet that Trump would beg and plead to go on after her, though, and Rogan will probably agree to it. Either way, I think this would be great. 

HughFreakingDillon

all 3 of them should sit down while watching UFC and smoking cigars and hitting the bong. 

The Juggler

https://www.inquirer.com/politics/election/republican-national-committee-mail-ballot-suit-dropped-20241017.html

RNC abandons lawsuit against Montgomery County that could have slowed mail ballot counting

The Republican National Committee dropped its lawsuit against Montgomery County. They had argued the county improperly sent ballots before completing state required testing.

Montgomery County Commissioner Neil Makhija, then a candidate, voting with his wife Rachel Nash at the Ludington Library in Bryn Mawr in 2023.Steven M. Falk / Steven M. Falk / Staff Photograp

by Katie BernardPublished Oct. 17, 2024, 10:39 a.m. ET

The Republican National Committee dropped a lawsuit against Montgomery County after acknowledging the county had completed adequate testing of ballots and machines before it mailed ballots to voters last month.

The RNC had sued the county last month, saying election officials made ballots available before completing state-required logic and accuracy testing on voting machines. The county said at the time that it had completed all testing of ballots before making them available to voters and that it also tested the machines that count mail ballots after making ballots available in-person but before mailing ballots out.

When the lawsuit was filed, the Pennsylvania Department of State criticized the suit as frivolous and said Montgomery County had completed all required testing before it printed ballots and made them available.

In a filing last week, the RNC dropped its request that Montgomery County stop sending mail ballots, agreeing that proper testing had taken place. The organization dropped the suit on Monday.

In a news release last week, the RNC described the litigation as an “election integrity win,” and said its efforts had delayed the mailing of ballots in the county by several days. Montgomery County made ballots available in offices on Sept. 17 but did not mail ballots until after machine testing concluded on Sept. 23. The RNC’s legal team had sent a letter to Montgomery County expressing their concern on the 17th.

“Election officials must be held accountable, and that’s exactly what we’ve done in Montgomery County. Rules, safeguards, and laws are critical to ensuring there are no holes in the system that undermine voters or election integrity,” RNC Chairman Michael Watley said in a statement.

The RNC filed a separate lawsuit earlier this week against the suburban county over its use of a mobile voter services van. The suit would not directly impact voters or the counting of votes, but it asked the county to stop using the van until it had publicly posted a full schedule of where and when it would be used.

Bentleyspop

https://x.com/CalltoActivism/status/1847025422602551738?t=NjB0l44KzvJdsorvsoUsVw&s=19

mace1229

Poncier said:

I watched and don't think it went too well.

I finally got to watch it and I agree.
Didnt seem to answer any of the questions, which is why Bret kept interrupting. And while avoiding the questions  she’d respond with “But Trump…..”
Kudos for going in fox, but she needs to be able to answer a question without turning the focus to Trump 

gimmesometruth27

mace1229 said:

Poncier said:

I watched and don't think it went too well.

I finally got to watch it and I agree.
Didnt seem to answer any of the questions, which is why Bret kept interrupting. And while avoiding the questions  she’d respond with “But Trump…..”
Kudos for going in fox, but she needs to be able to answer a question without turning the focus to Trump 

lmao ok.

Tim Simmons

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Poncier

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

mace1229

Poncier said:

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

Exactly. No one expects her not to mention Trump. But when that’s the focus of every answer, you want more substance.

njhaley1

It's just not as exciting when no one mentions eating cats and dogs or illegal criminal transvestites.  

Tim Simmons

Her answers were fine. She wasn’t gonna win you guys over anyway. 

mickeyrat

so telling the truth about the candidate said channel favors and runs cover for is somehow ducking and dodging questions? 

objectively, he interupted to go off on a tangent from part of her attempts to answer. it was fucking rude. ask a follow up when she finishes.

gimmesometruth27

mace1229 said:

Poncier said:

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

Exactly. No one expects her not to mention Trump. But when that’s the focus of every answer, you want more substance.

she goes on a trump propaganda network that has been lying about her to their viewers for months and lying to prop up trump and make him seem normal and your reaction is "iLiKe It BeTtEr WhEn ShE aNsWeRs QuEsTiOnS wItHoUt MeNtIoNiNg TrUmP!!"

literally nothing she does is good enough for you guys. imagine trump going on msnbc. but he never would. it proves that to you harris critics the bar is constantly raising and lowering while the bar for trump is laying on the ground.

maybe if she would have had the interviewer listen to music for a half hour.

gimmesometruth27

also he phrased questions in a way where they were unanswerable. loaded questions, like that one "when did you know biden was unfit to run" or something along those lines implying that she knew something she is not saying, and that no matter how she answered it it was going to look bad and trump would have a commercial to make out of it.

it is a loaded question, similar to the "so are you still beating your wife?" implying that no matter how the man answers he is admitting to beating his with in the past or currently. its disgusting. 

Merkin Baller

Yeah… most of his ‘questions’ were phrased as gotcha moments, but sure, she should have shown more substance in response to his bad faith bullshit. 

& blaming Harris for Baier’s constant (& strategic) interrupting of her is…. something. 

mace1229

gimmesometruth27 said:

mace1229 said:

Poncier said:

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

Exactly. No one expects her not to mention Trump. But when that’s the focus of every answer, you want more substance.

she goes on a trump propaganda network that has been lying about her to their viewers for months and lying to prop up trump and make him seem normal and your reaction is "iLiKe It BeTtEr WhEn ShE aNsWeRs QuEsTiOnS wItHoUt MeNtIoNiNg TrUmP!!"

literally nothing she does is good enough for you guys. imagine trump going on msnbc. but he never would. it proves that to you harris critics the bar is constantly raising and lowering while the bar for trump is laying on the ground.

maybe if she would have had the interviewer listen to music for a half hour.

Not what I said.
Of course she’s going to talk about Trump. No one said she shouldn’t mention him. But making him the center point of literally every response while not answering the question is another thing. 

mace1229

gimmesometruth27 said:

also he phrased questions in a way where they were unanswerable. loaded questions, like that one "when did you know biden was unfit to run" or something along those lines implying that she knew something she is not saying, and that no matter how she answered it it was going to look bad and trump would have a commercial to make out of it.

it is a loaded question, similar to the "so are you still beating your wife?" implying that no matter how the man answers he is admitting to beating his with in the past or currently. its disgusting. 

I agree on this point, I wasn’t thrilled with the question selection and the amount of time he spent on immigration given that it was a short interview.

Gern Blansten

mace1229 said:

Poncier said:

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

Exactly. No one expects her not to mention Trump. But when that’s the focus of every answer, you want more substance.

She was on fox... They scrub all bad references of trump. Mission accomplished 

Poncier

Tim Simmons said:

Her answers were fine. She wasn’t gonna win you guys over anyway. 

Win me over?
I'm voting for her regardless. I was watching hoping for something that would win whatever few undecideds there are over, and frankly didn't see anything.

Halifax2TheMax

gimmesometruth27 said:

mace1229 said:

Poncier said:

Tim Simmons said:

I mean, when you are running against one other person, you kinda have to contrast yourself to them. 

Of course. But at least give some semblance of an answer to the questions at hand in the process.

Exactly. No one expects her not to mention Trump. But when that’s the focus of every answer, you want more substance.

she goes on a trump propaganda network that has been lying about her to their viewers for months and lying to prop up trump and make him seem normal and your reaction is "iLiKe It BeTtEr WhEn ShE aNsWeRs QuEsTiOnS wItHoUt MeNtIoNiNg TrUmP!!"

literally nothing she does is good enough for you guys. imagine trump going on msnbc. but he never would. it proves that to you harris critics the bar is constantly raising and lowering while the bar for trump is laying on the ground.

maybe if she would have had the interviewer listen to music for a half hour.

Bar for POOTWH? There is no bar. It’s a cult.