Middle East ......
Options
Comments
-
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.0 -
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
Again, read a fucking book. Hamas or H, as you refer to the PLO, are not and have not been one and the same.Lerxst1992 said:Halifax2TheMax said:
Replying directly to the bolded IN YOUR POST, which I’m quoting, you’re making shit up. If one is to assume “H” is Hamas, as you seem to imply, they haven’t been around for 70 fucking years and they’re not “getting Americans ‘to attack Jews.’” A fucking I tells me that Hamas was founded in 1987 but I knew that already.Lerxst1992 said:
MR hereLerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
So who said Hamas should not negotiate? You didn't answer the question. You said "The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiate"Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?That is not what I intended to imply, the comment was assuming readers understand the long game H has been playing since the sixties trying to breed off and establish more hatred instead of expressing good faith steps to end this, but bad typing, too much backspacing, sorry…“They should share it (disputed land) and instead Hamas gets others to attack israelis here (US soil, DC streets, Internet forums, etc) so Hamas has no reason to negotiate (in good faith).”
this is what the liberal left is now falling for. They’ve (H) tried it for nearly 70 years, and it hasn’t worked in America til now. And it will cost dems many more voters and if there is no leadership to negotiate a treaty, htf does it end? The irony is it might not be Jewish voters in NY,CA, costing Dems those votes as much as in fly over country with their own version of hatred.
Now I fully expect you to claim that “H” doesn’t stand for Hamas or that you meant “Hal” but I’m not 70 either, or that you typed too fast or everyone else is just antisemitic. And to complain that you were personally attacked. Like I advised you previously, read a fucking book.So we can’t interchange PLO with Hamas? That’s some set of rules you’re creating. I get hundreds of rules, untype whatever crap unwant.
” The PLO, upon its founding in 1964, used the phrase as a call for a single Palestinian state to replace Israel and encompass the territory from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea”
that’s you fighting for genocide. Using your words.
Post your Israeli misinformation somewhere else. Care to answer why Israel invaded and bombed Syria? How about addressing why Israel has fenced off and Gaza-ized a Palestinian town in the West Bank? Didn’t think so.
Take your victimization to Reddit or facebook, please.
How the fuck does one expect to be understood when using “H” for “PLO”?
alternate reality strikes again.I was referring to continued Palestine aggression which happens to go back beyond Hamas tenure. So your entire defense is that Hamas is good and PLO is bad, or Palestinians are not responsible for what the plo did? They both sing the same song celebrating genocide so what exactly are you arguing, that I’m not allowed to use abbreviations in a COMMENT TO SOMEONE ELSE? That commenter used Hamas twice in a short comment so the abbreviation wasn’t obvious? Or that AI comment about the song is false?
And you make more accusations THAT HAVE EFFING ZERO TO DO WITH ME. I continually say both sides need to negotiate peace and you attack me with some crap about Syria? You don’t want peace you just want to express hate against Israel. Wonder why.
Why TF do you think I support bibi? ANYONE NOT SUPPORTING PALESTINE AGGRESSION IS A BIBI SUPPORTER? ITS MY FAULT THEY STARTED THE GAZA WAR AND ARE INCAPABLE OF WINNING, AND THEIR PROXY POWER IRAN WAS DEMOLISHED?
really Matt, this is the type of comment you support? I get personally attacked because I use an H abbreviation and get attacked personally with crap about stuff I didnt post? It’s all my fault? this is exactly why this forum is unreadable partisan cesspool.0 -
shecky said:
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.Ah, trying out liberal shoes there, sheckster?0 -
Naw, just havin' a laugh. I don't even wear shoes anymore. Why should I - I'm retired, living at the beach these days. Lovin' life.Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.Ah, trying out liberal shoes there, sheckster?0 -
shecky said:
Naw, just havin' a laugh. I don't even wear shoes anymore. Why should I - I'm retired, living at the beach these days. Lovin' life.Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.Ah, trying out liberal shoes there, sheckster?Lucky you. I got a year or so to join you, enjoy!0 -
Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Naw, just havin' a laugh. I don't even wear shoes anymore. Why should I - I'm retired, living at the beach these days. Lovin' life.Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.Ah, trying out liberal shoes there, sheckster?Lucky you. I got a year or so to join you, enjoy!
Thank you. And I do enjoy - every second of every minute of every day.Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Naw, just havin' a laugh. I don't even wear shoes anymore. Why should I - I'm retired, living at the beach these days. Lovin' life.Lerxst1992 said:shecky said:
Can you two just get a divorce already? That "staying together for the kids" bullsh*t is just that, bullsh*t.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.Ah, trying out liberal shoes there, sheckster?Lucky you. I got a year or so to join you, enjoy!
When you get "here" in a year or so you won't believe how much better it is than you ever imagined in your wildest dreams.
Good luck to you, sir!0 -
My point is is that you’re clueless about the history of the Middle East and express your opinions extremely poorly.Lerxst1992 said:Halifax2TheMax said:
Again, read a fucking book. Hamas or H, as you refer to the PLO, are not and have not been one and the same.Lerxst1992 said:Halifax2TheMax said:
Replying directly to the bolded IN YOUR POST, which I’m quoting, you’re making shit up. If one is to assume “H” is Hamas, as you seem to imply, they haven’t been around for 70 fucking years and they’re not “getting Americans ‘to attack Jews.’” A fucking I tells me that Hamas was founded in 1987 but I knew that already.Lerxst1992 said:
MR hereLerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
So who said Hamas should not negotiate? You didn't answer the question. You said "The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiate"Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?That is not what I intended to imply, the comment was assuming readers understand the long game H has been playing since the sixties trying to breed off and establish more hatred instead of expressing good faith steps to end this, but bad typing, too much backspacing, sorry…“They should share it (disputed land) and instead Hamas gets others to attack israelis here (US soil, DC streets, Internet forums, etc) so Hamas has no reason to negotiate (in good faith).”
this is what the liberal left is now falling for. They’ve (H) tried it for nearly 70 years, and it hasn’t worked in America til now. And it will cost dems many more voters and if there is no leadership to negotiate a treaty, htf does it end? The irony is it might not be Jewish voters in NY,CA, costing Dems those votes as much as in fly over country with their own version of hatred.
Now I fully expect you to claim that “H” doesn’t stand for Hamas or that you meant “Hal” but I’m not 70 either, or that you typed too fast or everyone else is just antisemitic. And to complain that you were personally attacked. Like I advised you previously, read a fucking book.So we can’t interchange PLO with Hamas? That’s some set of rules you’re creating. I get hundreds of rules, untype whatever crap unwant.
” The PLO, upon its founding in 1964, used the phrase as a call for a single Palestinian state to replace Israel and encompass the territory from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea”
that’s you fighting for genocide. Using your words.
Post your Israeli misinformation somewhere else. Care to answer why Israel invaded and bombed Syria? How about addressing why Israel has fenced off and Gaza-ized a Palestinian town in the West Bank? Didn’t think so.
Take your victimization to Reddit or facebook, please.
How the fuck does one expect to be understood when using “H” for “PLO”?
alternate reality strikes again.I was referring to continued Palestine aggression which happens to go back beyond Hamas tenure. So your entire defense is that Hamas is good and PLO is bad, or Palestinians are not responsible for what the plo did? They both sing the same song celebrating genocide so what exactly are you arguing, that I’m not allowed to use abbreviations in a COMMENT TO SOMEONE ELSE? That commenter used Hamas twice in a short comment so the abbreviation wasn’t obvious? Or that AI comment about the song is false?
And you make more accusations THAT HAVE EFFING ZERO TO DO WITH ME. I continually say both sides need to negotiate peace and you attack me with some crap about Syria? You don’t want peace you just want to express hate against Israel. Wonder why.
Why TF do you think I support bibi? ANYONE NOT SUPPORTING PALESTINE AGGRESSION IS A BIBI SUPPORTER? ITS MY FAULT THEY STARTED THE GAZA WAR AND ARE INCAPABLE OF WINNING, AND THEIR PROXY POWER IRAN WAS DEMOLISHED?
really Matt, this is the type of comment you support? I get personally attacked because I use an H abbreviation and get attacked personally with crap about stuff I didnt post? It’s all my fault? this is exactly why this forum is unreadable partisan cesspool.
All you have done is defend Bibi and Israel, never once criticizing them, while calling anyone supporting Palestine antisemitic. It is clear who you support from your posts. You even claimed, at one point, that Israel treated the Palestinians of the West Bank so well and that it was evidence of their peaceful and humane nature. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Enjoy your retirement when you get there but you may want to retire from this thread because your screed of a word salad makes absolutely no sense except I sense you’ve been victimized again.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax said:
My point is is that you’re clueless about the history of the Middle East and express your opinions extremely poorly.Lerxst1992 said:Halifax2TheMax said:
Again, read a fucking book. Hamas or H, as you refer to the PLO, are not and have not been one and the same.Lerxst1992 said:Halifax2TheMax said:
Replying directly to the bolded IN YOUR POST, which I’m quoting, you’re making shit up. If one is to assume “H” is Hamas, as you seem to imply, they haven’t been around for 70 fucking years and they’re not “getting Americans ‘to attack Jews.’” A fucking I tells me that Hamas was founded in 1987 but I knew that already.Lerxst1992 said:
MR hereLerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
So who said Hamas should not negotiate? You didn't answer the question. You said "The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiate"Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?That is not what I intended to imply, the comment was assuming readers understand the long game H has been playing since the sixties trying to breed off and establish more hatred instead of expressing good faith steps to end this, but bad typing, too much backspacing, sorry…“They should share it (disputed land) and instead Hamas gets others to attack israelis here (US soil, DC streets, Internet forums, etc) so Hamas has no reason to negotiate (in good faith).”
this is what the liberal left is now falling for. They’ve (H) tried it for nearly 70 years, and it hasn’t worked in America til now. And it will cost dems many more voters and if there is no leadership to negotiate a treaty, htf does it end? The irony is it might not be Jewish voters in NY,CA, costing Dems those votes as much as in fly over country with their own version of hatred.
Now I fully expect you to claim that “H” doesn’t stand for Hamas or that you meant “Hal” but I’m not 70 either, or that you typed too fast or everyone else is just antisemitic. And to complain that you were personally attacked. Like I advised you previously, read a fucking book.So we can’t interchange PLO with Hamas? That’s some set of rules you’re creating. I get hundreds of rules, untype whatever crap unwant.
” The PLO, upon its founding in 1964, used the phrase as a call for a single Palestinian state to replace Israel and encompass the territory from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea”
that’s you fighting for genocide. Using your words.
Post your Israeli misinformation somewhere else. Care to answer why Israel invaded and bombed Syria? How about addressing why Israel has fenced off and Gaza-ized a Palestinian town in the West Bank? Didn’t think so.
Take your victimization to Reddit or facebook, please.
How the fuck does one expect to be understood when using “H” for “PLO”?
alternate reality strikes again.I was referring to continued Palestine aggression which happens to go back beyond Hamas tenure. So your entire defense is that Hamas is good and PLO is bad, or Palestinians are not responsible for what the plo did? They both sing the same song celebrating genocide so what exactly are you arguing, that I’m not allowed to use abbreviations in a COMMENT TO SOMEONE ELSE? That commenter used Hamas twice in a short comment so the abbreviation wasn’t obvious? Or that AI comment about the song is false?
And you make more accusations THAT HAVE EFFING ZERO TO DO WITH ME. I continually say both sides need to negotiate peace and you attack me with some crap about Syria? You don’t want peace you just want to express hate against Israel. Wonder why.
Why TF do you think I support bibi? ANYONE NOT SUPPORTING PALESTINE AGGRESSION IS A BIBI SUPPORTER? ITS MY FAULT THEY STARTED THE GAZA WAR AND ARE INCAPABLE OF WINNING, AND THEIR PROXY POWER IRAN WAS DEMOLISHED?
really Matt, this is the type of comment you support? I get personally attacked because I use an H abbreviation and get attacked personally with crap about stuff I didnt post? It’s all my fault? this is exactly why this forum is unreadable partisan cesspool.
All you have done is defend Bibi and Israel, never once criticizing them, while calling anyone supporting Palestine antisemitic. It is clear who you support from your posts. You even claimed, at one point, that Israel treated the Palestinians of the West Bank so well and that it was evidence of their peaceful and humane nature. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Enjoy your retirement when you get there but you may want to retire from this thread because your screed of a word salad makes absolutely no sense except I sense you’ve been victimized again.Not anything, but Comments expressing hatred of Israel, for example giving them no right to defend their country, or even your first comment making light of the Palestine invasion and murder of Israeli women and children as funny are indicators. As is contestant strawman comments against anything that is not clear support for Palestine on these pages. (Yes I made a joke about Ukraine before that war, but to me that was in support of their defense).if you have support for that “humane nature” West Bank comment, please share. The only truth to solving the West Bank problem, for anyone that knows about the topography and population distribution there, and how that land has been utilized to attack Israel during cease fires, is that a large DMZ would be a necessity if it’s ever completely handed over. So people would be displaced even in a best case scenario for Hamas.0 -
how is it that the state of israel can very accurately pinpoint high level figures in both lebanon and iran to great effect with relatively minimal collateral damage, but this same fucking government cant do so in Gaza or the west bank?riddle me that?this as well. didnt god "give" the land twice already? 2 temple mounts suggest so, no?how many bites at that apple do they get?_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
dude, you are a man that has no concept of the history in the region. read a book.Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight.
you are the one saying all of this is hamas's fault and it all started on oct 7. you have not admitted that israel's policies have contributed to that attack. you make excuses for settlement expansion. you have stated multiple times that you only care about how this conflict impacts american interests. you will not answer when i have three times asked you how much palestinian blood will avenge 10/7.
you are an unserious person and you block out the facts that every one of us has presented to you.
it must be tough being the smartest man on the train. maybe that is why you feel you believe you have no friends on here.
also it is all the fault of the democrats.
perhaps it is you that should grow up, mind your business, and for god's sake, read a book."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
israel is doing genocide. you do not need pinpoint strikes when the goal is to eliminate everyone.mickeyrat said:how is it that the state of israel can very accurately pinpoint high level figures in both lebanon and iran to great effect with relatively minimal collateral damage, but this same fucking government cant do so in Gaza or the west bank?riddle me that?this as well. didnt god "give" the land twice already? 2 temple mounts suggest so, no?how many bites at that apple do they get?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
so, when are you going to join the america party?Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:
dude, you are a man that has no concept of the history in the region. read a book.Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight.
you are the one saying all of this is hamas's fault and it all started on oct 7. you have not admitted that israel's policies have contributed to that attack. you make excuses for settlement expansion. you have stated multiple times that you only care about how this conflict impacts american interests. you will not answer when i have three times asked you how much palestinian blood will avenge 10/7.
you are an unserious person and you block out the facts that every one of us has presented to you.
it must be tough being the smartest man on the train. maybe that is why you feel you believe you have no friends on here.
also it is all the fault of the democrats.
perhaps it is you that should grow up, mind your business, and for god's sake, read a book.you’re the one that entered a convo amongst others, and off topic by making it about me, the first rule for losing debates. If you are making accusations, have the decency to provide evidence I did any of that. And Let’s argue about who knows more about the ME. Another brilliant ultra leftist.
My point above is simple. If you know anything about the West Bank, you certainly know that if Israel were to hand it over, a land that was theirs thousands of years before Muhammad was around, but I’m not saying they shouldn’t share it, just pointing out facts, so don’t misquote me, there will need to be a DMZ. That’s clear to anyone familiar with the WB topography, history as an invasion point, and where the population centers exist. Anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t understand the problems there.0 -
its a free forum. people can comment where they see fit.Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
dude, you are a man that has no concept of the history in the region. read a book.Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight.
you are the one saying all of this is hamas's fault and it all started on oct 7. you have not admitted that israel's policies have contributed to that attack. you make excuses for settlement expansion. you have stated multiple times that you only care about how this conflict impacts american interests. you will not answer when i have three times asked you how much palestinian blood will avenge 10/7.
you are an unserious person and you block out the facts that every one of us has presented to you.
it must be tough being the smartest man on the train. maybe that is why you feel you believe you have no friends on here.
also it is all the fault of the democrats.
perhaps it is you that should grow up, mind your business, and for god's sake, read a book.you’re the one that entered a convo amongst others, and off topic by making it about me, the first rule for losing debates. If you are making accusations, have the decency to provide evidence I did any of that. And Let’s argue about who knows more about the ME. Another brilliant ultra leftist.
My point above is simple. If you know anything about the West Bank, you certainly know that if Israel were to hand it over, a land that was theirs thousands of years before Muhammad was around, but I’m not saying they shouldn’t share it, just pointing out facts, so don’t misquote me, there will need to be a DMZ. That’s clear to anyone familiar with the WB topography, history as an invasion point, and where the population centers exist. Anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t understand the problems there.
you are the one saying everything started on 10/7 when CLEARLY it didn't. when given links and basic info that this has been going on forever, that israel is taking lands and illegally building settlements on them, bombing hospitals, bombing women and children, turning off water and electricity, burning olive groves, blocking refugees from getting medical and food aid, and crickets from you.
i ask you, if israel was the good actor in this entire situation, why is the un always voting to sanction them? are you calling all of the entire un antisemitic?"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
No I’m saying the argument doesn’t make sense.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.0 -
mrussel1 said:
No I’m saying the argument doesn’t make sense.Lerxst1992 said:
Are you trying on purpose to ignore that July 2 clarification that YOU requested multiple times, reposted three times, including the date?mrussel1 said:
You have no idea the size of the plank in your own eye. No one knows what you mean half the time. If I fail to reply it’s because I’m tired of the discussion that is going nowhere. You would be better served to write with more specificity. I read your reply yesterday and I don’t know what you’re trying to say. And I certainly had no idea that it connected to your comment to Static saying he’s intolerant, which is what you seem to be imply in this latest post.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
It would be better If you actually quoted an example of his intolerance rather than a passive-aggressive reply like the one you just did. You’ve made a habit of saying things, getting called out, then declaring you were misunderstood.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Can someone sane help explain this so called intolerance that I am being accused of? I honestly feel like I am trying to follow a string on a corkboard from a Q adherent.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
Intolerance of what? Just making shit up again?Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
He keeps making shit up to prove his fallacious arguments.mrussel1 said:
Who exactly said Hamas should not negotiate?Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
What about who had the land twelve thousand years ago? What about all of the years between then and 1948? Is 11,000 some sort of magic number?Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
or the palestinians could have just let israel annex all of their land and build illegal settlements on it, but israel would NEVER dream of doing that, now would they.Lerxst1992 said:
Bolded- I was referring to US supporting Israel. Not how you interpreted..mrussel1 said:
Where do you see me or anyone here criticizing the Israeli people? I have never said a word about them, saving my criticism for Bibby and the Lukid. All I know is that YOU don't appear to have any concern about the Palestinian people, considering your callous comment. But then you justify it by criticizing us for something we never did.Lerxst1992 said:static111 said:
When did you become a card carrying anti USA Marxist?mrussel1 said:
You forgot "fuck collateral damage". Because that's what this is.Lerxst1992 said:Fuck terrorism.Of course Palestinians get a free pass to what their leadership always does, as it did to start this particular war, but every person in Israel gets cursed out regularly on lunatic forums, despite being the actual victims of genocide. Wonder why. But we are a well moderated community.
my only care is how mid east impacts American politics. And where the dem party is headed on mid east politics is suicidal. Can the Dems become even more irrelevant? Probably.
And then you follow up by saying you don't care about any of those people, only how it affects US politics. This is most amoral of any position you could take.There was a simple way not to have this war. That’s to not attack Israel and kill their women and children during a ceasefire. The second way to end it once it started is to operate how normal countries operate, by negotiating a peace treaty.What other country on earth has zero rights to share land for which evidence exists was theirs eleven thousand years ago?Bible says 11,000 archaeologist say 4000. The problem is I expressed my opinion that they should share it and others attack that Hamas has no reason to negotiateThe comment was a reply to the hypothetical annexation charade. When does your intolerance end?Just look at the prior comment at 8.52 DC time. If you don’t understand you can’t possibly be typing honest shyt in this space. Intolerance 100%You continually make baseless accusations.
why don’t you try to read your own comments fairly before feigning ignoranceSeriously man, stop stirring this up. I used to think you commented here honestly. This is the second time you pulled this crap.
regarding the Hamas negotiation point, I took the time to provide a detailed explanation two days ago, after you asked for it a few times. Just posted it again above. So you instead decide to ignore that explanation, and go support this commenters complete dishonesty, which is also addressed in detail for you if you seriously care, instead of running to your comrade safe space to support their nonsense.You did this a few months ago. You asked endlessly for an explanation, mocked me, I provided it, and you never responded. Either engage honestly to my comments or please put me on ignore. I can’t believe the level of lack of candor to support leftist views here.
(About tolerance, They made an accusation I was making shit up and I explaned that was a reply to someone making stuff up about annexation, not me. It’s all in this quote box, but they plays fake victim, and you fall for it. The crap about you ignoring the negotiation explanation was reposted five minutes ago).It’s even reposted on this current page # 63 and bolded.By never responding directly to the clarification. I doubt you took the time to find it. Please just ignore me, I’d deserve that, thanks!0 -
gimmesometruth27 said:
its a free forum. people can comment where they see fit.Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
dude, you are a man that has no concept of the history in the region. read a book.Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight.
you are the one saying all of this is hamas's fault and it all started on oct 7. you have not admitted that israel's policies have contributed to that attack. you make excuses for settlement expansion. you have stated multiple times that you only care about how this conflict impacts american interests. you will not answer when i have three times asked you how much palestinian blood will avenge 10/7.
you are an unserious person and you block out the facts that every one of us has presented to you.
it must be tough being the smartest man on the train. maybe that is why you feel you believe you have no friends on here.
also it is all the fault of the democrats.
perhaps it is you that should grow up, mind your business, and for god's sake, read a book.you’re the one that entered a convo amongst others, and off topic by making it about me, the first rule for losing debates. If you are making accusations, have the decency to provide evidence I did any of that. And Let’s argue about who knows more about the ME. Another brilliant ultra leftist.
My point above is simple. If you know anything about the West Bank, you certainly know that if Israel were to hand it over, a land that was theirs thousands of years before Muhammad was around, but I’m not saying they shouldn’t share it, just pointing out facts, so don’t misquote me, there will need to be a DMZ. That’s clear to anyone familiar with the WB topography, history as an invasion point, and where the population centers exist. Anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t understand the problems there.
you are the one saying everything started on 10/7 when CLEARLY it didn't. when given links and basic info that this has been going on forever, that israel is taking lands and illegally building settlements on them, bombing hospitals, bombing women and children, turning off water and electricity, burning olive groves, blocking refugees from getting medical and food aid, and crickets from you.
i ask you, if israel was the good actor in this entire situation, why is the un always voting to sanction them? are you calling all of the entire un antisemitic?Sure it’s free and the one thing the owners ask is we don’t target each other. That’s literally what you did the past few days on this topic..
again, if you have a quote where I said “everything started” oct seven please share
what I did say was the “Gaza war” started Oct seven. it’s an actual topic that had its own wiki for a long time. I didn’t make it up. Its when a cease fire ended and Hamas decided civilians on both sides would die. Right now is a rare time that Hamas is expressing interest in some negotiation, likely because their masters, the Iranians, have problems right now. But hey, let’s hope they get a deal. Usually they’d just continue the fight by hiding in tunnels underneath civilians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war
and lol the old days when I’d get cursed out by some for using wiki as a source.0 -
Meanwhile:
Palestinians fear razing of villages in West Bank, as settlers circle their homes
An Israeli directive gives a green light for demolitions in Masafer Yatta, where residents keep watch at night for attackers in the darkness
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
i just want the fighting to stop.Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
its a free forum. people can comment where they see fit.Lerxst1992 said:gimmesometruth27 said:
dude, you are a man that has no concept of the history in the region. read a book.Lerxst1992 said:
You completely misunderstood his diatribe. Grow up or mind your own business.gimmesometruth27 said:hal, this stuff all started on october 6. get it straight.
you are the one saying all of this is hamas's fault and it all started on oct 7. you have not admitted that israel's policies have contributed to that attack. you make excuses for settlement expansion. you have stated multiple times that you only care about how this conflict impacts american interests. you will not answer when i have three times asked you how much palestinian blood will avenge 10/7.
you are an unserious person and you block out the facts that every one of us has presented to you.
it must be tough being the smartest man on the train. maybe that is why you feel you believe you have no friends on here.
also it is all the fault of the democrats.
perhaps it is you that should grow up, mind your business, and for god's sake, read a book.you’re the one that entered a convo amongst others, and off topic by making it about me, the first rule for losing debates. If you are making accusations, have the decency to provide evidence I did any of that. And Let’s argue about who knows more about the ME. Another brilliant ultra leftist.
My point above is simple. If you know anything about the West Bank, you certainly know that if Israel were to hand it over, a land that was theirs thousands of years before Muhammad was around, but I’m not saying they shouldn’t share it, just pointing out facts, so don’t misquote me, there will need to be a DMZ. That’s clear to anyone familiar with the WB topography, history as an invasion point, and where the population centers exist. Anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t understand the problems there.
you are the one saying everything started on 10/7 when CLEARLY it didn't. when given links and basic info that this has been going on forever, that israel is taking lands and illegally building settlements on them, bombing hospitals, bombing women and children, turning off water and electricity, burning olive groves, blocking refugees from getting medical and food aid, and crickets from you.
i ask you, if israel was the good actor in this entire situation, why is the un always voting to sanction them? are you calling all of the entire un antisemitic?Sure it’s free and the one thing the owners ask is we don’t target each other. That’s literally what you did the past few days on this topic..
again, if you have a quote where I said “everything started” oct seven please share
what I did say was the “Gaza war” started Oct seven. it’s an actual topic that had its own wiki for a long time. I didn’t make it up. Its when a cease fire ended and Hamas decided civilians on both sides would die. Right now is a rare time that Hamas is expressing interest in some negotiation, likely because their masters, the Iranians, have problems right now. But hey, let’s hope they get a deal. Usually they’d just continue the fight by hiding in tunnels underneath civilians.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war
and lol the old days when I’d get cursed out by some for using wiki as a source."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help