Should Pearl Jam delete their Twitter account?

lmckenney24

No, my experience was years ago. My comment was in reference to the same guys going after each other in the media ect, then having drinks and dinner together the same night. Nothing more, nothing less.

It really is as simple as that. 

lmckenney24

lmckenney24 said:

No, my experience was years ago. My comment was in reference to the same guys going after each other in the media ect, then having drinks and dinner together the same night. Nothing more, nothing less.

It really is as simple as that. But back to the actual topic. I don't know why they would delete Twitter. I'm sure it's a good source of info for PJ fans who don't have IG or Facebook.

lastexitlondon

This  is the only source of pj i need.

Robbert

Whats Twitter?

PJ5a1

"Politicians have become divorce lawyers, separating the two parties so they can benefit"

They all do it - they all have done it. Trump, Biden, Clinton, Barack, Bush... all of them... 

Deleting a twitter account isn't going to do a thing.

if you want change - be more granular and take action in your own communities rather than worrying about billion/millionaires 

mace1229

There's not an "I don't care" option. I don't have or use twitter. If they want to maintain and update their account, have at it. 

jwhjr17

Lol who cares?

Spiritual_Chaos

jwhjr17 said:

Lol who cares?

You

Spiritual_Chaos

Robbert said:

Whats Twitter?

A social media plattform Jack White and Trent Reznor just left. 

jwhjr17

Spiritual_Chaos said:

jwhjr17 said:

Lol who cares?

You

HughFreakingDillon

Foriginal Sin said:

trees said:

droptheleash9 said:

Deleting their Twitter would be silly. It wouldn’t make the statement that many here probably think it would (I’m sorry but the band’s reach isn’t what it once was) and the format of Twitter hasn’t changed at changed all since it was recently purchased. Those leaving the platform in light of recent events are overreacting and I suspect many of them will be back simply because they crave the attention.

That said, I’m someone who personally thinks most social media is a waste of time so my life wouldn’t change much at all.

What happened anyway ? 

Democrats have hurt feelings, don’t realize “their” party causes just as many problems with this country as anything Trump has done because they don’t research anything. 

HAHA, it was the trumpsters who were hightailing it off twitter to truth social once their cult leader got banned. 

HughFreakingDillon

liberals just don't want it to turn back into a cesspool of mis/disinformation. all in the name of "freedumb". 

Ledbetterman10

If Twitter didn't censor legitimate news that didn't fit the narratives they wanted out there (such as studies or opinions on the Wuhan lab leak), then this Musk thing would've never happened. Same thing goes with Hunter Biden's laptop. While that wasn't nearly as important as the origins of the pandemic, it was true. And to censor the New York Post for reporting on it is bullshit and that's why someone with enough money to buy it, bought it. Now, hopefully he runs it into the ground and it goes away forever. 

HughFreakingDillon

opinions on the wuhan lab leak is not "news". it was (and still is) conjecture and people were legitimately afraid that it would lead to violence against asians. which it did. 

https://ccncsj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Anti-Asian-Racism-Across-Canada-Two-Years-Into-The-Pandemic_March-2022.pdf

the hunter biden laptop thing is also nothing, and they didn't want it leading to more election-meddling bullshit by the right. 

Ledbetterman10

HughFreakingDillon said:

opinions on the wuhan lab leak is not "news". it was (and still is) conjecture and people were legitimately afraid that it would lead to violence against asians. which it did. 

https://ccncsj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Anti-Asian-Racism-Across-Canada-Two-Years-Into-The-Pandemic_March-2022.pdf

the hunter biden laptop thing is also nothing, and they didn't want it leading to more election-meddling bullshit by the right. 

I'm not talking about random users. Links to opinions by credentialed scientists (more credentialed than Fauci) were not allowed.

As for Biden's laptop, if it's true, then an article about it should be able to be posted without being censored or without people sharing it being called Russian agents. "Election-meddling bullshit?" To censor a story like that because you think it could hurt Biden in the election (which it wouldn't have) IS election-meddling bullshit. 

HughFreakingDillon

no, I mean because people make up stories that are based on nothing linking the laptop story to biden. if it was legit, post away. but it wasn't. and you know how social media works: one idiot celebrity retweets something and all of a sudden to millions it's taken as fact, and that cat can't be put back in the bag. 

of course I wasn't suggesting snuffing out a real story that might hurt my preferred candidate. come on. 

HughFreakingDillon

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

opinions on the wuhan lab leak is not "news". it was (and still is) conjecture and people were legitimately afraid that it would lead to violence against asians. which it did. 

https://ccncsj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Anti-Asian-Racism-Across-Canada-Two-Years-Into-The-Pandemic_March-2022.pdf

the hunter biden laptop thing is also nothing, and they didn't want it leading to more election-meddling bullshit by the right. 

I'm not talking about random users. Links to opinions by credentialed scientists (more credentialed than Fauci) were not allowed.

As for Biden's laptop, if it's true, then an article about it should be able to be posted without being censored or without people sharing it being called Russian agents. "Election-meddling bullshit?" To censor a story like that because you think it could hurt Biden in the election (which it wouldn't have) IS election-meddling bullshit. 

more credentialed than fuaci? um, ok. the guy spent his entire life studying infectious diseases. And plus, credentialed or not, it was still just opinion. who cares how credentialed they are? there was still no proof or anything to back it up. 

Ledbetterman10

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

opinions on the wuhan lab leak is not "news". it was (and still is) conjecture and people were legitimately afraid that it would lead to violence against asians. which it did. 

https://ccncsj.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Anti-Asian-Racism-Across-Canada-Two-Years-Into-The-Pandemic_March-2022.pdf

the hunter biden laptop thing is also nothing, and they didn't want it leading to more election-meddling bullshit by the right. 

I'm not talking about random users. Links to opinions by credentialed scientists (more credentialed than Fauci) were not allowed.

As for Biden's laptop, if it's true, then an article about it should be able to be posted without being censored or without people sharing it being called Russian agents. "Election-meddling bullshit?" To censor a story like that because you think it could hurt Biden in the election (which it wouldn't have) IS election-meddling bullshit. 

more credentialed than fuaci? um, ok. the guy spent his entire life studying infectious diseases. And plus, credentialed or not, it was still just opinion. who cares how credentialed they are? there was still no proof or anything to back it up. 

Umm, ok, Fauci isn’t the only person who’s studied infectious diseases his entire life. And by “opinions,” I mean opinions backed by research. There were many studies done by scientists all over the globe about this virus, but if their conclusions was that the lab leak was most likely, it wasn’t allowed on Twitter. So they need definitive proof that it’s a lab leak, but Fauci can claim it’s likely from the nearby wet market…with no proof. 

I don’t want to litigate Fauci or the virus though. My overall point is that that stuff like that led Musk to buy Twitter….as he’s said.  

demetrios

No.

josevolution

I don’t give two rats asses about it!