With there being a history of swiped art for the Halloween-shirts. Is this also just swiped and the text added? It doesn't look like the text was added by the original artist. Looks very last-minute tacked on. Was someone scared tombstones in front of the supreme court wasn't enough to make the point, so someone wrote the text just before uploading it?
Post edited by Spiritual_Chaos on
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
The claim of loss of rights is particularly ironic/funny for Carson and Bruen considering they actually protected rights
Agreed, Bruen, was an incredible civil rights victory for all law-abiding citizens of NY regardless of race, color, creed, sex etc etc.
But it opens the door to having more guns carried in public and thus increases the chances of more shootings. Fine, it may uphold second amendment rights, but the ruling can put more lives at risk.
This is just some shit ass, confusing, and busy design. I would wear the shirt w/o "Pearl Jam" plastered on the top. I would also wear it w/o the text on the tombstones. But also don't think I'd pay for it in either instance. Don't think it needs text on the tombstones to make the point it's making tbh.
Comments
AMERICAN POLITICS AND WOMEN-HATE IS TOO COMPLICATED FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND!
Strong 2nd Amendment supporter and advocate targeted methods of reducing gun violence, sans-infringement.
But people would likely still argue about it :(