US Extremists

HughFreakingDillon

PJ_Soul said:

Anti-semitism is nuts to me. I don't it at all. Regarding the stuff above, I see that and automatically wonder what the stats are for anti-Muslim sentiment during the same time frame... It turns out that it's at an all-time high. Where is the outrage and concern about that side of the coin? Or what? Is one justified while the other isn't? Is that the idea?

I posted an article this morning in the middle east thread where the UN is warning that anti-islamism is at an alarming high right now. 

mickeyrat

https://www.threads.net/@qasimrashid/post/DIxRl7-pEaw?xmt=AQGzUnlx7QTiN7l1EKXh5-90limPYxrAdlrMyestrPcJJw

Mississippi Governor @tatereeves has declared May "Confederate Heritage Month" in Mississippi

In 2022 Tate Reeves banned teaching about Black history.

In 2023, 2024, and now in 2025 he declares Confederate Heritage Month.

When you're banning Black history, but honoring the Confederacy, it isn't education you're protecting—it's white supremacy.

That's who this fascist is.

HughFreakingDillon

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

DarthMaeglin

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

Lerxst1992

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

HughFreakingDillon

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

Actively supporting and celebrating past treasonous behaviour is, by definition, treasonous. 

Lerxst1992

https://youtu.be/2t560SJVHeM?si=xcISm-dA2y8gkuw8

tbergs

Lerxst1992 said:

https://youtu.be/2t560SJVHeM?si=xcISm-dA2y8gkuw8

I watched this the other day. He still has a bit of an arrogance, but sometimes he's also right about things. Still hard to tolerate him in large doses. I'll usually watch these clips and call it good. 

Go Beavers

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Lerxst1992

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Tim Simmons

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument America supporting terrorists is treasonous.

FTFY


Just a grand tradition.

Halifax2TheMax

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

Lerxst1992

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

Halifax2TheMax

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

You didn’t answer my question, per usual deflection.

Maybe ask Bibi.

Go Beavers

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

And what if a right wing president accepts a jet from a country that supports Hamas? 

Tim Simmons

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

Who is saying this? 

mickeyrat

what sovereign nation? 

Bibi and his government at the time handed this over? Because from my seat, without their tacit support Hamas goes no where.

Bigger question , how often are elections in this sovereign nation? seems like the last one was 20 yrs ago? who controls that?

Lerxst1992

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

You didn’t answer my question, per usual deflection.

Maybe ask Bibi.

Perhaps we ageee and both want Bibi out. But what is the solution with Hamas there? Do we expect Israel to withdraw completely from all disputed territories? How does that work? How does that get maintained and  enforced? When have we had a superior military power cede significant territory to a weaker military voluntarily and without enforcement?

mickeyrat

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

You didn’t answer my question, per usual deflection.

Maybe ask Bibi.

Perhaps we ageee and both want Bibi out. But what is the solution with Hamas there? Do we expect Israel to withdraw completely from all disputed territories? How does that work? How does that get maintained and  enforced? When have we had a superior military power cede significant territory to a weaker military voluntarily and without enforcement?

UN or a coalition of western powers in that role.

static111

Tim Simmons said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Lerxst1992 said:

Go Beavers said:

Lerxst1992 said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

in any normal country, that would be considered treasonous. But not in 'murica. 

You have a really strange bar when it comes to labeling things and people as treasonous.

The irony is they come on an American forum with the only purpose to sow divisions with far left positions. Even center left positions are intolerable and deserve constant ridicule. And yes, much stronger conviction with that bad Mississippi post above than the incident in PA. A piece of paper vs violent attack…..

Honoring people who committed treason is a far right position. 

Perhaps, but some could make the argument the far left supporting terrorists is treasonous.

Where does, and who, of the far left supports terrorists? Be specific.

What would you call handing Hamas control of a sovereign nation?

Who is saying this? 

The boogeymen,  oh I mean the “far left”.