Options

Live Nation - Memo Leaked

Matts3221Matts3221 Posts: 658
edited June 2020 in The Porch

https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/live-nation-memo-pay-cuts-covid-1016989


So I guess artist have to take pay cuts so Live Nation can keep making the money it wants.

Reading this article just blew my mind.

Post edited by Sea on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Matts3221Matts3221 Posts: 658
    "Most of the new policies shift financial burdens to artists: For example, the company wants to decrease the monetary guarantees promised to artists before an event by 20% across the board. Live Nation also says that if a concert is cancelled due to poor ticket sales, it will give artists 25% of the guarantee (as opposed to the 100% that promoters are currently expected to pay). Moreover, if an artist cancels a performance in breach of the agreement, the artist will pay the promoter two times the artist’s fee — a type of penalty that, as Billboard notes, is unheard of in the live music industry."
  • Options
    Matts3221Matts3221 Posts: 658

    Also I love Pearl Jam but this is going to hurt so many up and coming artist and those that play small ( 500-1000 ) venues operated by Live Nation.

    I really feel for new bands trying to get out to tour , when touring and merch is were all the money is made now.

  • Options
    PoncierPoncier Posts: 16,220
    Wonder if PJ and a select few others will agree to this point"

    Ticket Prices: Ticket prices are set by the promoter, at the promoter’s sole discretion, and are subject to change.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Options
    Weston1283Weston1283 Fredericksburg, VA Posts: 4,626
    Correct me If I’m wrong, but what I took from it (from a consumer standpoint) was:

    1) Bands should only play venues they are 100% sure they can sell out, and raise the price of tickets to help cover their own insurance (which they must now provide) and to do whatever it takes to avoid having to cancel due to ticket sales

    So basically we will see smaller venues and a significant increase in cost to the consumer
    2010: Cleveland
    2012: Atlanta
    2013: London ONT / Wrigley Field / Pittsburgh / Buffalo / San Diego / Los Angeles I / Los Angeles II
    2014: Cincinnati / St. Louis / Tulsa / Lincoln / Detroit / Denver
    2015: New York City
    2016: Ft. Lauderdale / Miami / Jacksonville / Greenville / Hampton / Columbia / Lexington / Philly II / New York City II / Toronto II / Bonnaroo / Telluride / Fenway I / Wrigley I / Wrigley - II / TOTD - Philadelphia, San Francisco
    2017: Ohana Fest (EV)
    2018: Amsterdam I / Amsterdam II / Seattle I / Seattle II / Boston I / Boston II
    2021: Asbury Park / Ohana Encore 1 / Ohana Encore 2
    2022: Phoenix / LA I / LA II / Quebec City / Ottawa / New York City / Camden / Nashville / St. Louis / Denver
    2023: St. Paul II
  • Options
    PoncierPoncier Posts: 16,220
    Though after reading through the memo, it appears these new rules apply to festivals, its not made clear in the opening paragraph, but most of the bullet points contain the word "festival" and it concludes with:

    We are fully aware of the significance of these changes, and we did not make these changes without serious consideration. We appreciate you – and all artists – understanding the need for us to make these changes in order to allow the festival business to continue not only for the artists and the producers, but also for the fans.


    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Options
    cutzcutz Posts: 11,422
    Live Nation Wants Artists to Take Pay Cuts and Cancelation Burdens for Shows in 2021
    In a memo obtained by Rolling Stone, Live Nation cites “unprecedented times” and “the exponential rise of certain costs” as reasons for adjusting payment policies

    By SAMANTHA HISSONG 



    There’s still no telling when music venues will be able to reopen their doors to large crowds of concertgoers, and Live Nation — the largest live events company in North America — is making changes seemingly in reaction to the uncertainty. In a recent memo obtained by Rolling Stone, the company told its talent partners that it plans to make an array of alterations for concerts and festivals held in 2021.

    Most of the new policies shift financial burdens to artists: For example, the company wants to decrease the monetary guarantees promised to artists before an event by 20% across the board. Live Nation also says that if a concert is cancelled due to poor ticket sales, it will give artists 25% of the guarantee (as opposed to the 100% that promoters are currently expected to pay). Moreover, if an artist cancels a performance in breach of the agreement, the artist will pay the promoter two times the artist’s fee — a type of penalty that, as Billboard notes, is unheard of in the live music industry.
     
    “We are fully aware of the significance of these changes, and we did not make these changes without serious consideration,” Live Nation wrote. The company did not respond to request for comment.


    A source close to the matter tells Rolling Stone that some of the terms detailed in the memo are standard in existing concert contracts prior to the pandemic, and that the new aspects are part of broader negotiations with the music industry to navigate the post-COVID future when shows get back up and running.

    Read the full memo below.

    Live Nation Memo to Talent Agencies

    The global pandemic has changed the world in recent months and with it the dynamics of the music industry. We are in unprecedented times and must adequately account for the shift in market demand, the exponential rise of certain costs and the overall increase of uncertainty that materially affects our mission. In order for us to move forward, we must make certain changes to our agreements with the artists. The principle changes for 2021 are outlined below.

    Artist Guarantees: Artist guarantees will be adjusted downward 20% from 2020 levels.

    Ticket Prices: Ticket prices are set by the promoter, at the promoter’s sole discretion, and are subject to change.

    Payment Terms: Artists will receive a deposit of 10% one month before the festival, contingent on an executed agreement and fulfillment of marketing responsibilities. The balance, minus standard deductions for taxes and production costs, will be paid after the performance.

    Minimum Marketing Requirements: All artists will be required to assist in marketing of the festival through minimum social media posting requirements outlined in artist offer.

    Streaming requirements: All artists will be required to allow their performance to be filmed by the festival for use in a live television broadcast, a live webcast, on-demand streaming, and/or live satellite radio broadcast.

    Billing: All decisions regarding “festival billing” are at the sole discretion of the promoter.

    Merchandise: Purchaser will retain 30 % of Artist merchandise sales and send 70% to the artist within two weeks following the Festival.

    Airfare and Accommodations: These expenses will be the responsibility of the artist.

    Sponsorship: The promoter controls all sponsorship at the festival without any restrictions, and artists may not promote brands onstage or in its productions.

    Radius Clause. Violation of a radius clause without the festival’s prior authorization in writing will, at the festival’s sole discretion, result in either a reduction of the artist fee or the removal of the artist from the event, with any pre-event deposits returned to the festival immediately.
     
    Insurance: The artist is required to maintain its own cancellation insurance as the promoter is not responsible for the artist fee in the event of a cancellation of the festival due to weather or a force majeure.

    Cancellation by Artist: If an artist cancels its performance in breach of the agreement, the artist will pay the promoter two times the artist’s fee.

    Cancellation Due to Poor Sales. If a show is cancelled due to poor ticket sales, the artist will receive 25% of the guarantee.

    Force Majeure: If the artist’s performance is canceled due to an event of force majeure – including a pandemic similar to Covid-19 – the promoter will not pay the artist its fee. The artist is responsible for obtaining any cancellation insurance for its performance.

    Inability to Use Full Capacity of the Venue: If the promoter – either because of orders of the venue or any governmental entity – is not permitted to use the full capacity of the venue, then the promoter may terminate the agreement, and artist will refund any money previously paid.

    We are fully aware of the significance of these changes, and we did not make these changes without serious consideration. We appreciate you – and all artists – understanding the need for us to make these changes in order to allow the festival business to continue not only for the artists and the producers, but also for the fans.

  • Options
    Matts3221Matts3221 Posts: 658
    Poncier said:
    Though after reading through the memo, it appears these new rules apply to festivals, its not made clear in the opening paragraph, but most of the bullet points contain the word "festival" and it concludes with:

    We are fully aware of the significance of these changes, and we did not make these changes without serious consideration. We appreciate you – and all artists – understanding the need for us to make these changes in order to allow the festival business to continue not only for the artists and the producers, but also for the fans.


    the company told its talent partners that it plans to make an array of alterations for concerts and festivals held in 2021.
  • Options
    Matts3221Matts3221 Posts: 658
    Correct me If I’m wrong, but what I took from it (from a consumer standpoint) was:

    1) Bands should only play venues they are 100% sure they can sell out, and raise the price of tickets to help cover their own insurance (which they must now provide) and to do whatever it takes to avoid having to cancel due to ticket sales

    So basically we will see smaller venues and a significant increase in cost to the consumer


    Higher Ticket Prices while paying bands less and taking more on the merch cut.

    So everyone losses except for Live Nation.

  • Options
    RatherStarvedRatherStarved Posts: 4,180
    Hey, at least they’re talking about shows in 2021 and not 2022.
    PJ: 2013: London (ON); Buffalo; 2014: Cincinnati; 2016: Sunrise, Miami, Toronto 1-2, Wrigley 2; 2018: London (UK) 1, Milan, Padova, Sea 2, Wrigley 1-2, Fenway 1-2; 2021: SHN, Ohana, Ohana Encore 1-2; 2022: LA 1-2, Phx, Oak 1-2, Fresno, Copenhagen, Hyde Park 1-2; Quebec, Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto; MSG, Camden, Nashville, Louisville, St. Louis, OKC; 2023: St. Paul 1-2, Chicago 1-2; Fort Worth 2; Austin 1-2
     
    EV Solo: 2017 Louisville and Franklin, 2018 Ohana, 2019 Innings Fest, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Dublin and Ohana; 2021 Ohana Friday (from beach) and Saturday; 2022 Earthlings Newark; 2023 Innings Fest and Benoraya 1-2.

    Gutted:  London 2 2018, Sacramento 2022, Noblesville 2023
  • Options
    pjl44pjl44 Posts: 8,058
    There is no shortage of bullshit in there but I'm not convinced higher ticket prices are a given. I don't think anyone knows what demand will be once venues open again. It's a total crapshoot and that will ultimately drive everything from ticket prices to the size of a venue a band will play. I have a really hard time believing people will pay more to see a band play the same sized venue they would have pre-covid.

    It's a total shot in the dark, but my guess is if you're paying a higher ticket price you're seeing a band in a room that's typically small for them. I'd be totally fine with that. 
  • Options
    pjl44pjl44 Posts: 8,058
    And that's not even considering the supply side. Once places open, does every band want to hit the road at once? Or is it a small trickle? The number of shows coming through in, say, a given month would have a big impact on how much I'm willing to pay for a ticket. It also determines how much competition any particular show is up against.
  • Options
    JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,423
    I hope AEG doesn't follow suit.

    This opens the door for smaller promoters to outbid Livenation for the services of many bands.
  • Options
    hrd2imgnhrd2imgn Southwest Burbs of Chicago Posts: 4,865
    Well what a shock, the TM/LN kabal is in it for the money and don't  give a shit about Joe Common. Welcome to forever 
  • Options
    mr bunglemr bungle Posts: 1,282
    edited June 2020
    all businesses that rely on crowds gathering in set spaces are going to have to re-evaluate their business model for the next few years.  It has nothing to do with fucking artists or fans over.  It's just going to be the reality for awhile.
    Post edited by mr bungle on
  • Options
    PoncierPoncier Posts: 16,220
    Matts3221 said:
    Poncier said:
    Though after reading through the memo, it appears these new rules apply to festivals, its not made clear in the opening paragraph, but most of the bullet points contain the word "festival" and it concludes with:

    We are fully aware of the significance of these changes, and we did not make these changes without serious consideration. We appreciate you – and all artists – understanding the need for us to make these changes in order to allow the festival business to continue not only for the artists and the producers, but also for the fans.


    the company told its talent partners that it plans to make an array of alterations for concerts and festivals held in 2021.
    That is the RS writer's spin on it.
    When you read the actual memo, its clearly referring to festivals.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • Options
    KV4053KV4053 Mike's side, crushed up against the stage Posts: 1,439
    When a talking head on television does stupid things, the people rise up against the advertisers. The talking head then straightens up or gets fired. Maybe we need the same mechanism against Live Nation. Rise up against the venues who signed these stupid contracts with Ticketmaster.
    I know I was born and I know that I'll die. The in between is mine.
  • Options
    bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 15,532
    The price of guaranteed money upfront....
  • Options
    BF25394BF25394 Posts: 3,152
    KV4053 said:
    When a talking head on television does stupid things, the people rise up against the advertisers. The talking head then straightens up or gets fired. Maybe we need the same mechanism against Live Nation. Rise up against the venues who signed these stupid contracts with Ticketmaster.
    I'm on board.  I will not attend any event at a Live Nation venue for the rest of 2020...
    I gather speed from you fucking with me.
  • Options
    Foriginal SinForiginal Sin Scottsdale, AZ Posts: 1,748
    Correct me If I’m wrong, but what I took from it (from a consumer standpoint) was:

    1) Bands should only play venues they are 100% sure they can sell out, and raise the price of tickets to help cover their own insurance (which they must now provide) and to do whatever it takes to avoid having to cancel due to ticket sales

    So basically we will see smaller venues and a significant increase in cost to the consumer
    For most bands, not for any headliners. Rage will still sellout, PJ will still sell out a place as big as Wrigley. If Pink Floyd ever gets back together, 100,000 a night in any football stadium, etc. Band of Horses, Beck, Chris Stapleton, etc would want to stick to small venues (all great live btw)
    Chicago 6/29/98, Alpine Valley(EV) 6/13/99, Alpine Valley 10/08/00, Chicago 10/09/00, Phoenix 10/20/00, Orlando 4/12/03, Tampa 4/13/03, San Diego 6/05/03, Vegas 6/06/03, Phoenix 6/07/03, Chicago 6/18/03, Alpine Valley 6/21/03, Orlando 10/08/04, D.C. 10/11/04, Chicago 5/16/06, Chicago 5/17/06, LA 7/12/08, Chicago 8/23/09, Chicago 8/24/09, LA 10/07/09, San Diego 10/09/09 (Front Row Center, Finally), Phoenix(EV) 11/4/11, Wrigley 7/19/13, Phoenix 11/19/13, Denver 10/22/14, Wrigley 8/20/16, Wrigley 8/22/16
  • Options
    ZodZod Posts: 10,108
    It seems a little harsh, on the other hand it seems like right now promoters/venues/ticket agency are all taking the biggest hits?  IE they're running business but currently have no revenue.  So they're bleeding money.  I guess they're trying to avoid having that happen again if concerts turn out to be a crapshoot next year too.

    To me this is going to make bands think twice about touring until covid is over.
  • Options
    JimmyVJimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 18,886
    BF25394 said:
    KV4053 said:
    When a talking head on television does stupid things, the people rise up against the advertisers. The talking head then straightens up or gets fired. Maybe we need the same mechanism against Live Nation. Rise up against the venues who signed these stupid contracts with Ticketmaster.
    I'm on board.  I will not attend any event at a Live Nation venue for the rest of 2020...
    I'm with you. Solidarity.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Options
    pjl44pjl44 Posts: 8,058
    I don't see how boycotting Live Nation venues helps the artist. If the artist chooses to work with them, they're counting on people to buy tickets, show up, and buy merch. If anything, I can see going out of your way to support an artist who is explicitly trying to circumvent Live Nation by driving a little further to a show or paying more for a ticket.

    Whenever Greg Dulli's Paradise (LN venue) show goes off, there is zero chance I'm missing it and I guarantee he wants a packed room. Who am I really sticking it to if I stay home?
  • Options
    ZodZod Posts: 10,108
    pjl44 said:
    I don't see how boycotting Live Nation venues helps the artist. If the artist chooses to work with them, they're counting on people to buy tickets, show up, and buy merch. If anything, I can see going out of your way to support an artist who is explicitly trying to circumvent Live Nation by driving a little further to a show or paying more for a ticket.

    Whenever Greg Dulli's Paradise (LN venue) show goes off, there is zero chance I'm missing it and I guarantee he wants a packed room. Who am I really sticking it to if I stay home?

    I think they were kidding.   There are no shows in 2020 to boycott :)
  • Options
    pjl44pjl44 Posts: 8,058
    Zod said:
    pjl44 said:
    I don't see how boycotting Live Nation venues helps the artist. If the artist chooses to work with them, they're counting on people to buy tickets, show up, and buy merch. If anything, I can see going out of your way to support an artist who is explicitly trying to circumvent Live Nation by driving a little further to a show or paying more for a ticket.

    Whenever Greg Dulli's Paradise (LN venue) show goes off, there is zero chance I'm missing it and I guarantee he wants a packed room. Who am I really sticking it to if I stay home?

    I think they were kidding.   There are no shows in 2020 to boycott :)
    Ah yeah. I am a giant dummy!
  • Options
    eboweddieeboweddie Posts: 921
    What happens if an artist refuses to play ball with live nation?. Will they be locked out of venues.  Where have we seen this before!!! 

    i wish i wish i wish i wish, i guess it never stops
  • Options
    RF123172RF123172 Posts: 110
    The concert industry is going down before our eyes.  By me, the Nassau Coliseum has closed until they find a new investor.  We may hate the past profiteers, but I certainly do not want to have to live without concerts.  This is why i was upset with all the people hammering to get refunds on postponed shows.  It was mostly COVID...but we partly created this.
  • Options
    ZAPPERZAPPER Posts: 246
    edited June 2020
    Zod said:
    It seems a little harsh, on the other hand it seems like right now promoters/venues/ticket agency are all taking the biggest hits?  IE they're running business but currently have no revenue.  So they're bleeding money.  I guess they're trying to avoid having that happen again if concerts turn out to be a crapshoot next year too.

    To me this is going to make bands think twice about touring until covid is over.
    Hopefully this will put those scumbag “ticket broker” businesses out. Ive never had a problem with a fan selling their 2 tickets because they can no longer attend, but when we have these brokers that have retail stores buying tons of tickets to scalp when fans cant even buy them through TM, LN, or even fanclub tickets, those types of price gouging businesses shouldnt even be legal.
    Previously known as Elzar
  • Options
    PB11041PB11041 Earth Posts: 2,765
    anyone who thinks that concert industry is going to come back resembling anything close to what you experienced prior to March of 2020 is going to be in for a shock. 
    His eminence has yet to show. 
    http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
    http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=3652

  • Options
    JOEJOEJOEJOEJOEJOE Posts: 10,423
    ZAPPER said:
    Zod said:
    It seems a little harsh, on the other hand it seems like right now promoters/venues/ticket agency are all taking the biggest hits?  IE they're running business but currently have no revenue.  So they're bleeding money.  I guess they're trying to avoid having that happen again if concerts turn out to be a crapshoot next year too.

    To me this is going to make bands think twice about touring until covid is over.
    Hopefully this will put those scumbag “ticket broker” businesses out. Ive never had a problem with a fan selling their 2 tickets because they can no longer attend, but when we have these brokers that have retail stores buying tons of tickets to scalp when fans cant even buy them through TM, LN, or even fanclub tickets, those types of price gouging businesses shouldnt even be legal.
    I agree that it sucks to have to compete with resellers to get tickets.  

    However!   You can often beat them at their own game when they are forced to sell tickets below face due to over-speculation.  
  • Options
    Gern BlanstenGern Blansten Your Mom's Posts: 17,954
    I thought it was odd that I recently received an email related to a cancelled Sammy Hagar show that I bought tickets for.  Live Nation gave me the option of a 100% refund or a 150% credit if I let them keep the $$.  

    I figured the credit would be too hard to use later and asked for the refund.
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
Sign In or Register to comment.