"Dance of".... a devil's advocate point of view-both sides
If you're like me, and you've been disappointed in the last two albums, then you're collectively holding your breath that the new album is NOT BackSpacer II or Lightning Bolt (side 2 all over again). Upon the release of "Dance", I almost found myself in the fetal position, whimpering "what happen to the band I love so much." I have read in the press that people who had advance snippets of the new album, describe it as quote/unquote "different". That alone sends up a red flag. But one should remind one's self that Tool's latest "Fear Innoculium" ,had stories of the band being disjointed and it took 13 years to produce etc... but fans were not disappointed. Having said this.....Allow me to dip my fingers into the holy water to let it bubble and sizzle and let the steam rise...
Being that I'm a bass player of close to 40 years, I understand that as a musician you have to stretch your legs a bit; otherwise you will grow complacent. Your music will sound the same and fans will abandon you in droves. After hearing "Dance" the 2nd time through, I couldn't help but be put at ease by the fact that Jeff's bass line stands out like those of "Jeremy", "WMA", and "Father's Son" (double bass line). They grab you and make you listen. And maybe that's the point to the release of "Dance" right out of the box. Maybe we should be open and receptive; not to prejudge based on our past experiences. Are you like me and have your "shields up" in anticipation of the new album? Or are you openly waiting for the next chapter in the PJ story?
Your comments are appreciated.
Comments
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 2016
I enjoyed DotC. I am a bit less excited about SBWM, but its ok so far, and looking forward to hearing the full thing. It's just a snippet, so to judge it based on 30 seconds would be unfair.
Nuclear fission
it seems the loyal fans here can not deal with an intense 2020 version of even flow or alive. They need new music to be fresh or something different. They did not like CDM as much as DotC. Casual rock fans are starting to approach me at places like work asking me about what’s up with DotC. I have actually been put in the awkward position quite a few times defending their decision to explore a different genre. I simply believe the song does not work well within the strengths of Pearl Jam. Every 10 minute Tool song on FI better than DotC.
Pearl Jam is not a thinking man's music. Lyrically you could argue it was from 1991 to 2000. But Pearl Jam is a band that borrows more than it creates. Nothing they do will push any envelope or make you think they are music geeks like a Radiohead or The National. DOTC is different but it isn't a great song by any stretch of the imagination. Entertaining, yes, but I don't expect anything from Pearl Jam that will make me respect the musicality of it like I respect other musicians and their creativity. Maybe it is their punk influences or limitations with Ed's sound/range. The guitar riff in the Wolf song is bland as hell (to my ears) and perhaps my musical tastes have moved on.
Pearl Jam is a great live band and had some truly amazing records in the first 15-16 years, but as far as musicality they are straightforward rock. I love most of it but it doesn't suck me in musically like a Nick Cave, Radiohead, The National, Nine Inch Nails, etc...
The 2 minute songs singing about things being supersonic doesn't really though, compared to Nine Inch Nails etc.
I think more it is that my musical tastes have changed and what I’m more interested in now is not what PJ has been selling lately or could ever get in stock (at least from a non-live perspective).
Mw...mw....mw....