Does twice the time mean a double album?

Options
BK35942
BK35942 Posts: 22
in The Porch
well, why not?!?!
Tagged:

Comments

  • BrainofBGA
    BrainofBGA Australia Posts: 4,558
    I’d accept this course of action! 
    Melbourne #1 '98
    Melbourne #2 '03
    Melbourne #3 '03
    Melbourne #1 '06
    Melbourne #3 '06
    Melbourne '09
    Melbourne '14
  • lastexitlondon
    lastexitlondon Posts: 14,875
    edited June 2019
    I hope it means quality. The one thing  the last 2 albums have struggled with all the way through. In patches yes but as albums weak. Imo


    this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
  • iOnlyownMymind
    iOnlyownMymind Posts: 2,953
    If Can't Deny Me was their best song for a single, they are likely scraping to get a single disc together of decent material and probably why it is taking so long.   Take more time and put out a quality single disc album I say.  I don't care how long it takes.  I'd be happy with one more really good album. 
  • reisgericht
    reisgericht Posts: 90
    iOnlyownMymind said:
    If Can't Deny Me was their best song for a single, they are likely scraping to get a single disc together of decent material and probably why it is taking so long.   Take more time and put out a quality single disc album I say.  I don't care how long it takes.  I'd be happy with one more really good album. 
    I’ve always found that while I grow to love them, the first singles are not really the best songs on the album
  • NewJPage
    NewJPage Posts: 3,319
    iOnlyownMymind said:
    If Can't Deny Me was their best song for a single, they are likely scraping to get a single disc together of decent material and probably why it is taking so long.   Take more time and put out a quality single disc album I say.  I don't care how long it takes.  I'd be happy with one more really good album. 
    I think they should do the opposite. They've done the "let's take forever to write and record" thing the last few albums. They need to go in with zero ideas, jam, turn jams into songs. 1 week max deadline. Then see what they have out of that.
    6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/16
  • RoleModelsinBlood31
    RoleModelsinBlood31 Austin TX Posts: 6,239
    Nah. It means they have half the interest.
    I'm like an opening band for your mom.
  • goldrush
    goldrush everybody knows this is nowhere Posts: 7,787
    RoleModelsinBlood31 said:
    Nah. It means they have half the interest.
    This is, word for word, exactly what I was going to post.
    “Do not postpone happiness”
    (Jeff Tweedy, Sydney 2007)

    “Put yer good money on the sunrise”
    (Tim Rogers)
  • danny
    danny Posts: 2,283
    we can pray
    danny d
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    It's wishful thinking.  Pearl Jam records cost a lot of money to make and the return is simply not there anymore.  It sucks.  I wish the band would self produce a bit more.  seemed like they were doing a bit of that for a while? 
  • KN219077
    KN219077 Montana Posts: 1,199
    vaggar99 said:
    It's wishful thinking.  Pearl Jam records cost a lot of money to make and the return is simply not there anymore.  It sucks.  I wish the band would self produce a bit more.  seemed like they were doing a bit of that for a while? 
    I highly doubt cost is the big issue when it comes to getting them in the studio when compared to creativity and schedules.  New albums mean tours which equals the greatest money maker for the band. Even a 20 date tour more than pays the bills.
  • vaggar99
    vaggar99 San Diego USA Posts: 3,431
    edited June 2019
    KN219077 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    It's wishful thinking.  Pearl Jam records cost a lot of money to make and the return is simply not there anymore.  It sucks.  I wish the band would self produce a bit more.  seemed like they were doing a bit of that for a while? 
    I highly doubt cost is the big issue when it comes to getting them in the studio when compared to creativity and schedules.  New albums mean tours which equals the greatest money maker for the band. Even a 20 date tour more than pays the bills.
    exactly, they can play 20 shows and make a ton of money with or without a new album.  let's face it, few go  to see Pearl Jam to hear the songs off Lightning Bolt or Backspacer.  Or, any of the last 5-6 albums for that matter.  

    I think I heard Mike say, more than once, that it cost around a $1 million to make the last PJ record.  He didn't sound very excited about having to do that again.
    Post edited by vaggar99 on
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,497
    Every double album has fat that could be cut. Its best they don't do this and just put out 7" with b-sides.


  • Spiritual_Chaos
    Spiritual_Chaos Posts: 31,445
    vaggar99 said:
    KN219077 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    It's wishful thinking.  Pearl Jam records cost a lot of money to make and the return is simply not there anymore.  It sucks.  I wish the band would self produce a bit more.  seemed like they were doing a bit of that for a while? 
    I highly doubt cost is the big issue when it comes to getting them in the studio when compared to creativity and schedules.  New albums mean tours which equals the greatest money maker for the band. Even a 20 date tour more than pays the bills.
    exactly, they can play 20 shows and make a ton of money with or without a new album.  let's face it, few go  to see Pearl Jam to hear the songs off Lightning Bolt or Backspacer.  Or, any of the last 5-6 albums for that matter.  

    I think I heard Mike say, more than once, that it cost around a $1 million to make the last PJ record.  He didn't sound very excited about having to do that again.
    Suddenly I understand the sevens single release 
    "Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
  • rummy
    rummy British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,466
    How about a four-song EP? That'd be my recommendation (not that I have any say whatsoever). That's only about one-third of the length of most albums and will at least tide us all over until the next tour (???????).
  • kramer73
    kramer73 Posts: 2,628
    What makes you think they've been working on an album this whole time?
  • rummy
    rummy British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,466
    Rumour has it ...
  • bootlegger10
    bootlegger10 Posts: 16,251
    vaggar99 said:
    KN219077 said:
    vaggar99 said:
    It's wishful thinking.  Pearl Jam records cost a lot of money to make and the return is simply not there anymore.  It sucks.  I wish the band would self produce a bit more.  seemed like they were doing a bit of that for a while? 
    I highly doubt cost is the big issue when it comes to getting them in the studio when compared to creativity and schedules.  New albums mean tours which equals the greatest money maker for the band. Even a 20 date tour more than pays the bills.
    exactly, they can play 20 shows and make a ton of money with or without a new album.  let's face it, few go  to see Pearl Jam to hear the songs off Lightning Bolt or Backspacer.  Or, any of the last 5-6 albums for that matter.  

    I think I heard Mike say, more than once, that it cost around a $1 million to make the last PJ record.  He didn't sound very excited about having to do that again.

    And it probably costs $5 to make those shirts they sell for $35.  Money isn't the issue for the lack of new albums.  One festival gig probably pays for the album. 
  • BK35942
    BK35942 Posts: 22
    ...looks like no.  Can't wait to hear it!
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,656
    No, it means 66 2/3 RPM.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni











Categories