The Democratic Candidates

Hi!

Klobuchar is a reasonable, smart, level headed, human being/candidate.
Biden up next, god help us, lol.

Hi!

Damn, who’s this Biden guy?

mrussel1

Hi! said:

Damn, who’s this Biden guy?

How's he doing?

Hi!

mrussel1 said:

Hi! said:

Damn, who’s this Biden guy?

How's he doing?

Well, (lol)I thought he did fine. Exceeded expectations. Unfortunately there was a little blip that’s already making headlines, so we know how that’s gonna go. He might not be making a fundraiser scheduled for tomorrow.

Hi!

Jfc, it was going so well. Looks like two little blips.

Hi!

What gains more traction?
Bloody eye
or
Confusion Over fundraiser with fossil fuel execs.

When I was watching I kept thinking, That doesn’t look good, but he doesn’t seem in pain. Maybe nobody will notice.

mrussel1

Hi! said:

What gains more traction?
Bloody eye
or
Confusion Over fundraiser with fossil fuel execs.

When I was watching I kept thinking, That doesn’t look good, but he doesn’t seem in pain. Maybe nobody will notice.

I thought the person was not an executive. 

Hi!

mrussel1 said:

Hi! said:

What gains more traction?
Bloody eye
or
Confusion Over fundraiser with fossil fuel execs.

When I was watching I kept thinking, That doesn’t look good, but he doesn’t seem in pain. Maybe nobody will notice.

I thought the person was not an executive. 

Was or is? I have no idea. Might be different rules or expectations depending on sec filings. I’ll have to look into some more, but just the perception or whatever doesn’t look good.

Hi!

This one is for Spiritual

mrussel1

 

Biden has signed the No Fossil Fuel Pledge, an agreement that his campaign would not accept donations from the fossil fuel industry or its executives.

 

"He's not a fossil fuel executive," Biden said, adding that he supports suing the fossil fuel industry over its contributions to climate change.

 

CNN's Anderson Cooper later clarified that Goldman no longer had any day to day functions with the company.

 

Biden said his staff told told him Goldman "was not on the board, or not involved at all in the operation of the company."

 

He added that if that turns out to be false, he wouldn't "in any way accept his help."

 

"We check every single contribution," Biden said

Hi!

Just a small sampling, a snapshot if you will.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/04/politics/wisconsin-poll-august-marquette-biden-leads-trump/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F

HughFreakingDillon

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

ikiT

Hi! said:

This one is for Spiritual

he shoulda gone with the eyepatch

The Juggler

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

mrussel1

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

Agree with both of you.  And exhausted is precisely right. 

mickeyrat

mrussel1 said:

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

Agree with both of you.  And exhausted is precisely right. 

and they need to be energetic while they do it...

The Juggler

mickeyrat said:

mrussel1 said:

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

Agree with both of you.  And exhausted is precisely right. 

and they need to be energetic while they do it...

I can envision one of the tv spots: just a quick hit of a ton of the iconic dumb, racist, misogynistic, anti democratic, idiotic, tweets and soundbites ending with "ENOUGH. VOTE. 11/3/2020."

mfc2006

The Juggler said:

mickeyrat said:

mrussel1 said:

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

Agree with both of you.  And exhausted is precisely right. 

and they need to be energetic while they do it...

I can envision one of the tv spots: just a quick hit of a ton of the iconic dumb, racist, misogynistic, anti democratic, idiotic, tweets and soundbites ending with "ENOUGH. VOTE. 11/3/2020."

Yes. Cut through the bullshit and get to the truth.

HughFreakingDillon

The Juggler said:

mickeyrat said:

mrussel1 said:

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

mrussel1 said:

dignin said:

Lerxst1992 said:

I don't think Lex meant the God statement literally. 

Regarding your other point,  she has said she's a capitalist,  however her policies never focus on that. If she latches on to M4A, which effectively eliminates private insurance,  it will be difficult to shake that accusation regardless if what she claims she is.  

Thanks mr. I think you nailed it.

The god help us all was a shout of love and desperation to the beloved Hank Moody ("god hates us all")

If Warren insists on forcing us to give up insurance she will be tagged as a socialist no matter what she claims to be.

It's getting very scary how many are forgetting how effective the trump GOP was at setting the narrative and making attacks stick. 

Let's not help him with 100% socialist policies.

Trump and the GOP will label and hammer Biden as an old man losing his mind.

You really shouldn't concern yourself too much with what the GOP is gonna do. The GOP is gonna do what it does whether you like it or not.

There's a big difference between accusing someone of being old, and accusing them of having a plan to raise tax rates to 40% and eliminate private insurance.  No one's going back to Trump if they think he's a douche just because Joe Biden has some gaffs.  People will go back to Trump if they think their taxes are doubling and they have to wait in line for doctors.  

You really don't think the attacks on Hillary's health in 2016 were effective?

No, not really.  The attacks that worked were related to the Comey stuff.  I also think the Bernie thing depressed turnout because the party never really coalesced.  But either way, Trump was an unknown entity in 2016.  Now he has a record he has to defend, so I don't think the calculus is even close to being the same.  

Okay, here's Trump's record then. I tried to take away your health care, and still want to.

That's an easy counter attack any democratic candidate (including Warren) can make, and I think convincingly.

Yes, he tried to kill Obamacare, but 1. it hasn't happened and 2. Obamacare is generally not used by what you would consider swing voters, those in the suburbs of PA, OH, MI, etc.  Most Americans are on private insurance and receive it through work, not the exchange.  Obamacare covered the gap between medicaid users and those with employee based insurance.  That was important to be sure, but when faced with a vote of continuing to strip away Obamacare or going M4A, I think Trump would be happy with that election choice.  He's very vulnerable on healthcare and making the election a referendum on M4A would be exactly the issue he needs to go on the offensive.  

M4A may come to the US one day, but I don't believe it's political wise to make 2020 about that issue. The election must be about Trump and his fitness for office.   

I disagree. I think the eventual Democratic nominee should run on a positive inspirational platform. Something to get people excited and motivated to vote.

I don't think running on a platform about how bad Trump is is going to do that. I think you run the risk of people staying home, just like in 2016. 

I think you can because at the time no one knew what trump was going to do. it was all conjecture. now they have 4 years of bullshit to throw at the wall, and almost all of it is likely to stick. 

I do think, though, you need a healthy balance. Lots of people vote the negatives, but many stay home if they have no idea what your platform is, so the message needs to be two-pronged. 

People are simply tired of Trump. They will be even more tired of him next year. Whoever the candidate is needs to emphasize how exhausted we all are.

Agree with both of you.  And exhausted is precisely right. 

and they need to be energetic while they do it...

I can envision one of the tv spots: just a quick hit of a ton of the iconic dumb, racist, misogynistic, anti democratic, idiotic, tweets and soundbites ending with "ENOUGH. VOTE. 11/3/2020."

that's actually an excellent suggestion. simple. to the point. effective. 

Hi!

I didn’t watch Colbert, but read a quick little article. Biden shouldn’t make jokes about Michelle as vp. Unless....