ISIS Fighters and their wives?

Meltdown99
Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
ISIS fighters and their wives?

Do you want them back?

I say they should have been left for dead on the battlefield.  



Give Peas A Chance…
«1345

Comments

  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
  • The gig is up? Now that they can't behead anyone anymore without incurring great risk to themselves... they're seeking the assurance of human rights policies to ensure their safety?

    What of their ideology? Has it gone away? Or has it just been shelved for a more opportune time (ie. a soft target like a street sidewalk or mall while rehabilitating themselves on the government dime)?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    The gig is up? Now that they can't behead anyone anymore without incurring great risk to themselves... they're seeking the assurance of human rights policies to ensure their safety?

    What of their ideology? Has it gone away? Or has it just been shelved for a more opportune time (ie. a soft target like a street sidewalk or mall while rehabilitating themselves on the government dime)?
    I say we bring back the firing squad and get rid of them all.  A UK MP claims Trudeau tried to bring Jihadi Jack to Canada.  
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    The closest any US ISIS fighter should get to the States is Guantanamo. I say leave them to dehydrate out in the desert somewhere. Fuck 'em.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Why not just execute them when they surrender.  ISIS members and their wives are not human and do not deserve due process...
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,306
    Dinosaur Island would be a respectable destination.  
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,123
    Don't you renounce your us citizenship when you fight for the enemy?  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,480
    Why not just execute them when they surrender.  ISIS members and their wives are not human and do not deserve due process...
    how about a videotaped beheading? live on PPV maybe?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,642
    Yep let them eat crow should not be allowed back here ..
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,480
    go fight for the enemy and call for the deaths of those you are now seeking refuge with?

    no. I'm about as forgiving as you get, but no. fuck you. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Why not just execute them when they surrender.  ISIS members and their wives are not human and do not deserve due process...
    how about a videotaped beheading? live on PPV maybe?
    That would work.  We could give the PPV money to wounded soldiers and their families...
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Interesting opinion piece on the potential value of allowing US (or Canadian, or British, etc.) nationals to return home to face their justice system, including insights into both operational issues and how recruitment/radicalization occurs.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/isis-foreign-fighters.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    Interesting opinion piece on the potential value of allowing US (or Canadian, or British, etc.) nationals to return home to face their justice system, including insights into both operational issues and how recruitment/radicalization occurs.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/isis-foreign-fighters.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
    It's certainly an argument for it.  I personally do not agree.  You leave and join something like ISIS and fight against your country, you lose citizenship.  Thus, you can't come back into the US.  If captured by US you go to where all the other terrorists go.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,480
    Interesting opinion piece on the potential value of allowing US (or Canadian, or British, etc.) nationals to return home to face their justice system, including insights into both operational issues and how recruitment/radicalization occurs.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/isis-foreign-fighters.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
    There is real danger in bringing them back, even to be put into prison where they have time to be able to radicalize others. how can we be sure of their intentions when bringing them back? 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,480
    I mean, isn't it convenient they have realized the error of their ways after they have nowhere else to turn?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    I mean, isn't it convenient they have realized the error of their ways after they have nowhere else to turn?
    Logically that would be when someone recognized the error of their ways, because if your ways are successful then the error is harder to see. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,480
    I mean, isn't it convenient they have realized the error of their ways after they have nowhere else to turn?
    Logically that would be when someone recognized the error of their ways, because if your ways are successful then the error is harder to see. 
    for the morally defunct, yeah, I'd say that's true. But I can often, I won't claim 100%, see the error of my ways and need to change course even if I'm "getting away with it". 

    obviously they are much further entrenched, and yes, it would be much more difficult to see that, I just see it as disingenuous. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    Interesting opinion piece on the potential value of allowing US (or Canadian, or British, etc.) nationals to return home to face their justice system, including insights into both operational issues and how recruitment/radicalization occurs.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/opinion/isis-foreign-fighters.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
    It's certainly an argument for it.  I personally do not agree.  You leave and join something like ISIS and fight against your country, you lose citizenship.  Thus, you can't come back into the US.  If captured by US you go to where all the other terrorists go.
    I totally agree, she is no longer a US citizen in my opinion.  Send her a baseball glove to catch the next hellfire missile!
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    There’s got to be some way to get data from these people, otherwise it’s a huge missed opportunity. Maybe some way to screen who is lower risk to being back. We need to study the radicalization process. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf