are pearl jam really bothered about releasing a new album anytime soon?
Comments
- 
            Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.Post edited by cp3iverson on0
- 
            Maybe Ed has writer's block?
 0
- 
            
 Right. Don’t be looking at PJ for your new music fix.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.0
- 
            
 You are right now defending legacy act:ing.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
- 
            
 Im defending realism. Five multi-millionaires all with their own projects and passions (music and non-music). Young kids and wives too. I’m not expecting them to have the same mad scientist ideals they had when they were 35 (as much as id like them to). They’ve crept into the same tier as U2 and the Stones as bands who can sell out arenas without an album. Shit even Journey does. Older bands dont sell records. They’ll get two singles out of it that rock radio will care about for three weeks before it’s back to Daughter and Evenflow. Studio time costs money and more importantly time. When they get the urge then it’ll be true and pure.Spiritual_Chaos said:
 You are right now defending legacy act:ing.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.
 same discussion every week Post edited by cp3iverson on0 Post edited by cp3iverson on0
- 
            
 Yep.cp3iverson said:
 Im defending realism. Five multi-millionaires all with their own projects and passions (music and non-music). Young kids and wives too. I’m not expecting them to have the same mad scientist ideals they had when they were 35 (as much as id like them to). They’ve crept into the same tier as U2 and the Stones as bands who can sell out arenas without an album. Shit even Journey does. Older bands dont sell records. They’ll get two singles out of it that rock radio will care about for three weeks before it’s back to Daughter and Evenflow. Studio time costs money and more importantly time. When they get the urge then it’ll be true and pure.Spiritual_Chaos said:
 You are right now defending legacy act:ing.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.
 same discussion every week 
 Star Lake 00 / Pittsburgh 03 / State College 03 / Bristow 03 / Cleveland 06 / Camden II 06 / DC 08 / Pittsburgh 13 / Baltimore 13 / Charlottesville 13 / Cincinnati 14 / St. Paul 14 / Hampton 16 / Wrigley I 16 / Wrigley II 16 / Baltimore 20 / Camden 22 / Baltimore 24 / Raleigh I 25 / Raleigh II 25 / Pittsburgh I 250
- 
            
 Right. Don’t be looking at PJ for your new music fix.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.0
- 
            If PJ can't be fired up to make an album given the current political climate around the world, i'd rather they didn't bother.'F*** the pessimists. F*** 'em.' Eddie Vedder0
- 
            They are going to make one, and wouldn't be talking about it if it wasn't going to be done "soon", so I assume that means they're bothered to.
 With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
- 
            
 Except U2 still put new material out. Whether it’s good or not is a diff story... but they still create.cp3iverson said:
 Im defending realism. Five multi-millionaires all with their own projects and passions (music and non-music). Young kids and wives too. I’m not expecting them to have the same mad scientist ideals they had when they were 35 (as much as id like them to). They’ve crept into the same tier as U2 and the Stones as bands who can sell out arenas without an album. Shit even Journey does. Older bands dont sell records. They’ll get two singles out of it that rock radio will care about for three weeks before it’s back to Daughter and Evenflow. Studio time costs money and more importantly time. When they get the urge then it’ll be true and pure.Spiritual_Chaos said:
 You are right now defending legacy act:ing.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.
 same discussion every week Post edited by nicknyr15 on0 Post edited by nicknyr15 on0
- 
             
 His eminence has yet to show.
 http://www.hi5sports.org/ (Sports Program for Kids with Disabilities)
 http://www.livefootsteps.org/user/?usr=36520
- 
            With Ed touring in June, they could get some studio time before then, it’s only Feb.Melbourne #1 '98
 Melbourne #2 '03
 Melbourne #3 '03
 Melbourne #1 '06
 Melbourne #3 '06
 Melbourne '09
 Melbourne '140
- 
            
 U2's output is musically superior now too, not just more frequent (and I don't mean that as an actual compliment to U2's latest few albums, although they are listenable from start to finish, if not actually good IMO).nicknyr15 said:
 Except U2 still put new material out. Whether it’s good or not is a diff story... but they still create.cp3iverson said:
 Im defending realism. Five multi-millionaires all with their own projects and passions (music and non-music). Young kids and wives too. I’m not expecting them to have the same mad scientist ideals they had when they were 35 (as much as id like them to). They’ve crept into the same tier as U2 and the Stones as bands who can sell out arenas without an album. Shit even Journey does. Older bands dont sell records. They’ll get two singles out of it that rock radio will care about for three weeks before it’s back to Daughter and Evenflow. Studio time costs money and more importantly time. When they get the urge then it’ll be true and pure.Spiritual_Chaos said:
 You are right now defending legacy act:ing.cp3iverson said:Im not worried about it. For older bands its not a money making venture anyway. Touring is. They don’t even need to release an album to play arenas so they’re in a rare tier of bands.
 So once they get the urge to lock themselves in the studio it will be worth waiting for. If they dont then they dont.
 same discussion every week 
 Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
- 
            
 There have been plenty of months for getting in the studio.BrainofBGA said:With Ed touring in June, they could get some studio time before then, it’s only Feb.
 0
- 
            
 I think you mean "years" lolbootlegger10 said:
 There have been plenty of months for getting in the studio.BrainofBGA said:With Ed touring in June, they could get some studio time before then, it’s only Feb.
 2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
 
 Pearl Jam bootlegs:
 http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0
- 
            I was hoping for a trump-leaguer-esque album0
- 
            
 I would like that anger captured in an album for sure. Pj for me are best when they are angry or pissed off with a situation.KN219077 said:I was hoping for a trump-leaguer-esque album
 this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -0
- 
            Lightning Bolt is probably PJ's last album.I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell.
 -Christopher Walken
 you're=you are
 your=showing ownership
 The truth has a well known liberal bias.
 -Stephen Colbert0
- 
            
 I doubt this is the case. I think they'll never break up. They are the stones 2.0, although when the stones were in their 50s they still released new music and toured a decent amountevenflow82 said:Lightning Bolt is probably PJ's last album.6/26/98, 8/17/00, 10/8/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/25/03, 5/28/03, 6/1/03, 6/3/03, 6/5/03, 6/6/03, 6/12/03, 6/13/03, 6/15/03, 6/18/03, 6/21/03, 6/22/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03, 10/3/04, 10/5/04, 9/9/05, 9/11/05, 9/16/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/19/06, 6/30/06, 7/23/06, 8/5/07, 6/30/08, 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 5/4/10, 5/7/10, 9/3/11, 9/4/11, 10/11/13, 10/17/14, 8/20/160
- 
            Both U2 and Stones make records. I thought Jeff made an interesting statement: "This is a broken album". Not sure if he was only talking about the state of the album or its atmosphere. I really get the feeling, they have some tunes, riffs, ideas, lyrics but no direction yet. (Hence the "limbo" comment.) I think the death of Chris Cornell really hit hard, some members maybe harder than others, and that life itself came in between. I dont see them as multi-millionaire easy lay asses. I think Jeff was earnest when he said at the start of PJ when he said "art is hard work". They give 3+ hours shows. Even Ed Sheeran (to give a comparative example) plays 1+ hour and he is 24 or something . So I dont question their work ethic. I think it is more an inspirational thing - and you cant force that. If Jeff was reffering to the atmosphere of "being broken" - I would say, use that as your inspirational starting point. For the world is broken at this point0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help
















