Clicked on the link. Article has been taken down. Apparently the identity of the blogger can't be identified
Hmmm strange. Wait, no it isn't.
It was a wacky fringe belief posted on a blog, which was taken down when people who weren't wacky fringers read it. It would take a wacky fringe believer from the other end of the spectrum to take it seriously as a representation of anything beyond a wacky fringe.
Was there a comment to the effect that they endorsed it? I would assume this, like many of the blog posts, falls under "opinion expressed do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the organization".
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Further thoughts - yes, by putting it on their site they made it viewable and accessible by a wide audience. I think it's naive to believe that means they endorse the idea itself or think it would ever possibly come to pass. I think it means that they judged it as controversial enough to guarantee discussion and increased traffic on their site and a small amount of outrage in certain circles, but not enough to damage them. The perfect click bait.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Further thoughts - yes, by putting it on their site they made it viewable and accessible by a wide audience. I think it's naive to believe that means they endorse the idea itself or think it would ever possibly come to pass. I think it means that they judged it as controversial enough to guarantee discussion and increased traffic on their site and a small amount of outrage in certain circles, but not enough to damage them. The perfect click bait.
And also perfect for furthering their agenda. Test the waters, if nothing else they can remove it and claim it was an unendorsed blog post. But it still gets the idea out there, gets them talking, and before long someone like Hillary Clinton thinks she can gain one vote by it and boom, it is the party platform.
Further thoughts - yes, by putting it on their site they made it viewable and accessible by a wide audience. I think it's naive to believe that means they endorse the idea itself or think it would ever possibly come to pass. I think it means that they judged it as controversial enough to guarantee discussion and increased traffic on their site and a small amount of outrage in certain circles, but not enough to damage them. The perfect click bait.
And also perfect for furthering their agenda. Test the waters, if nothing else they can remove it and claim it was an unendorsed blog post. But it still gets the idea out there, gets them talking, and before long someone like Hillary Clinton thinks she can gain one vote by it and boom, it is the party platform.
Please let me know when the Democrat Party endorses elimination of the white race as a party platform plank.
Yeah, sure, that's the next party platform. A guaranteed winner.
And I return to the fact that this wasn't even suggested by an American, for the US. The rest of the world can have independent thoughts about their own countries without it revolving around the US.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
Further thoughts - yes, by putting it on their site they made it viewable and accessible by a wide audience. I think it's naive to believe that means they endorse the idea itself or think it would ever possibly come to pass. I think it means that they judged it as controversial enough to guarantee discussion and increased traffic on their site and a small amount of outrage in certain circles, but not enough to damage them. The perfect click bait.
And also perfect for furthering their agenda. Test the waters, if nothing else they can remove it and claim it was an unendorsed blog post. But it still gets the idea out there, gets them talking, and before long someone like Hillary Clinton thinks she can gain one vote by it and boom, it is the party platform.
Please let me know when the Democrat Party endorses elimination of the white race as a party platform plank.
Wouldn't the platform be the elimination of white males?
Further thoughts - yes, by putting it on their site they made it viewable and accessible by a wide audience. I think it's naive to believe that means they endorse the idea itself or think it would ever possibly come to pass. I think it means that they judged it as controversial enough to guarantee discussion and increased traffic on their site and a small amount of outrage in certain circles, but not enough to damage them. The perfect click bait.
And also perfect for furthering their agenda. Test the waters, if nothing else they can remove it and claim it was an unendorsed blog post. But it still gets the idea out there, gets them talking, and before long someone like Hillary Clinton thinks she can gain one vote by it and boom, it is the party platform.
Please let me know when the Democrat Party endorses elimination of the white race as a party platform plank.
Wouldn't the platform be the elimination of white males?
Don't you have a Richard Spencer blow up doll to play with, woman punching supporter? Mansplain to someone who cares, Nazi commie.
Haha, another internet tough guy punching away on his keyboard in mommy's basement.
A simple, "You're right. I'm an anti American fascist ahole. What Have I done?", would have been just fine. I hope you don't ever breed. You got a problem with me and others not normalizing this? Kiss my ass.
Honestly... I think it's a little unfair to paint Unsung as he has been painted recently given his posting history.
He has an alternative point of view and even though he hasn't done the greatest job detailing it recently... it's important given it's one of the few coming from that 'alternate dimension' that doesn't look like hieroglyphics or a kid's drawing when presented in these threads.
Honestly... I think it's a little unfair to paint Unsung as he has been painted recently given his posting history.
He has an alternative point of view and even though he hasn't done the greatest job detailing it recently... it's important given it's one of the few coming from that 'alternate dimension' that doesn't look like hieroglyphics or a kid's drawing when presented in these threads.
Honestly... I think it's a little unfair to paint Unsung as he has been painted recently given his posting history.
He has an alternative point of view and even though he hasn't done the greatest job detailing it recently... it's important given it's one of the few coming from that 'alternate dimension' that doesn't look like hieroglyphics or a kid's drawing when presented in these threads.
Actually it's quite fair. His posting history is full of Trump apologist crap. Ron Paul wouldn't want someone like him in his fan club. I'm equal opportunity towards the crap on both parties. He has no excuse.
Honestly... I think it's a little unfair to paint Unsung as he has been painted recently given his posting history.
He has an alternative point of view and even though he hasn't done the greatest job detailing it recently... it's important given it's one of the few coming from that 'alternate dimension' that doesn't look like hieroglyphics or a kid's drawing when presented in these threads.
I don't listen to Alex Jones, first I have heard it. I checked his show out once but it was all infomercials trying to sell supplements.
So if a real news organization publishes a fake news article and retracts it, are they now and forever fake news? Are they fake-fake news? Fake news that's been un-faked? Do 2 fakes make a right? Or is it more like a double negative?
I don't listen to Alex Jones, first I have heard it. I checked his show out once but it was all infomercials trying to sell supplements.
So if a real news organization publishes a fake news article and retracts it, are they now and forever fake news? Are they fake-fake news? Fake news that's been un-faked? Do 2 fakes make a right? Or is it more like a double negative?
Two fakes don't make a right, but multiple fakes make a Trump.
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
I don't listen to Alex Jones, first I have heard it. I checked his show out once but it was all infomercials trying to sell supplements.
So if a real news organization publishes a fake news article and retracts it, are they now and forever fake news? Are they fake-fake news? Fake news that's been un-faked? Do 2 fakes make a right? Or is it more like a double negative?
It is HuffPo, they have an agenda just as much as the rest of them.
I don't listen to Alex Jones, first I have heard it. I checked his show out once but it was all infomercials trying to sell supplements.
So if a real news organization publishes a fake news article and retracts it, are they now and forever fake news? Are they fake-fake news? Fake news that's been un-faked? Do 2 fakes make a right? Or is it more like a double negative?
It is HuffPo, they have an agenda just as much as the rest of them.
...ok....just so I follow....
news media with an agenda is fake all news media outlets have an agenda ergo, all news is fake
Comments
Wait, no it isn't.
It was a wacky fringe belief posted on a blog, which was taken down when people who weren't wacky fringers read it.
It would take a wacky fringe believer from the other end of the spectrum to take it seriously as a representation of anything beyond a wacky fringe.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And I return to the fact that this wasn't even suggested by an American, for the US. The rest of the world can have independent thoughts about their own countries without it revolving around the US.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
He has an alternative point of view and even though he hasn't done the greatest job detailing it recently... it's important given it's one of the few coming from that 'alternate dimension' that doesn't look like hieroglyphics or a kid's drawing when presented in these threads.
Now that Alex Jones has been been unmasked as a total charade, will InfoWars disavow all of his articles and opinions? Not likely.
That's the difference between what you call real or fake news.
news media with an agenda is fake
all news media outlets have an agenda
ergo, all news is fake
that pretty well sum it up?