Nope, no desire to minimize
unsung
I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Another story to make white males nothing but a bunch of betas.
http://m.huffingtonpost.co.za/shelley-garland/could-it-be-time-to-deny-white-men-the-franchise_a_22036640/
http://m.huffingtonpost.co.za/shelley-garland/could-it-be-time-to-deny-white-men-the-franchise_a_22036640/
0
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Just betas? Not beta-cuck bootlicking statists?
Give it time, I suppose.
The man who allegedly robbed a Wisconsin gun shop and mailed a manifesto to President Donald Trump has been captured after a 10-day manhunt
The 161-page manifesto described the government as a “gang of terrorists. He stole 30 guns because the system has “stolen my natural right to protect and defend life,” WTMJ reported. “Priests and churches control the presidents and the banks … ,” he wrote, according to the affiliate. He also described health insurance and taxes as a way for the government to brainwash its citizens.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
But this has nothing to do with the topic.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
And think of how many times you'd strain your neck- hearing a noise and spinning your head around super quick to make sure whatever made the noise wasn't going to get you.
I never understood all these people living a life full of fear.
Very sad
And all of you know it.
You say you don't worry, yet you feel enough victimhood as a white man to threaten a Galt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXXTJgyMA_g&index=10&list=PLdCzHSDd0Dis01yUIdTN9yadcbt4K9tDv
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
You weren't even born yet. But you know, huh?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
1). All wealth accumulated via violence. Umm bit of a stretch. I get hes trying to link this all back to Christopher Columbus, but what does that mean for Lebron James?
2). Liberalism and progressivism are the only proper ways of thought.
Thus proving himself wrong. Aren't these the lines of thought (from views opposing his) that led us to where we are? So as a result, wouldn't his world ultimately end up as we are now, just with different people "enforcing the rules?"
I am not arguing the Apartheid or American slavery concept. Any thoughtful person knows those were wrong. Just the poor logic that aims to be better than the condition he's railing against.
Another terribly written academic philosophy paper. Hope he got an F. Not for content. But, for the poorly designed hypothesis-argument-conclusion.
(And a final proof of his narrow mindedness - if his assumptions are correct how did Obama get elected? Not saying that's a bad thing. That's besides the point. If you read between the lines, this is just another whiny article about Trump.)
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©