Cryptocurrencies
unsung
Posts: 9,487
Anyone do bitcoin or any other digital currency?
I am in btc, eth, etc, ltc, doge, xem, pivx, and gnt right now.
Maybe we can learn a little more from others.
I am in btc, eth, etc, ltc, doge, xem, pivx, and gnt right now.
Maybe we can learn a little more from others.
Post edited by unsung on
0
Comments
Magic Money: The Bitcoin Revolution
http://imdb.com/rg/an_share/title/title/tt6467152/
Free watch on Amazon if Prime member.
Then again, it probably has it's upsides.
In the case of a mass power outage gold and silver would probably best for the long term.
Bitcoin has generally stabilized but is designed to get increasingly hard to get so the value is expected to still rise greatly.
One of the first btc transactions was 10,000 for some pizzas, today each are worth ~$1200.
I just don't understand the point of bitcoins. Money is essentially digital now anyway, if you want it to be.
When tax season rolls around do you have to declare bitcoin income?
Once in awhile when bitcoin comes up I do a little research but don't go full throttle and this is one of those times.
How does one even start to look for a bitcoin?
Mining isn't really profitable for an individual anymore as the electric bill exceeds the bitcoin mined.
It is also a hedge against manipulated currencies and it is designed to deflate rather than inflate. Some who really understand how it works say that value by 2030 could be $100k-500k.
Is that enough Kool Aid for you?
http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-price-could-be-500000-by-2030-first-snapchat-investor-says-2017-3
http://www.businessinsider.com/snapchat-lost-514-million-in-2016-warns-it-may-never-be-profitable-2017-2
Also, they said that the bitcoin would gain all that value by 2030 IF enough people buy into it between now and then. They said they'd need the equivalent of about half the population of China to do so for it to work out like that. That is a great big if. It is just as likely that bitcoin will not catch on in those numbers, which would mean that the value would plummet by 2030. As I said, caution should be used here - you seem eager to just plow full steam ahead just because of some predictions that rely on a bunch of "ifs". Be careful! Investing now could work out great, like it did for those lucky fuckers who bought stocks in Apple and Microsoft and Facebook. On the other hand, you could just as easily end up being on the other end of spectrum, with all the people who put their life savings into AOL or Blockbuster Video. And risk is the name of the game when it comes to investments. And with bitcoin, if you drink the Kool-Aid and go all in and decide to drop banking in favour of it, that is ALL your money that goes with it rather than just a certain amount of it that you put in at the beginning like with normal stocks.
Only invest what you can afford to lose. Diversify.
I get it, you don't like it. Stop being so miserable.
It is fucking hilarious that you of all people told me not to be so miserable, or called me out on turning every thread into an argument. The irony is thick. Especially since YOU just singlehandedly turned this into an argument once someone said some stuff that disagrees with your view.
Anyway, on to the DISCUSSION I was trying to have, if your delicate ego can stand it: You say only invest what you can afford to lose and to diversify. Okay, fair enough. That is good advice. But isn't the idea behind bitcoin and your whole point of liking it largely about getting out of a middle man situation altogether? You highlighted that point in this thread several times. That would mean a total conversion to bitcoin, wouldn't it? Otherwise, who cares about avoiding the middle man? It would seem pointless to go with bitcoin for that reason but only have 5% of your money invested in it. How is that going to get rid of the third party?
-Dr. John the Night Tripper
I think this is a great thread to discuss what is becoming a term in some conversation.
That game back in it's day when it started called Second Life was the "invention" of digital currency to eventually carry over to the real world - or am I wrong?
This digital currency is interesting.
There is a game, the name escapes me but if you search ten most expensive video game items sold it comes up. Anyway, the most expensive item was a virtual world in the form of a huge space station iirc. The owner would charge others to visit and set up their own stores, etc. He was pulling in big bucks on that alone. All digital.
Moving on.
If one is under the belief that 400m users is impossible in 13 years one should also consider that in the beginning 10k btc bought some pizza. Now the userbase is about 65m people and the actual btc market cap is about $19B.
Slice that anyway you want, it is a lot of pizza.
Misconception or is that what it was created for and primarily used?
Cincinnati 2014
Greenville 2016
(Raleigh 2016)
Columbia 2016
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-remains-most-popular-digital-currency-on-dark-web/
Dark web markets will exist no matter if btc exists. As someone who has actually been on the original Silk Rd, not as a buyer just curious, it wasn't filled with just illegal drugs. Heck, I could remember seeing recipes for regular food, and btc was $13 at the time.
Anyway, yeah, as I said, maybe bitcoin will be that kind of success. But maybe not. Hence the risk. I brought up some of the issues that might prevent it from becoming a success. Adding to that, I feel like most of those who will buy bitcoins are doing so only as an investment and not because they are "believers". I just have a feeling that for bitcoin to truly succeed it would need to become a ubiquitous currency instead of more like stock. If everyone just treats it like stock instead of like a ubiquitous currency, which is definitely what's happening now, everyone will just sell it off at some point and it will basically collapse, having no backbone as real currency. I'm not actually saying that people shouldn't buy some bitcoins if they have the money to (I wish I did - I'd buy at least one or two of them if I could). I just think it seems pretty shaky as a real currency, and I gathered from your contributions in this thread that you are looking at in that way (given the whole "no middleman" appeal it seems to have for you. I think viewing them like that at this point is, at the very least, premature.