Donald Trump

ikiT

At 6:31 AM in the early morning hours after voting had ended, Michigan suddenly reported 147,000 votes. An astounding 94 percent went to Joe Biden who campaigned brilliantly from his basement. Only a couple of percentage points went to Trump.

Such gigantic and one sided vote dumps were only observed in a few swing states and they were observed in the states where it was necessary--you know what's interesting? President Obama beat Biden in every state other than the swing states where Biden killed them, but the swing states were the ones that mattered.

They're always just enough to push Joe Biden barely into the lead. We were ahead by a lot and within a number of hours, we were losing by a little.

In addition, there is the highly troubling matter of Dominion voting systems. In one Michigan County alone, 6,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden and the same systems are used in the majority of states in our country.

Senator William Ligon, a great gentleman, Chairman of Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, Senator Ligon, highly respected, on elections has written a letter describing his concerns with Dominion in Georgia.

He wrote, and I quote, "The Dominion voting machines employed in Fulton County had an astronomical and astounding 93.67 percent error rate." It's only wrong 93 percent of the time in the scanning of ballots requiring a review panel to adjudicate or determine the voters' interest in over 106,000 ballots out of a total of 113,000.

Think of it, you go in and you vote and then they tell people who you're supposed to be voting for. They make up whatever they want. Nobody's ever even heard. They adjudicate your vote. They say, "Well, we don't think Trump wants to vote for Trump. We think he wants to vote for Biden. Put it down for Biden."

The national average for such an error rate is far less than 1 percent and yet you're at 93 percent. The source of this astronomical error rate must be identified to determine if these machines were set up or destroyed to allow for a third party to disregard the actual ballot cast by the registered voter.

The letter continues, "There is clear evidence that tens of thousands of votes were switched from President Trump to former Vice President Biden in several counties in Georgia." For example, in Bibb County, President Trump was reported to have 29,391 votes at 9:11 PM eastern time while simultaneously, Vice President Joe Biden was reported to have 17,213.

Minutes later, just minutes, at the next update, these vote numbers switched with President Trump going way down to 17,000 and Biden going way up to 29,391. And, that was very quick, a 12,000 vote switch all in Mr. Biden's favor.

So, I mean, I could go on and on about this fraud that took place in every state and all of these legislators want this back. I don't want to do it to you because I love you and it's freezing out here.--

--But, I could just go on forever. I can tell you this--

So, when you hear--when you hear, "While there is no evidence to prove any wrongdoing," this is the most fraudulent thing anybody's--this is a criminal enterprise. This is a criminal enterprise and--and the press will say, and I'm sure they won't put any of that on there because that's no good and did you ever see while there is no evidence to back President Trump's assertion--I could go on for another hour reading this stuff to you and telling you about it.

ikiT

There's never been anything like it. Think about it. Detroit had more votes than it had voters. Pennsylvania had 205,000 more votes than it had more--but you don't have to go--between that, I think that's almost better than dead people if you think, right? More votes than they had voters and many other states also. It's a disgrace that the United States of America, tens of millions of people are allowed to go vote without so much as even showing identification. In no state is there any question or effort made to verify the identity, citizenship, residency, or eligibility of the votes cast.

The Republicans have to get tougher. You're not going to have a Republican party if you don't get tougher. They want to play so straight; they want to play so serious the United States, the Constitution doesn't allow me to send them back to the states. Well, I would say yes, it does because the Constitution says you have to protect our country, and you have to protect our Constitution, and you can't vote on fraud, and fraud breaks up everything, doesn't it? When you catch somebody in a fraud, you are allowed to go by very different rules. So I hope Mike has the courage to do what he has to do, and I hope he doesn't listen to the RINOs and the stupid people that he's listening to.

It is also widely understood that the voter rolls are crammed full of noncitizens, felons, and people who have moved out of state, and individuals who are otherwise ineligible to vote, yet Democrats oppose every effort to clean up their voter rolls. They don't want to clean them up. They are loaded, and how many people here are--know other people that when hundreds of thousands and then millions of ballots got sent out got three, four, five, six and I heard one who got seven ballots, and then they say you didn't quite make it, sir. We won in a landslide. This was a landslide.

They said it's not American to challenge the election. This is the most corrupt election in the history, maybe in the world. You know you could go to third world countries, but I don't think they had hundreds of thousands of votes, and they don't have voters for them. I mean, no matter where you go, nobody would think this. In fact, it's so egregious, it's so bad that a lot of people don't even believe it. It is so crazy that people don't even believe it. It can't be true. So they don't believe it.

This is not just a matter of domestic politics; this is a matter of national security. So today, in addition to challenging the certification of the election, I'm calling on Congress and the state legislatures to quickly pass sweeping election reforms, and you had better do it before we have no country left. Today is not the end; it's just the beginning.

With your help over the last four years, we built the greatest political movement in the history of our country, and nobody even challenges that. I say that over and over, and I never get challenged by the fake news, and they challenge almost everything we say. But our fight against the big donors, big media, big tech, and others is just getting started.

This is the greatest in history; there's never been a movement like that. You look back, there are all of the way to the Washington Monument. It's hard to believe. We must stop the steal, and then we must ensure that such outrageous election fraud never happens again, can never be allowed to happen again, but we are going forward; we will take care of it going forward. We have got to take care of going back.

Don't let them talk, okay, well, we promise. I have had a lot of people, sir, you are at 96 percent for four years. I said I'm not interested right now. I'm interested in right there. With your help, we will finally pass powerful requirements for voter ID. You need an ID to cash a check, you need an ID to go to a bank, to buy alcohol, to drive a car; every person should need to show an ID in order to cast your most important thing, a vote.

We will also require proof of American citizenship in order to vote in American elections. We just have a good victory in court on that one, actually. We will ban ballot harvesting and prohibit the use of unsecured drop boxes to commit rampant fraud. These drop boxes are fraudulent. They get--they disappear, and then all of the sudden, they show up. It is fraudulent. We will stop the practice of universal unsolicited mail-in balloting. We will clean up the voter rolls and ensure that every single person who cast a vote is a citizen of our country, a resident of the state in which they vote, and their vote is cast in a lawful and honest manner.

ikiT

We will restore the vital civic tradition of in-person voting on election day so that voters can be fully informed when they make their choice. We will finally hold big tech accountable, and if these people had courage and guts, they would get rid of Section 230, something that no other company, no other person in America, in the world has.

All of these tech monopolies are going to abuse their power and interfere in our elections, and it has to be stopped; and the Republicans have to get a lot tougher, and so should the Democrats. They should be regulated, investigated, and brought to justice under the fullest extent of the law. They are totally breaking the law.

Together we will drain the Washington swamp, and we will clean up the corruption in our nation's Capitol. We have done a big job on it, but you think it's easy; it's a dirty business. It's a dirty business. We have a lot of bad people out there. Despite everything we have been through looking out all over this country and seeing fantastic crowds, although this I think is our all-time record.

I think you have 250,000 people, 250,000. Looking out at all of the amazing patriots here today I have never been more confident in our nation's future. Well, I have to say we have to be a little bit careful. That's a nice statement, but we have to be a little careful with that statement. If we allow this group of people to illegally take over our country because it's illegal when the votes are illegal when the way that they got there is illegal, when the states that vote are given false and fraudulent information.

We are the greatest country on earth, and we are headed and were headed in the right direction. You know the wall is built; we are doing record numbers at the wall. Now they want to take down the wall. Let's let everyone flow in. Let's let everybody flow in. We did a great job on the wall. Remember the wall; they said it could never be done, one of the largest infrastructure projects we have ever had in this country, and it has had a tremendous impact and we got rid of catch and release, we got rid of all of the stuff that we had to live with. But now the caravans they think Biden is getting in the caravans are forming again. They want to come in again and rip off our country, can't let it happen.

As this enormous crowd shows, we have truth and justice on our side. We have a deep and enduring love for America in our hearts. We love our country. We have overwhelming pride in this great country. We have it deep in our souls. Together we are determined to defend and preserve government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Our brightest days are before us. Our greatest achievements still wait. I think one of our great achievements will be election security because nobody until I came along had any idea how corrupt our elections were, and again most people would stand there at 9 o'clock in the evening and say I want to thank you very much, and they go off to some other life, but I said something is wrong here, something is really wrong, can't have happened and we fight, we fight like hell, and if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore.

Our exciting adventures and boldest endeavors have not yet begun. My fellow Americans, for our movement, for our children, and for our beloved country, and I say this despite all that has happened, the best is yet to come.

So we are going to--we are going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue, I love Pennsylvania Avenue, and we are going to the Capitol, and we are going to try and give--the Democrats are hopeless, they are never voting for anything, not even one vote but we are going to try--give our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don't need any of our help, we're try--going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country. So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.

I want to thank you all. God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here. This is incredible.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

ikiT

I literally refer to Trizzy as POS-TRAITOR to people I meet in person.

"Sets on foot" means "to begin".  He LITERALLY set this crowd ON FOOT 

Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy. And after this, we're going to walk down and I'll be there with you. We're going to walk down--

We're going to walk down. Anyone you want, but I think right here, we're going to walk down to the Capitol--

And we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them.

Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong.

He hypmo-tized those saps.

ikiT

Gern Blansten

are we supposed to read all of that?

ikiT

nicknyr15

Gern Blansten said:

are we supposed to read all of that?

YES!!!!! 

Gern Blansten

I still remember that stupid fucker bragging about his inauguration crowd that anyone with half a pea for a brain could see was sparse as hell.

ikiT

Gern Blansten said:

are we supposed to read all of that?

reading is fundamental

ikiT

Halifax2TheMax

ikiT said:

Gern Blansten said:

are we supposed to read all of that?

reading is fundamental

Yo! It’s RIF!

ikiT

and THIS is what you get...

https://instagram.com/p/ChZf8I8sKg6/embed/

ikiT

I gotta good feeling about those Camden GA tix.

benjs

lindamarie73 said:

tbergs said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

Previous 
Occupant
Of
The
White 
House

Not directed at you, but every time this acronym gets used, I think it's childish. If conservatives did this after Obama, it would be viewed as petty and stupid. Just say the fucking idiot's name. What's more empowering, going out of the way to make up another term or just using the name? Seems to draw more attention. Just my opinion.

If Obama were impeached twice and set in motion the events of 1/6, as well as bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, colluded with putin on the ritz and called "both sides" good people, I'd say it would be justified. POOTWH doesn't deserve the respect of my typing or saying his name. Although I suppose I could lengthen it to, "PPOSITWH," if that would make you feel better?

Don't worry, I'll do me. Honesty and all.

You don't need to justify Obama v. Trump comparisons to me, but which statement is more disparaging, Trump is a piece of shit or POOTWH is a piece of shit? The reasoning for either of us to come to that conclusion is obvious, but that doesn't mean there aren't conservatives who think Obama was shit. My point is simply, no matter the merits, it's dumb for either side to assign childish nicknames/acronyms. Just curious, is that how you refer to him when you talk to people in person?

“In Person”…. You think this guy ever leaves the house??  

I'm just glad Donald leaves the house - sounds like that was the only way the FBI felt confident they could get his illegally-kept top secret FBI documents.

As for the "In Person" thing - I thought Biden's the basement-dweller, not Obama? I think you're getting your asinine retorts mixed up again.

mickeyrat

benjs said:

lindamarie73 said:

tbergs said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

Previous 
Occupant
Of
The
White 
House

Not directed at you, but every time this acronym gets used, I think it's childish. If conservatives did this after Obama, it would be viewed as petty and stupid. Just say the fucking idiot's name. What's more empowering, going out of the way to make up another term or just using the name? Seems to draw more attention. Just my opinion.

If Obama were impeached twice and set in motion the events of 1/6, as well as bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, colluded with putin on the ritz and called "both sides" good people, I'd say it would be justified. POOTWH doesn't deserve the respect of my typing or saying his name. Although I suppose I could lengthen it to, "PPOSITWH," if that would make you feel better?

Don't worry, I'll do me. Honesty and all.

You don't need to justify Obama v. Trump comparisons to me, but which statement is more disparaging, Trump is a piece of shit or POOTWH is a piece of shit? The reasoning for either of us to come to that conclusion is obvious, but that doesn't mean there aren't conservatives who think Obama was shit. My point is simply, no matter the merits, it's dumb for either side to assign childish nicknames/acronyms. Just curious, is that how you refer to him when you talk to people in person?

“In Person”…. You think this guy ever leaves the house??  

I'm just glad Donald leaves the house - sounds like that was the only way the FBI felt confident they could get his illegally-kept top secret FBI documents.

As for the "In Person" thing - I thought Biden's the basement-dweller, not Obama? I think you're getting your asinine retorts mixed up again.

she was referring to H2M

benjs

mickeyrat said:

benjs said:

lindamarie73 said:

tbergs said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

Previous 
Occupant
Of
The
White 
House

Not directed at you, but every time this acronym gets used, I think it's childish. If conservatives did this after Obama, it would be viewed as petty and stupid. Just say the fucking idiot's name. What's more empowering, going out of the way to make up another term or just using the name? Seems to draw more attention. Just my opinion.

If Obama were impeached twice and set in motion the events of 1/6, as well as bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, colluded with putin on the ritz and called "both sides" good people, I'd say it would be justified. POOTWH doesn't deserve the respect of my typing or saying his name. Although I suppose I could lengthen it to, "PPOSITWH," if that would make you feel better?

Don't worry, I'll do me. Honesty and all.

You don't need to justify Obama v. Trump comparisons to me, but which statement is more disparaging, Trump is a piece of shit or POOTWH is a piece of shit? The reasoning for either of us to come to that conclusion is obvious, but that doesn't mean there aren't conservatives who think Obama was shit. My point is simply, no matter the merits, it's dumb for either side to assign childish nicknames/acronyms. Just curious, is that how you refer to him when you talk to people in person?

“In Person”…. You think this guy ever leaves the house??  

I'm just glad Donald leaves the house - sounds like that was the only way the FBI felt confident they could get his illegally-kept top secret FBI documents.

As for the "In Person" thing - I thought Biden's the basement-dweller, not Obama? I think you're getting your asinine retorts mixed up again.

she was referring to H2M

Oops... my bad. snarky remark retracted.

Halifax2TheMax

While basements can be overrated, I assure you that my mother’s is not. Gotta love the near constant year round temperature too.

mickeyrat

benjs said:

mickeyrat said:

benjs said:

lindamarie73 said:

tbergs said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

tbergs said:

Gern Blansten said:

Previous 
Occupant
Of
The
White 
House

Not directed at you, but every time this acronym gets used, I think it's childish. If conservatives did this after Obama, it would be viewed as petty and stupid. Just say the fucking idiot's name. What's more empowering, going out of the way to make up another term or just using the name? Seems to draw more attention. Just my opinion.

If Obama were impeached twice and set in motion the events of 1/6, as well as bragged about grabbing women by the pussy, colluded with putin on the ritz and called "both sides" good people, I'd say it would be justified. POOTWH doesn't deserve the respect of my typing or saying his name. Although I suppose I could lengthen it to, "PPOSITWH," if that would make you feel better?

Don't worry, I'll do me. Honesty and all.

You don't need to justify Obama v. Trump comparisons to me, but which statement is more disparaging, Trump is a piece of shit or POOTWH is a piece of shit? The reasoning for either of us to come to that conclusion is obvious, but that doesn't mean there aren't conservatives who think Obama was shit. My point is simply, no matter the merits, it's dumb for either side to assign childish nicknames/acronyms. Just curious, is that how you refer to him when you talk to people in person?

“In Person”…. You think this guy ever leaves the house??  

I'm just glad Donald leaves the house - sounds like that was the only way the FBI felt confident they could get his illegally-kept top secret FBI documents.

As for the "In Person" thing - I thought Biden's the basement-dweller, not Obama? I think you're getting your asinine retorts mixed up again.

she was referring to H2M

Oops... my bad. snarky remark retracted.

innocent enough mistake as I do recall statements to that effect during the campaign from her and others.

Halifax2TheMax