awesome. she'll fly in from NYC for a 3 hour appearance on OUR dime....then scurry back to her tower. Pseudo-marriage with the idiot in chief.
Wow. Even the FLOTUS is called out. You guys are unbelievable.
Wow, you are unbelievable. Don't seem to remember Michelle Obama being called out because she wanted kids to eat healthier diets, including kale, of all things. You don't recall Michelle Obama being called out for her appearance, compared to a gorilla, I believe. You don't recall Michelle Obama being called out for her popularity and support of girls striving to be their best. Wow.
And you don't recall the black couple, still married, one time each, to each other, occupying the WHITE House for the full eight years of their term. Wow.
^^^ All that stuff means what now? I live in a world where President Trump is the leader of the free world, as they say. Dems aren't quite accepting of this world yet.
There are only so many code posts you can use for "Trump is magically a saint because he ain't that black liberal but he has white republican privilege." Congrats on jail. Serves you right. Trump could burn the US flag and you'd still kiss his ass because of his privilege.
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
Never underestimate the stupidity or ignorance of the average American. Some of it is on full display here in the forums.
WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18 IT 07/05/2020AT 07/07/2020
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
You think Trump's looking forward to Easter Sunday mass? You know, because he's a big evangelical Christian....oh wait--the campaign was last year.
I bet he never goes to church ...
He swore on two bibles...
that was just a precautionary measure in case one of them burst into flames.
zing
0
Options
The Juggler
Behind that bush over there. Posts: 47,357
Far right abandoning Trump-
"Undeniably he is in contradiction with the commitments he had made," Le Pen said in an interview with France Info radio. "I am coherent, I don't change my mind in a few days. He had said he would not be the policeman of the world, that he would be the president of the United States and would not be the policeman of the world, but it seems today that he has changed his mind."
"Undeniably he is in contradiction with the commitments he had made," Le Pen said in an interview with France Info radio. "I am coherent, I don't change my mind in a few days. He had said he would not be the policeman of the world, that he would be the president of the United States and would not be the policeman of the world, but it seems today that he has changed his mind."
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
1. Americans generally don't trust Russia, due to knowledge of past offences and spying/influencing tactics 2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action 3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
1. Americans generally don't trust Russia, due to knowledge of past offences and spying/influencing tactics 2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action 3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
The people that would take offence can't comprehend this post, Benjs.
In order for them to understand how they were manipulated... you'd have to create some sort of picture that, after viewing, they could colour with crayons.
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
1. Americans generally don't trust Russia, due to knowledge of past offences and spying/influencing tactics 2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action 3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
I don't blame Russia. The blame is definitely on ignorant fools but those fools can't be convinced that they are fools.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
1. Americans generally don't trust Russia, due to knowledge of past offences and spying/influencing tactics 2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action 3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
The people that would take offence can't comprehend this post, Benjs.
In order for them to understand how they were manipulated... you'd have to create some sort of picture that, after viewing, they could colour with crayons.
I dunno, Thirty, sounds suspiciously similar to a graph, so it would probably be dismissed on sight.
I haven't posted on here in awhile. I just want to say I can't decide if I can or if I can't believe that this guy is the President.
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
Clinton made mistakes but think back to the all out internet war that was going on against her. That was a calculated attack from Russia to assist Trump. The question is did Russia have dirt on Trump so they knew they could manipulate him if he was elected? Or did they think assisting Trump would expose how a democracy can be manipulated by bombarding the ignorant voting public with bullshit?
1. Americans generally don't trust Russia, due to knowledge of past offences and spying/influencing tactics 2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action 3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
The people that would take offence can't comprehend this post, Benjs.
In order for them to understand how they were manipulated... you'd have to create some sort of picture that, after viewing, they could colour with crayons.
I dunno, Thirty, sounds suspiciously similar to a graph, so it would probably be dismissed on sight.
Lol
We should start a thread similar to the Ames Mystery thread: "Post your coloured Trump comprehension cartoons here thread"
At least then we could begin to say nice things to guys we've been scrapping with.
"PJFan... great job almost staying within the lines!"
"GF... are you sure you didn't want to use any colours? A little more effort and this could be really good!"
"Professor... I love your signature! It shows great pride and you know what... you should be proud!"
Hopefully... the 10C could give us stickers and we could place these on the submissions for our peers to make them feel awesome.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200707/field-guide-sarcastic-masters "Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200707/field-guide-sarcastic-masters "Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
Lol
A 'veil' of sarcasm is a little different than a 'sprinkling' of sarcasm here and there.
And hey... you don't have time to be researching psychology stuff. You haven't completed your picture yet.
Very underrated for making points. The typical response to effective sarcasm is to attack sarcasm itself- as if somehow... that makes the point being made null and void.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200707/field-guide-sarcastic-masters "Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
Lol
A 'veil' of sarcasm is a little different than a 'sprinkling' of sarcasm here and there.
And hey... you don't have time to be researching psychology stuff. You haven't completed your picture yet.
I'm sensing a lot of inadequacy and denial around here. Also linked to bullying type of behavior. Do you enjoy bullying people?
If you are having trouble detecting sarcasm, you may be interested in this excerpt from the same article posted above. "Some highly intelligent people who have autism or Asperger's syndrome, for example, may fail to understand jokes and sarcasm. But her research has shown that people who are particularly good at detecting sarcasm also tend to be better at identifying emotional facial expressions. They seem to understand social situations better overall, she says."
So it seems to me the that the over usage of sarcasm implies inadequacies, and the inability to detect sarcasm relates to other mental problems.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200707/field-guide-sarcastic-masters "Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
Lol
A 'veil' of sarcasm is a little different than a 'sprinkling' of sarcasm here and there.
And hey... you don't have time to be researching psychology stuff. You haven't completed your picture yet.
I'm sensing a lot of inadequacy and denial around here. Also linked to bullying type of behavior. Do you enjoy bullying people?
Says the guy who's "In Yo Face...."
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200707/field-guide-sarcastic-masters "Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
Lol
A 'veil' of sarcasm is a little different than a 'sprinkling' of sarcasm here and there.
And hey... you don't have time to be researching psychology stuff. You haven't completed your picture yet.
I'm sensing a lot of inadequacy and denial around here. Also linked to bullying type of behavior. Do you enjoy bullying people?
Says the guy who's "In Yo Face...."
I fail to see your point other than an ill attempt at projecting.
If you are having trouble detecting sarcasm, you may be interested in this excerpt from the same article posted above. "Some highly intelligent people who have autism or Asperger's syndrome, for example, may fail to understand jokes and sarcasm. But her research has shown that people who are particularly good at detecting sarcasm also tend to be better at identifying emotional facial expressions. They seem to understand social situations better overall, she says."
So it seems to me the that the over usage of sarcasm implies inadequacies, and the inability to detect sarcasm relates to other mental problems.
So? Do I have mental problems or am I inadequate? Or maybe I just can't read?
If you are having trouble detecting sarcasm, you may be interested in this excerpt from the same article posted above. "Some highly intelligent people who have autism or Asperger's syndrome, for example, may fail to understand jokes and sarcasm. But her research has shown that people who are particularly good at detecting sarcasm also tend to be better at identifying emotional facial expressions. They seem to understand social situations better overall, she says."
So it seems to me the that the over usage of sarcasm implies inadequacies, and the inability to detect sarcasm relates to other mental problems.
So? Do I have mental problems or am I inadequate? Or maybe I just can't read?
I'm not sure, I don't know you very well. Don't shoot the messenger...
Comments
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
And you don't recall the black couple, still married, one time each, to each other, occupying the WHITE House for the full eight years of their term. Wow.
You are unbelievable.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
On the one hand, given the toxic level of discourse that has arisen over the last few decades, it makes sense that enough people would vote for him to give him an Electoral College victory.
On the other hand, this is a new low even for the country that put Dubya in charge. I mean, how do we go from Obama to Trump?
I honestly don't think America's reputation can ever recover from this. It doesn't matter that Trump lost the popular vote by 2.86 million. It shouldn't have been that close. I was 100% for Bernie during the primaries, but I had no issue voting for Hillary Clinton in November. Because Donald Trump is a disgusting pig, a raging narcissist, a bigot, a warmongering lunatic and a pathological liar.
I could go on and on about the failures of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party... but they pale of comparison to that of Trump and the modern Republican Party. The claim that "Trump is anti-establishment" was not only plainly false, but also no excuse for maintaining the status quo with Clinton over a fear-mongering shit-for-brains asshole with no detectable soul.
I wouldn't be worried about Clinton starting a war with North Korea right now.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
"Undeniably he is in contradiction with the commitments he had made," Le Pen said in an interview with France Info radio. "I am coherent, I don't change my mind in a few days. He had said he would not be the policeman of the world, that he would be the president of the United States and would not be the policeman of the world, but it seems today that he has changed his mind."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
2. Donald Trump reached out to Russia for spying assistance in public calls to action
3. Intelligence agencies warned of the possibility of Russian propaganda
So based on this, apologies to those I'll offend again, but do you blame Russia for attempting to indirectly influence an easily influenced populace? Or, alternatively, do you blame an entire populace who claim to be superior for so many reasons, but can't seem to stitch together a reasonable logic-based decision, or avoid making one based on unfounded hatred or analysis defining Clinton as unfit without doing the same due diligence on Trump?
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
In order for them to understand how they were manipulated... you'd have to create some sort of picture that, after viewing, they could colour with crayons.
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Chicago; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana
We should start a thread similar to the Ames Mystery thread: "Post your coloured Trump comprehension cartoons here thread"
At least then we could begin to say nice things to guys we've been scrapping with.
"PJFan... great job almost staying within the lines!"
"GF... are you sure you didn't want to use any colours? A little more effort and this could be really good!"
"Professor... I love your signature! It shows great pride and you know what... you should be proud!"
Hopefully... the 10C could give us stickers and we could place these on the submissions for our peers to make them feel awesome.
Utopia.
"Some people resort to over-the-top sarcasm in an attempt to shore up their own self-image. Consider whether you yourself harbor feelings of inadequacy. Once you feel comfortable with who you are, you won't need to hide behind a veil of sarcasm."
A 'veil' of sarcasm is a little different than a 'sprinkling' of sarcasm here and there.
And hey... you don't have time to be researching psychology stuff. You haven't completed your picture yet.
I don't mean "adult" colouring books, though there are probably those, too.
Very underrated for making points. The typical response to effective sarcasm is to attack sarcasm itself- as if somehow... that makes the point being made null and void.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/world/europe/trump-tower-neighbor-europe-populists-orban-wilders-le-pen.html
Now, please, show me the sarcasm.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Some highly intelligent people who have autism or Asperger's syndrome, for example, may fail to understand jokes and sarcasm. But her research has shown that people who are particularly good at detecting sarcasm also tend to be better at identifying emotional facial expressions. They seem to understand social situations better overall, she says."
So it seems to me the that the over usage of sarcasm implies inadequacies, and the inability to detect sarcasm relates to other mental problems.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©