Donald Trump

mrussel1

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

HughFreakingDillon

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

mrussel1

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

I don't think it is.  I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic.  If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so.  But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.  

Ledbetterman10

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

Not throwing literal "shit" at them. Or even throwing anything. I'm talking about going to where there's a group of people with the purpose of fucking with them. You're changing your tune though. Before you said you go there to "fight" with them. Now you post counterpoints. I see.

And look, I assume you just do that sort of trolling online so whatever. But you know there's people that take it further out on the streets. The people that fuck with Trump supporters, the people that shame women walking into an abortion clinic, the people that protest gay-pride rallies or military funerals. These are all people that are just trying to annoy and fuck with people that don't share their views. 

ikiT

I found myself starting fights, just by stating facts that were countered by koolaid fueled VENOM.  They cray over there.

ikiT

Going there just reinforced that those public hearings tomorrow are gonna have a really sad alternative narrative.  I hope you're ready.

ikiT

mrussel1 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

I don't think it is.  I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic.  If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so.  But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.  

word

ikiT

it is mad racist in there.  homophobic too

ikiT

talkin about how they'd like to see Pencil Neck Schiffs funeral and what not.   keyboard warriors.  so goddamn BRAVE.

ikiT

I got schooled on the Charlottesville HOAX over there, so I guess that's good,

Ledbetterman10

It's sounds mad cray over there yo. Not sure why you'd even bother to engage them. I could understand reading some of it out of morbid curiosity. I've watched segments of Trump rallies for that reason. But I wouldn't actually go to one and try to talk some sense into anyone. 

HughFreakingDillon

mrussel1 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

I don't think it is.  I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic.  If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so.  But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.  

your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference. 

I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there. 

Kat

I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.

mrussel1

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

I don't think it is.  I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic.  If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so.  But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.  

your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference. 

I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there. 

Fight is a euphemism.  I can't actually start a fight.  Contrast that with someone can actually throw shit at a person in the street.  When it comes to posting online, I can't tell the difference between a fight, argument, counterpoint, etc.  If you are cussing someone out, well that's closer to trolling I think. 

HughFreakingDillon

mrussel1 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

I don't think it is.  I post arguments that are backed up by facts and logic.  If that's trolling, then so be it, but I don't think so.  But to say that a person that goes there and counters the lunacy is actually WORSE than the racist, sexist 4Chan bullshit that is posted there, is quite silly.  

your comments on the previous page pointed to you, in my opinion, going there to intentionally start fights, not going there to discuss which inevitably turned into arguments. there's a difference. 

I have never been there, nor do i have any desire to, so I can't comment on the folks that post there. 

Fight is a euphemism.  I can't actually start a fight.  Contrast that with someone can actually throw shit at a person in the street.  When it comes to posting online, I can't tell the difference between a fight, argument, counterpoint, etc.  If you are cussing someone out, well that's closer to trolling I think. 

I know. I was referring to intent. 

cincybearcat

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

Why yes it is.  Surprised he doesn't just own it.

mrussel1

cincybearcat said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

Why yes it is.  Surprised he doesn't just own it.

Hey I'm right here!  Why speak indirectly?  Trolling is baiting, I don't bait.  I speak directly.  As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.  

tempo_n_groove

Kat said:

I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.

With all the misinformation on the internet now a days I think the days of the USA being the beacon of light are gone.

cincybearcat

mrussel1 said:

cincybearcat said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

Ledbetterman10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

why would anyone want to go there just to start fights? wouldn't it just be incredibly aggravating to not only read that stuff, but to engage with the type of person who posts there?

But who's worse? The "type of person who posts there" (I'm guessing that would be right-wing deplorables that wear MAGA hats?) or someone that goes there simply to troll? 

read between the lines in my first question. 

My question was rhetorical. The person that goes to troll is worse. I suspect there are people that have that sort of mentality online (I'm going to go there to fuck with them!), may also do that sort of thing in real life (i.e. wait outside a Trump rally and throw shit at his supporters). "Sad!"

I'm so sorry you guys feel this way.  And your analogy is "sad", unsupported.  You think someone posting counter points to the lunacy is the same as throwing feces at a supporter?  

I won't comment on the "throwing shit", but you said you go there just to start arguments. isn't that the very definition of trolling?

Why yes it is.  Surprised he doesn't just own it.

Hey I'm right here!  Why speak indirectly?  Trolling is baiting, I don't bait.  I speak directly.  As a contrast, one might say that you are trolling right now.  

Sorry.  Yes, going to a website to start arguments for fun is trolling.  It is what it is.  I kinda feel like they likely deserve it

Kat

tempo_n_groove said:

Kat said:

I'm looking forward to having a president who cares about mending our relationships with our allies and will work his/her butt off towards that end. Friends are very important and I don't want the next presidential term to have a pro-Russian president or be a Russian asset. I want a president who thinks about America every minute of every day. We have a lot of issues that need to be addressed and it's going to take a lot of hard work.

With all the misinformation on the internet now a days I think the days of the USA being the beacon of light are gone.

Getting the thread back on topic here...
Yes, that's possible so I think it'll be about our actions. Judge us by what we do, not what we say or what others say. Sound good?